Parasitology Research

, Volume 118, Issue 10, pp 2863–2875 | Cite as

Beta diversity of gastrointestinal helminths in two closely related South African rodents: species and site contributions

  • Andrea Spickett
  • Luther van der Mescht
  • Kerstin Junker
  • Boris R. Krasnov
  • Voitto Haukisalmi
  • Sonja MattheeEmail author
Helminthology - Original Paper


A fundamental aim of parasite ecology is to understand the mechanisms behind spatial variation in diversity and structure of parasite assemblages. To understand the contribution of individual parasite species and their assemblages to spatial variation in parasite communities, we examined species contributions to beta diversity (SCBD) and local contributions to beta diversity (LCBD) of parasitic gastrointestinal helminths (nematodes and cestodes) in two closely related rodents, Rhabdomys dilectus and Rhabdomys pumilio, from 20 localities across South Africa. Although the two Rhabdomys spp. are morphologically similar, they differ substantially in body size, habitat preference, and sociality. We asked whether the variation in life history traits and infection parameters are associated with SCBD of helminths and whether variation in environmental factors, host population density, and species richness of host communities are associated with LCBD of component assemblages of helminths. We also considered spatial factors to test whether LCBD of helminth assemblages demonstrate geographic structure. We found that the contribution of helminth species parasitic in both hosts to beta diversity significantly increased with characteristic prevalence of these species, whereas mean abundance, type of life cycle, and location in the host’s gut had no effect on SCBD. The LCBD of helminth assemblages showed a significant positive correlation with environmental factors in both host species. Our results suggest that predictors of variation in SCBD and LCBD may substantially differ between parasites with different infection parameters and/or parasite communities at different hierarchical scales.


Beta diversity Rhabdomys Gastrointestinal helminths Environment LCBD SCBD 



We thank private landowners and nature reserve authorities for permitting us to conduct fieldwork on their properties, under the following provincial permit numbers: Eastern Cape, CRO37/11CR; KwaZulu-Natal, OP4990/2010; Western Cape, 0035-AAA007-00423; Northern Cape, FAUNA 1076/2011, Free State, 01/8091; Gauteng, CPF 6-0153, and Mpumalanga, MPB. 5331. We thank G. Froeschke for the identification of helminths that were recovered from most of the Fynbos localities as well as N. Avenant, M.D. Chipana, J. Coetsee, L. Cohen, N. Du Toit, A. Engelbrecht, G. Froeschke, R.F. Masubelle, C.A. Matthee, and L. Richards for help with field and technical work. This is publication no. 1025 of the Mitrani Department of Desert Ecology.

Data accessibility

The datasets generated and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Funding information

Financial support for the project was provided by the National Research Foundation (NRF), Agricultural Research Council – Onderstepoort Veterinary Institute and Stellenbosch University. LVDM received financial support through a postdoctoral fellowship from the Claude Leon Foundation. The Grant holder acknowledges that opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in any publication generated by the NRF-supported research are those of the authors, and that the NRF accepts no liability whatsoever in this regard.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving animals were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institution or practice at which the studies were conducted (Stellenbosch University - Research Ethics Committee: Animal Care and Use, permit numbers 2006B01007 and SU-ACUM11-00004 and Onderstepoort Veterinary Institute - Animal Ethics Committee, permit number AEC32.11).

Supplementary material

436_2019_6411_MOESM1_ESM.docx (17 kb)
Supplementary Table 1 (DOCX 17 kb)


