Assessment of combined tools and strategies for Aedes aegypti control with low environmental impact
The control of the mosquito vector Aedes aegypti L. (Diptera: Culicidae) is the main action against dengue, chikungunya, and Zika. The excessive use of conventional insecticides has promoted the development of other control methods and strategies with lower environmental impact. We evaluated the effectiveness of applying triflumuron 1 ppm and emptying water-filled containers in a field trial in temperate Argentina. Both control methods were implemented either individually or combined and regularly from the beginning of the mosquito reproductive season or once it reached peak abundance. The impact on a non-target midge of the genus Chironomus was also tested. The highest reductions of Ae. aegypti were achieved in treatments which included triflumuron. This effect was stronger when applied from the beginning of the reproductive season, with < 1.3% of positive containers throughout the entire season. No enhancing effects were obtained when combining both control methods. Treatments with triflumuron were not completely innocuous for the non-target species, with Chironomus sp. more susceptible to treatments including triflumuron applied from the beginning of the reproductive season than all others. Sharp reductions of mosquito populations in urban environments with high density of water-filled containers are possible with minimum container management efforts, by applying triflumuron 1 ppm every 6 weeks. In temperate urban settings, better results can be obtained when applications begin early in the reproductive season of the mosquito vector Aedes aegypti.
KeywordsDengue Mosquito control Triflumuron Container management Non-target species Chironomus
The authors would like to thank the authorities of the cemeteries for allowing us to work inside their boundaries.
This work was financially supported by the Agencia Nacional de Promoción Científica y Tecnológica (PICT 2014-3217) and the Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (PIP 112-201301-00038).
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- Ali A (1991) Perspectives on management of pestiferous Chironomidae (Diptera), an emerging global problem. J Am Mosq Control Assoc 7:260–281Google Scholar
- Bang YH, Pant CP (1972) A field trial of abate larvicide for the control of Aedes aegypti in Bangkok, Thailand. Bull World Health Organ 46:416–425Google Scholar
- Bartón K (2013) MuMIn: Multi-model inference. R package version 1(15):6Google Scholar
- Batra CP, Mittal PK, Adak T, Ansari MA (2005) Efficacy of IGR compound Starycide 480 SC (triflumuron) against mosquito larvae in clear and polluted water. J Vector Borne Dis 42:109–116Google Scholar
- Chang MS, Christophel EM, Gopinath D, Abdur RM (2011) Challenges and future perspective for dengue vector control in the Western Pacific Region. Western Pac Surveill Response J 2:9–16Google Scholar
- Epler JH (2001) Identification Manual of the Larval Chironomidae (Diptera) of North and South Carolina. A guide to the taxonomy of the midges of the southeastern United States, including Florida. Special Publication SJ2001-SP13. North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources, Raleigh, NC, and St. Johns River Water Management District, PalatkaGoogle Scholar
- Giraldo-Calderón GI, Pérez M, Morales CA, Ocampo CB (2008) Evaluación del triflumurón y la mezcla de Bacillus thuringiensis más Bacillus sphaericus para el control de las formas inmaduras de Aedes aegypti y Culex quinquefasciatus en sumideros de Cali, Colombia. Biomedica 28:224–233CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Guzzetta G, Trentini F, Poletti P, Baldacchino FA, Montarsi F, Capelli G, Rizzoli A, Rosà R, Merler S, Melegaroet A (2017) Effectiveness and economic assessment of routine larviciding for prevention of chikungunya and dengue in temperate urban settings in Europe. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 11(9):e0005918. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0005918 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Kantor IN (2018) Dengue, zika, chikungunya and the development of vaccines. Medicina (B Aires) 78(1):23–28Google Scholar
- Oki M, Sunahara T, Hashizume M, Yamamoto T (2011) Optimal timing of insecticide fogging to minimize dengue cases: modeling dengue transmissions among various seasonalities and transmission intensities. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 5(10):e1367. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0001367 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Rossi GC, Mariluis JC, Schnack JA and Spinelli GR (2002) Dípteros vectores (Culicidae y Calliphoridae) de la Provincia de Buenos Aires. COBIOBO - PROBIOTA, La PlataeGoogle Scholar
- Soltani N, Rehimi N, Beldi H, Bendali F (1999) Activité du triflumuron sur Culex pipiens pipiens (Diptera: Culicidae) et impacts sur deux espèces larvivores non visées. Ann Soc Entomol Fr 35:502–508Google Scholar
- Sulaiman S, Siti Hajar AS, Othman HF (2004) Residual efficacy of insect growth regulators pyriproxyfen, triflumuron and s-methoprene against Aedes aegypti (L.) in plastic containers in the field. Trop Biomed 21:97–100Google Scholar
- Wiederholm T (1983) Chironomidae of the Holarctic region: keys and diagnoses. Part 1. Larvae. Scandinavian Entomology, Södra SandbyGoogle Scholar
- World Health Organization (2009) Dengue: guidelines for diagnosis, treatment, prevention and control. WHO, GenevaGoogle Scholar
- World Health Organization (2012) Handbook for integrated vector management. WHO, GenevaGoogle Scholar
- Yee DA (2008) Tires as habitats for mosquitoes: a review of studies within the eastern United States. J Med Entomol 45:581–593Google Scholar
- Zuur AF, Leno EN, Walker NJ, Saveliev AA and Smith GM (2009) Mixed effects models and extensions in ecology with R. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar