Advertisement

Springer Nature is making SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

Predicting understorey structure from the presence and composition of canopies: an assembly rule for marine algae

Abstract

Assembly rules provide a useful framework for predicting patterns of community assembly under defined environmental conditions. Habitat created by canopy-forming algae (such as kelps) provides a promising system for identifying assembly rules because canopies typically have a large and predictable influence on understorey communities. Across >1,000 km of subtidal South Australian coastline, we identified natural associations between assemblages of understorey algae and (1) monospecific canopies of Ecklonia radiata, (2) canopies comprised of E. radiata mixed with Fucales (Cystophora spp. and Sargassum spp.), and (3) gaps among canopies of algae. We were able to recreate these associations with experimental tests that quantified the assembly of understorey algae among these three habitat types. We propose the assembly rule that understorey communities on subtidal rocky coast in South Australia will be (1) monopolised by encrusting coralline algae beneath monospecific canopies of E. radiata, (2) comprised of encrusting corallines, encrusting non-corallines, and sparse covers of articulated corallines, beneath mixed E. radiata-Fucales canopies, and (3) comprised of extensive covers of articulated corallines and filamentous turfs, as well as sparse covers of foliose algae and juvenile canopy-formers, within gaps. Consistencies between natural patterns and experimental effects demonstrate how algal canopies can act as a filter to limit the subsets of species from the locally available pool that are able to assemble beneath them. Moreover, the subsets of species that assemble to subtidal rocky substrata in South Australia appear to be predictable, given knowledge of the presence and composition of canopies incorporating E. radiata.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Fig. 1a–b
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

References

  1. Anderson MJ (2001) A new method for non-parametric multivariate analysis of variance. Aust Ecol 26:32–46

  2. Belyea LR, Lancaster J (1999) Assembly rules within a contingent ecology. Oikos 86:402–416

  3. Bertness MD, Leonard GH, Levine JM, Schmidt PR, Ingraham AO (1999) Testing the relative contribution of positive and negative interactions in rocky intertidal communities. Ecology 80:2711–2726

  4. Callaway RM (1995) Positive interactions among plants. Bot Rev 61:306–349

  5. Callaway RM (1997) Positive interactions in plant communities and the individualistic-continuum concept. Oecologia 112:143–149

  6. Cannell MGR, Malcolm DC, Robertson PA (1992) The ecology of mixed-species stands of trees. Blackwell Scientific, Oxford

  7. Chapman ARO, Johnson CR (1990) Disturbance and organization of macroalgal assemblages in the Northwest Atlantic. Hydrobiologia 192:77–121

  8. Cheroske AG, Williams SL, Carpenter RC (2000) Effects of physical and biological disturbances on algal turfs in Kaneohe Bay, Hawaii. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 248:1–34

  9. Clarke KR (1993) Non-parametric multivariate analyses of changes in community structure. Aust J Ecol 18:117–143

  10. Clarke KR, Warwick RM (1994) Change in marine communities: an approach to statistical analysis and interpretation. Natural Environment Research Council, Plymouth

  11. Clements FE (1916) Plant succession. Carnegie Institution of Washington, Washington

  12. Cody ML (1999) Assembly rules at different scales in plant and bird communities. In: Weiher E, Keddy PA (eds) Ecological assembly rules: perspectives, advances, retreats. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 165–205

  13. Connell SD (2003) The monopolization of understorey habitat by subtidal encrusting coralline algae: a test of the combined effects of canopy-mediated light and sedimentation. Mar Biol 142:1065–1071

  14. Connell SD (2005) Assembly and maintenance of subtidal habitat heterogeneity: synergistic effects of light penetration and sedimentation. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 289:53–61

  15. Connor EF, Simberloff D (1979) The assembly of species communities: chance or competition? Ecology 60:1132–1140

  16. Dayton PK (1975) Experimental studies of algal canopy interactions in a sea otter-dominated kelp community at Amchitka Island, Alaska. Fish Bull 73:230–237

  17. Dayton PK, Currie V, Gerrodette T, Keller BD, Rosenthal R, Ven Tresca D (1984) Patch dynamics and stability of some California kelp communities. Ecol Monogr 54:253–289

  18. Diamond JM (1975) Assembly of species communities. In: Cody ML, Diamond JM (eds) Ecology and evolution of communities. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, pp 342–444

  19. Díaz S, Cabido M, Casanoves F (1998) Plant functional traits and environmental filters at a regional scale. J Veg Sci 9:113–122

  20. Drake JA (1990) Communities as assembled structures: do rules govern pattern? Trends Ecol Evol 5:159–164

  21. Duggins DO, Eckman JE (1994) The role of kelp detritus in the growth of benthic suspension feeders in an understory kelp forest. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 176:53–68

  22. Edwards MS (1998) Effects of long-term kelp canopy exclusion on the abundance of the annual alga Desmarestia ligulata (Light F). J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 228:309–326

  23. Figueiredo MAdO, Kain (Jones) JM, Norton TA (2000) Responses of crustose corallines to epiphyte and canopy cover. J Phycol 36:17–24

  24. Fowler-Walker MJ, Connell SD (2002) Opposing states of subtidal habitat across temperate Australia: consistency and predictability in kelp canopy–benthic associations. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 240:49–56

  25. Gleason HA (1926) The individualistic concept of the plant association. Bull Torrey Bot Club 53:7–26

  26. Gómez I, López-Figueroa F, Ulloa N, Morales V, Lovengreen C, Huovinen P, Hess S (2004) Patterns of photosynthesis in 18 species of intertidal macroalgae from southern Chile. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 270:103–116

  27. Goodsell PJ, Fowler-Walker MJ, Gillanders BM, Connell SD (2004) Variations in the configuration of algae in subtidal forests: implications for invertebrate assemblages. Aust Ecol 29:350–357

