Advertisement

Oecologia

, Volume 189, Issue 1, pp 243–253 | Cite as

Geographic location, local environment, and individual size mediate the effects of climate warming and neighbors on a benefactor plant

  • Jesús VillellasEmail author
  • María B. García
  • William F. Morris
Global change ecology – original research

Abstract

Predictions of plant responses to global warming frequently ignore biotic interactions and intraspecific variation across geographical ranges. Benefactor species play an important role in plant communities by protecting other taxa from harsh environments, but the combined effects of warming and beneficiary species on their performance have been largely unexamined. We analyzed the joint effects of elevated temperature and neighbor removal on the benefactor plant Silene acaulis, in factorial experiments near its low- and high-latitude range limits in Europe. We recorded growth, probability of reproduction and fruit set during 3 years. The effects of enhanced temperature were positive near the northern limit and negative in the south for some performance measures. This pattern was stronger in the presence of neighbors, possibly due to differential thermal tolerances between S. acaulis and beneficiary species in each location. Neighbors generally had a negative or null impact on S. acaulis, in agreement with previous reviews of overall effects of plant–plant interactions on benefactors. However, small S. acaulis individuals in the north showed higher growth when surrounded by neighbors. Finally, the local habitat within each location influenced some effects of experimental treatments. Overall, we show that plant responses to rising temperatures may strongly depend on their position within the geographic range, and on species interactions. Our results also highlight the need to consider features of the interacting taxa, such as whether they are benefactor species, as well as local-scale environmental variation, to predict the joint effects of global warming and biotic interactions on species and communities.

Keywords

Arctic–alpine communities Distribution range limits Global warming Plant–plant interactions Stress gradient hypothesis 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This project was funded by the Swedish Research Council to W. F. Morris (Ref: 2012-42619-94710-26) and by the Spanish Ministry of Economy, Industry and Competitiveness to M. B. García (CGL2017-90040-R). We would like to thank Q. Canelles, M. Guzmán, K. Kempe, P. Nuche, I. Pardo, H. Petrén, S. Pironon, P. Sánchez, P. Tejero, M. Vass and L. Wikström for field assistance, and M. Villellas, A. Varea and U. Molau for logistic help with the experiment. Two anonymous reviewers helped to improve a previous version of the manuscript.

Author contribution statement

WFM conceived the study and JV and MBG set up the experiment. JV monitored the plants and performed data analysis. JV wrote the manuscript with help from WFM and MBG.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Supplementary material

442_2018_4304_MOESM1_ESM.docx (15 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 14 kb)
442_2018_4304_MOESM2_ESM.docx (17 kb)
Supplementary material 2 (DOCX 16 kb)

