Pyrosequencing of prey DNA in faeces of carnivorous land snails to facilitate ecological restoration and relocation programmes
Identifying and understanding predator diets is of high importance in biological conservation. This is particularly true for the introduction, establishment and maintenance of predator populations in newly created or modified ecological communities, such as translocation sites or restored habitats. Conservation status of predators may not permit captive feeding trials or intrusive gut-content methods, so non-intrusive diet assessment is required, such as faecal analysis. However, prey such as earthworms leave no morphological clues suitable for accurately discriminating between species consumed through visual faecal analysis. This study uses non-intrusive molecular methods on earthworm DNA extracted from the faeces of the carnivorous land snail Powelliphanta patrickensis to identify its earthworm diet and any seasonal trends. Data from 454-pyrosequencing revealed earthworm DNA in all samples (n = 60). Sequences were compared to a DNA library created from published and unpublished studies of New Zealand’s endemic earthworms and online databases. Unidentified earthworm sequences were clustered into molecular operational taxonomic units (MOTUs). Twenty-six MOTUs were identified, 17 of which matched the library, whereas nine did not. Similarity indices indicate that there were seasonal differences (P < 0.05) in the earthworm communities represented in the summer and the winter diets. This study highlights the importance of utilising the vast body of data generated by pyrosequencing to investigate potential temporal diet shifts in protected species. The method described here is widely applicable to a wide range of predatory species of conservation interest and can further inform habitat restoration and relocation programmes to optimize the long-term survival of the target species.
KeywordsDNA Molecular diet analysis Molluscs Earthworms Next-generation sequencing Metagenomics
This study was financially supported by The Bio-Protection Research Centre, New Zealand, the Miss E. L. Hellaby Indigenous Grassland Trust, and Solid Energy New Zealand. We thank Paul Weber for advice and MBC Consulting, in particular Mark Hamilton, for mine site access and sampling support. Finally, thanks to the anonymous reviewers whose comments and feedback led to a substantially improved manuscript.
- Bouché MB (1972) Lombriciens de France, ecologie et systématique. Ann Zool—Ecol Anim 92:45. doi: 10.3917/ls.092.0045
- Boyer S, Blakemore R, Wratten S (2011a) An integrative taxonomic approach to the identification of three new New Zealand endemic earthworm species (Acanthodrilidae, Octochaetidae: Oligochaeta). Zootaxa 32:21–32Google Scholar
- Buckley H, Damgaard C (2012) Lorenz R: R code for drawing sample Lorenz curves and to calculate Gini coefficients and Lorenz asymmetry coefficients. In: Buckley HL, Damgaard C. http://pure.au.dk/portal/en/publications/lorenzr(21dbe72d-0f9c-4a3b-9a2c-f364828089d3).html
- Clarke KR, Gorley RN (2006) PRIMER v.6: user manual/tutorial. PRIMER-E, PlymouthGoogle Scholar
- Colbourne R, Powlesland R (1988) Diet of the Stewart Island brown kiwi (Apteryx australis lawryi) at Scollay’s Flat, southern Stewart Island. N Z J Ecol 11:99–104Google Scholar
- Piearce T (1978) Gut contents of some lumbiricid earthworms. Pedobiologia 18:153–157Google Scholar
- R Development Core Team (2011) R: a language and environment for statistical computingGoogle Scholar
- Society for Ecological Restoration (2013) http://www.ser.org/resources/resources-detail-view/ecological-restoration-a-means-of-conserving-biodiversity-and-sustaining-livelihoods. http://www.ser.org/resources/resources-detail-view/ecological-restoration-a-means-of-conserving-biodiversity-and-sustaining-livelihoods