Patient-reported outcomes in the phase 3 BFORE trial of bosutinib versus imatinib for newly diagnosed chronic phase chronic myeloid leukemia
In the phase 3 BFORE trial (NCT02130557), treatment with bosutinib resulted in a significantly higher major molecular response rate at 12 months versus imatinib in the modified intent-to-treat (mITT) population of patients with newly diagnosed chronic phase chronic myeloid leukemia (CP CML). Assessment of patient-reported outcomes (PROs) was an exploratory objective.
Patients with newly diagnosed CP CML were randomized 1:1 to receive once-daily bosutinib 400 mg or imatinib 400 mg as first-line therapy. Patients completed the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Leukemia (FACT-Leu) and EuroQoL-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) questionnaires at baseline, every 3 months for the first 24 months of treatment, every 6 months thereafter, and at treatment completion. We report PRO results at month 12 in the mITT population (bosutinib: n = 246; imatinib: n = 241).
Mean FACT-Leu combined and subscale scores were similar at baseline in the bosutinib and imatinib arms; at month 12, all scores demonstrated improvement or maintenance of health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in both treatment arms. Repeated-measures mixed-effects models showed no significant difference between bosutinib and imatinib for any FACT-Leu score. Functional health status, as measured by EQ-5D, also demonstrated improvement or maintenance with bosutinib and imatinib at month 12.
Similar improvements in PROs compared with baseline were seen after 12 months of treatment with first-line bosutinib or imatinib in the BFORE trial. Newly diagnosed patients with CP CML receiving bosutinib or imatinib can preserve or improve HRQoL during treatment, although clinical efficacy was superior with bosutinib.
KeywordsBosutinib Chronic myeloid leukemia Health-related quality of life Imatinib Patient-reported outcomes
This study (ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02130557) was sponsored by Avillion LLP under a collaborative development agreement with Pfizer Inc. Medical writing support was provided by Joanna Bloom, PhD, of Engage Scientific Solutions and was funded by Pfizer. The authors would like to thank Irina Dyagil for her contributions to collection, assembly, and analysis of data, and Laurence Reilly and Allison Jeynes-Ellis of Avillion LLP, London, UK, for their contributions to study design and data analysis.
This study was sponsored by Avillion LLP under a collaborative development agreement with Pfizer Inc.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
JEC: consultancy (ARIAD, Bristol-Myers Squibb, ImmunoGen, Novartis, Pfizer, Takeda) and research funding (ARIAD, Bristol-Myers Squibb, ImmunoGen, Novartis, Sun Pharma, Pfizer, Takeda, Teva). CG-P: consultancy (Bristol-Myers Squibb) and honoraria and research funding (Pfizer). MWD: advisory board (Blue Print, Pfizer, Ascentage Pharma, and Humana), consultancy (Blue Print, Pfizer, Ascentage Pharma, and TRM), research funding (Pfizer), and study management committee (Blue Print and Takeda). MJM: consultancy (Bristol-Myers Squibb). CC: honoraria (Bristol-Myers Squibb, Chiltern, Novartis, and Otsuka) and travel (Pfizer). D-WK: consultancy (Bristol-Myers Squibb, Il-Yang, Novartis), honoraria, and research funding (Bristol-Myers Squibb, Il-Yang, Novartis, Pfizer), membership on board of directors or advisory committees (Bristol-Myers Squibb), and speakers bureau (Bristol-Myers Squibb, Novartis, Pfizer). DM: consultancy and honoraria (ARIAD, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Novartis, Pfizer) and honoraria and speakers bureau (Incyte). PlC: honoraria (ARIAD, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Incyte, Novartis, Pfizer) and research funding (Novartis). VG-G: consultancy, honoraria, and research funding (Bristol-Myers Squibb, Incyte, Novartis, Pfizer). RC: equity ownership (Pfizer and GlaxoSmithKline). CM: employment and equity ownership (Pfizer). AR: employment (Pfizer). AH: research funding (Bristol-Myers Squibb, Incyte, Novartis, Pfizer). THB: consultancy (Novartis, Pfizer, Janssen, Merck, Takeda) and research funding (Novartis, Pfizer).
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
- Cella D (1997) F.A.C.I.T. manual. Manual of the functional assessment of chronic illness therapy (FACIT) scales, v4. Center on Outcomes, Research and Education (CORE). Evanston Northwestern Healthcare, and Northwestern University, EvanstonGoogle Scholar
- Hughes TP et al (2010) Long-term prognostic significance of early molecular response to imatinib in newly diagnosed chronic myeloid leukemia: an analysis from the International randomized study of interferon and STI571 (IRIS). Blood 116:3758–3765. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2010-03-273979 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Kantarjian HM, Deisseroth A, Kurzrock R, Estrov Z, Talpaz M (1993) Chronic myelogenous leukemia: a concise update. Blood 82:691–703Google Scholar
- Kantarjian HM et al (2018) Long-term patient-reported outcomes from an open-label safety and efficacy study of bosutinib in Philadelphia chromosome-positive chronic myeloid leukemia patients resistant or intolerant to prior therapy. Cancer 124:587–595. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.31082 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Pfizer Inc (2017) Bosulif® (bosutinib) prescribing information. Pfizer Inc, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- van Reenan M, Oppe M (2015) EQ-5D-3L user guide, v5.1. Basic information on how to use the EQ-5D-3L instrument. EuroQol Research Foundation. https://euroqol.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/EQ-5D-3L_UserGuide_2015.pdf. Accessed Mar 28 2018
- Whiteley J, Reisman A, Shapiro M, Cortes J, Cella D (2016) Health-related quality of life during bosutinib (SKI-606) therapy in patients with advanced chronic myeloid leukemia after imatinib failure. Curr Med Res Opin 32:1325–1334. https://doi.org/10.1185/03007995.2016.1174108 CrossRefGoogle Scholar