References

  1. Adler PB, Dalgleish HJ, Ellner SP (2012) Forecasting plant community impacts of climate variability and change: when do competitive interactions matter? J Ecol 100:478–487.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2745.2011.01930.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alatalo JM, Little CJ (2014) Simulated global change: contrasting short and medium term growth and reproductive responses of a common alpine/arctic cushion plant to experimental warming and nutrient enhancement. SpringerPlus 3:157.  https://doi.org/10.1186/2193-1801-3-157 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  3. Alatalo JM, Totland Ø (1997) Response to simulated climatic change in an alpine and subarctic pollen-risk strategist, Silene acaulis. Glob Change Biol 3:74–79.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.1997.gcb133.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Angert AL, Sheth SN, Paul JR (2011) Incorporating population-level variation in thermal performance into predictions of geographic range shifts. Integr Comp Biol 51:733–750.  https://doi.org/10.1093/icb/icr048 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Anthelme F, Cavieres LA, Dangles O (2014) Facilitation among plants in alpine environments in the face of climate change. Front Plant Sci.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2014.00387 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  6. Antonsson H, Björk RG, Molau U (2009) Nurse plant effect of the cushion plant Silene acaulis (L.) Jacq. in an alpine environment in the subarctic Scandes, Sweden. Plant Ecol Divers 2:17–25.  https://doi.org/10.1080/17550870902926504 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Arft AM et al (1999) Responses of tundra plants to experimental warming: meta-analysis of the international tundra experiment. Ecol Monogr 69:491–511.  https://doi.org/10.1890/0012-9615(1999)069%5b0491:ROTPTE%5d2.0.CO;2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Aubert S, Boucher F, Lavergne S, Renaud J, Choler P (2014) 1914–2014: a revised worldwide catalogue of cushion plants 100 years after Hauri and Schröter. Alp Bot 124:59–70.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00035-014-0127-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bertness MD, Callaway R (1994) Positive interactions in communities. Trends Ecol Evol 9:191–193.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0169-5347(94)90088-4 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Bertness MD, Ewanchuk PJ (2002) Latitudinal and climate-driven variation in the strength and nature of biological interactions in New England salt marshes. Oecologia 132:392–401.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-002-0972-y CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Bronstein JL (2009) The evolution of facilitation and mutualism. J Ecol 97:1160–1170.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2745.2009.01566.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Brooker RW (2006) Plant-plant interactions and environmental change. New Phytol 171:271–284.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2006.01752.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Burnham KP, Anderson DR (2003) Model selection and multimodel inference: a practical information-theoretic approach. Springer Science & Business Media, New York.  https://doi.org/10.1007/b97636 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Butterfield BJ (2009) Effects of facilitation on community stability and dynamics: synthesis and future directions. J Ecol 97:1192–1201.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2745.2009.01569.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Callaway RM (2007) Positive interactions and interdependence in plant communities. Springer, Dordrecht.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6224-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Callaway RM, Brooker RW, Choler P, Kikvidze Z (2002) Positive interactions among alpine plants increase with stress. Nature 417:844.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nature00805 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Cavieres LA, Sierra-Almeida A (2012) Facilitative interactions do not wane with warming at high elevations in the Andes. Oecologia 170:575–584.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-012-2316-x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Cavieres LA et al (2014) Facilitative plant interactions and climate simultaneously drive alpine plant diversity. Ecol Lett 17:193–202.  https://doi.org/10.1111/ele.12217 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Choler P, Michalet R, Callaway RM (2001) Facilitation and competition on gradients in alpine plant communities. Ecology 82:3295–3308.  https://doi.org/10.1890/0012-9658(2001)082%5b3295:FACOGI%5d2.0.CO;2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Cranston BH, Callaway RM, Monks A, Dickinson KJM (2012) Gender and abiotic stress affect community-scale intensity of facilitation and its costs. J Ecol 100:915–922.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2745.2012.01981.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Davis AJ, Jenkinson LS, Lawton JH, Shorrocks B, Wood S (1998) Making mistakes when predicting shifts in species range in response to global warming. Nature 391:783.  https://doi.org/10.1038/35842 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Doak DF, Morris WF (2010) Demographic compensation and tipping points in climate-induced range shifts. Nature 467:959–962.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nature09439 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Doxford SW, Ooi MKJ, Freckleton RP (2013) Spatial and temporal variability in positive and negative plant–bryophyte interactions along a latitudinal gradient. J Ecol 101:465–474.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2745.12036 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Ehrlén J, Morris WF (2015) Predicting changes in the distribution and abundance of species under environmental change. Ecol Lett 18:303–314.  