  1. Altman I, Byers JE (2014) Large-scale spatial variation in parasite communities influenced by anthropogenic factors. Ecology 95:1876–1887. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Anderson RC (2000) Nematode parasites of vertebrates. Their development and transmission, 2nd edn. CABI, WallingfordCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Anderson MJ, Crist TO, Chase JM, Vellend M, Inouye BD, Freestone AL, Sanders NJ, Cornell HV, Comita LS, Davies KF, Harrison SP, Kraft NJB, Stegen JC, Swenson NG (2011) Navigating the multiple meanings of β diversity: a roadmap for the practicing ecologist. Ecol Lett 14:19–28. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Arneberg P, Skorping A, Read AF (1997) Is population density a species character? Comparative analyses of the nematode parasites of mammals. Oikos 80:289–300. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Biguezoton A, Adehan S, Adakal H, Zoungrana S, Farougou S, Chevillon C (2016) Community structure, seasonal variations and interactions between native and invasive cattle tick species in Benin and Burkina Faso. Parasit Vectors 9:43. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  6. Blasco-Costa I, Waters JM, Poulin R (2012) Swimming against the current: genetic structure, host mobility and the drift paradox in trematode parasites. Mol Ecol 21:207–217. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Borcard D, Legendre P (2002) All-scale spatial analysis of ecological data by means of principal coordinates of neighbour matrices. Ecol Model 153:51–68. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Borcard D, Gillet F, Legendre P (2011) Numerical ecology with R, 2nd edn. Springer, New York. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Botha M, Siebert SJ, van den Berg J (2016) Do arthropod assemblages fit the grassland and savanna biomes of South Africa? S Afr J Sci 112:1–10. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Brouat C, Kane M, Diouf M, Bâ K, Sall-Dramé R, Duplantier JM (2007) Host ecology and variation in helminth community structure in Mastomys rodents from Senegal. Parasitology 134:437–450. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Bush AO, Lafferty KD, Lotz JM, Shostak AW (1997) Parasitology meets ecology on its own terms: Margolis et al. revisited. J Parasitol 83:575–583. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Cramer MD, Hoffman MT (2015) The consequences of precipitation seasonality for Mediterranean-ecosystem vegetation of South Africa. PLoS One 10:1–21. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cribari-Neto F, Zeileis A (2010) Beta regression in R. J Stat Softw 34:1–24. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. da Silva PG, Hernández MIM, Heino J (2018) Disentangling the correlates of species and site contributions to beta diversity in dung beetle assemblages. Divers Distrib 24:1674–1686. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dray S, Bauman D, Blanchet G, Borcard D, Clappe S, Guenard G, Jombart T, Larocque G, Legendre P, Madi N, Wagner HH (2018) adespatial: multivariate multiscale spatial analysis. R package version 0.2–0.
  16. du Toit N, Jansen van Vuuren B, Matthee S, Matthee CA (2012) Biome specificity of distinct genetic lineages within the four-striped mouse Rhabdomys pumilio (Rodentia: Muridae) from southern Africa with implications for taxonomy. Mol Phylogenet Evol 65:75–86. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Dufour CMS, Meynard C, Watson J, Rioux C, Benhamou S, Perez J, du Plessis JJ, Avenant N, Pillay N, Ganem G (2015) Space use variation in co-occurring sister species: Response to environmental variation or competition? PLoS One 10:1–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Dybing NA, Fleming PA, Adams J (2013) Environmental conditions predict helminth prevalence in red foxes in Western Australia. Int J Parasitol Parasites Wildl 2:165–172. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  19. Ellison AM (2010) Partitioning diversity. Ecology 91:1962–1963. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Ezenwa VO (2004) Host social behavior and parasitic infection: a multifactorial approach. Behav Ecol 15:446–454. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Faleh AB, Annabi A, López S, Said K, Ribas A (2012) On the helminth parasites of the genus Jaculus (Rodentia: Dipodidae) in Tunisia: a preliminary survey study. Leb Sci J 13:107–110Google Scholar
  22. Froeschke G, Harf R, Sommer S, Matthee S (2010) Effects of precipitation on parasite burden along a natural climatic gradient in southern Africa – implications for possible shifts in infestation patterns due to global changes. Oikos 119:1029–1039. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Galbreath KE, Hoberg EP (2012) Return to Beringia: parasites reveal cryptic biogeographic history of North American pikas. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol 279:371–378. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Guernier V, Hochberg ME, Guégan JF (2004) Ecology drives the worldwide distribution of human infectious diseases. PLoS Biol 2:e186. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Harrison S, Ross SJ, Lawton JH (1992) Beta-diversity on geographic gradients in Britain. J Anim Ecol 61:151–158. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Haukisalmi V, Hardman LM, Fedorov VB, Hoberg EP, Henttonen H (2016) Molecular systematics and Holarctic phylogeography of cestodes of the genus Anoplocephaloides Baer, 1923 s. s. (Cyclophyllidea, Anoplocephalidae) in lemmings (Lemmus, Synaptomys). Zool Scr 45:88–102. