Advertisement

Springer Nature is making Coronavirus research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

Relative strengths of benthic algal nutrient and grazer limitation along a lake productivity gradient

  • 162 Accesses

  • 12 Citations

Abstract

The relative effects of nutrients and herbivores on primary producers are rarely compared across ecosystems that vary in potential primary productivity. Furthermore, proposed mechanisms to explain such patterns remain understudied. Here, I examine the strength of nutrient and grazer (herbivore) limitation (i.e., the extent to which producers’ growth is limited by insufficient nutrient supply or herbivory) of benthic algae across 13 southwest Michigan lakes that vary widely in productivity (i.e., resource supply). I compare the observed patterns of algal limitation and species composition to those predicted by two simple models: one that includes multiple species and species’ traits (the food-web model) and one that includes no variation in species or traits (the food-chain model). Species in the food-web model are assumed to display a tradeoff between resource competitive ability and resistance to herbivory (the “keystone predator” tradeoff). Among these lakes, benthic algal nutrient limitation was positive \( {\left( {\ifmmode\expandafter\bar\else\expandafter\=\fi{x} = 0.083\,{\text{day}}^{{ - 1}} } \right)} \) and declined significantly along a lake N:P gradient. In contrast, grazer limitation was negative \( {\left( {\ifmmode\expandafter\bar\else\expandafter\=\fi{x} = - 0.019\,{\text{day}}^{{ - 1}} } \right)} \) and was not significantly related to any of the measured lake productivity variables. Negative grazer limitation indicated that the removal of grazers caused unexpected declines in algal biomass, which were potentially due to indirect, positive effects (e.g., nutrient recycling) of grazers. Nutrient limitation was significantly stronger than grazer limitation across lakes, which was more consistent with the food-web versus food-chain model. Changes in algal composition were also broadly consistent with predictions of the food-web model in that vulnerable, superior nutrient competitors dominated in low productivity lakes and more grazer-resistant species were observed in high productivity lakes. In general, these results point to the importance of examining limiting factors across systems and the consideration of key species’ traits when predicting and interpreting patterns.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Reference

  1. APHA (1980) Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater, 15th edn. APHA, Washington, D.C.

  2. Bachmann RW, Canfield DE Jr (1996) Use of an alternative method for monitoring total nitrogen concentrations in Florida lakes. Hydrobiologia 323:1–8

  3. Bohannan BJM, Lenski RE (2000) The relative importance of competition and predation varies with productivity in a model community. Am Nat 153:73–82

  4. Bott TL (1996) Algae in microscopic food webs. In: Stevenson RJ, Bothwell ML, Lowe RL (eds) Algal ecology: freshwater benthic ecosystems. Academic Press, San Diego, Calif., pp 573–608

  5. Carpenter SR, Kitchell JF (1993) The trophic cascade in lakes. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

  6. Carrick HJ, Lowe RL, Rotenberry JT (1988) Guilds of benthic algae along nutrient gradients: relationships to algal community diversity. J N Am Benthol Soc 7:117–128

  7. Crumpton WG, Isenhart TM, Mitchell PD (1992) Nitrate and organic nitrogen analyses with second-derivative spectroscopy. Limnol Oceanogr 37:907–913

  8. Cummins KW (1973) Trophic relations of aquatic insects. Annu Rev Entomol 18:183–206

  9. Dixon PM (2001) The bootstrap and the jackknife. In: Scheiner SM, Gurevitch J (eds) Design and analysis of ecological experiments. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 267–288

  10. Downing JA, Osenberg CW, Sarnelle O (1999) Meta-analysis of marine nutrient-enrichment experiments: variation in the magnitude of nutrient limitation. Ecology 80:1157–1167

  11. Fairchild GW, Lowe RL, Richardson WB (1985) Algal periphyton growth on nutrient-diffusing substrates: an in situ bioassay. Ecology 66:465–472

  12. Feminella JW, Hawkins CP (1995) Interactions between stream herbivores and periphyton: a quantitative analysis of past experiments. J N Am Benthol Soc 14:465–509

  13. Geddes P, Trexler JC (2003) Uncoupling of omnivore-mediated positive and negative effects on periphyton mats. Oecologia 136:585–595

  14. Graham MD, Vinebrooke RD (1998) Trade-offs between herbivore resistance and competitiveness in periphyton of acidified lakes. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 55:806–814

  15. Grover JP (1997) Resource competition. Chapman and Hall, New York

  16. Hairston NG, Smith FE, Slobodkin LB (1960) Community structure, population control, and competition. Am Nat 44:421–425