  28. Grace JB, Tilman D (eds) (1990) Perspectives on plant competition. Academic, San Diego

  29. Grime JP (1979) Plant strategies and vegetation processes. Wiley, Chichester

  30. Irving AD, Connell SD, Elsdon TS (2004a) Effects of kelp canopies on bleaching and photosynthetic activity of encrusting coralline algae. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 310:1–12

  31. Irving AD, Connell SD, Gillanders BM (2004b) Local complexity in patterns of canopy-benthos associations produces regional patterns across temperate Australasia. Mar Biol 144:361–368

  32. Jackson GA, Winant CD (1983) Effect of a kelp forest on coastal currents. Cont Shelf Res 2:75–80

  33. Keddy PA (1992) Assembly and response rules: two goals for predictive community ecology. J Veg Sci 3:157–164

  34. Keddy PA (1999) Epilogue: from global exploration to community assembly. In: Weiher E, Keddy PA (eds) Ecological assembly rules: perspectives, advances, retreats. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 393–402

  35. Keddy PA (2001) Extending the generality of field experiments. In: Competition, vol 26, 2nd edn. Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, pp 317–332

  36. Keddy PA, Weiher E (1999) Introduction: the scope and goals of research on assembly rules. In: Weiher E, Keddy PA (eds) Ecological assembly rules: perspectives, advances, retreats. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 1–20

  37. Kennelly SJ (1987) Physical disturbances in an Australian kelp community. I. Temporal effects. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 40:145–153

  38. Kennelly SJ (1989) Effects of kelp canopies on understorey species due to shade and scour. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 50:215–224

  39. Lawton JH (1999) Are there general laws in ecology? Oikos 84:177–192

  40. Lenssen J, Menting F, van der Putten W, Blom K (1999) Control of plant species richness and zonation of functional groups along a freshwater flooding gradient. Oikos 86:523–534

  41. McPherson GR, Weltzin JF (1998) Herbaceous response to canopy removal in southwestern oak woodlands. J Range Manage 51:674–678

  42. Melville AJ, Connell SD (2001) Experimental effects of kelp canopies on subtidal coralline algae. Aust Ecol 26:102–108

  43. Peters RH (1991) A critique for ecology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

  44. Peterson CJ, Pickett STA (1995) Forest reorganization: a case study in an old-growth forest catastrophic blowdown. Ecology 76:763–774

  45. Santelices B (1990) Patterns of reproduction, dispersal and recruitment in seaweeds. Oceanogr Mar Biol Ann Rev 28:177–276

  46. Shepherd SA, Womersley HBS (1970) The sublittoral ecology of West Island, South Australia. 1. Environmental features and the algal ecology. Trans R Soc S Aust 94:105–137

  47. Steneck RS, Dethier MN (1994) A functional group approach to the structure of algal-dominated communities. Oikos 69:476–498

  48. Thrush SF, Schneider DC, Legendre P, Whitlatch RB, Dayton PK, Hewitt JE, Hines AH, Cummings VJ, Lawrie SM, Grant J, Pridmore RD, Turner SJ, McArdle BH (1997) Scaling-up from experiments to complex ecological systems: where to next? J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 216:243–254

  49. Underwood AJ (1997) Experiments in ecology: their logical design and interpretation using analysis of variance. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

  50. Underwood AJ, Kingsford MJ, Andrew NL (1991) Patterns in shallow subtidal marine assemblages along the coast of New South Wales. Aust J Ecol 6:231–249

  51. Watling JR, Press MC (2000) Light heterogeneity in tropical rain forests: photosynthetic responses and their ecological consequences. In: Hutchings MJ, John EA, Stewart AJA (eds) The ecological consequences of environmental heterogeneity. Blackwell Science, Oxford, pp 131–153

  52. Weiher E, Keddy PA (eds) (1999) Ecological assembly rules: perspectives, advances, retreats. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

  53. Wernberg T, Coleman MA, Fairhead A, Miller S, Thomsen M (2003) Morphology of Ecklonia radiata (Phaeophyta: Laminariales) along its geographic distribution in south-western Australia and Australasia. Mar Biol 143:47–55

  54. West DC, Shugart HH, Botkin DB (eds) (1981) Forest succession: concepts and application. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York

  55. Whitmore TC (1989) Canopy gaps and the two major groups of forest trees. Ecology 70:536–538

  56. Whittaker RH (1951) A criticism of the plant association and climatic climax concepts. Northwest Sci 25:17–31

  57. Wilson JB (1999) Assembly rules in plant communities. In: Weiher E, Keddy PA (eds) Ecological assembly rules: perspectives, advances, retreats. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 130–164

Download references

Acknowledgments

P. Keddy, L. Benedetti-Cecchi, and J. Estes gave insightful suggestions on this manuscript and their advice and encouragement were greatly appreciated. We also thank C. Körner and three anonymous reviewers for their useful and constructive comments. We thank M. Anderson for an advance copy of her PERMANOVA software, and T. Elsdon, B. Russell, J. Stehbens, A. Bloomfield, T. Greig, and C. Pale for field support. This research was supported by grants from the Australia and Pacific Science Foundation and the Nature Foundation of South Australia to A.D.I and S.D.C., and an Australian Research Council Discovery grant to S.D.C. The research in this manuscript complies with the current laws of Australia.

Author information

Correspondence to Andrew D. Irving.

Additional information

Communicated by Christian Koerner

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Irving, A.D., Connell, S.D. Predicting understorey structure from the presence and composition of canopies: an assembly rule for marine algae. Oecologia 148, 491–502 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-006-0389-0

Download citation

Keywords

  • Association
  • Benthos
  • Ecklonia radiata
  • Habitat heterogeneity
  • Kelp