Advertisement

Springer Nature is making SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

Population differences in host use by a seed-beetle: local adaptation, phenotypic plasticity and maternal effects

Abstract

For insects that develop inside discrete hosts, both host size and host quality constrain offspring growth, influencing the evolution of body size and life history traits. Using a two-generation common garden experiment, we quantified the contribution of maternal and rearing hosts to differences in growth and life history traits between populations of the seed-feeding beetle Stator limbatus that use a large-seeded host, Acacia greggii, and a small-seeded host, Pseudosamanea guachapele. Populations differed genetically for all traits when beetles were raised in a common garden. Contrary to expectations from the local adaptation hypothesis, beetles from all populations were larger, developed faster and had higher survivorship when reared on seeds of A. greggii (the larger host), irrespective of their native host. We observed two host plant-mediated maternal effects: offspring matured sooner, regardless of their rearing host, when their mothers were reared on P. guachapele (this was not caused by an effect of rearing host on egg size), and females laid larger eggs on P. guachapele. This is the first study to document plasticity by S. limbatus in response to P. guachapele, suggesting that plasticity is an ancestral trait in S. limbatus that likely plays an important role in diet expansion. Although differences between populations in growth and life history traits are likely adaptations to their host plants, host-associated maternal effects, partly mediated by maternal egg size plasticity, influence growth and life history traits and likely play an important role in the evolution of the breadth of S. limbatus’ diet. More generally, phenotypic plasticity mediates the fitness consequences of using novel hosts, likely facilitating colonization of new hosts, but also buffering herbivores from selection post-colonization. Plasticity in response to novel versus normal hosts varied among our study populations such that disentangling the historical role of plasticity in mediating diet evolution requires the consideration of evolutionary history.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5a–b
Fig. 6a–b
Fig. 7a–d

References

  1. Agrawal AA (2000) Host-range and trade-offs in fitness of mites on alternative hosts. Ecology 81:500–508

  2. Agrawal AA (2001) Phenotypic plasticity in the interactions and evolution of species. Science 294:321–326

  3. Agrawal AA (2002) Herbivory and maternal effects: mechanisms and consequences of transgenerational induced plant resistance. Ecology 83:3408–3415

  4. Allen GR, Hunt CJ (2001) Larval competition, adult fitness, and reproductive strategies in the acoustically orienting Ormiine Homotrixia alleni (Diptera: Tachinidae). J Insect Behav 14:283–296

  5. Awmack CS, Leather SR (2002) Host plant quality and fecundity in herbivorous insects. Annu Rev Entomol 47:817–844

  6. Chandrakantha J, Mathavan S (1986) Changes in development rates and biomass energy in Callosobruchus maculatus (F.) (Coleoptera: Bruchidae) reared on different foods and temperatures. J Stored Prod Res 22:71–75

  7. Credland PF, Dick KM, Wright AW (1986) Relationships between larval density, adult size and egg production in the cowpea see beetle, Callosobruchus maculatus. Ecol Entomol 11:41–50

  8. Czesak ME, Fox CW (2003) Evolutionary ecology of egg size and number in a seed beetle: genetic trade-off differs between environments. Evolution 57:1121–1132

  9. Ekbom B, Popov SYA (2004) Host plant affects pollen beetle (Meligethes aeneus) egg size. Physiol Entomol 29:118–122

  10. Fox CW (1997a) Egg-size manipulations in the seed beetle Stator limbatus: consequences for progeny growth. Can J Zool 75:1465–1473

  11. Fox CW (1997b) The ecology of body size in a seed beetle. Stator limbatus: persistence of environmental variation across generations?. Evolution 51:1005–1010

  12. Fox CW (2006) Colonization of a new host: Genetic variation, maternal experience, and the effect of an alternate host. Ann Zool Fenn 43:239–247

  13. Fox CW, Czesak ME (2000) Evolutionary ecology of progeny size in arthropods. Annu Rev Entomol 45:341–369

  14. Fox CW, Dingle H (1994) Dietary mediation of maternal age effects on offspring performance in a seed beetle (Coleoptera: Bruchidae). Funct Ecol 8:600–606

  15. Fox CW, Mousseau TA (1998) Maternal effects as adaptation for transgenerational phenotypic plasticity in insects. In: Mousseau TA, Fox CW (eds) Maternal effects as adaptations, Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 159–177

  16. Fox CW, Savalli UM (2000) Maternal effects mediate diet expansion in a seed feeding beetle. Ecology 81:3–7

  17. Fox CW, Czesak ME, Mousseau TA, Roff DA (1999) The evolutionary genetics of an adaptive maternal effect: egg size plasticity in a seed beetle. Evolution 53:552–560

  18. Fox CW, Nilsson JA, Mousseau TA (1997) The ecology of diet expansion in a seed-feeding beetle—pre-existing variation, rapid adaptation and maternal effects? Evol Ecol 11:183–194

