Springer Nature is making SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

Evaluating the effect of clinical care pathways on quality of cancer care: analysis of breast, colon and rectal cancer pathways

Abstract

Purpose

Substantial gaps exist between clinical practice and evidence-based cancer care, potentially leading to adverse clinical outcomes and decreased quality of life for cancer patients. This study aimed to evaluate the usefulness of clinical pathways as a tool for improving quality of cancer care, using breast, colon, and rectal cancer pathways as demonstrations.

Methods

Newly diagnosed patients with invasive breast, colon, and rectal cancer were enrolled as pre-pathway groups, while patients with the same diagnoses treated according to clinical pathways were recruited for post-pathway groups.

Results

Compliance with preoperative core biopsy or fine-needle aspiration, utilization of sentinel lymph node biopsy, and proportion of patients whose tumor hormone receptor status was stated in pathology report were significantly increased after implementation of clinical pathway for breast cancer. For colon cancer, compliance with two care processes was significantly improved: surgical resection with anastomosis and resection of at least 12 lymph nodes. Regarding rectal cancer, there was a significant increase in compliance with preoperative evaluation of depth of tumor invasion, total mesorectal excision treatment of middle- or low-position rectal cancer, and proportion of patients who had undergone rectal cancer surgery whose pathology report included margin status. Moreover, total length of hospital stay was decreased remarkably for all three cancer types, and postoperative complications remained unchanged following implementation of the clinical pathways.

Conclusions

Clinical pathways can improve compliance with standard care by implementing evidence-based quality indicators in daily practice, which could serve as a useful tool for narrowing the gap between clinical practice and evidence-based care.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

References

  1. Aeyels D, Van Vugt S, Sinnaeve PR, Panella M, Van Zelm R, Sermeus W, Vanhaecht K (2015) Lack of evidence and standardization in care pathway documents for patients with ST-elevated myocardial infarction. Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs. doi:10.1177/1474515115580237

  2. Badakhshi H, Gruen A, Sehouli J, Budach V, Boehmer D (2013) The impact of patient compliance with adjuvant radiotherapy: a comprehensive cohort study. Cancer Med 2:712–717

  3. Bao H, Yang FJ, Wang XY, Su SF, Liu D, Fu R, Zhang HM, Liu MN (2015) Developing a set of quality indicators for breast cancer care in China. Int J Qual Health Care 27:291–296

  4. Beaupre LA, Cinats JG, Senthilselvan A, Lier D, Jones CA, Scharfenberger A, Johnston DW, Saunders LD (2006) Reduced morbidity for elderly patients with a hip fracture after implementation of a perioperative evidence-based clinical pathway. Qual Saf Health Care 15:375–379

  5. Bernardshaw SV, Øvrebø K, Eide GE, Skarstein A, Røkke O (2006) Treatment of rectal cancer: reduction of local recurrence after the introduction of TME—experience from One University Hospital. Dig Surg 23:51–59

  6. Breslin TM, Caughran J, Pettinga J, Wesen C, Mehringer A, Yin H, Share D, Silver SM (2011) Improving breast cancer care through a regional quality collaborative. Surgery 150:635–642

  7. Bruening W, Fontanarosa J, Tipton K, Treadwell JR, Launders J, Schoelles K (2010) Systematic review: comparative effectiveness of core-needle and open surgical biopsy to diagnose breast lesions. Ann Intern Med 152:238–246

  8. Campion FX, Larson LR, Kadlubek PJ, Earle CC, Neuss MN (2011) Advancing performance measurement in oncology: quality oncology practice initiative participation and quality outcomes. J Oncol Pract 7:31s–35s

  9. Carlsen E, Schlichting E, Guldvog I, Johnson E, Heald RJ (1998) Effect of the introduction of total mesorectal excision for the treatment of rectal cancer. Br J Surg 85:526–529

  10. De Bleser L, Depreitere R, De Waele K, Vanhaecht K, Vlayen J, Sermeus W (2006) Defining pathways. J Nurs Manag 14:553–563

  11. Eberth JM, Xu Y, Smith GL, Shen Y, Jiang J, Buchholz TA, Hunt KK, Black DM, Giordano SH, Whitman GJ, Yang W, Shen C, Elting L, Smith BD (2014) Surgeon influence on use of needle biopsy in patients with breast cancer: a national medicare study. J Clin Oncol 32:2206–2216

  12. Fan L, Strasser-Weippl K, Li JJ, St Louis J, Finkelstein DM, Yu KD, Chen WQ, Shao ZM, Goss PE (2014) Breast cancer in China. Lancet Oncol 15:e279–e289

  13. Fisher AA, Poole RL, Machie R, Tsang C, Baugh N, Utley K, Kerner JA Jr (1997) Clinical pathway for pediatric parenteral nutrition. Nutr Clin Pract 12:76–80

  14. Frei CR, Bell AM, Traugott KA, Jaso TC, Daniels KR, Mortensen EM, Restrepo MI, Oramasionwu CU, Ruiz AD, Mylchreest WR, Sikirica V, Raut MR, Fisher A, Schein JR (2011) A clinical pathway for community-acquired pneumonia: an observational cohort study. BMC Infect Dis 11:188