https://doi.org/10.1111/ele.12410 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  25. Escudero A, Romao RL, de la Cruz M, Maestre FT (2005) Spatial pattern and neighbour effects on Helianthemum squamatum seedlings in a Mediterranean gypsum community. J Veg Sci 16:383–390.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1654-1103.2005.tb02377.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Eskelinen A, Harrison S (2015) Biotic context and soil properties modulate native plant responses to enhanced rainfall. Ann Bot 116:963–973.  https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcv109 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  27. García MC, Bader MY, Cavieres LA (2016) Facilitation consequences for reproduction of the benefactor cushion plant Laretia acaulis along an elevational gradient: costs or benefits? Oikos 125:434–442.  https://doi.org/10.1111/oik.02592 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. García-Ruiz JM et al (1996) Land-use changes and sustainable development in mountain areas: a case study in the Spanish Pyrenees. Landsc Ecol 11:267–277.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02059854 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Ghazoul J (2006) Floral diversity and the facilitation of pollination. J Ecol 94:295–304.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2745.2006.01098.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Gilman SE, Urban MC, Tewksbury J, Gilchrist GW, Holt RD (2010) A framework for community interactions under climate change. Trends Ecol Evol 25:325–331.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2010.03.002 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Giménez-Benavides L, Escudero A, García-Camacho R, García-Fernández A, Iriondo JM, Lara-Romero C, Morente-López J (2017) How does climate change affect regeneration of Mediterranean high-mountain plants? An integration and synthesis of current knowledge. Plant Biol 20:50–62.  https://doi.org/10.1111/plb.12643 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Goldberg DE, Rajaniemi T, Gurevitch J, Stewart-Oaten A (1999) Empirical approaches to quantifying interaction intensity: competition and facilitation along productivity gradients. Ecology 80:1118–1131.  https://doi.org/10.1890/0012-9658(1999)080%5b1118:EATQII%5d2.0.CO;2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Gottfried M et al (2012) Continent-wide response of mountain vegetation to climate change. Nat Clim Change 2:111–115.  https://doi.org/10.1038/NCLIMATE1329 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Hobbie SE, Shevtsova A, Chapin III FS (1999) Plant responses to species removal and experimental warming in Alaskan tussock tundra. Oikos, pp 417–434.  https://doi.org/10.2307/3546421
  35. Hunter AF, Aarssen LW (1988) Plants helping plants. Bioscience 38:34–40.  https://doi.org/10.2307/1310644 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Johnson JB, Omland KS (2004) Model selection in ecology and evolution. Trends Ecol Evol 19:101–108.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2003.10.013 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Jones V, Richards PW (1962) Silene acaulis (L.) Jacq. J Ecol 50:475–487.  https://doi.org/10.2307/2257458 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Kennedy AD (1997) Bridging the gap between general circulation model (GCM) output and biological microenvironments. Int J Biometeorol 40:119–122.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s004840050031 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Klanderud K (2005) Climate change effects on species interactions in an alpine plant community. J Ecol 93:127–137.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2745.2004.00944.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Klanderud K, Totland Ø (2005) The relative importance of neighbours and abiotic environmental conditions for population dynamic parameters of two alpine plant species. J Ecol 93:493–501.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2745.2005.01000.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. le Roux PC, Shaw JD, Chown SL (2013) Ontogenetic shifts in plant interactions vary with environmental severity and affect population structure. New Phytol 200:241–250.  https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.12349 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Lesica P, McCune B (2004) Decline of arctic-alpine plants at the southern margin of their range following a decade of climatic warming. J Veg Sci 15:679–690.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1654-1103.2004.tb02310.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Liancourt P et al (2013) Plant response to climate change varies with topography, interactions with neighbors, and ecotype. Ecology 94:444–453.  https://doi.org/10.1890/12-0780.1 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Louthan AM, Doak DF, Angert AL (2015) Where and when do species interactions set range limits? Trends Ecol Evol 30:780–792.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2015.09.011 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Louthan AM, Pringle RM, Goheen JR, Palmer TM, Morris WF, Doak DF (2018) Aridity weakens population-level effects of multiple species interactions on Hibiscus meyeri. Proc Natl Acad of Sci USA 115:543–548.  https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1708436115 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Maestre FT, Valladares F, Reynolds JF (2005) Is the change of plant-plant interactions with abiotic stress predictable? A meta-analysis of field results in arid environments. J Ecol 93:748–757.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2745.2005.01017.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Marion GM et al (1997) Open-top designs for manipulating field temperature in high-latitude ecosystems. Glob Change Biol 3:20–32.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.1997.gcb136.