  19. Fox CW, Waddell KJ, Mousseau TA (1995) Parental host plant affects offspring life histories in a seed beetle. Ecology 76:402–411

  20. Fox CW, Gordon DM, Bojang P (2006) Genetic and environmental sources of variation in survival on non-native host species in the generalist seed beetle, Stator limbatus. Southwest Nat (in press)

  21. Futuyma DJ (2001) Ecological specialization and generalization. In: Fox CW, Roff DA, Fairbairn DJ (eds) Evolutionary ecology. Concepts and case studies. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 177–189

  22. Gil DJ, Graves J, Hazon N, Wells A (1999) Male attractiveness and differential testosterone investment in zebra finch eggs. Science 286:126–128

  23. Girton JR, Jeon S-H (1994) Novel embryonic and adult phenotypes are produced by pleiohomeotic mutations in Drosophila. Dev Biol 161:393–407

  24. Glazier DS (1992) Effects of food, genotype, and maternal size and age on offspring investment in Daphnia magna. Ecology 73:910–926

  25. Hardy IC, Griffiths WNT, Godfray HCJ (1992) Clutch size in a parasitoid wasp: a manipulation experiment. J Anim Ecol 61:121–129

  26. Hartmann T, Theuring C, Beuerle T, Bernays EA (2004) Phenological fate of plant-acquired pyrrolizidine alkaloids in the polyphagous arctiid Estigmene acrea. Chemoecology 14:207–216

  27. Johnson CD, Kingsolver JM (1976) Systematics of Stator of North and Central America (Coleoptera: Bruchidae). USDA Tech Bull 1537:1–101

  28. Johnson CD, Kingsolver JM, Teran AL (1989) Sistemática del género Stator (Insecta: Coleoptera: Bruchidae) en Sudamérica. Oper Lilloana 37:1–105

  29. Kirk WD (1991) The size relationship between insects and their hosts. Ecol Entomol 16:351–359

  30. Lacey EP (1998) What is an environmentally induced parental effect?. In: Mousseau TA, Fox CW (eds) Maternal effects as adaptations. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 54–66

  31. Leather SR, Burnand AC (1987) Factors affecting life history parameter in the pine beauty moth, Panolis flammea (D&S): the hidden costs of reproduction. Funct Ecol 4:331–338

  32. Lindroth RL, Barman MA, Weisbrod AV (1991) Nutrient deficiencies and the gypsy moth Lymantria dispar: effects on larval performance and detoxication enzyme activities. J Insect Physiol 37:45–52

  33. Mackauer M, Chau A (2001) Adaptive self superparasitism in a solitary parasitoid wasp: the influence of clutch size on offspring size. Funct Ecol 15:335–343

  34. Mazer SJ, Damuth J (2001) Evolutionary significance of variation. In: Fox CW, Roff DA, Fairbairn DJ (eds) Evolutionary ecology. Concepts and case studies. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 16–28

  35. McIntyre GS, Gooding RH (2000a) Effects of maternal age on larval competitiveness in house flies. Heredity 85:480–489

  36. Messina FJ (1991a) Life history variation in a seed beetle: adult egg-laying vs. competitive ability. Oecologia 85:447–455

  37. Messina FJ (1991b) Competitive interactions between larvae from divergent strains of the cowpea weevil (Coleoptera: Bruchidae). Environ Entomol 20:1438–1443

  38. Messina FJ (2004) Predictable modification of body size and competitive ability following a host shift by a seed beetle. Evolution 58:2788–2797

  39. Mira A, Bernays EA (2002) Trade-offs in host use by Manduca sexta: plant characters vs. natural enemies. Oikos 97:387–397

  40. Mopper S (1996) Adaptive genetic structure in phyptophagous insect populations. Tree 11:235–238

  41. Morse GE, Farrell BD (2005a) Interspecific phylogeography of the Stator limbatus species complex: the geographic context of speciation and specialization. Mol Phylogenet Evol 36:201–213

  42. Morse GE, Farrell BD (2005b) Ecological and evolutionary diversification of the seed beetle genus Stator (Coleoptera : Chrysomelidae : Bruchinae). Evolution 59:1315–1333

  43. Mousseau TA, Dingle H (1991) Maternal effects in insects: examples, constrains and geographic variation. In: Dudley EC (eds) The unity of evolutionary biology, vol. 2. Dioscordies, Portland, OR, pp 745–761

  44. Murphy DD, Launer AE, Ehrlich PR (1983) The role of adult feeding in egg production and population dynamics of the checkerspot butterfly Euphydrya editha. Oecologia 56:257–263

  45. Nylin S, Gotthard K (1998) Plasticity in life-history traits. Annu Rev Entomol 43:63–83

  46. Ode PJ, Antolin MF, Strand MR (1996) Sex allocation and sexual asymmetries in intra-brood competition in the parasitic wasp Bracon hebetor. J Anim Ecol 65:690–700