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Haukisalmi V, Ribas A, Junker K, Spickett A, Matthee S, Henttonen H, Jrijer J, Halajian A, Ander JL, Nakao M (2018) Molecular systematics and evolutionary history of catenotaeniid cestodes (Cyclophyllidea). Zool Scr 47:221–230. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Heino J, Grönroos M (2017) Exploring species and site contributions to beta diversity in stream insect assemblages. Oecologia 183:151–160. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Hijmans RJ, Cameron SE, Parra JL, Jones PG, Jarvis A (2005) Very high resolution interpolated climate surfaces for global land areas. Int J Climatol 25:1965–1978. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hoberg EP, Brooks DR (2015) Evolution in action: climate change, biodiversity dynamics and emerging infectious disease. Philos Trans R Soc B 370:20130553. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Krasnov BR, Shenbrot GI, Khokhlova IS, Degen AA (2004) Flea species richness and parameters of host body, host geography and host “milieu”. J Anim Ecol 73:1121–1128. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Krasnov BR, Khokhlova IS, Arakelyain MS, Degen AA (2005) Is a starving host tastier? Reproduction in fleas parasitizing food-limited rodents. Funct Ecol 19:625–631. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Krasnov BR, Mouillot D, Shenbrot GI, Khokhlova IS, Poulin R (2010) Deconstructing spatial patterns in species composition of ectoparasite communities: the relative contribution of host composition, environmental variables and geography. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 19:515–526. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Krasnov BR, Shenbrot GI, Warburton EM, van der Mescht L, Surkova EN, Medvedev SG, Pechnikova N, Ermolova N, Kotti BK, Khokhlova IS (2018) Species and site contributions to beta diversity in fleas parasitic on the Palearctic small mammals: ecology, geography and host species composition matter the most. Parasitol 146:653–661. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Landeiro VL, Franz B, Heino J, Siqueira T, Bini LM (2018) Species-poor and low-lying sites are more ecologically unique in a hyperdiverse Amazon region: evidence from multiple taxonomic groups. Divers Distrib 24:966–977. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Legendre P (2008) Studying beta diversity: ecological variation partitioning by multiple regression and canonical analysis. J Plant Ecol 1:3–8. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Legendre P (2014) Interpreting the replacement and richness difference components of beta diversity. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 23:1324–1334. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Legendre P, de Cáceres M (2013) Beta diversity as the variance of community data: dissimilarity coefficients and partitioning. Ecol Lett 16:951–963. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  39. Legendre P, Borcard D, Peres-Neto PR (2005) Analyzing beta diversity: partitioning the spatial variation of community composition data. Ecol Monogr 75:435–450. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Lennon JJ, Koleff P, Greenwood JJD, Gaston KJ (2001) The geographical structure of British bird distributions: diversity, spatial turnover and scale. J Anim Ecol 70:966–979. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Lenth R (2019) emmeans: estimated marginal means, aka least-squares means. R package version 1.3.2.
  42. Lindenfors P, Nunn CL, Jones KE, Cunningham AA, Sechrest W, Gittleman JL (2007) Parasite species richness in carnivores: effects of host body mass, latitude, geographical range and population density. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 16:496–509. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Littlewood DT, Curini-Galletti M, Herniou EA (2000) The interrelationships of Proseriata (Platyhelminthes: Seriata) tested with molecules and morphology. Mol Phylogenet Evol 16:449–466. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Lockyer AE, Olson PD, Littlewood DTJ (2003) Utility of complete large and small subunit rRNA genes in resolving the phylogeny of the Neodermata (Platyhelminthes): implications and a review of the cercomer theory. Biol J Linn Soc 78:155–171. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Morand S, Guégan JF (2000) Distribution and abundance of parasite nematodes: Ecological specialisation, phylogenetic constraint or simply epidemiology? Oikos 88:563–573. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Morand S, Krasnov BR (eds) (2010) The biogeography of host-parasite interactions. Oxford Univ. Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  47. Morgan BB, Hawkins PA (1951) Veterinary helminthology. Burgess Publishing Company, MinneapolisGoogle Scholar
  48. Oksanen J, Blanchet G, Friendly M, Kindt P, Legendre P, McGlinn D, Minchin PR, O'Hara RB, Simpson GL, Solymos P, Stevens MHH, Szoecs E, Wagner H (2018) vegan: community ecology package. R package version 2.5-2.
  49. Paradis E, Claude J, Strimmer K (2004) APE: analyses of phylogenetics and evolution in R language. Bioinformatics 20:289–290. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Poisot T, Guéeveneux-Julien C, Fortin M-J, Gravel D, Legendre P (2017) Hosts, parasites and their interactions respond to different climatic variables. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 26:242–251. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Poulin R (2003) The decay of similarity with geographical distance in parasite communities of vertebrate hosts. J Biogeogr 30:1609–1615. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Poulin R (2006) Variation in infection parameters among populations within parasite species: intrinsic properties versus local factors. Int J Parasitol 36:877–885. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Poulin R, Guégan J-F (2000) Nestedness, anti-nestedness and the relationship between prevalence and intensity in ectoparasite assemblages of marine fish: a special model of species coexistence. Int J Parasitol 30:1147–1152. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Procheş Ş, Cowling R (2007) Do insect distributions fit our biomes? S A J Sci 103:258–261Google Scholar
