Advertisement

Springer Nature is making SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

Ontogeny of the appendicularian Oikopleura dioica (Tunicata, Chordata) reveals characters similar to ascidian larvae with sessile adults

Abstract

Appendicularians have always occupied a central role in considerations of tunicate and chordate evolution. Two hypotheses have been proposed – one holds that appendicularia represents the sister taxon to the remaining tunicates, the other suggests that appendicularians were derived from an ascidian-like ancestor. In the present study I report results from electron microscopic investigation of larval tunicates including the first electron microscopic investigation of the tail of the early ontogenetic appendicularian “Streckform” and discuss their phylogenetic implications. The early “Streckform” of Oikopleura dioica Fol, 1872 is invested with an extracellular covering that consists of an inner electron-light layer and an electron-dense outermost layer. In addition, the extracellular covering forms fin blades. Because these traits are shown to be similar to the tunic of different ascidian larvae, the extracellular covering in early appendicularian embryos is suggested to be homologous to the larval tunic of ascidian larvae. Overall, the tail of early developmental stages of appendicularians consists of a mosaic of apomorphic and plesiomorphic features. The straight, continuous endodermal strand was inherited from a common chordate ancestor whereas the finlets of larvae, consisting of extracellular material, were inherited from a common tunicate ancestor. The horizontal orientation of the tail as a whole was inherited from the last common ancestor of appendicularians and aplousobranch ascidians, and the discovered floating extension at the posterior tip of the tail is unique to the holoplanktonic Oikopleura dioica. These findings support the hypothesis that Appendicularia is derived from a sessile, ascidian-like ancestor.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

References

  1. Alldredge A (1976) Appendicularians. Sci Am 235:94–102

  2. Berrill NJ (1950) The Tunicata with an account of the British species. Ray Society, London

  3. Brien P (1948) C. – Embranchement des Tuniciers. Mreproduction. In: Grassé P-P (ed) Traité de Zoologie, vol XI. Masson et Cie, Paris, pp 553–930

  4. Britz R, Bartsch P (2003) The myth of dorsal ribs in gnathostome vertebrates. Proc R Soc B 270:1–4

  5. Burighel P, Cloney RA (1997) Urochordata: ascidiacea. In: Harrison FW, Ruppert EE (eds) Microscopic anatomy of invertebrates, vol 15. Wiley-Liss, New York, pp 221–337

  6. Cañestro C, Bassham S, Postlethwait J (2005) Development of the central nervous system in the larvacean Oikopleura dioica and the evolution of the chordate brain. Dev Biol 15:298–315

  7. Christen R, Braconnot J-C (1998) Molecular phylogeny of tunicates. A preliminary study using 28S ribosomal RNA partial sequences: implications in terms of evolution and ecology. In: Bone Q (ed) The biology of pelagic tunicates. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 265–273

  8. Delsman HC (1910) Beiträge zur Entwicklungsgeschichte von Oikopleura dioica. Verh Rijksinsti Onderz Zee 3:3–24

  9. Delsman HC (1912) Weitere Beobachtungen über die Entwicklung von Oikopleura dioica. Tijdskr Nederl Dierk Ver 12:197–205

  10. Delsuc F, Brinkmann H, Chourrout D, Philippe H (2006) Tunicates and not cephalochordates are the closest living relatives of vertebrates. Nature 439:965–968

  11. Dolcemascolo G, Gianguzza M (2004) Early stages of test formation in larva of Ascidia malaca (Tunicata, Ascidiacea): ultrastructural and cytochemical investigations. Micron 35:261–271

  12. Fenaux R (1976) Cycle vitale d’un appendiculaire: Oikopleura dioica Fol, 1872. Description et chronologie. Annales de l’institut Oceanographique 52:89–107

  13. Fenaux R (1998) Life history of the Appendicularia. In: Bone Q (ed) The biology of pelagic tunicates. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 151–159

  14. Galt CP (1972) Development of Oikopleura dioica (Urochordata: Larvacea): ontogeny of behavior and of organ systems related to construction and use of the house. PhD thesis. University of Washington, Seattle, pp 1–84

