Advertisement

The effects of environment, hosts and space on compositional, phylogenetic and functional beta-diversity in two taxa of arthropod ectoparasites

  • Boris R. KrasnovEmail author
  • Georgy I. Shenbrot
  • Natalia P. Korallo-Vinarskaya
  • Maxim V. Vinarski
  • Elizabeth M. Warburton
  • Irina S. Khokhlova
Arthropods and Medical Entomology - Original Paper

Abstract

We studied the effects of variation in environmental, host-associated and spatial factors on variation in compositional, phylogenetic/taxonomic and functional facets of beta-diversity in fleas and gamasid mites parasitic on small mammals and asked whether (a) the importance of these factors as drivers of beta-diversity differs among its multiple facets and (b) the effects of variation in environment, hosts and space on beta-diversity variation differ between the two ectoparasite taxa. To understand the relative effects of each group of predictors, we used a distance-based redundancy analysis and variation partitioning. The greatest portions of variation in the compositional beta-diversity of fleas were equally explained by host-associated and spatial predictors, whereas variation in host species composition contributed the most to variation in the compositional beta-diversity of mites. Variation in the phylogenetic (i.e. based on phylogenetic tree) beta-diversity of fleas was mainly due to variation in the phylogenetic composition of host communities, while the taxonomic (i.e. based on Linnean taxonomy) beta-diversity of mites was influenced by environmental variation. Unique contributions of spatial and environmental variation explained most of the variation in functional beta-diversity and its species replacement (= turnover) component (i.e. beta-diversity explained by replacement of species alone) in fleas and mites, respectively. Variation in the richness difference component (i.e. beta-diversity explained by species loss/gain alone) of functional beta-diversity was mainly affected by either variation in the functional composition of host assemblages (fleas) or its joint action with environmental variables (mites). We conclude that the pattern of the relative effects of environmental, host-associated and spatial factors on beta-diversity is context-dependent and may differ among different facets of beta-diversity, among different beta-diversity components and also among taxa dependent on biological affinities.

Keywords

Beta-diversity Fleas Mites Species composition Phylogeny Traits Variation 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We thank the anonymous referees for their helpful comments on the earlier version of the manuscript. This is publication no. 1026 of the Mitrani Department of Desert Ecology.

Funding

This study was partly supported by the Israel Science Foundation (grant no. 149/17 to BRK and ISK) and the Russian Ministry of Education and Science (grant no. 6.1352.2017/4.6 to MVV and NPKV). EMW received financial support from the Blaustein Center for Scientific Cooperation.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Supplementary material

436_2019_6371_MOESM1_ESM.docx (349 kb)
ESM 1 (DOCX 348 kb)

