Advertisement

Oecologia

pp 1–13 | Cite as

Reproductive plasticity of female white-tailed deer at high density and under harsh climatic conditions

  • Pascale AyotteEmail author
  • M. Anouk Simard
  • Steeve D. Côté
Population ecology – original research

Abstract

Life-history strategies of female ungulates usually depend on density-dependent and independent processes affecting body condition. Using a long-term data set on life-history traits of female white-tailed deer (2002–2014), we investigated the influence of population density and environmental factors on the reproductive effort of females. We also evaluated post-reproductive consequences on body condition using body mass, body fat, and body protein contents in the autumn following conception. We found that under high densities, females had a lower reproductive rate, which corresponds to a conservative reproduction strategy. However, females born at high density were more likely to reproduce and conceive larger litter size than females born at low density, a possible consequence of strong selective pressure in early life. Body condition was affected by reproduction; lactation had a large negative impact on body mass and body reserves, and conception, irrespectively of litter size, had a negative impact on body fat. Our long-term study demonstrates that plasticity in life-history strategies is a major determinant of reproductive potential for females living at high density and under harsh climates.

Keywords

Life-history strategies Conception Body condition Environmental variation Odocoileus virginianus 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This study was funded by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) Research Chair in integrated management of the resources of Anticosti Island. We particularly thank Produits forestiers Anticosti for their financial support. We thank M. Bonin, M. Le Corre, and L. De Vriendt for comments on earlier versions of the manuscript. A special thank you to S. de Bellefeuille and the staff of the Ministère des Forêts, de la Faune et des Parcs du Québec who provided their help throughout the study. We are also grateful to the outfitters (SEPAQ Anticosti, Safari Anticosti and Pourvoirie du Lac Geneviève), hunting guides, hunters, local residents, and numerous assistants for their help in the field.

Author contribution statement

SDC originally formulated the research hypotheses and methodology, SDC financed the research and managed data collection over the years, PA and MAS collected and formatted the data, PA analyzed the data, and PA wrote the manuscript, which was reviewed by MAS and SDC.

Supplementary material

442_2019_4337_MOESM1_ESM.docx (79 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 78 kb)

