Advertisement

Springer Nature is making SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

Environmental stressors differentially affect leaf ecophysiological responses in two Ipomopsis species and their hybrids

Abstract

The recombination that follows natural hybridization may produce hybrid genotypes with traits that are intermediate or extreme relative to the parental species, and these traits may influence the relative fitness of the hybrids. Here we examined leaf ecophysiological traits that may influence fitness patterns in a natural plant hybrid zone. We compared the biochemical photosynthetic capacity of Ipomopsis aggregata, I. tenuituba, and early generation hybrids, as well as their photosynthetic responses to varying light and temperature, two abiotic factors found to differ among sites along the hybrid zone. In general, ecophysiological traits expressed in these plants were consistent with their natural habitat, even when grown under common greenhouse conditions. I. tenuituba reached higher photosynthetic rates (A) at higher light levels than I. aggregata, and also had a higher optimal temperature for photosynthesis (T opt). This suite of traits may reflect adaptations to the more exposed, rocky sites where I. tenuituba is found, compared to the more vegetated, mesic I. aggregata site. Hybrids had characters that were largely intermediate or tenuituba-like, but particular individual hybrids were extreme for some traits, including light saturation level, light-saturated A, and T opt. Many of these traits are consistent with adaptations reported for plants found in warm, dry sites, so they may put certain hybrids at an advantage at the relatively xeric center of the natural hybrid zone.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4 

References

  1. Anderson E (1948) Hybridization of the habitat. Evolution 2:1–9

  2. Anderson E (1949) Introgressive hybridization. Wiley, New York

  3. Arnold ML (1997) Natural hybridization and evolution. Oxford University Press, New York

  4. Arnold ML, Hodges SA (1995) Are natural hybrids fit or unfit relative to their parents? Trends Ecol Evol 10:67–71

  5. Arntz AM, DeLucia EH, Jordan N (2000) From fluorescence to fitness: variation in photosynthetic rate affects fecundity and survivorship. Ecology 81:2567–2576

  6. Bazzaz FA (1991) Habitat selection in plants. Am Nat 137:S116–S130

  7. Berry JA, Björkman O (1980) Photosynthetic response and adaptation to temperature in higher plants. Annu Rev Plant Physiol 31:491–543

  8. Berry JA, Raison JK (1981) Responses of macrophytes to temperature. In: Lange OL, Nobel PS, Osmond CB, Ziegler H (eds) Physiological plant ecology, vol A. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 277–338

  9. Björkman O (1981a) The response of photosynthesis to temperature. In: Grace J, Ford ED, Jarvis PG (eds) Plants and their atmospheric environment. Blackwell, Boston, Mass., pp 273–302

  10. Björkman O (1981b) Responses to different quantum flux densities. In: Lange OL, Nobel PS, Osmond CB, Ziegler H (eds) Physiological plant ecology, vol 12A. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 57–107

  11. Burke JM, Arnold ML (2001) Genetics and the fitness of hybrids. Annu Rev Genet 35:31–52

  12. Burke JM, Voss TJ, Arnold ML (1998) Genetic interactions and natural selection in Louisiana iris hybrids. Evolution 52:1304–1310

  13. Cabrera HM, Rada F, Cavieres L (1998) Effects of temperature on photosynthesis of two morphologically contrasting plant species along an altitudinal gradient in the tropical high Andes. Oecologia 114:145–152

  14. Campbell DR (1997) Genetic and environmental variation in life-history traits of a monocarpic perennial: a decade-long field experiment. Evolution 51:373–382

  15. Campbell DR, Waser NM (2001) Genotype-by-environment interaction and the fitness of plant hybrids in the wild. Evolution 55:669–676

  16. Campbell DR, Waser NM, Melendez-Ackerman EJ (1997) Analyzing pollinator-mediated selection in a plant hybrid zone: hummingbird visitation patterns on three spatial scales. Am Nat 149:295–315

  17. Campbell DR, Waser NM, Wolf PG (1998) Pollen transfer by natural hybrids and parental species in an Ipomopsis hybrid zone. Evolution 52:1602–1611

  18. Campbell DR, Waser NM, Pederson GT (2002) Predicting patterns of mating and rates of hybridization from pollinator behavior. Am Nat 159:438–450

