Advertisement

Springer Nature is making SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

Spatial pattern of grazing affects influence of herbivores on spatial heterogeneity of plants and soils

  • 455 Accesses

  • 15 Citations

Abstract

With our enhanced understanding of the factors that determine biodiversity and assemblage structure has come increasing acknowledgment that the use of an appropriate disturbance regime to maintain spatial heterogeneity is an effective conservation technique. A herbivore’s behavior affects its disturbance regime (size and intensity); this, in turn, may modify the associated spatial heterogeneity of plants and soil properties. We examined whether the pattern of spatial disturbance created by the Siberian marmot (Marmota sibirica) affects the spatial heterogeneity of vegetation and soils at a colony scale on the Mongolian steppe. We expected that the difference in management between two types of area (protection against hunting marmots vs. hunting allowed) would result in different behavioral patterns; therefore, we estimated the patterns of spatial disturbance separately in protected and unprotected areas. We then surveyed plant communities and soil nutrients in these areas to assess their spatial heterogeneity. We found that disturbance of both vegetation and soil was more concentrated near marmot burrows in the unprotected area than in the protected area. In addition, the degrees of spatial heterogeneity of vegetation and soil NO3-N were greater in the unprotected area than in the protected area, where disturbance was more widely distributed. These results indicate that the spatial pattern of disturbance by herbivores affects the spatial heterogeneity of vegetation and soil properties through changes in the disturbance regime. Our findings also suggest that the intensity of disturbance is more important than its size in determining community structure in Mongolian grasslands.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

References

  1. Adler PB, Raff DA, Lauenroth WK (2001) The effect of grazing on the spatial heterogeneity of vegetation. Oecologia 128:465–479

  2. Augustine DJ, Frank DA (2001) Effects of migratory grazers on spatial heterogeneity of soil nitrogen properties in a grassland ecosystem. Ecology 82:3149–3162

  3. Benton TG, Vickery JA, Wilson JD (2003) Farmland biodiversity: is habitat heterogeneity the key? Trends Ecol Evol 18:182–188

  4. Bergeron Y, Dansereau PR (1993) Predicting the composition of Canadian southern boreal forest in different fire cycles. J Veg Sci 4:827–832

  5. Branch LC (1993) Intergroup and intragroup spacing in the plains vizcacha, Lagostomus maximus. J Mammal 74:890–900

  6. Collins SL, Smith MD (2006) Scale-dependent interaction of fire and grazing on community heterogeneity in tallgrass prairie. Ecology 87:2058–2067

  7. Davidson AD, Lightfoot DL (2006) Keystone rodent interactions: prairie dogs and kangaroo rats structure the biotic composition of a desertified grassland. Ecography 29:755–756

  8. Denslow JS (1987) Tropical rain forest gaps and tree species-diversity. Annu Rev Ecol Evol S 18:431–451

  9. Fortin MJ, Dale MRT (2005) Spatial analysis: a guide for ecologists. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

  10. Griffin SC, Valois T, Taper ML, Mills LS (2007) Effects of tourists on behavior and demography of Olympic marmots. Conserv Biol 21:1070–1081

  11. Gurney WSC, Lawton JH (1996) The population dynamics of ecosystem engineers. Oikos 76:273–283

  12. Holland EA, Detling JK (1990) Plant-response to herbivory and belowground nitrogen cycling. Ecology 71:1040–1049

  13. Karels TJ, Koppel L, Hik DS (2004) Fecal pellet counts as a technique for monitoring an alpine-dwelling social rodent, the hoary marmot (Marmota caligata). Arct Antarct Alp Res 36:490–494

  14. Magle S, Zhu J, Crooks KR (2005) Behavioral responses to repeated human intrusion by black-tailed prairie dogs (Cynomys ludovicianus). J Mammal 86:524–530

  15. Morgan JW (1998) Importance of canopy gaps for recruitment of some forbs in Themeda triandra-dominated grasslands in south-eastern Australia. Aust J Bot 46:609–627

  16. Questad EJ, Foster BL (2007) Vole disturbances and plant diversity in a grassland metacommunity. Oecologia 153:341–351