References

  1. Andersen R, Linnell JDC (2000) Irruptive potential in roe deer: density-dependent effects on body mass and fertility. J Wildl Manag 64:698–706.  https://doi.org/10.2307/3802739 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ayotte P (2018) Stratégies biodémographiques du cerf de Virginie en réponse aux variations de la densité de population et des facteurs environnementaux. Master thesis, Department of Biology, Université Laval, Québec, CanadaGoogle Scholar
  3. Bårdsen B-J, Tveraa T (2012) Density-dependence vs. density-independence—linking reproductive allocation to population abundance and vegetation greenness. J Anim Ecol 81:364–376.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2656.2011.01913.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bårdsen B-J, Fauchald P, Tveraa T, Langeland K, Yoccoz NG, Ims RA (2008) Experimental evidence of a risk-sensitive reproductive allocation in a long-lived mammal. Ecology 89:829–837.  https://doi.org/10.1890/07-0414.1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bårdsen B-J, Tveraa T, Fauchald P, Langeland K (2010) Observational evidence of risk-sensitive reproductive allocation in a long-lived mammal. Oecologia 162:627–639.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-009-1537-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bates D, Mächler M, Bolker BM, Walker SC (2015) Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. J Stat Softw 67:1–48.  https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bonenfant C, Gaillard J-M, Klein F, Loison A (2002) Sex- and age-dependent effects of population density on life history traits of red deer Cervus elaphus in a temperate forest. Ecography 25:446–458.  https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0587.2002.250407.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bonenfant C, Gaillard J-M, Coulson T, Festa-Bianchet M, Loison A, Garel M, Loe LE, Blanchard P, Pettorelli N, Owen-Smith N, Du Toit J, Duncan P (2009) Empirical evidence of density-dependence in populations of large herbivores. Adv Ecol Res 41:313–357.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2504(09)00405-X CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bonin M, Tremblay J-P, Côté SD (2016) Contributions of digestive plasticity to the ability of white-tailed deer to cope with a low-quality diet. J Mammal 97:1406–1413.  https://doi.org/10.1093/jmammal/gyw091 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Borowik T, Wawrzyniak P, Jędrzejewska B (2016) Red deer (Cervus elaphus) fertility and survival of young in a low-density population subject to predation and hunting. J Mammal 97:1671–1681.  https://doi.org/10.1093/jmammal/gyw133 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Burnham KP, Anderson DR (2002) Model selection and multimodel inference. A practical information-theoretic approach, 2nd edn. Springer, New-YorkGoogle Scholar
  12. Canada Environment (2006) Climate normals and averages, daily data reports of Port-Menier’s station from 1995 to 2005. Atmospheric Environment Service, TorontoGoogle Scholar
  13. Canada Center for Remote Sensing, Natural Ressources Canada (2016) <http://www.nrcan.gc.ca/earth-sciences/geomatics/satellite-imagery-air-photos/long-term-satellite-data-records/10935%3E. Accessed 22 Jan 2016
  14. Chan-McLeod ACA, White RG, Holleman DF (1994) Effects of protein and energy intake, body condition, and season on nutrient partitioning and milk production in caribou and reindeer. Can J Zool 72:938–947.  https://doi.org/10.1139/z94-127 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Clutton-Brock TH, Coulson T (2002) Comparative ungulate dynamics: the devil is in the detail. Philos Trans R Soc B 357:1285–1298.  https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2002.1128 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Clutton-Brock TH, Guinness FE, Albon SD (1983) The costs of reproduction to red deer hinds. J Anim Ecol 52:367–383.  https://doi.org/10.2307/4560 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Cook RC, Cook JG, Mech LD (2004) Nutritional condition of northern yellowstone elk. J Mammal 85:714–722.  https://doi.org/10.1644/brg-131 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Crête M, Huot J, Nault R, Patenaude R (1993) Reproduction, growth and body composition of Rivière George caribou in captivity. Arctic 46:189–196.  https://doi.org/10.14430/arctic1343 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Ericsson G, Wallin K, Ball JP, Broberg M (2001) Age-related reproductive effort and senescence in free-ranging moose, Alces alces. Ecology 82:1613–1620.  https://doi.org/10.1890/0012-9658(2001)082%5b1613:ARREAS%5d2.0.CO;2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Festa-Bianchet M, Côté SD (2008) Mountain goats: ecology, behavior, and conservation of an alpine ungulate. Island Press, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  21. Flajšman K, Jerina K, Pokorny B (2017) Age-related effects of body mass on fertility and litter size in roe deer. PLoS One 12:e0175579.