References

  1. Ackerly DD (2003) Community assembly, niche conservatism and adaptive evolution in changing environments. Int J Plant Sci 164:S165–S184.  https://doi.org/10.1086/368401 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Adlard RD, Miller TL, Smit NJ (2015) The butterfly effect: parasite diversity, environment, and emerging disease in aquatic wildlife. Trends Parasitol 31:160–166.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pt.2014.11.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baselga A (2007) Disentangling distance decay of similarity from richness gradients: response to Soininen et al. 2007. Ecography 30:838–841.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2007.0906-7590.05191.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Baselga A (2010) Partitioning the turnover and nestedness components of beta diversity. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 19:134–143.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1466-8238.2009.00490.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bininda-Emonds ORP, Cardillo M, Jones KE, MacPhee RDE, Beck RMD, Grenyer R, Price SA, Vos RA, Gittleman JL, Purvis A (2007) The delayed rise of present-day mammals. Nature 446:507–512.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nature05634 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Borcard D, Legendre P (2002) All-scale spatial analysis of ecological data by means of principal coordinates of neighbour matrices. Ecol Model 153:51–68.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3800(01)00501-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Borcard D, Gillet F, Legendre P (2018) Numerical ecology with R, 2 edn. Springer, New York.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71404-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bregetova NG (1956) Gamasid mites (Gamasoidea). A short identification key. Acad Sci USSR. USSR, Moscow (in Russian)Google Scholar
  9. Cardoso P, Rigal F, Carvalho JC, Fortelius M, Borges PAV, Podani J, Schmera D (2014) Partitioning taxon, phylogenetic and functional beta diversity into replacement and richness difference components. J Biogeogr 41:749–761.  https://doi.org/10.1111/jbi.12239 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cardoso P, Rigal F, Carvalho JC (2015) BAT – Biodiversity Assessment Tools, an R package for the measurement and estimation of alpha and beta taxon, phylogenetic and functional diversity. Methods Ecol Evol 6:232–236.  https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.12310 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cardoso P, Rigal F, Carvalho JC (2018) BAT: biodiversity assessment tools. R package version 1.6.0. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=BAT Google Scholar
  12. Cavender-Bares J, Kozak KH, Fine PVA, Kembel SW (2009) The merging of community ecology and phylogenetic biology. Ecol Lett 12:693–715.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2009.01314.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Clark NJ, Clegg SM, Sam K, Goulding W, Koane B, Wells K (2018) Climate, host phylogeny and the connectivity of host communities govern regional parasite assembly. Divers Distrib 24:13–23.  https://doi.org/10.1111/ddi.12661 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Clarke KR, Warwick RM (1999) The taxonomic distinctness measure of biodiversity: weighting of step lengths between hierarchical levels. Mar Ecol Progr Ser 184:21–29.  https://doi.org/10.3354/meps184021 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dallas T, Presley SJ (2014) Relative importance of host environment, transmission potential and host phylogeny to the structure of parasite metacommunities. Oikos 123:866–874.  https://doi.org/10.1111/oik.00707 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Davydova MS, Belova OS (1972) Fauna of gamasid mites of the floodplain of the Ob River. In: Maximov AA (ed) Biological resources of the River Ob valley. Nauka, Siberian Branch, Novosibirsk, USSR, pp 306–324 in RussianGoogle Scholar
  17. De Bello F, Lavergne S, Meynard CN, Lepš J, Thuiller W (2010) The partitioning of diversity: showing Theseus a way out of the labyrinth. J Veget Sci 21:992–1000.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1654-1103.2010.01195.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Dowling APG, OConnor BM (2010) Phylogeny of Dermanyssoidea (Acari:Parasitiformes) suggests multiple origins of parasitism. Acarologia 50:113–129.  https://doi.org/10.1051/acarologia/20101957 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Dray S, Legendre P, Peres-Neto PR (2006) Spatial modelling: a comprehensive framework for principal coordinate analysis of neighbour matrices (PCNM). Ecol Model 196:483–493.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2006.02.015 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Edler A, Mehl R (1972) Mites (Acari, Gamasina) from small mammals in Norway. Norsk Entomologisk Tidsskr 19:133–147Google Scholar