  55. R Core Team (2018) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria Google Scholar
  56. Rambau RV, Robinson TJ, Stanyon R (2003) Molecular genetics of Rhabdomys pumilio subspecies boundaries: mtDNA phylogeography and karyotypic analysis by fluorescence in situ hybridization. Mol Phylogenet Evol 28:564–575. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. Schradin C, Pillay N (2005) Intraspecific variation in the spatial and social organization of the African striped mouse. J Mammal 86:99–107.<0099:IVITSA>2.0.CO;2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Schradin C, Pillay N (2006) Female striped mice (Rhabdomys pumilio) change their home ranges in response to seasonal variation in food availability. Behav Ecol 17:452–458. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Skinner JD, Chimimba CT (2005) The mammals of the southern African subregion, 3rd edn. Cambridge University Press, Cape TownCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Spickett A, Junker K, Krasnov BR, Haukisalmi V, Matthee S (2017a) Intra- and interspecific similarity in species composition of helminth communities in two closely-related rodents from South Africa. Parasitology 144:1211–1220. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. Spickett A, Junker K, Krasnov BR, Haukisalmi V, Matthee S (2017b) Helminth parasitism in two closely related South African rodents: abundance, prevalence, species richness and impinging factors. Parasitol Res 116:1395–1409. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. Spickett A, Junker K, Krasnov BR, Haukisalmi V, Matthee S (2017c) Community structure of helminth parasites in two closely related South African rodents differing in sociality and spatial behaviour. Parasitol Res 116:2299–2312. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. Stromberg BE (1997) Environmental factors influencing transmission. Vet Parasitol 72:247–264. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. Stuart C, Stuart T (2007) Field guide to mammals of southern Africa, revised edition. Struik Nature, Cape TownGoogle Scholar
  65. Tonkin JD, Heino J, Sundermann A, Haase P, Jähnig SC (2016) Context dependency in biodiversity patterns of central German stream metacommunities. Freshw Biol 61:607–620. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Torre I, Arrizabalaga A, Feliu C, Ribas A (2013) The helminth infracommunities of the wood mouse (Apodemus sylvaticus) two years after the fire in Mediterranean forests. Helminthologia 50(1):27–38.
  67. van der Mescht L (2011) Ectoparasite assemblage of the four-striped mouse, Rhabdomys pumilio: the effect of anthropogenic habitat transformation and temporal variation. Stellenbosch University, MSc DissertationGoogle Scholar
  68. van Schaik J, Kerth G (2017) Host social organization and mating system shape parasite transmission opportunities in three European bat species. Parasitol Res 116:589–599. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  69. Vellend M (2010) Conceptual synthesis in community ecology. Q Rev Biol 85:183–206. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Vestey MR, McMurry ST, Lochmiller RL (1993) Influence of dietary protein on selected measures of humoral and cellular immunity in the cotton rat Sigmodon hispidus. Can J Zool 71:579–586. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Vilmi A, Karjalainen SM, Heino J (2017) Ecological uniqueness of stream and lake diatom communities shows different macroecological patterns. Divers Distrib 23:1042–1053. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. von Nickisch-Rosenegk M, Brown WM, Boore JL (2001) Complete sequence of the mitochondrial genome of the tapeworm Hymenolepis diminuta: gene arrangements indicate that platyhelminths are eutrochozoans. Mol Biol Evol 18:721–730. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Whittaker RH (1960) Vegetation of the Siskiyou Mountains, Oregon and California. Ecol Monogr 30:279–338. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Whittaker RH (1972) Evolution and measurement of species diversity. Taxon 21:213–251. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Williams PH (1996) Mapping variations in the strength and breadth of biogeographic transition zones using species turnover. Proc R Soc B 263:579–588. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Yamaguti S (1961) Systema helminthum. III. The nematode parasites of vertebrates, part I. Interscience Publishers, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  77. Zeileis A, Hothorn T (2002) Diagnostic checking in regression relationships. R News 2:7–10 Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Agricultural Research Council-Onderstepoort Veterinary InstituteOnderstepoortSouth Africa
  2. 2.Department of Conservation ecology and EntomologyStellenbosch UniversityMatielandSouth Africa
  3. 3.Evolutionary Genomics Group, Department of Botany and ZoologyStellenbosch UniversityStellenboschSouth Africa
  4. 4.Mitrani Department of Desert Ecology, Swiss Institute for Dryland Environmental and Energy Research, Jacob Blaustein Institutes for Desert ResearchBen-Gurion University of the NegevBeershebaIsrael
  5. 5.PirkkalaFinland

Personalised recommendations