  19. Campbell DR, Galen C, Wu CA (2005) Ecophysiology of first and second generation hybrids in a natural plant hybrid zone. Oecologia 144:214–225

  20. Cruzan MB, Arnold ML (1994) Assortative mating and natural selection in an Iris hybrid zone. Evolution 48:1946–1958

  21. Farquhar GD, von Caemmerer S, Berry JA (1980) A biochemical model of photosynthetic CO2 assimilation in leaves of C3 species. Planta 149:79–90

  22. Fritsche F, Kaltz O (2000) Is the Prunella (Lamiaceae) hybrid zone structured by an environmental gradient? Evidence from a reciprocal transplant experiment. Am J Bot 87:995–1003

  23. Fritz RA, Roche BM, Brunsfeld SJ (1998) Genetic variation in resistance of hybrid willows to herbivores. Oikos 83:117–128

  24. Galloway LF, Fenster CB (1999) The effect of nuclear and cytoplasmic genes on fitness and local adaptation in an annual legume, Chamaecrista fasciculata. Evolution 53:1734–1743

  25. Geber MA, Dawson TE (1997) Genetic variation in stomatal and biochemical limitations to photosynthesis in the annual plant, Polygonum arenastrum. Oecologia 109:535–546

  26. Givnish TJ (1988) Adaptation to sun and shade: a whole plant perspective. Aust J Plant Physiol 1:63–92

  27. Givnish TJ, Montgomery RA, Goldstein G (2004) Adaptive radiation of photosynthetic physiology in the Hawaiian lobeliads: light regimes, static light responses, and whole-plant compensation points. Am J Bot 91:228–246

  28. Grant V (1981) Plant speciation. Columbia University Press, New York

  29. Hamerlynck E, Knapp AK (1996) Photosynthetic and stomatal responses to high temperature and light in two oaks at the western limit of their range. Tree Physiol 16:557–565

  30. Harley PC, Sharkey TD (1991) An improved model of C3 photosynthesis at high CO2—reversed O2 sensitivity explained by lack of glycerate reentry into the chloroplast. Photosynth Res 27:169–178

  31. Harley PC, Thomas RB, Reynolds JF, Strain BR (1992) Modelling photosynthesis of cotton grown in elevated CO2. Plant Cell Environ 15:271–282

  32. Heschel MS, Stinchcombe JR, Holsinger KE, Schmidt J (2004) Natural selection on light response curve parameters in the herbaceous annual, Impatiens capensis. Oecologia 139:487–494

  33. Johnston JA, Grise DJ, Donovan LA, Arnold ML (2001) Environment-dependent performance and fitness of Iris brevicaulis, I. fulva (Iridaceae), and hybrids. Am J Bot 88:933–938

  34. Körner C, Diemer M (1987) In situ photosynthetic responses to light, temperature, and carbon dioxide in herbaceous plants from low and high altitude. Funct Ecol 1:179–194

  35. Lambers H, Chapin FS III, Pons TL (1998) Plant physiological ecology. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York

  36. Larcher W (1995) Physiological plant ecology, 3rd edn. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York

  37. Li A, Pinston SRM, Paterson AH, Park WD, Stansel JW (1997) Genetics of hybrid sterility and hybrid breakdown in an intersubspecific rice (Oryza sativa L.) population. Genetics 145:1139–1148

  38. Ludwig F et al (2004) Selection on leaf ecophysiological traits in a desert hybrid Helianthus species and early-generation hybrids. Evolution 58:2682–2692

  39. Lynch M, Walsh B (1998) Genetics and analysis of quantitative traits. Sinauer, Sunderland

  40. McArthur ED et al. (1998) Narrow hybrid zone between two subspecies of big sagebrush (Artemesia tridentate: Asteraceae). VI. Respiration and water potential. Can J Bot 76:567–574

  41. McDowell SCL (2002) Photosynthetic characteristics of invasive and noninvasive species of Rubus (Rosaceae). Am J Bot 89:1431–1438

  42. Melendez-Ackerman EJ, Campbell DR (1998) Adaptive significance of flower color and inter-trait correlations in an Ipomopsis hybrid zone. Evolution 52:1293–1303