  15. Gray JE, Laronga C, Siegel EM, Lee JH, Fulp WJ, Fletcher M, Schreiber F, Brown R, Levine R, Cartwright T, Abesada-Terk G Jr, Kim G, Alemany C, Faig D, Sharp P, Markham MJ, Shibata D, Malafa M, Jacobsen PB (2011) Degree of variability in performance on breast cancer quality indicators: findings from the Florida initiative for quality cancer care. J Oncol Pract 7:247–251

  16. Hewitt M et al (2006) Measuring the quality of cancer care: the national initiative for cancer care quality (NICCQ). Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation. http://www.rand.org/pubs/research_briefs/RB9219. Accessed 21 June 2013

  17. Higashi T, Nakamura F, Saruki N, Sobue T (2013) Establishing a quality measurement system for cancer care in Japan. Jpn J Clin Oncol 43:225–232

  18. Ishiguro S, Yamamoto S, Fujita S, Akasu T, Kobayashi Y, Moriya Y (2008) Effect of a clinical pathway after laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer. Hepatogastroenterology 55:1315–1319

  19. Kesson EM, Allardice GM, George WD, Burns HJ, Morrison DS (2012) Effects of multidisciplinary team working on breast cancer survival: retrospective, comparative, interventional cohort study of 13722 women. BMJ 344:e2718

  20. Lemmens L, Van Zelm R, Borel Rinkes I, Van Hillegersberg R, Kerkkamp H (2009) Clinical and organizational content of clinical pathways for digestive surgery: a systematic review. Dig Surg 26:91–99

  21. Lovrics P, Hodgson N, O'Brien MA, Thabane L, Cornacchi S, Coates A, Heller B, Reid S, Sanders K, Simunovic M (2014) Results of a surgeon-directed quality improvement project on breast cancer surgery outcomes in South-Central Ontario. Ann Surg Oncol 21:2181–2187

  22. Lyman GH (2005) ASCO guideline recommendations for sentinel lymph node biopsy in early-stage breast cancer: guideline summary. J Oncol Pract 1:134–136

  23. Malin JL, Schneider EC, Epstein AM, Adams J, Emanuel EJ, Kahn KL (2006) Results of the national initiative for cancer care quality: how can we improve the quality of cancer care in the United States? J Clin Oncol 24:626–634

  24. Panella M, Marchisio S, Di Stanislao F (2003) Reducing clinical variations with clinical pathways: do pathways work? Int J Qual Health Care 15:509–521

  25. Panella M, Marchisio S, Demarchi ML, Manzoli L, Di Stanislao F (2009) Reduced in-hospital mortality for heart failure with clinical pathways: the results of a cluster randomised controlled trial. Qual Saf Health Care 18:369–373

  26. Panella M, Marchisio S, Brambilla R, Vanhaecht K, Di Stanislao F (2012) A cluster randomized trial to assess the effect of clinical pathways for patients with stroke: results of the clinical pathways for effective and appropriate care study. BMC Med 10:71–82

  27. Rotter T, Kinsman L, James E, Machotta A, Willis J, Snow P, Kugler J (2012) The effects of clinical pathways on professional practice, patient outcomes, length of stay, and hospital costs: Cochrane systematic review and meta-analysis. Eval Health Prof 35:3–27

  28. Siegel EM, Jacobsen PB, Malafa M, Fulp W, Fletcher M, Lee JH, Smith JC, Brown R, Levine R, Cartwright T, Abesada-Terk G Jr, Kim G, Alemany C, Faig D, Sharp P, Markham MJ, Shibata D (2012) Evaluating the quality of colorectal cancer care in the state of Florida: results from the Florida initiative for quality cancer care. J Oncol Pract 8:239–245

  29. So JB, Lim ZL, Lin HA, Ti TK (2008) Reduction of hospital stay and cost after the implementation of a clinical pathway for radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer. Gastric Cancer 11:81–85

  30. Tastan S, Hatipoglu S, Iyigun E, Kilic S (2012) Implementation of a clinical pathway in breast cancer patients undergoing breast surgery. Eur J Oncol Nurs 16:368–374

  31. Uzark K (2003) Clinical pathways for monitoring and advancing congenital heart disease care. Prog Pediatr Cardiol 18:131–139

  32. Vanhaecht K (2007) The impact of clinical pathways on the organisation of care processes. Dissertation, Catholic University Leuven

  33. Zhang HM, Bao H, Fu R, Liu D, Liu MN (2015) Development of quality indicators for colorectal cancer care in Chinese Hospital. Chin J Hosp Stat (in Chinese) 1:1–4

  34. Zhao K, Zhang Y, Ma L, Sui BY (2013) Evaluation of the effectiveness and current status of clinical pathway management trials in public hospitals: based on data collected through the clinical pathway platform. Chin Health Econ (in Chinese) 32:76–80

Download references

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank the financial support of National Natural Science Foundation of China.

Funding

This study was funded by National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Number 81273183).

Author information

Correspondence to Meina Liu.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

We declare that we have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bao, H., Yang, F., Su, S. et al. Evaluating the effect of clinical care pathways on quality of cancer care: analysis of breast, colon and rectal cancer pathways. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 142, 1079–1089 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00432-015-2106-z

Download citation

Keywords

  • Quality of care
  • Quality improvement
  • Clinical pathway
  • Cancer