Advertisement

Formula feeding increases the risk of antibiotic prescriptions in children up to 2 years: results from a cohort study

  • Simona Di MarioEmail author
  • Carlo Gagliotti
  • Andrea Donatini
  • Sergio Battaglia
  • Rossella Buttazzi
  • Sara Balduzzi
  • Silvana Borsari
  • Vittorio Basevi
  • Luca Barbieri
  • and the Regional breastfeeding monitoring group
Original Article

Abstract

Association between the use of infant formula and risks for infants’ health is seldom studied in western countries. We set up a historical cohort based on record linkage analysis, combining the data from administrative databases providing individual data. Infants receiving the second dose of pediatric immunization between 2015 and 2017 were included. The main outcome measure was antibiotic prescriptions from enrolment up to 24 months of age, by infant feeding category at enrolment. The extended Cox regression technique was used to account for recurrent events. The infants’ cohort included 40,258 5-month-old infants; during the study period, 60,932 antibiotic prescriptions were filled. Compared with infants fully breastfed, children fed with both maternal milk and formula received 106 more antibiotic prescriptions per 1000 children/year, whereas infants receiving formula only had 138 excess prescriptions per 1000 children/year. The association with infant feeding was statistically significant and remained unchanged after adjustment for common confounders (adjusted hazard ratio, HR, for complementary feeding vs full breastfeeding 1.09; 95%CI 1.05 to 1.12; formula only versus full breastfeeding adj. HR 1.12; 95%CI 1.08 to 1.16).

Conclusion: In our cohort, we observed a positive association between infant formula use considered a proxy of infections antibiotic prescription rate, considered a proxy of infections. The association followed a gradient.

What is Known:

• Formula feeding is associated with increased morbidity and mortality even in western countries, but still, it is common.

• Information on formula are seldom unbiased; thus, public perception of risks is distorted.

What is New:

• In a large Italian cohort of infants, formula feeding at 5 months of age results to be associated with an increased rate of antibiotic prescription (considered to be a proxy of infection) up to 24 months of age: the association follows a dose-response relationship.

• Record linkage analysis using administrative databases provides useful information at a limited cost.

Keywords

Breastfeeding Infections Record linkage analysis Italy 

Abbreviations

BF

Breastfeeding

BMI

Body mass index

DRG

Diagnosis-related group

95%CI

95% confidence interval

HR

Hazard ratio

ICD-IX

International Classification of Diseases, 9th edition

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to thank Bruna Borgini (biologist), Michela Bragliani (biologist), and Elena Castelli (biologist) (Emilia-Romagna region) for administrative support at regional level; APEC (Association of Community Pediatricians) for conceiving and sustaining the monitoring system since 1999. Finally, the authors are sincerely grateful to all parents and caregivers who participated to the survey for providing infant feeding information. The authors also thank the following members of the Regional breastfeeding monitoring group (2015-2017): Cristina Barella (MD), Angela Castellana (nurse), Carla Ghigini (nurse), Roberto Maffi (nurse), Ilario Maffini (MD), Anna Maria Milani (MD), Raffaella Pellizzari (nurse), and Marilena Prazzoli (MD) (Piacenza AUSL); Giovanna Bussolati (MD), Icilio Dodi (MD), Emanuela Ferraroni (MD), and Nicoletta Piazza (MD) (Parma AUSL); Marina Sparano (midwife), Luigi Moscara (MD), and Alessandro Volta (MD) (Reggio Emilia AUSL); Giulio Sighinolfi (MD) and Maria Vezzani (MD) (Modena AUSL); Paola Lenzi (nurse) and Rita Ricci (MD) (Bologna AUSL); Barbara Baldisserri (nurse), Paola Caroli (MD), Lucia Suzzi (midwife), and Elisabetta Valenti (MD) (Imola AUSL); Massimo Cornale (MD), Chiara Cuoghi (MD), and Flavia Pascoletti (MD) (Ferrara AUSL); Luisa Baldi (nurse), Giovanna Cappelli (nurse), Oriana Gasperoni (midwife), Annarita Loreti (nurse), Giuliana Monti (MD), Claudia Muratori (MD), Norma Pelliconi (nurse), and Ivonne Zoffoli (MD) (ex Ravenna AUSL); Anna Maria Baldoni (MD) (ex Forlì AUSL); Antonella Brunelli (MD), Massimo Farneti (MD), Marcella Lombardi (midwife), and Fosca Marrone (MD) (ex Cesena AUSL); Maurizio Bigi (MD), Roberta Gabellini (nurse), Antonella Mazzocchi (midwife), and Morena Vanni (nurse) (ex Rimini AUSL).

