Springer Nature is making SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

Genetic composition of resident populations influences establishment success of immigrant species

  • 333 Accesses

  • 42 Citations

Abstract

We conducted an outdoor container experiment to test the hypothesis that the genetic composition of resident populations influences the establishment success of immigrant species. We manipulated the genetic compositions (source populations) of populations of the water flea Daphnia magna, a strong competitor in pond and shallow lake zooplankton communities, and monitored the establishment success of immigrant cladoceran species of a regional species pool. We show that establishment success is affected by the source population of the resident D. magna as well as by the presence/absence of macrophytes and the presence/absence of fish in the containers. Our results provide evidence that the genetic composition of resident populations can impact community assembly and metacommunity dynamics, and that community genetics can influence ecosystem functioning.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

References

  1. Agrawal AA (2003) Community genetics: new insights into community ecology by integrating population genetics. Ecology 84:543–544

  2. Burks RL, Jeppesen E, Lodge DM (2001) Littoral zone structures as Daphnia refugia against fish predators. Limnol Oceanogr 46:230–237

  3. Chase JM, Leibold MA (2002) Spatial scale dictates the productivity-biodiversity relationship. Nature 416:427–430

  4. Cottenie K, De Meester L (2004) Metacommunity structure: Synergy of biotic interactions as selective agents and dispersal as fuel. Ecology 85:114–119

  5. Cousyn C, De Meester L, Colbourne JK, Brendonck L, Verschuren D, Volckaert F (2001) Rapid, local adaptation of zooplankton behavior to changes in predation pressure in the absence of neutral genetic changes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98:6256–6260

  6. Davis MB, Shaw RG, Etterson JR (2005) Evolutionary responses to changing climate. Ecology 86:1704–1714

  7. De Meester L, Gómez A, Okamura B, Schwenk K (2002) The monopolization hypothesis and the dispersal-gene flow paradox in aquatic organisms. Acta Oecologica 23:121–135

  8. Grant PR, Grant BR (2002) Unpredictable evolution in a 30-year study of Darwin’s finches. Science 296:707–711

  9. Hairston NG, Ellner SP, Geber MA, Yoshida T, Fox JA (2005) Rapid evolution and the convergence of ecological and evolutionary time. Ecol Lett 8:1114–1127

  10. Hanski I (1998) Metapopulation dynamics. Nature 396:41–49

  11. Hendry AP, Kinnison MT (1999) The pace of modern life: measuring rates of contemporary microevolution. Evolution 53:1637–1653

  12. Holyoak M, Leibold MA, Holt RD (eds) (2005) Metacommunities: spatial dynamics and ecological communities. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL

  13. Lambrinos JG (2004) How interactions between ecology and evolution influence contemporary invasion dynamics. Ecology 85:2061–2070

  14. Lauridsen TL, Lodge DM (1996) Avoidance by Daphnia magna of fish and macrophytes: Chemical cues and predator-mediated use of macrophyte habitat. Limnol Oceanogr 41:794–798

  15. Leibold MA, Holyoak M, Mouquet N, Amarasekare P, Chase JM, Hoopes MF, Holt RD, Shurin JB, Law R, Tilman D, Loreau M, Gonzalez A (2004) The metacommunity concept: A framework for multi-scale community ecology. Ecol Lett 7:601–613

  16. Levine JM (2000) Species diversity and biological invasions: relating local process to community pattern. Science 288:852–854

  17. McCauley E (1984) The estimation of the abundance and biomass of zooplankton in samples. In: Downing JA, Rigler FH (eds) A manual on methods for the assessment of secondary productivity in fresh waters. Blackwell, Oxford, pp 228–265

  18. Olsen EM, Heino M, Lilly GR, Morgan MJ, Brattey J, Ernande B, Dieckmann U (2004) Maturation trends indicative of rapid evolution preceded the collapse of northern cod. Nature 428:932–935

  19. Pauwels K, Stoks R, De Meester L (2005) Coping with predator stress: interclonal differences in induction of heat-shock proteins in the water flea Daphnia magna. J Evol Biol 18:867–872

  20. Scheffer M (1998) Ecology of shallow lakes. Chapman and Hall, London

  21. Schlaepfer MA, Runge MC, Sherman PW (2002) Ecological and evolutionary traps. Trends Ecol Evol 17:474–480

  22. Schlaepfer MA, Sherman PW, Blossey B, Runge MC (2005) Introduced species as evolutionary traps. Ecol Lett 8:241–246

  23. StatSoft Inc. (2004) Electronic statistics textbook. StatSoft Inc., Tulsa, OK

  24. Stockwell CA, Hendry AP, Kinnison MT (2003) Contemporary evolution meets conservation biology. Trends Ecol Evol 18:94–101

  25. Talling JF, Driver D (1963) Some problems in the estimation of chlorophyll a in phytoplankton. In: Doty MS(ed) Proceedings of the conference on primary production measurements, marine and freshwaters (TID-7633). US Atomic Energy Commission, Oak Ridge, TN, pp 142–146

  26. Urban MC, Skelly DK (2006) Evolving metacommunities: toward an evolutionary perspective on metacommunities. Ecology 87:1616–1626

  27. Vellend M (2005) Species diversity and genetic diversity: parallel processes and correlated patterns. Am Nat 166:199–215

  28. Vellend M, Geber MA (2005) Connections between species diversity and genetic diversity. Ecol Lett 8:767–781

  29. Yoshida T, Jones LE, Ellner SP, Fussmann GF, Hairston NG (2003) Rapid evolution drives ecological dynamics in a predator-prey system. Nature 424:303–306

  30. Yoshida T, Hairston NG, Ellner SP (2004) Evolutionary trade-off between defence against grazing and competitive ability in a simple unicellular alga, Chlorella vulgaris. Proc R Soc Biol 271:1947–1953

  31. Weltzin J F, Muth NZ, Von Holle B, Cole PG (2003) Genetic diversity and invasibility: a test using a model system with a novel experimental design. Oikos 103:505–518

  32. Whitham TG, Young WP, Martinsen GD, Gehring CA, Schweitzer JA, Shuster SM, Wimp GM, Fischer DG, Bailey JK, Lindroth LR, Woolbright S, Kuske GR (2003) Community and ecosystem genetics: a consequence of the extended phenotype. Ecology 84:559–573

  33. Williamson M (1999) Invasions. Ecography 22:5–12

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was financially supported by the K. U. Leuven Research Fund (project OT/04/23) and by the ESF EURODIVERSITY program (project BIOPOOL, nationally funded by Belspo and Fund for Scientific Research, Flanders). We thank R. Brandl and two anonymous reviewers for constructive comments on earlier versions of the manuscript.

Author information

Correspondence to Luc De Meester.

Additional information

Communicated by Roland Brandl.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

De Meester, L., Louette, G., Duvivier, C. et al. Genetic composition of resident populations influences establishment success of immigrant species. Oecologia 153, 431–440 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-007-0721-3

Download citation

Keywords

  • Feedback of evolution on ecology
  • Establishment success
  • Community genetics
  • Priority effects
  • Zooplankton