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. McIntire EJB (2014) Being a facilitator can be costly: teasing apart reciprocal effects. New Phytol 202:4–6.  https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.12740 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Michalet R et al (2016) Beneficiary feedback effects on alpine cushion benefactors become more negative with increasing cover of graminoids and in dry conditions. Funct Ecol 30:79–87.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2435.12507 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Miriti MN (2006) Ontogenetic shift from facilitation to competition in a desert shrub. J Ecol 94:973–979.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2745.2006.01138.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Molau U, Alatalo JM (1998) Responses of subarctic-alpine plant communities to simulated environmental change: biodiversity of bryophytes, lichens, and vascular plants. Ambio 27:322–329Google Scholar
  52. Molenda O, Reid A, Lortie CJ (2012) The alpine cushion plant Silene acaulis as foundation species: a bug’s-eye view to facilitation and microclimate. PLoS One 7:e37223.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0037223 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  53. Morris WF, Doak DF (2005) How general are the determinants of the stochastic population growth rate across nearby sites? Ecol Monogr 75:119–137.  https://doi.org/10.1890/03-4116 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Myneni RB, Keeling CD, Tucker CJ, Asrar G, Nemani RR (1997) Increased plant growth in the northern high latitudes from 1981 to 1991. Nature 386:698–702.  https://doi.org/10.1038/386698a0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Nuche P, Alados CL (2017) Shrub interactions drive vegetation succession of subalpine grasslands under two climatic conditions. J Plant Ecol 2:22.  https://doi.org/10.1093/jpe/rtx002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. O’Neill GA, Hamann A, Wang T (2008) Accounting for population variation improves estimates of the impact of climate change on species’ growth and distribution. J Appl Ecol 45:1040–1049.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2664.2008.01472.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Parmesan C, Yohe G (2003) A globally coherent fingerprint of climate change impacts across natural systems. Nature 421:37–42.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nature01286 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. Peterson M, Doak DF, Morris WF (2018) Both life history plasticity and local adaptation will shape range-wide responses to climate warming in the tundra plant Silene acaulis. Glob Change Biol 24:1614–1625.  https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.13990 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. R Core Team (2017) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, ViennaGoogle Scholar
  60. Rixen C, Mulder CPH (2009) Species removal and experimental warming in a subarctic tundra plant community. Oecologia 161:173–186.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-009-1369-y CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. Sala OE et al (2000) Global biodiversity scenarios for the year 2100. Science 287:1770–1774.  https://doi.org/10.1126/science.287.5459.1770 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. Schöb C et al (2014) The context dependence of beneficiary feedback effects on benefactors in plant facilitation. New Phytol 204:386–396.  https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.12908 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. Sharkhuu A et al (2016) Soil and ecosystem respiration responses to grazing, watering and experimental warming chamber treatments across topographical gradients in northern Mongolia. Geoderma 269:91–98.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2016.01.041 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  64. Shevtsova A, Haukioja E, Ojala A (1997) Growth response of subarctic dwarf shrubs, Empetrum nigrum and Vaccinium vitis-idaea, to manipulated environmental conditions and species removal. Oikos 2:440–458.  https://doi.org/10.2307/3545606 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Soliveres S, Smit C, Maestre FT (2015) Moving forward on facilitation research: response to changing environments and effects on the diversity, functioning and evolution of plant communities. Biol Rev 90:297–313.  https://doi.org/10.1111/brv.12110 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. Spence LA, Liancourt P, Boldgiv B, Petraitis PS, Casper BB (2014) Climate change and grazing interact to alter flowering patterns in the Mongolian steppe. Oecologia 175:251–260.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-014-2884-z CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  67. Valladares F, Bastias CC, Godoy O, Granda E, Escudero A (2015) Species coexistence in a changing world. Front Plant Sci 6:866.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2015.00866 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  68. Villellas J, Cardós JLH, García MB (2016) Contrasting population dynamics in the boreo-alpine Silene acaulis (Caryophyllaceae) at its southern distribution limit. Ann Bot Fennici 53:193–204.  https://doi.org/10.5735/085.053.0407 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Walther GR et al (2002) Ecological responses to recent climate change. Nature 416:389–395.  https://doi.org/10.1038/416389a CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  70. Williams SE, Shoo LP, Isaac JL, Hoffmann AA, Langham G (2008) Towards an integrated framework for assessing the vulnerability of species to climate change. PLoS Biol 6:e325.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.0060325 CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Biology DepartmentDuke UniversityDurhamUSA
  2. 2.Pyrenean Institute of Ecology (IPE-CSIC)SaragossaSpain
  3. 3.Departamento Biogeografía y Cambio GlobalMuseo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales, MNCN-CSICMadridSpain

Personalised recommendations