  47. Ohsaki N, Sato Y (1994) Food plant choice of Pieris butterflies as a trade-off between parasitoid avoidance and quality of plants. Ecology 75:59–68

  48. Reinhold K (2002) Maternal effects and the evolution of behavioral and morphological characters: a literature review indicates the importance of extended maternal care. J Hered 93:400–405

  49. Rushlow C, Frasch M, Doyle H, Levine M (1987) Maternal regulation of Zerknullt-A Homeobox gene controlling differentiation of dorsal tissues in Drosophila. Nature 330:583–586

  50. Sargent CS (1965) Manual of trees of North America, vol. 2. Dover Publications Inc., New York

  51. SAS Institute (1985) SAS user’s guide: statistics, version 5. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC

  52. Savalli UM, Fox CW (2002) Proximate mechanisms influencing egg size plasticity in the seed beetle Stator limbatus (Coleoptera : Bruchidae). Ann Entomol Soc Am 95:724–734

  53. Sime KR, Feeny PP, Harribal MM (2000) Sequestration of aristolochid acids by the pipevine swallowtail, Battus philenor (L.): evidence and ecological implications. Chemoecology 10:169–178

  54. Singer MS, Stireman JO (2003) Does anti-parasitoid defense explain host-plant selection by a phytophagous caterpillar? Oikos 100:554–562

  55. Stockhoff BA (1993) Diet heterogeneity: implications for growth of a generalist herbivore, the gypsy moth. Ecology 74:1939–1949

  56. Spitzer BW (2004) Maternal effects in the scale insect Saissetia coffeae (Hemiptera: Coccidae). Evolution 58:2452–2461

  57. Strauss SY, Lau JA, Carroll SP (2006) Evolutionary responses of natives to introduced species: what do introductions tell us about natural communities? Ecol Lett 9:354–371

  58. Takakura KI (2004) Variation in egg size within and among generations of the bean weevil, Bruchidius dorsalis (Coleoptera, Bruchidae): effects of host plant quality and paternal nutritional investment. Ann Entomol Soc Am 97:346–352

  59. Toquenaga Y (1993) Contest and scramble competition in Callosobruchus maculatus (Coleoptera: Bruchidae) II: Larval competition and interference mechanisms. Res Popul Ecol 35:57–68

  60. Toquenaga Y, Fuji K (1990) Contest and scramble competition in two bruchid species, Callosobruchus analis and C. phaseoli (Coleoptera: Bruchidae) I. Larval competition curves and resource sharing patterns. Res Popul Ecol 32:199–211

  61. Tsai ML, Li JJ, Dai CF (2001) How host size may constrain the evolution of parasite body size and clutch size. The parasitic isopod Ichthyonexus fushanensis and its host fish, Varicorhinus bacbatulus, as an example. Oikos 92:13–19

  62. Van Zandt PA, Mopper S (1998) A meta-analysis of adaptive deme formation in phytophagous insect populations. Am Nat 152:595–604

  63. Via S (1991) Specialized host plant performance of pea aphid clones is not altered by experience. Ecology 72:1420–1427

  64. Via S (1994) The evolution of phenotypic plasticity: what do we really know?. In: Real LA (eds) Ecological genetics. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, pp 35–57

  65. Wade MJ (1998) The evolutionary genetics of maternal effects. In: Mousseau TA, Fox CW (eds) Maternal effects as adaptations. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 5–21

  66. Wallin H, Chiverton PA, Ekbom BS, Borg A (1992) Diet, fecundity and egg size in some polyphagous predatory carabid beetles. Entomol Exp Appl 65:129–140

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Scott Carroll, María Gómez, Rick Karban, Jordi Moya-Laraño, Craig Stillwell and two anonymous reviewers for comments on earlier versions of this paper. We thank Craig Stillwell and Bill Wallin for help with the experiments and field collecting in Arizona, and thank Celestino Amarillo, Fidelia Suárez, Carlos Sarmiento-M, María A. Sarmiento-Amarillo, Adela Suárez and Wilson Yaya for help with field collecting in Colombia. Support for this study was provided by Grants 1568 and 620 from Fundación para la Promoción de la Investigación y la Teconología, Banco de la República, Colombia (to A. Amarillo-Suárez) and DEB 01-10754 from the National Science Foundation, USA (to C. W. Fox). All experiments comply with the laws of the USA. Colombian populations of S. limbatus were imported into and maintained in the USA under permit no. 59578 of the Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service of the USDA (to C.W. Fox).

Author information

Correspondence to Angela R. Amarillo-Suárez.

Additional information

Communicated by Richard Karban

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Amarillo-Suárez, A.R., Fox, C.W. Population differences in host use by a seed-beetle: local adaptation, phenotypic plasticity and maternal effects. Oecologia 150, 247–258 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-006-0516-y

Download citation

Keywords

  • Body size
  • Egg size
  • Host size
  • Insect–plant interactions
  • Stator limbatus