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0175579 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Flajšman K, Borowick T, Pokorny B, Jędrzejewska B (2018) Effects of population density and female body mass on litter size in European roe deer at a continental scale. Mam Res 63:91–98.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s13364-017-0348-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Forchhammer MC, Clutton-Brock TH, Lindstrom J, Albon SD (2001) Climate and population density induce long-term cohort variation in a northern ungulate. J Anim Ecol 70:721–729.  https://doi.org/10.1046/j.0021-8790.2001.00532.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Gaillard J-M, Sempéré AJ, Boutin J-M, Van Laere G, Boisaubert B (1992) Effects of age and body weight on the proportion of females breeding in a population of roe deer (Capreolus capreolus). Can J Zool 70:1541–1545.  https://doi.org/10.1139/z92-212 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Gingras J, Couturier S, Côté SD, Tremblay J-P (2014) Opposite responses of body condition and fertility in adjacent moose populations. J Wildl Manag 78:830–839.  https://doi.org/10.1002/jwmg.729 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Goudreault F (1980) Reproduction and population dynamics of white-tailed deer on Anticosti Island. Master thesis, Department of Biology, Université Laval, Québec, CanadaGoogle Scholar
  27. Guinness FE, Lincoln GA, Short RV (1971) The reproductive cycle of the female red deer, Cervus elaphus L. J Reprod Fertil 27:427–438.  https://doi.org/10.1530/jrf.0.0270427 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hamel S, Gaillard J-M, Festa-Bianchet M, Côté SD (2009) Individual quality, early-life conditions, and reproductive success in contrasted populations of large herbivores. Ecology 90:1981–1995.  https://doi.org/10.1890/08-0596.1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hamel S, Côté SD, Festa-Bianchet M (2010) Maternal characteristics and environment affect the costs of reproduction in female mountain goats. Ecology 91:2034–2043.  https://doi.org/10.1890/09-1311.1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hamel S, Côté SD, Festa-Bianchet M (2011) Tradeoff between offspring mass and subsequent reproduction in a highly iteroparous mammal. Oikos 120:690–695.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0706.2011.19382.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hamilton WD (1966) The moulding of senescence by natural selection. J Theor Biol 12:12–45.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-5193(66)90184-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Hamlin KL, Pac DF, Sime CA, DeSimone RM, Dusek GL (2000) Evaluating the accuracy of ages obtained by two methods for Montana ungulates. J Wildl Manag 64:441–449.  https://doi.org/10.2307/3803242 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Hastie TJ, Tibshirani RJ (1990) Generalized additive models. Chapman and Hall, LondonGoogle Scholar
  34. Kirkwood TBL, Austad SN (2000) Why do we age? Nature 408:233–238.  https://doi.org/10.1038/35041682 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Langvatn R, Bakke Ø, Engen S (1994) Retrospective studies of red deer reproduction using regressing luteal structures. J Wildl Manag 58:654–663.  https://doi.org/10.2307/3809678 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Leader-Williams N, Ricketts C (1982) Seasonal and sexual patterns of growth and condition of reindeer introduced into South Georgia. Oikos 38:27–39.  https://doi.org/10.2307/3544564 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Lefort S, Tremblay J-P, Fournier F, Potvin F, Huot J (2007) Importance of balsam fir as winter forage for white-tailed deer at the northeastern limit of their distribution range. Ecoscience 14:109–116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Mauget C, Mauget R, Sempéré A (1997) Metabolic rate in female European roe deer (Capreolus capreolus): incidence of reproduction. Can J Zool 75:731–739.  https://doi.org/10.1139/z97-094 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Mautz WW (1978) Sledding on a bushy hillside: the fat cycle in deer. Wildl Soc Bull 6:88–90Google Scholar
  40. McNamara JM, Houston AI (1996) State-dependent life histories. Nature 380:215–221.  https://doi.org/10.1038/380215a0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Medawar PB (1946) Old age and natural death. Modern Quarterly 1:30–56Google Scholar
  42. Moen AN (1978) Seasonal changes in heart rates, activity, metabolism, and forage intake of white-tailed deer. J Wildl Manag 42:715–738.  https://doi.org/10.2307/3800763 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Monteith KL, Stephenson TR, Bleich VC, Conner MM, Pierce BM, Bowyer RT (2013) Risk-sensitive allocation in seasonal dynamics of fat and protein reserves in a long-lived mammal. J Anim Ecol 82:377–388.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2656.12016 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Mysterud A, Steinheim G, Yoccoz NG, Holand Ø, Stenseth NC (2002) Early onset of reproductive senescence in domestic sheep, Ovis aries. Oikos 97:177–183.  https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0706.2002.970203.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Noble MS, Hurley WL (1999) Effects of secretion removal on bovine mammary gland function following an extended milk stasis. J Dairy Sci 82:1723–1730.  https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(99)75402-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Nussey DH, Kruuk LEB, Donald A, Fowlie M, Clutton-Brock TH (2006) The rate of senescence in maternal performance increases with early-life fecundity in red deer. Ecol Lett 9:1342–1350.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2006.00989.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Nussey DH, Kruuk LEB, Morris A, Clements MN, Pemberton JM, Clutton-Brock TH (2009) Inter- and intrasexual variation in aging patterns across reproductive traits in a wild red deer population. Am Nat 174:342–357.  https://doi.org/10.1086/603615 Google Scholar
  48. Nussey DH, Froy H, Lemaître J-F, Gaillard J-M, Austad SN (2013) Senescence in natural populations of animals: widespread evidence and its implications for bio-gerontology. Age Res Rev 12:214–225.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arr.2012.07.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Panagakis A, Hamel S, Côté SD (2017) Influence of early reproductive success on longevity and late reproductive success in an alpine ungulate. Am Nat 189:667–683.  https://doi.org/10.1086/691388 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Parker KL, Robbins CT, Hanley TA (1984) Energy expenditures for locomotion by mule deer and elk. J Wildl Manag 48:474–488.  https://doi.org/10.2307/3801180 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Parker KL, Gillingham MP, Hanley TA, Robbins CT (1999) Energy and protein balance of free-ranging black-tailed deer in a natural forest environment. Wildl Monogr 143:1–48Google Scholar
  52. Parker KL, Barboza PS, Gillingham MP (2009) Nutrition integrates environmental responses of ungulates. Funct Ecol 23:57–69.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2435.2009.01528.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Pekins PJ, Smith KS, Mautz WW (1998) The energy cost of gestation in white-tailed deer. Can J Zool 76:1091–1097.  https://doi.org/10.1139/z98-032 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Pettorelli N, Weladji RB, Holand Ø, Mysterud A, Breie H, Stenseth NC (2005) The relative role of winter and spring conditions: linking climate and landscape-scale plant phenology to alpine reindeer body mass. Biol Lett 1:24–26.  https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2004.0262 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Pettorelli N, Côté SD, Gingras A, Potvin F, Huot J (2007a) Aerial surveys vs hunting statistics to monitor deer density: the example of Anticosti Island, Québec, Canada. Wildl Biol 13:321–327.  https://doi.org/10.2981/0909-6396(2007)13%5b321:ASVHST%5d2.0.CO;2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Pettorelli N, Pelletier F, von Hardenberg A, Festa-Bianchet M, Côté SD (2007b) Early onset of vegetation growth vs. rapid green-up: impacts on juvenile mountain ungulates. Ecology 88:381–390.  https://doi.org/10.1890/06-0875 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Pinheiro JC, Bates DM (2000) Mixed-effects models in S and S-PLUS. Springer, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Plard F, Yoccoz NG, Bonenfant C, Klein F, Warnant C, Gaillard J-M (2015) Disentangling direct and growth-mediated influences on early survival: a mechanistic approach. J Anim Ecol 84:1363–1372.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2656.12378 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Potvin F, Breton L (1992) Rigueur de l’hiver pour le cerf au Québec : description de l’indicateur prévisionnel NIVA et présentation d’un logiciel approprié. Ministère du Loisir, de la Chasse et de la Pêche, Québec. Rep. SP 1936Google Scholar
  60. Potvin F, Breton L (2005) From the field: testing 2 aerial survey techniques on deer in fenced enclosures—visual double-counts and thermal infrared sensing. Wildl Soc Bull 33:317–325.  https://doi.org/10.2193/0091-7648(2005)33%5b317:FTFTAS%5d2.0.CO;2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Sand H (1996) Life history patterns in female moose (Alces alces): the relationship between age, body size, fecundity and environmental conditions. Oecologia 106:212–220.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00328601 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Schielzeth H (2010) Simple means to improve the interpretability of regression coefficients. Methods Ecol Evol 1:103–113.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2041-210X.2010.00012.