  21. Fick SE, Hijmans RJ (2017) Worldclim 2: new 1-km spatial resolution climate surfaces for global land areas. Int J Climatol 37:4302–4315.  https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.5086 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hadfield JD, Krasnov BR, Poulin R, Nakagawa S (2014) A tale of two phylogenies: comparative analyses of ecological interactions. Am Nat 183:174–187.  https://doi.org/10.1086/674445 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Harrison S, Ross SJ, Lawton JH (1992) Beta-diversity on geographic gradients in Britain. J Anim Ecol 61:151–158.  https://doi.org/10.2307/5518 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hawlena H, Abransky Z, Krasnov BR, Saltz D (2007) Host defence versus intraspecific competition in the regulation of infrapopulations of the flea Xenopsylla conformis on its rodent host Meriones crassus. Int J Parasitol 37:919–925.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpara.2007.01.015 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Heino J, Tolonen KT (2017) Ecological drivers of multiple facets of beta diversity in a lentic macroinvertebrate metacommunity. Limnol Oceanogr 62:2431–2444.  https://doi.org/10.1002/lno.10577 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Ives AR, Helmus MR (2010) Phylogenetic metrics of community similarity. Am Nat 176:E128–E142.  https://doi.org/10.1086/656486 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Jones KE, Bielby J, Cardillo M, Fritz SA, O'Dell J, Orme CDL, Safi K, Sechrest W, Boakes EH, Carbone C, Connolly C, Cutts MJ, Foster JK, Grenyer R, Habib M, Plaster CA, Price SA, Rigby EA, Rist J, Teacher A, Bininda-Emonds ORP, Gittleman JL, Mace GM, Purvis A (2009) PanTHERIA: a species-level database of life history, ecology, and geography of extant and recently extinct mammals. Ecology 90:2648.  https://doi.org/10.1890/08-1494.1 (last modified 2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kamiya T, O’Dwyer K, Nakagawa S, Poulin R (2014) What determines species richness of parasitic organisms? A meta-analysis across animal, plant and fungal hosts. Biol Rev 89:123–134.  https://doi.org/10.1111/brv.12046 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kaspari M, Clay NA, Lucas J, Yanoviak SP, Kay A (2015) Thermal adaptation generates a diversity of thermal limits in a rainforest ant community. Glob Chang Biol 21:1092–1102.  https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.12750 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kembel SW, Cowan PD, Helmus MR, Cornwell WK, Morlon H, Ackerly DD, Blomberg SP, Webb CO (2010) Picante: R tools for integrating phylogenies and ecology. Bioinformatics 26:1463–1464.  https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btq166 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Krasnov BR (2008) Functional and evolutionary ecology of fleas. A model for ecological parasitology. Cambridge Univ Press, Cambridge.  https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511542688 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Krasnov BR, Shenbrot GI, Khokhlova IS, Poulin R (2005) Nested pattern in flea assemblages across the host’s geographic range. Ecography 28:475–484.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0906-7590.2005.04238.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Krasnov BR, Shenbrot GI, Khokhlova IS, Poulin R (2007) Geographical variation in the “bottom-up” control of diversity: fleas and their small mammalian hosts. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 16:179–186.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1466-8238.2006.00273.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Krasnov BR, Mouillot D, Shenbrot GI, Khokhlova IS, Vinarski MV, Korallo-Vinarskaya NP, Poulin R (2010a) Similarity in ectoparasite faunas of Palaearctic rodents as a function of host phylogenetic, geographic or environmental distances: which matters the most? Int J Parasitol 40:807–817.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpara.2009.12.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Krasnov BR, Mouillot D, Shenbrot GI, Khokhlova IS, Poulin R (2010b) Deconstructing spatial patterns in species composition of ectoparasite communities: the relative contribution of host composition, environmental variables and geography. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 19:515–526.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1466-8238.2010.00529.x Google Scholar
  36. Krasnov BR, Mouillot D, Khokhlova IS, Shenbrot GI, Poulin R (2012) Compositional and phylogenetic dissimilarity of host communities drives dissimilarity of ectoparasite assemblages: geographical variation and scale-dependence. Parasitology 139:338–347.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S0031182011002058 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Krasnov BR, Vinarski MV, Korallo-Vinarskaya NP, Khokhlova IS (2013) Ecological correlates of body size in gamasid mites parasitic on small mammals: abundance and niche breadth. Ecography 36:1042–1050.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0587.2012.00140.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Krasnov BR, Shenbrot GI, Khokhlova IS, Stanko M, Morand S, Mouillot D (2015) Assembly rules of ectoparasite communities across scales: combining patterns of abiotic factors, host composition, geographic space, phylogeny and traits. Ecography 38:184–197.  https://doi.org/10.1111/ecog.00915 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Krasnov BR, Shenbrot GI, Khokhlova IS, Degen AA (2016) Trait-based and phylogenetic associations between parasites and their hosts: a case study with small mammals and fleas in the Palearctic. Oikos 125:29–38.  https://doi.org/10.1111/oik.02178 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Krasnov BR, Shenbrot GI, Warburton EM, van der Mescht L, Surkova EN, Medvedev SG, Pechnikova N, Ermolova N, Kotti BK, Khokhlova IS (2019a) Species and site contributions to β-diversity in fleas parasitic on the Palearctic small mammals: ecology, geography and host species composition matter the most. Parasitology 146:653–661.