Linking conservation implications of modified disturbance regimes, plant communities, plant associations, and arthropod communities
Modifications to disturbance regimes have landscape-level effects on plant communities and have the potential to influence organisms at multiple trophic levels. We examined differences in the arthropod community across a gradient of oak/hickory dominance, a plant community maintained by disturbance such as periodic fires and extensive land clearing. In southern Illinois, we used patches of forest that varied in tree dominance ranging from 94 to 0% oak/hickory composition dependent on prior land usage that occurred > 50 years ago at minimum, to test two predictions: (1) oak (Quercus) and hickory (Carya) species contain more arthropod biomass and diversity than mesic tree species [e.g., American beech (Fagus grandifolia) and maples (Acer spp.)] and (2) due to plant associations, arthropod communities are more diverse and abundant on host trees within oak/hickory stands than non-oak/hickory stands. Our results were consistent with the prediction that arthropod biomass, guild Shannon diversity, and guild richness are higher on oaks, hickories and tulip tree (Liriodendron tulipifera) than beech and maples. We also found support for the prediction that due to plant associations, % non-oak/hickory stand composition negatively influenced arthropod guild Shannon diversity and guild richness on host trees, including maples and beech. These results are the first to demonstrate that modified disturbance regimes can influence multiple trophic levels both directly due to species-specific variation in susceptibility of plants to herbivory and indirectly through effects of plant associations. This result is concerning as modified disturbance regimes are influencing large-scale plant community composition among biomes worldwide.
KeywordsDisturbance Diversity Trophic interactions Plant association Succession
The authors would like to thank the U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service for funding this project through USFS Agreement 13-CS-11090800-022. We would like to thank J. Suda, W. Holland, and others for laboratory assistance; and R. Richards for field assistance.
Author contribution statement
KS helped develop and design the study, collected and analyzed the data, helped interpret the results and drafted the original article; ME developed and designed the study, helped interpret the results, substantially edited the original draft and created the final draft.
- Bates D, Maechler M, Bolker B, Walker S (2015) Lme4: linear mixed-effects models using eigen and S4. R package version 1.1-9, https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=lme4. Accessed Dec 2015
- Braun EL (1950) Deciduous forests of Eastern North America. Hafner Publishing Company, New York, p c1950Google Scholar
- Butler L, Strazanac J (2000) Macrolepidopteran larvae sampled by tree bands in temperate mesic and xeric forests in eastern United States. Proc Entomol Soc Wash 102:188–197Google Scholar
- Feeny P (1976) Plant apparency and chemical defense. In: Wallace JW, Mansell RL (eds) Recent advances in phytochemistry. Plenum Press, New York, pp 1–40Google Scholar
- Heiermann J, Schütz S (2008) The effect of the tree species ratio of European beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) and Norway spruce (Picea abies (L.) Karst.) on polyphagous and monophagous pest species—Lymantria monacha L. and Calliteara pudibunda L. (Lepidoptera: Lymantriidae) as an example. For Ecol Manage 255:1161–1166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Hovind HJ, Rieck CE (1970) Basal area and point-sampling: interpretation and application. Technical bulletin. Number 23. R.L. Hine, editor. Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources, Game Management Division, Wisconsin Conservation DepartmentGoogle Scholar
- Hunter MD, Price PW (1992) Playing chutes and ladders: heterogeneity and the relative roles of bottom-up and top-down forces in natural communities. Ecology 73:724–732Google Scholar
- R Core Team (2014) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. http://www.R-project.org/
- Schwegman J (1975) The natural divisions of Illinois. In: Mohlenbrock RH (ed) Guide to the vascular flora of Illinois. Southern Illinois University Press, Carbondale, pp 1–47Google Scholar
- Sierzega KP (2016) Factors Influencing avian habitat selection between oak-hickory and mesic forests in Southern Illinois M.S. Thesis Southern Illinois University CarbondaleGoogle Scholar
- Thompson FR (2004) The hoosier-shawnee ecological assessment 3rd edition. general technical report. NC-244. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, North Central Research Station. St. Paul, Minnesota, USAGoogle Scholar