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Simard MA, Côté SD, Weladji RB, Huot J (2008) Feedback effects of chronic browsing on life-history traits of a large herbivore. J Anim Ecol 77:678–686.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2656.2008.01374.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Simard MA, Côté SD, Gingras A, Coulson T (2012) Tests of density dependence using indices of relative abundance in a deer population. Oikos 121:1351–1363.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0706.2011.19723.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Simard MA, Huot J, de Bellefeuille S, Côté SD (2014a) Influences of habitat composition, plant phenology, and population density on autumn indices of body condition in a northern white-tailed deer population. Wildl Monogr 187:1–28.  https://doi.org/10.1002/wmon.1010 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Simard MA, Huot J, de Bellefeuille S, Côté SD (2014b) Linking conception and weaning success with environmental variation and female body condition in a northern ungulate. J Mammal 95:311–327.  https://doi.org/10.1644/13-MAMM-A-036 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Stearns SC (1989) Trade-offs in life-history evolution. Funct Ecol 3:259–268.  https://doi.org/10.2307/2389364 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Stearns SC (1992) The evolution of life histories. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  69. Stewart KM, Bowyer RT, Dick BL, Johnson BK, Kie JG (2005) Density-dependent effects on physical condition and reproduction in North American elk: an experimental test. Oecologia 143:85–93.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-004-1785-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Taillon J, Brodeur V, Festa-Bianchet M, Côté SD (2011) Variation in body condition of migratory caribou at calving and weaning: which measures should we use? Ecoscience 18:295–303.  https://doi.org/10.2980/18-3-3447 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Tavecchia G, Coulson T, Morgan BJT, Pemberton JM, Pilkington JG, Gulland FMD, Clutton-Brock TH (2005) Predictors of reproductive cost in female soay sheep. J Anim Ecol 74:201–213.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2656.2005.00916.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Tollefson TN, Shipley LA, Myers WL, Keisler DH, Dasgupta N (2010) Influence of summer and autumn nutrition on body condition and reproduction in lactating mule deer. J Wildl Manag 74:974–986.  https://doi.org/10.2193/2008-529 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Tremblay J-P, Thibault I, Dussault C, Huot J, Côté SD (2005) Long-term decline in white-tailed deer browse supply: can lichens and litterfall act as alternative food sources that preclude density-dependent feedbacks. Can J Zool 83:1087–1096.  https://doi.org/10.1139/z05-090 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Tveraa T, Fauchald P, Henaug C, Yoccoz NG (2003) An examination of a compensatory relationship between food limitation and predation in semi-domestic reindeer. Oecologia 137:370–376.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-003-1373-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Verme LJ (1968) An index of winter weather severity for northern deer. J Wildl Manag 32:566–574.  https://doi.org/10.2307/3798937 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Wairimu S, Hudson RJ (1993) Foraging dynamics of wapiti stags (Cervus elaphus) during compensatory growth. Appl Anim Behav Sci 36:65–79.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0168-1591(93)90099-B CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. White KS, Pendleton GW, Hood E (2009) Effects of snow on sitka black-tailed deer browse availability and nutritional carrying capacity in Southeastern Alaska. J Wildl Manag 73:481–487.  https://doi.org/10.2193/2007-499 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Williams GC (1957) Pleiotropy, natural selection, and the evolution of senescence. Evolution 11:398–411.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.1957.tb02911.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Wood SN (2006) Generalized additive models: an introduction with R. CRC Press, FloridaCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Zuur AF, Leno EN, Elphick CS (2010) A protocol for data exploration to avoid common statistical problems. Methods Ecol Evol 1:3–14.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2041-210X.2009.00001.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Pascale Ayotte
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • M. Anouk Simard
    • 3
  • Steeve D. Côté
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Chaire de recherche industrielle CRSNG en aménagement intégré des ressources de l’île d’AnticostiQuébecCanada
  2. 2.Département de biologie and Centre d’études nordiquesUniversité LavalQuébecCanada
  3. 3.Ministère des Forêts, de la Faune et des ParcsDirection de la biodiversité et des maladies de la FauneQuébecCanada

Personalised recommendations