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S0031182018001944 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Krasnov BR, Shenbrot GI, van der Mescht L, Warburton EM, Khokhlova IS (2019b) Phylogenetic and compositional diversity are governed by different rules: a study of fleas parasitic on small mammals in four biogeographic realms. Ecography (Early View) 42:1000–1011.  https://doi.org/10.1111/ecog.04224 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Laliberté E, Legendre P (2010) A distance-based framework for measuring functional diversity from multiple traits. Ecology 91:299–305.  https://doi.org/10.1890/08-2244.1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Legendre P (2008) Studying beta diversity: ecological variation partitioning by multiple regression and canonical analysis. J Plant Ecol 1:3–8.  https://doi.org/10.1093/jpe/rtm001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Legendre P (2014) Interpreting the replacement and richness difference components of beta diversity. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 23:1324–1334.  https://doi.org/10.1111/geb.12207 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Legendre P, Anderson MJ (1999) Distance-based redundancy analysis: testing multispecies responses in multifactorial ecological experiments. Ecol Monogr 69:1–24.  https://doi.org/10.1890/0012-9615(1999)069[0001:DBRATM]2.0.CO;2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Legendre P, Legendre L (1998) Numerical ecology, 2nd Engl edn. Elsevier, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  47. Lennon JJ, Koleff P, Greenwood JJD, Gaston KJ (2001) The geographical structure of British bird distributions: diversity, spatial turnover and scale. J Anim Ecol 70:966–979.  https://doi.org/10.1046/j.0021-8790.2001.00563.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Lichstein J (2007) Multiple regression on distance matrices: a multivariate spatial analysis tool. Plant Ecol 188:117–131.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11258-006-9126-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. MacArthur R, Levins R (1967) The limiting similarity, convergence, and divergence of coexisting species. Amer Nat 101:377–385.  https://doi.org/10.1086/282505 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Maddison WP, Maddison DR (2018) Mesquite: a modular system for evolutionary analysis, version 3.51. http://mesquiteproject.org
  51. Maestri R, Shenbrot GI, Krasnov BR (2017) Parasite beta diversity, host beta diversity and environment: application of two approaches to reveal patterns of flea species turnover in Mongolia. J Biogeogr 44:1880–1890.  https://doi.org/10.1111/jbi.13025 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Marshall AG (1981) The ecology of ectoparasitic insects. Acad Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  53. McQuaid CF, Britton NF (2013) Host-parasite nestedness: a result of co-evolving trait-values. Ecol Complex 13:53–59.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecocom.2013.01.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Medvedev SG (2014) The Palaearctic centers of taxonomic diversity of fleas (Siphonaptera). Entomol Rev 94:345–358.  https://doi.org/10.1134/S0013873814030075 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Oksanen J, Blanchet FG, Friendly M, Kindt R, Legendre P, McGlinn D, Minchin PR, O'Hara RB, Simpson GL, Solymos P, Stevens MHH, Szoecs E, Wagner H (2018) Vegan: community ecology package. R package version 2.5–2. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=vegan
  56. Paradis E, Claude J, Strimmer K (2004) APE: analyses of phylogenetics and evolution in R language. Bioinformatics 20:289–290.  https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btg412 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Pavoine S (2018) Adiv: analysis of diversity. R package version 1.2. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=adiv
  58. Poisot T, Guéeveneux-Julien C, Fortin M-J, Gravel D, Legendre P (2017) Hosts, parasites and their interactions respond to different climatic variables. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 26:242–251.  https://doi.org/10.1111/geb.12602 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Poulin R (2007) Evolutionary ecology of parasites: from individuals to communities, 2nd edn. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  60. Poulin R, Krasnov BR, Mouillot D (2011) Host specificity in phylogenetic and geographic space. Trends Parasitol 27:355–361.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pt.2011.05.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. R Core Team (2018) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna. URL https://www.R-project.org/
  62. Radovsky FJ (1985) Evolution of mammalian mesostigmatid mites. In: Kim KC (ed) Coevolution of parasitic arthropods and mammals. Wiley, New York, pp 441–504Google Scholar
  63. Raup DM, Crick RE (1979) Measurement of faunal similarity in paleontology. J Paleontol 53:1213–1227.  https://doi.org/10.2307/1304099 Google Scholar