Authors’ Contributions

Simona Di Mario conceived the idea to carry out the record linkage analysis, designed the study, wrote the first draft of the paper, and submitted it to the journal; Carlo Gagliotti developed the analysis plan and run it; Andrea Donatini supported the study design and performed the record linkage; Sergio Battaglia supported the study design and performed the record linkage; Rossella Buttazzi extracted and analyzed the data; Sara Balduzzi supported and checked the data analysis; Silvana Borsari supervised and coordinated the research team; Vittorio Basevi performed the literature search for background information; Luca Barbieri supervised and coordinated the research team. All the authors revised and approved the final version of the manuscript.

Compliance with ethical statements

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Supplementary material

431_2019_3462_MOESM1_ESM.docx (13 kb)
ESM 1 (DOCX 13 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Achten NB, Dorigo-Zetsma JW, van der Linden PD, van Brakel M, Plötz FB (2018) Sepsis calculator implementation reduces empiric antibiotics for suspected early-onset sepsis. Eur J Pediatr 177:741-746.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00431-018-3113-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Amorim LDAF, Cai J (2015) Modelling recurrent events: a tutorial for analysis in epidemiology. Int J Epidemiol 44:324-333.  https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyu222.324-333
  3. 3.
    Anderson H, Vuillermin P, Jachno K, Allen KJ, Tang ML, Collier F, Kemp A, Ponsonby AL, Burgner D, Barwon Infant Study Investigator Group (2017) Prevalence and determinants of antibiotic exposure in infants: a population-derived Australian birth cohort study. J Paediatr Child Health 53:942-949.  https://doi.org/10.1111/jpc.13616 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Balogun OO, Dagvadorj A, Yourkavitch J, da Silva Lopes K, Suto M, Takemoto Y, Mori R, Rayco-Solon P, Ota E (2017) Health facility staff training for improving breastfeeding outcome: a systematic review for step 2 of the Baby-Friendly Hospital Initiative. Breastfeed Med 12:537-546.  https://doi.org/10.1089/bfm.2017.0040 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Beasley A, Amir LH (2007) Policy on infant formula industry funding, support or sponsorship of articles submitted for publication. Int Breastfeed J 2:5.  https://doi.org/10.1186/1746-4358-2-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bentley JP, Simpson JM, Bowen JR, Morris JM, Roberts CL, Nassar N (2016) Gestational age, mode of birth and breastmilk feeding all influence acute early childhood gastroenteritis: a record-linkage cohort study. BMC Pediatr 16:55.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s12887-016-0591-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bonnet C, Blondel B, Piedvache A, Wilson E, Bonamy AE, Gortner L, Rodrigues C, van Heijst A, Draper ES, Cuttini M, Zeitlin J, EPICE Research Group (2018) Low breastfeeding continuation to 6 months for very preterm infants: a European multiregional cohort study. Matern Child Nutr 15:e12657.  https://doi.org/10.1111/mcn.12657 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bowatte G, Tham R, Dai X (2015) Breastfeeding and childhood acute otitis media: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Acta Paediatr 104:85-95.  https://doi.org/10.1111/apa.13151 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Brady JP, Brady JP (2012) Marketing breast milk substitutes: problems and perils throughout the world. Arch Dis Child 97:529-532.  https://doi.org/10.1136/archdischild-2011-301299 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Clavenna A, Bonati M (2011) Differences in antibiotic prescribing in paediatric outpatients. Arch Dis Child 96:590-595.  https://doi.org/10.1136/adc.2010.183541 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Di Mario S, Borsari S, Verdini E, Battaglia S, Cisbani L, Sforza S, Cuoghi C, Basevi V (2017) Regular monitoring of breast-feeding rates: feasible and sustainable. The Emilia-Romagna experience. Public Health Nutr 20:1895-1902.