  17. Shure DJ, Phillips DL, Bostick PE (2006) Gap size and succession in cutover southern Appalachian forests: an 18 year study of vegetation dynamics. Plant Ecol 185:299–318

  18. Sparks DL, Page AL, Helmke PA, Loeppert RH, Soltanpour PN, Tabatabai MA, Johnston CT, Sumner ME (1996) Methods of soil analysis. 3. Chemical methods. Soil Science Society of America. Madison

  19. Stoyan D, Penttinen A (2000) Recent applications of point process methods in forestry statistics. Stat Sci 15:61–78

  20. Takenaka A (2008) PPA-R: point process analysis programming, Japan. http://takenaka-akio.cool.ne.jp/etc./ppa-r/

  21. Tews J, Brose U, Grimm V, Tielbörger K, Wichmann MC, Schwager M (2004) Animal species diversity driven by habitat heterogeneity/diversity: the importance of keystone structures. J Biogeogr 31:79–92

  22. Turner MG, Baker WL, Peterson CJ, Peet RK (1998) Factors influencing succession: lessons from large, infrequent natural disturbances. Ecosystems 1:511–523

  23. Van Staalduinen MA, Werger MJA (2007) Marmot disturbances in a Mongolian steppe vegetation. J Arid Environ 69:344–351

  24. Van Staalduinen MA, During H, Werger MJA (2007) Impact of grazing regime on a Mongolian forest steppe. Appl Veg Sci 10(3):299-306

  25. Warren SD, Holbrook SW, Dale DA, Whelan NL, Elyn M, Grimm W, Jentsch A (2007) Biodiversity and the heterogeneous disturbance regime on military training lands. Restor Ecol 15:606–612

  26. Wesche K, Nadrowski K, Retzer V (2007) Habitat engineering under dry conditions: the impact of pikas (Ochotona pallasi) on vegetation and site conditions in southern Mongolian steppes. J Veg Sci 18:665–674

  27. White PS, Harrod J (1997) Disturbance and diversity in a landscape context. In: Bissonette JA (ed) Wildlife and landscape ecology effects and pattern of scale. Springer, New York, pp 128–159

  28. Wiegand T, Moloney KA (2004) Rings, circles, and null-models for point pattern analysis in ecology. Oikos 104:209–229

  29. Wingard JR, Zahler P (2006) Silent steppe: the illegal wildlife trade crisis in Mongolia: Mongolia discussion papers. East Asia and Pacific Environment and Social Development Department, World Bank, New York

  30. Wright JP, Flecker AS, Jones CG (2003) Local vs. landscape controls on plant species richness in beaver meadows. Ecology 84:3162–3173

  31. Yoshihara Y, Chimeddorj B, Buuveibaatar B, Lhagvasuren B, Takatsuki S (2008) Effects of livestock grazing on pollination on a steppe in eastern Mongolia. Biol Conserv 141:2376–2386

  32. Yoshihara Y, Ohkuro T, Buuveibaatar B, Takeuchi K (2009) Effects of disturbance by Siberian marmots (Marmota sibirica) on spatial heterogeneity of vegetation at multiple spatial scales. Grassland Sci 55:89–95

  33. Zar JH (1996) Biostatistical analysis, 3rd edn. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank the project members, and especially T. Okayasu of the University of Tokyo, for their kind help with the field survey. We also thank the staff at Hustai National Park for all their help during the study. This work was carried out with support from the Global Environmental Research Fund (G-071) of Japan’s Ministry of the Environment. The authors declare that this work was conducted in compliance with the laws of Mongolia.

Author information

Correspondence to Yu Yoshihara.

Additional information

Communicated by Debra Peters.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

(DOC 100 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Yoshihara, Y., Ohkuro, T., Buuveibaatar, B. et al. Spatial pattern of grazing affects influence of herbivores on spatial heterogeneity of plants and soils. Oecologia 162, 427–434 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-009-1481-z

Download citation

Keywords

  • Disturbance intensity
  • Disturbance size
  • Disturbance regime
  • Marmots
  • Mongolian grassland