Advertisement

Parasitology Research

, Volume 118, Issue 10, pp 2767–2772 | Cite as

Effects of temperature on the survival of Sarcoptes scabiei of black bear (Ursus americanus) origin

  • Kevin D. NiedringhausEmail author
  • Justin D. Brown
  • Mark A. Ternent
  • Sarah K. Peltier
  • Michael J. YabsleyEmail author
Arthropods and Medical Entomology - Original Paper

Abstract

For two decades, the incidence and range of sarcoptic mange in black bears (Ursus americanus) in Pennsylvania has increased. The causative agent, Sarcoptes scabiei, can be directly or indirectly transmitted; therefore, data on environmental persistence is important for guiding management and public communications. The objective of this study was to determine the survival of S. scabiei at different temperatures. Full section skin samples and superficial skin scrapes were collected from bears immediately after euthanasia due to severe mange. After ~ 24 h on ice packs (shipment to lab), samples were placed in dishes at 0, 4, 18, or 30 °C and 60, 20, 12, and 25% relative humidity, respectively, and the percentage of mites alive, by life stage, was periodically determined. Humidity was recorded but not controlled. Temperature significantly affected mite survival, which was shortest at 0 °C (mostly ≤ 4 h) and longest at 4 °C (up to 13 days). No mites survived beyond 8 days at 18 °C or 6 days at 30 °C. Mites from full-thickness skin sections survived significantly longer than those from superficial skin scrapes. Adults typically survived longer than nymphs and larvae except at 30 °C where adults survived the shortest time. These data indicate that at cooler temperatures, S. scabiei can survive for days to over a week in the environment, especially if on host skin. However, these data also indicate that the environment is unlikely to be a long-term source of S. scabiei infection to bears, other wildlife, or domestic animals.

Keywords

Black bear Environmental transmission Ursus americanus Mange Sarcoptes scabiei 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the staff of the Pennsylvania Game Commission for providing skin samples for this study. They would also like to thank Chris Cleveland, Livvy Jones, Devinn Sinnott, and staff in the parasitology laboratory at the Southeastern Cooperative Wildlife Disease Study for the assistance in the analysis.

Funding Statement

Funding was provided by the sponsorship of the Southeastern Cooperative Wildlife Disease Study by the fish and wildlife agencies of Alabama, Arkansas, Florida, Georgia, Kentucky, Kansas, Louisiana, Maryland, Mississippi, Missouri, Nebraska, North Carolina, Ohio, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, Tennessee, Virginia, and West Virginia, USA. Support from the states to SCWDS was provided in part by the Federal Aid to Wildlife Restoration Act (50 Stat. 917). Additional funding was provided by the Pennsylvania Game Commission and a grant from the National Center for Veterinary Parasitology.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving animals were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institution or practice at which the studies were conducted.