  43. Murray FW (1967) On the computation of saturation vapor pressure. J Appl Meteorol 6:203–204

  44. Neuffer B, Auge H, Mesch H, Amarell U, Brandl R (1999) Spread of violets in polluted pine forests: morphological and molecular evidence for the ecological importance of interspecific hybridization. Mol Ecol 8:365–377

  45. Peek MS, Russek-Cohen E, Wait DA, Forseth IN (2002) Physiological response curve analysis using nonlinear mixed models. Oecologia 132:175–180

  46. Prioul JL, Chartier P (1977) Partitioning of transfer and carboxylation components of intracellular resistance to photosynthetic CO2 fixation: a critical analysis of the methods used. Ann Bot 41:789–800

  47. Rada F, Gonzalez J, Azocar A, Briceno B, Jaimez R (1992) Net photosynthesis-leaf temperature relations in plant species with different height along an altitudinal gradient. Acta Oecol 13:535–542

  48. Rieseberg LH, Ellstrand NC (1993) What can molecular and morphological markers tell us about plant hybridization? Crit Rev Plant Sci 12:213–241

  49. Rieseberg LH, Sinervo B, Linder CR, Ungerer MC, Arias DM (1996) Role of gene interactions in hybrid speciation: evidence from ancient and experimental hybrids. Science 272:741–745

  50. Rieseberg LH et al (2003) Major ecological transitions in wild sunflowers facilitated by hybridization. Science 301:1211–1216

  51. Rosenthal DM, Schwarzbach AE, Donovan LA, Raymond O, Rieseberg LH (2002) Phenotypic differentiation between three ancient hybrid taxa and their parental species. Int J Plant Sci 163:387–398

  52. Schwarzbach AE, Donovan LA, Rieseberg LH (2001) Transgressive character expression in a hybrid sunflower species. Am J Bot 88:270–277

  53. Sharkey TD (1985) Photosynthesis in intact leaves of C3 plants—physics, physiology and rate limitations. Bot Rev 51:53–105

  54. Silim SN, Guy RD, Patterson TB, Livingston NJ (2001) Plasticity in water-use efficiency of Picea sitchensis, P. glauca and their natural hybrids. Oecologia 128:317–325

  55. von Caemmerer S, Farquhar GD (1981) Some relationships between the biochemistry of photosynthesis and the gas exchange rates of leaves. Planta 153:376–387

  56. Walker DA (1989) Automated measurement of leaf photosynthetic O2 evolution as a function of photon flux density. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B 323:313–326

  57. Williams DG, Black RA (1993) Phenotypic variation in contrasting environments: growth and photosynthesis in Pennisetum setaceum from different altitudes in Hawaii. Funct Ecol 7:623–633

  58. Wu CA (2005) Genetic and ecophysiological consequences of natural hybridization between Ipomopsis aggregata and I. tenuituba. PhD dissertation, University of California Irvine

  59. Wu CA, Campbell DR (2005) Cytoplasmic and nuclear markers reveal contrasting patterns of spatial genetic structure in a natural Ipomopsis hybrid zone. Mol Ecol 14:781–792

  60. Wullschleger SD (1993) Biochemical limitations to carbon assimilation in C3 plants—a retrospective analysis of the A/Ci curves from 109 species. J Exp Bot 44:907–920

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by funding from the University of California Irvine, the National Science Foundation (DEB-9806547 to D. R. C. and DEB-0308772 to D. R. C. and C. A. W.), a GAANN Fellowship from the US Department of Education, and a Graduate Women in Science Eloise Gerry Fellowship. G. Aldridge, K. Suding, S. Weller, E. Wu, and two anonymous reviewers provided helpful comments on earlier versions of this manuscript. The experiments reported here comply with all current laws of the USA.

Author information

Correspondence to Carrie A. Wu.

Additional information

Communicated by Todd Dawson

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wu, C.A., Campbell, D.R. Environmental stressors differentially affect leaf ecophysiological responses in two Ipomopsis species and their hybrids. Oecologia 148, 202 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-006-0363-x

Download citation

Keywords

  • Environment-dependent selection
  • Hybridization
  • Ipomopsis
  • Temperature response
  • Photosynthesis