Parasitology Research

, Volume 118, Issue 2, pp 707–710 | Cite as

Abomasal nematode species differ in their in vitro response to exsheathment triggers

  • Kiliana BekelaarEmail author
  • Tania Waghorn
  • Michael Tavendale
  • Catherine McKenzie
  • Dave Leathwick
Helminthology - Short Communication


A crucial step in the infection process of grazing ruminants by gastro-intestinal nematodes is the exsheathment of the infective third-stage larva following ingestion. Recently, heat shock was shown to play an important role in the carbon dioxide (CO2)–dependent exsheathment response in Haemonchus contortus. The current in vitro study set out to evaluate the role of heat shock in other abomasal species. In rumen fluid, all species tested exsheathed rapidly and efficiently in response to heat shock and CO2. This response was significantly higher compared to slow temperature changes, supporting the hypothesis that heat shock plays an important role in vivo. However, in artificial buffer, the effect of heat shock was species-dependent. For H. contortus and Ostertagia leptospicularis, the response in artificial buffer was similar to rumen fluid. In contrast, Ostertagia ostertagi and Teladorsagia circumcincta exsheathment was significantly lower and/or slower in artificial buffer, and there was no benefit of heat shock. For these two species, it appears that there are co-factors in the rumen fluid, in addition to heat shock and CO2, contributing to exsheathment. Overall, the data indicate that there are significant differences between abomasal species in their response to exsheathment triggers.


Exsheathment Temperature Heat shock Carbon dioxide Parasite Rumen fluid 



We thank Peter Janssen, Stefan Muetzel and Alec Mackay for their valuable input on this project.

Funding information

This project was supported by a research grant from the Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment’s Science and Innovation Group (MBIE), New Zealand (contract C10X1506).

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.


  1. Bekelaar K, Waghorn T, Tavendale M, McKenzie C, Leathwick D (2018) Heat shock, but not temperature, is a biological trigger for the exsheathment of third stage larvae of Haemonchus contortus. Parasitol Res 117:2395–2402. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Berbigier P, Gruner L, Mambrini M, Sophie SA (1990) Faecal water content and egg survival of goat gastro-intestinal strongyles under dry tropical conditions in Guadeloupe. Parasitol Res 76:379–385CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bisset SA, Knight JS, Bouchet CLG (2014) A multiplex PCR-based method to identify strongylid parasite larvae recovered from ovine faecal cultures and/or pasture samples. Vet Parasitol 200:117–127. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Borgsteede FH (1981) Experimental cross-infections with gastrointestinal nematodes of sheep and cattle. Z Parasitenkd 65:1–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. DeRosa AA, Chirgwin SR, Fletcher J, Williams JC, Klei TR (2005) Exsheathment of Ostertagia ostertagi infective larvae following exposure to bovine rumen contents derived from low and high roughage diets. Vet Parasitol 129:77–81. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Hendrix CM (1998) Common laboratory procedures for diagnosing parasitism. In: Diagnostic veterinary parasitology. Mosby Inc, St Louis MO, pp 239–277Google Scholar
  7. Hertzberg H, Huwyler U, Kohler L, Rehbein S, Wanner M (2002) Kinetics of exsheathment of infective ovine and bovine strongylid larvae in vivo and in vitro. Parasitology 125:65–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. MAFF (1986) Manual of Veterinary Parasitological Techniques. Technical Bulletin 18. Her Majesty’s Stationary Office (HMSO), London, UKGoogle Scholar
  9. Mavrot F, Hertzberg H, Torgerson P (2015) Effect of gastro-intestinal nematode infection on sheep performance: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Parasit Vectors 8:557. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Petronijevic T, Rogers WP (1987) Undissociated bases as the stimulus for the development of early parasitic stages of nematodes. Int J Parasitol 17:911–915CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Petronijevic T, Rogers WP, Sommerville RI (1985) Carbonic acid as the host signal for the development of parasitic stages of nematodes. Int J Parasitol 15:661–667CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Petronijevic T, Rogers WP, Sommerville RI (1986) Organic and inorganic acids as the stimulus for exsheathment of infective juveniles of nematodes. Int J Parasitol 16:163–168CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Rogers WP (1960) The physiology of infective processes of nematode parasites; the stimulus from the animal host. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 152:367–386CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Rogers WP, Sommerville RI (1960) The physiology of the second ecdysis of parasitic nematodes. Parasitology 50:329–348CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Saleem F, Bouatra S, Guo AC, Psychogios N, Mandal R, Dunn SM, Ametaj BN, Wishart DS (2013) The bovine ruminal fluid metabolome. Metabolomics 9:360–378. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Silverman PH, Podger KR (1964) In vitro exsheathment of some nematode infective larvae. Exp Parasitol 15:314–324CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Sommerville RI (1957) The exsheathing mechanism of nematode infective larvae. Exp Parasitol 6:18–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Sykes AR, Coop RL (2001) Interactions between nutrition and gastrointestinal parasitism in sheep. N Z Vet J 49:222–226. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Taylor A, Whitlock JH (1960) The exsheathing stimulus for infective larvae of Haemonchus contortus. Cornell Vet 50:339–344Google Scholar
  20. VSN International (2016) GenStat for Windows 18th Edition vol 18th Edition. VSN International, Hemel Hempstead, UKGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.AgResearch Ltd, Grasslands Research CentrePalmerston NorthNew Zealand

Personalised recommendations