  64. Rezende EL, Jordano P, Bascompte J (2007) Effects of phenotypic complementarity and phylogeny on the nested structure of mutualistic networks. Oikos 116:1919–1929.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0030-1299.2007.16029.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Ricotta C, Podani J, Pavoine S (2016) A family of functional dissimilarity measures for presence and absence data. Ecol Evol 6:5383–5389.  https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.2214 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Rocha M, Bini LM, Domisch S, Tolonen KT, Jyrkänkallio-Mikkola J, Soininen J, Hjort J, Heino J (2018) Local environment and space drive multiple facets of stream macroinvertebrate beta diversity. J Biogeogr 45:2744–2754.  https://doi.org/10.1111/jbi.13457 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Smith RJ (1999) Statistics of sexual size dimorphism. J Hum Evol 36:423–459.  https://doi.org/10.1006/jhev.1998.0281 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Soininen J, Jamoneau A, Rosebery J, Passy SI (2016) Global patterns and drivers of species and trait composition in diatoms. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 25:940–950.  https://doi.org/10.1111/geb.12452 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Spitz J, Ridoux V, Brind’Amour A (2014) Let’s go beyond taxonomy in diet description: testing a trait-based approach to prey-predator relationships. J Anim Ecol 83:1137–1148.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2656.12218 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Surkova EN, Warburton EM, van der Mescht L, Khokhlova IS, Krasnov BR (2018a) Body size and ecological traits in fleas parasitic on small mammals in the Palearctic: larger species attain higher abundance. Oecologia 188:559–569.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-018-4235-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Surkova EN, Korallo-Vinarskaya NP, Vinarski MV, Stanko M, Warburton EM, van der Mescht L, Khokhlova IS, Krasnov BR (2018b) Sexual size dimorphism and sex ratio in arthropod ectoparasites: contrasting patterns at different hierarchical scales. Int J Parasitol 48:969–978.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpara.2018.05.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Tilman D, Knops J, Wedin D, Reich P, Ritchie M, Siemann E (1997) The influence of functional diversity and composition on ecosystem processes. Science 277:1300–1302.  https://doi.org/10.1126/science.277.5330.1300 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Vinarski MV, Korallo-Vinarskaya NP (2016) An annotated catalogue of the gamasid mites associated with small mammals in Asiatic Russia. The family Laelapidae s. str. (Acari: Mesostigmata: Gamasina). Zootaxa 4111:223–245.  https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4111.3.2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Vinarski MV, Korallo-Vinarskaya NP (2017) An annotated catalogue of the gamasid mites associated with small mammals in Asiatic Russia. The family Haemogamasidae (Acari: Mesostigmata: Gamasina). Zootaxa 4273:001–018.  https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4273.1.1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Vinarski MV, Korallo NP, Krasnov BR, Shenbrot GI, Poulin R (2007) Decay of similarity of gamasid mite assemblages parasitic on Palaearctic small mammals: geographic distance, host-species composition or environment. J Biogeogr 34:1691–1700.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2699.2007.01735.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Walter DE, Proctor HC (1999) Mites: ecology, evolution and behaviour. Springer, Dordrecht, NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
  77. Walter DI, Proctor HC (2013) Mites: ecology, evolution & behaviour. Life at a microscale, 2nd edn. Springer, Dordrecht.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7164-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Warwick RM, Clarke KR (2001) Practical measures of marine biodiversity based on relatedness of species. Oceanogr Mar Biol Annu Rev 39:207–231Google Scholar
  79. Webb CO, Ackerly DD, McPeek MA, Donoghue MJ (2002) Phylogenies and community ecology. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 33:475–505.  https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ecolysis.33.010802.150448 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Whittaker RH (1960) Vegetation of the Siskiyou Mountains, Oregon and California. Ecol Monogr 30:279–338.  https://doi.org/10.2307/1943563 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Whittaker RH (1972) Evolution and measurement of species diversity. Taxon 21:213–251.  https://doi.org/10.2307/1218190 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Williams PH (1996) Mapping variations in the strength and breadth of biogeographic transition zones using species turnover. Proc R Soc B 263:579–588.  https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.1996.0087 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Wilson MW, Shmida A (1984) Measuring beta diversity with presence–absence data. J Ecol 72:1055–1064.  https://doi.org/10.2307/2259551 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Zemskaya AA (1973) Parasitic gamasid mites and their medical significance. Meditsina, Moscow (in Russian)Google Scholar
  85. Zhu Q, Hastriter MW, Whiting MF, Dittmar K (2015) Fleas (Siphonaptera) are cretaceous, and evolved with Theria. Mol Phyl Evol 90:129–139.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2015.04.027 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Mitrani Department of Desert Ecology, Swiss Institute of Dryland Environmental and Energy Research, Jacob Blaustein Institutes for Desert ResearchBen-Gurion University of the NegevMidreshet Ben-GurionIsrael
  2. 2.Laboratory of Arthropod-Borne Viral InfectionsOmsk Research Institute of Natural Foci InfectionsOmskRussian Federation
  3. 3.Omsk State Pedagogical UniversityOmskRussian Federation
  4. 4.Saint-Petersburg State UniversitySaint-PetersburgRussian Federation
  5. 5.Omsk State UniversityOmskRussian Federation
  6. 6.Wyler Department of Dryland Agriculture, French Associates Institute for Agriculture and Biotechnology of Drylands, Jacob Blaustein Institutes for Desert ResearchBen-Gurion University of the NegevMidreshet Ben-GurionIsrael

Personalised recommendations