Informed consent

N/A

References

  1. Abu-Samra MT, Imbabi SE, Mahgoub ES (1981) Mange in domestic animals in the Sudan. Ann Trop Med Parasitol 75:627–637.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00034983.1981.11687494 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Almberg ES, Cross PC, Dobson AP, Smith DW, Metz MC, Stahler DR, Hudson PJ (2015) Social living mitigates the costs of a chronic illness in a cooperative carnivore. Ecol Lett 18:660–667.  https://doi.org/10.1111/ele.12444 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  3. Alt GL, Matula GJ Jr, Alt FW, Lindzey JS (1980) Dynamics of home range and movements of adult black bears in northeastern Pennsylvania. Int C Bear 4:131–136 https://www.jstor.org/stable/3872856. Accessed 1 Nov 2018
  4. Arends JJ, Stanislaw CM, Gerdon D (1990) Effects of sarcoptic mange on lactating swine and growing pigs. J Anim Sci 68:1495–1499.  https://doi.org/10.2527/1990.6861495x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Arlian LG (1989) Biology, host relations, and epidemiology of Sarcoptes scabiei. Annu Rev Entomol 34:139–161.  https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.en.34.010189.001035 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Arlian LG, Runyan RA, Achar S, Estes SA (1984a) Survival and infestivity of Sarcoptes scabiei var. canis and var. hominis. J Am Acad Dermatol 11:210–215.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0190-9622(84)70151-4 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Arlian LG, Runyan RA, Estes SA (1984b) Cross infestivity of Sarcoptes scabiei. J Am Acad Dermatol 10:979–986.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0190-9622(84)80318-7 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Arlian LG, Runyan RA, Sorlie LB, Estes SA (1984c) Host-seeking behavior of Sarcoptes scabiei. J Am Acad Dermatol 11:594–598.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0190-9622(84)70212-X CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Arlian LG, Vyszenski-Moher DL, Cordova D (1988) Host specificity of S. scabiei var. canis (Acari: Sarcoptidae) and the role of host odor. J Med Entomol 25:52–56.  https://doi.org/10.1093/jmedent/25.1.52 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Arlian LG, Vyszenski-Moher DL, Pole MJ (1989) Survival of adults and development stages of Sarcoptes scabiei var. canis when off the host. Exp Appl Acarol 6:181–187.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01193978 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Astorga F, Carver S, Almberg ES, Sousa GR, Wingfield K, Niedringhaus KD, Van Wick P, Rossi L, Xie Y, Cross P, Angelone S, Gortázar C, Escobar LE (2018) International meeting on sarcopic mange in wildlife, June 2018, Blacksburg, Virginia, USA. Parasite Vector 11: 449.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-018-3015-1
  12. Bates D, Maechler M, Bolker B, Walker S (2015) Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. J Stat Softw 67:1–48.  https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.io1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Bornstein S (1991) Experimental infection of dogs with Sarcoptes scabiei derived from naturally infected wild red foxes (Vulpes vulpes): clinical observations. Vet Dermatol 2:151–159.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3164.1991.tb00126.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Bornstein S, Morner T, Samuel WM (2001) Sarcoptes scabiei and sarcoptic mange. In: Samuel WM, Pybus MJ, Kocan AA (eds) Parasitic diseases of wild mammals, 2nd edn. Iowa State Press, Ames, IA, pp 107–119Google Scholar
  15. Cameron AE (1925) Studies on the bionomics of mange mites in cattle. Parasitology 17:278–283.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S0031182000004716 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Fain A (1968) Étude de la variabilitÉ de Sarcoptes scabiei avec une rÉvision des Sarcoptidae. Acta Zool Pathol Antverp 47:1–196Google Scholar
  17. Fain A (1978) Epidemiological problems of scabies. Int J Dermatol 17:20–30.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-4362.1978.tb06040.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Folk GE Jr, Folk MA, Minor JJ (1972) Physiological condition of three species of bears in winter dens. IUCN Publs (New Series) 23:107–124.  https://doi.org/10.2307/3872574 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Fraser TA, Shao R, Fountain-Jones NM, Charleston M, Martin A, Whiteley P, Holme R, Carver S, Polkinghorne A (2017) Mitochondrial genome sequencing reveals potential origins of the scabies mite Sarcoptes scabiei infesting two iconic Australian marsupials. BMC Evol Biol 17:233.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s12862-017-1086-9 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  20. Garshelis DL, Pelton MR (1980) Activity of black bears in the Geat Smoky Mountains National Park. J Mammol 61(1):8–19.  