  15. Garstang W (1928) The morphology of the Tunicata and its bearing on the phylogeny of the Chordata. Q J Microsc Sci 72:51–187

  16. Hall BK (1995) Homology and embryonic development. Evol Biol 28:1–37

  17. Kowalevsky A (1866) Entwicklungsgeschichte der einfachen Ascidien. Mem Acad Imperiale Sci St.-Petersbourg 10:1–19

  18. Kryzanowzsky SG (1939) Das Rekapitulationsprinzip und die historische Auffassung der Ontogenese. A Zool 20:1–87

  19. Lacalli TC (2005) Protochordate body plan and the evolutionary role of larvae: old controversies resolved? Can J Zool 83:216–224

  20. Lamarck JB (1816) Histoire naturelle des animaux sans vertebres. III. Verdiere, Paris, pp 80–130

  21. Lohmann H (1933) Erste Klasse der Tunicaten: appendiculariae. In: Lohmann H, Kükenthal W, Krumbach T (eds) Handbuch der Zoologie, vol2. De Gruyter, Leipzig, pp 15–202

  22. McHenry MJ, Patek SN (2004) The evolution of larval morphology and swimming performance in ascidians. Evolution 58:1209–1224

  23. Nielsen C (2001) Animal evolution. Interrelationships of the living phyla, 2nd edn. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 1–578

  24. Nishino A, Satoh N (2001) The simple tail of chordates: phylogenetic significance of appendicularians. Genesis 29:36–45

  25. Power JH (1989) Sink or swim: growth dynamics and zooplankton hydromechanics. Am Nat 133:706–721

  26. Ruppert EE (1997) Introduction: microscopic anatomy of the notochord, heterochrony, and chordate evolution. In: Harrison FW, Ruppert EE (eds) Microscopic anatomy of invertebrates, vol 15. Wiley-Liss, New York, pp 1–13

  27. Ruppert EE (2005) Key characters uniting hemichordates and chordates: homologies or homoplasies? Can J Zool 83:8–23

  28. Seeliger O (1885) Die Entwicklungsgeschichte der socialen Ascidien. Jena Zeitschr Naturw 18:45–120

  29. Seo H-C, Edvardsen RB, Maeland AD, Bjordal M, Jensen MF, Hansen A, Flaat M, Weissenbach J, Lehrach H, Wincker P, Reinhardt R, Chourrout D (2004) Hox cluster disintegration with persistent anteroposterior order of expression in Oikopleura dioica. Nature 431:67–71

  30. Stach T (2005) Comparison of the serotonergic nervous system among Tunicata: implications for its evolution within Chordata. Organ Divers Evol 5:15–24

  31. Stach T, Turbeville JM (2002) Phylogeny of Tunicata inferred from molecular and morphological characters. Mol Phyl Evol 25:408–428

  32. Stach T, Turbeville JM (2005) The role of appendicularians in chordate evolution—a phylogenetic analysis of molecular and morphological characters, with remarks on “neotenyscenarios”. In: Youngbluth MJ, Deibel D (eds) Responses of marine ecosystems to global change. Ecological impact of appendicularians. Contemporary Publishing International, Paris, pp 9–26

  33. Swalla BJ, Cameron CB, Corley LS, Garey JR (2000) Urochordates are monophyletic within the deuterostomes. Syst Biol 49:52–64

Download references

Acknowledgments

The author wishes to express his sincere gratitude to J.-M. Bouquet and Dr. D. Chourrout at the SARS International Center for Marine Molecular Biology in Bergen (Norway). Expertise and help of A. Kirbach and J. Winter is appreciated. This work was supported by DFG grant STA 655/1–1.

Author information

Correspondence to Thomas Stach.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Stach, T. Ontogeny of the appendicularian Oikopleura dioica (Tunicata, Chordata) reveals characters similar to ascidian larvae with sessile adults. Zoomorphology 126, 203–214 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00435-007-0041-5

Download citation

Keywords

  • Tunicate
  • Urochordate
  • Larvacea
  • Phylogeny
  • Evolution
  • Development
  • Tail