  17. Hecky RE, Kilham P (1988) Nutrient limitation of phytoplankton in freshwater and marine environments: a review of recent evidence on the effects of enrichment. Limnol Oceanogr 33:796–822

  18. Hillebrand H (2002) Top-down versus bottom-up control of autotrophic biomass—a meta- analysis on experiments with periphyton. J N Am Benthol Soc 21:349–369

  19. Hillebrand H, Kahlert M (2001) Effect of grazing and nutrient supply on periphyton biomass and nutrient stoichiometry in habitats of different productivity. Limnol Oceanogr 46:1881–1898

  20. Hillebrand H, Dürselen CD, Kirschtel D, Pollingher U, Zohary T (1999) Biovolume calculation for pelagic and benthic microalgae. J Phycol 35:403–424

  21. Hillebrand H, Kahlert M, Haglund A-L, Berninger U-G, Nagel S, Wickham S (2002) Control of microbenthic communities by grazing and nutrient supply. Ecology 83:2205–2219

  22. Holt RD, Grover JP, Tilman D (1994) Simple rules for interspecific dominance in systems with exploitative and apparent competition. Am Nat 144:741–771

  23. Hunter MD, Price PW (1992) Playing chutes and ladders: heterogeneity and the relative roles of top-down and bottom-up forces in natural communities. Ecology 73:724–732

  24. Huntly NJ (1987) Influence of refuging consumers (pikas: Ochotona princeps) on subalpine meadow vegetation. Ecology 68:274–283

  25. Jones DL (2002) User's manual for FATHOM: a MATLAB toolbox for multivariate ecological & oceanographic data analysis. http://www.rsmas.miami.edu/personal/djones/

  26. Lamberti GA (1996) The role of periphyton in benthic food webs. In: Stevenson RJ, Bothwell ML, Lowe RL (eds) Algal ecology: freshwater benthic ecosystems. Academic Press, San Diego, Calif., pp 532–572

  27. Lamberti GA, Gregory SV, Ashkenas LR, Steinman AD, McIntire CD (1989) Productive capacity of periphyton as a determinant of plant-herbivore interactions in streams. Ecology 70:1840–1856

  28. Leibold MA (1996) A graphical model of keystone predators in food webs: trophic regulation of abundance, incidence, and diversity patterns in communities. Am Nat 147:784–812

  29. Leibold MA (1999) Biodiversity and nutrient enrichment in pond plankton communities. Evol Ecol Res 1:73–95

  30. Leibold MA, Chase JM, Shurin JB, Downing AL (1997) Species turnover and the regulation of trophic structure. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 28:467–494

  31. Lowe RL, Pan Y (1996) Benthic algal communities as biological monitors. In: Stevenson RJ, Bothwell ML, Lowe RL (eds) Algal ecology: freshwater benthic ecosystems. Academic Press, San Diego, Calif., pp 705–739

  32. Lubchenco J, Gaines SD (1981) A unified approach to marine plant-herbivore interactions. I. Populations and communities. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 12:405–437

  33. de Mazancourt C, Loreau M (2000) Grazing optimization, nutrient cycling, and spatial heterogeneity of plant-herbivore interactions: should a palatable plant evolve? Evolution 54:81–92

  34. de Mazancourt C, Loreau M, Abbadie L (1998) Grazing optimization and nutrient cycling: when do herbivores enhance plant production? Ecology 79:2242–2252

  35. MathWorks (1999) MATLAB 5.3: the language of technical computing. MathWorks Inc., Natick, MA, USA

  36. McCormick PV (1991) Lotic protistan herbivore selectivity and its potential impact on benthic algal assemblages. J N Am Benthol Soc 10:238–250

  37. McCormick PV, Stevenson RJ (1989) Effects of snail grazing on benthic algal community structure in different nutrient environments. J N Am Benthol Soc 8:162–172

  38. McCormick PV, Stevenson RJ (1991) Grazer control of nutrient availability in the periphyton. Oecologia 86:287–291

  39. McCune B, Grace JB (2002) Nonmetric multidimensional scaling. In: Analysis of ecological communities. MjM Software Design, Gleneden Beach, Oreg., pp 125–142

  40. McNaughton SJ, Oesterheld M, Frank DA, Williams KJ (1989) Ecosystem-level patterns of primary productivity and herbivory in terrestrial habitats. Nature 341:142–144

  41. McQueen DJ, Post JR, Mills EL (1986) Trophic relationships in freshwater pelagic ecosystems. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 43:1571–1581

  42. Miller TE, Burns JH, Munquia P, Walters EL, Kneitel JM, Richards PM, Mouquet N, Buckley HL (2005) A critical review of twenty years’ use of the resource-ratio theory. Am Nat 165:439–448

  43. Oksanen L, Fretwell SD, Arruda J, Niemela P (1981) Exploitation ecosystems in gradients of primary productivity. Am Nat 118:240–261

  44. Osenberg CW, Mittelbach GG (1996) The relative importance of resource limitation and predator limitation in food chains. In: Polis GA, Winemiller KO (eds) Food webs: integration of patterns and dynamics. Chapman and Hall, New York, pp 134–148

  45. Paine RT (1966) Food web complexity and species diversity. Am Nat 100:65–75

  46. Patrick R, Reimer CW (1966) The diatoms of the United States exclusive of Alaska and Hawaii. Monograph 13, vol I. Academy of Natural Science, Philadelphia, Pa.

  47. Porter KG (1977) The plant-animal interface in freshwater ecology. Am Sci 65:159–170

  48. Power ME (1992) Top-down and bottom-up forces in food webs: do plants have primacy? Ecology 73:733–746

  49. Prepas EE, Rigler FH (1982) Improvements in quantifying the phosphorus concentration in lake water. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 39:822–829

  50. Rice WR (1989) Analyzing tables of statistical tests. Evolution 43:223–225

  51. Rosemond AD, Brawley SH (1996) Species-specific characteristics explain the persistence of Stigeoclonium tenue (Chlorophyta) in a woodland stream. J Phycol 32:54–63

  52. Rosemond AD, Mulholland PJ, Elwood JW (1993) Top-down and bottom-up control of stream periphyton: effects of nutrients and herbivores. Ecology 74:1264–1280

  53. Smith VH (1979) Nutrient dependence of primary productivity in lakes. Limnol Oceanogr 24:1051–1064

  54. Smith VH (1982) The nitrogen and phosphorus dependence of algal biomass in lakes: an empirical and theoretical analysis. Limnol Oceanogr 27:1101–1112

  55. Steiner CF (2001) The effects of prey heterogeneity and consumer identity on the limitation of trophic-level biomass. Ecology 82:2495–2506

  56. Steiner CF (2003) Keystone predator effects and grazer control of planktonic primary production. Oikos 101:569–577

  57. Steinman AD (1996) Effects of grazers on freshwater benthic algae. In: Stevenson RJ, Bothwell ML, Lowe RL (eds) Algal ecology: freshwater benthic ecosystems. Academic Press, San Diego, Calif., pp 341–373

  58. Steinman AD, Mulholland PJ, Hill WR (1992) Functional responses associated with growth form in stream algae. J N Am Benthol Soc 11:229–243

  59. Stelzer RS, Lamberti GA (2001) Effects of N:P ratio and total nutrient concentration on stream periphyton community structure, biomass, and elemental composition. Limnol Oceanogr 46:356–367

  60. Sterner RW (1986) Herbivores’ direct and indirect effects on algal populations. Science 231:605–607

  61. Tilman D (1982) Resource competition and community structure. Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J.

  62. Tilman D (1985) The resource-ratio hypothesis of plant succession. Am Nat 125:827–852

  63. Watson S, McCauley E, Downing JA (1992) Sigmoid relationships between phosphorus, algal biomass, and algal community structure. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 49:2605–2610

  64. Welschmeyer NA (1994) Fluorometric analysis of chlorophyll a in the presence of chlorophyll b and phaeopigments. Limnol Oceanogr 39:1985–1992

Download references

Acknowledgements

I gratefully thank S. Hall, G. Mittelbach, and J. Trexler, for their tireless efforts to provide valuable comments on this manuscript. K. Gross, C. Steiner, R. J. Stevenson, A. Tessier, and two anonymous reviewers also provided very helpful and insightful comments. A special thanks to S. Hall, T. D. H. Steiner, E. Garcia, N. Dorn, and J. Wojdak, for moral support and help in the field. This research was supported by an MSU University Distinguished Fellowship, an NSF pre-doctoral fellowship, an NSF research training grant (RTG) to KBS (DBI−9602252), a Sigma Xi Grant-in-Aid-of-Research, a George H. Lauff Research Award, and the Theodore Roosevelt Memorial Fund from the American Museum of Natural History. All experiments herein comply with current United States law. This is KBS contribution #1263.

Author information

Correspondence to Tara L. Darcy-Hall.

Additional information

Communicated by Joel Trexler

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Darcy-Hall, T.L. Relative strengths of benthic algal nutrient and grazer limitation along a lake productivity gradient. Oecologia 148, 660–671 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-006-0405-4

Download citation

Keywords

  • Benthic algae
  • Competition–resistance tradeoff
  • Food webs
  • Food chains
  • Productivity