https://doi.org/10.2307/1379952 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hengge UR, Currie BJ, Jager G, Lupi O, Schwartz RA (2006) Scabies: a ubiquitous neglected skin disease. Lancet Infect Dis 6:769–779.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S1473-3099(06)70654-5 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Ibrahim KE, Abu-Samra MT (1987) Experimental transmission of a goat strain of Sarcoptes scabiei to desert sheep and its treatment with ivermectin. Vet Parasitol 26:157–164.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4017(87)90085-9 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Martin AM, Burridge CP, Ingram J, Fraser TA, Carver S (2018) Invasive pathogen drives host population collapse: effects of a travelling wave of sarcoptic mange on bare-nosed wombats. J Appl Ecol 55(1):331–341.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12968 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Mitra M, Mahanta SK, Sen S, Ghosh C, Hati AK (1995) Transmission of Sarcoptes scabiei from animal to man and its control. J Indian Med Assoc 93:142–143PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Mellanby K, Johnson CG, Bartley WC, Brown P (1942) Experiments on the survival and behaviour of the itch mite, Sarcoptes scabiei DeG var. hominis. Bull Entomol Res 33(4):267–271.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007485300026584 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Niedringhaus KD, Brown JD, Ternent M, Childress W, Gettings JR, Yabsley MJ (2019) The emergence and expansion of sarcoptic mange in American black bears (Ursus americanus) in the United States. Veterinary Parasitology: Regional Studies and Reports 17:100303Google Scholar
  27. Peltier SK, Brown JD, Ternent M, Niedringhaus KD, Schuler K, Bunting EM, Kirchgessner M, Yabsley MJ (2017) Genetic characterization of Sarcoptes scabiei from black bears (Ursus americanus) and other hosts in the eastern United States. J Parasitol 103:593–597.  https://doi.org/10.1645/17-26 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Peltier SK, Brown JD, Ternent MA, Fenton H, Niedringhaus KD, Yabsley MJ (2018) Assays for detection and edentification of the causative agent of mange in free-ranging black bears (Ursus americanus). J Wildl Dis 54(3):471–479.  https://doi.org/10.7589/2017-06-148 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Pence DB, Ueckermann E (2002) Sarcoptic mange in wildlife. Rev Sci Tech Off Int Epiz 21:385–398CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. RCoreTeam (2017) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. URL https://www.R-project.org/, Vienna, Austria. Accessed 1 Nov 2018
  31. Rogers L (1981) A bear in its lair. Nat Hist 90:64–70Google Scholar
  32. Romani L, Steer AC, Whitfeld MJ, Kaldor JM (2015) Prevalence of scabies and impetigo worldwide: a systematic review. Lancet Infect Dis 15:960–967  https://doi.org/10.1016/S1473-3099(15)00132-2 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Samuel WM (1981) Attempted experimental transfer of sarcoptic mange (Sarcoptes scabiei, Acarina: Sarcoptidae) among red fox, coyote, wolf and dog. J Wildl Dis 17:343–347.  https://doi.org/10.7589/0090-3558-17.3.343 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Skerratt LF, Martin RW, Handasyde KA (1998) Sarcoptic mange in wombats. Aust Vet J 76:408–410CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Smith EB, Claypool TF (1967) Canine scabies in dogs and in humans. J Amer Med Assoc 199:59–64.  https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.1967.03120020053008 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Sorensen A, van Beest FM, Brook RK (2014) Impacts of wildlife baiting and supplemental feeding on infectious disease transmission risk: a synthesis of knowledge. Prev Vet Med 113:356–363.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prevetmed.2013.11.010 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Thomsett LR (1968) Mite infestations of man contracted from dogs and cats. Brit Med J 3:93–95.  https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.3.5610.93 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Twomey DF, Birch ES, Schock A (2009) Outbreak of sarcoptic mange in alpacas (Vicugna pacos) and control with repeated subcutaneous ivermectin injections. Vet Parasitol 159:186–191.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetpar.2008.10.023 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Southeastern Cooperative Wildlife Disease Study, College of Veterinary MedicineUniversity of GeorgiaAthensUSA
  2. 2.Pennsylvania Game CommissionHarrisburgUSA
  3. 3.Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation CommissionNaplesUSA
  4. 4.Warnell School of Forestry and Natural ResourcesUniversity of GeorgiaAthensUSA

Personalised recommendations