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S136898001700074X CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Di Mario S, Gagliotti C, Buttazzi R, Cisbani L, Di Girolamo C, Brambilla A, Moro ML, regional working group “Progetto ProBA-Progetto Bambini e Antibiotici-2014” (2018) Observational pre-post study showed that a quality improvement project reduced paediatric antibiotic prescribing rates in primary care. Acta Paediatr 107:1805-1809.  https://doi.org/10.1111/apa.14381 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Duijts L, Jaddoe VWV, Hofman A, Moll HA (2010) Prolonged and exclusive breastfeeding reduces the risk of infectious diseases in infancy. Pediatrics 126:e18-e25.  https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2008-3256 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Eidelman AI, Schanler RJ, American Acedemy of Pediatrics (2012) Breastfeeding and the use of human milk. Pediatrics 129:e827-e841.  https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2011-3552 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Esaiassen E, Fjalstad JW, Juvet LK, van den Anker JN, Klingenberg C (2017) Antibiotic exposure in neonates and early adverse outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Antimicrob Chemother 72:1858-1870.  https://doi.org/10.1093/jac/dkx08836 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Fabbri A, Holland TJ, Bero LA (2018) Food industry sponsorship of academic research: investigating commercial bias in the research agenda. Public Health Nutr 21:3422-3430.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S1368980018002100 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Feldman-Winter L, Szucs K, Milano A, Gottschlich E, Sisk B, Schanler RJ (2017) National trends in pediatricians’ practices and attitudes about breastfeeding: 1995 to 2014. Pediatrics 140:e20171229.  https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2017-1229 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Hartz LE, Bradshaw W, Brandon DH (2015) Potential NICU environmental influences on the neonate’s microbiome: a systematic review. Adv Neonatal Care 15:324-335.  https://doi.org/10.1097/ANC.000000000000022042. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Hawkins SS, Griffiths LJ, Dezateux C, Law C, Millennium Cohort Study Child Health Group (2007) The impact of maternal employment on breast-feeding duration in the UK Millennium Cohort Study. Public Health Nutr 10:891-896.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S1368980007226096 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Hernandez Perez M, feminine C, Diaz-Gomez NM, Romero Manzano AM, Díaz Gómez JM, Rodríguez Pérez V, Jiménez Sosa A (2018) Effectiveness of an intervention to improve breastfeeding knowledge and attitudes among adolescents. Rev Esp Salud Publica 92:e201806033Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Howard CR, Howard FM, Weitzman ML (1994) Infant formula distribution and advertising in pregnancy: a hospital survey. Birth 21:14-19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Ip S, Chung M, Raman G, Chew P, Magula N, DeVine D, Trikalinos T, Lau J (2007) Breastfeeding and maternal and infant health outcomes in developed countries. Evid Rep Technol Assess (Full Rep) 1-186Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Kristensen K, Fisker N, Haerskjold A, Ravn H, Simões EA, Stensballe L (2015) Caesarean section and hospitalization for respiratory syncytial virus infection: a population-based study. Pediatr Infect Dis J 34:145-148.  https://doi.org/10.1097/INF.0000000000000552 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Lawrence RM (2013) Circumstances when breastfeeding is contraindicated. Pediatr Clin NA 60:295-318.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pcl.2012.09.012 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Li R, Rock VJ, Grummer-Strawn L (2007) Changes in public attitudes toward breastfeeding in the United States, 1999-2003. J Am Diet Assoc 107:122-127.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jada.2006.10.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Lovegrove MC, Geller AI, Fleming-Dutra KE, Shehab N, Sapiano MRP, Budnitz DS (2018) US emergency department visits for adverse drug events from antibiotics in children, 2011-2015. J Pediatric Infect Dis Soc.  https://doi.org/10.1093/jpids/piy066
  27. 27.
    Muenchhoff M, Goulder PJR (2014) Sex differences in pediatric infectious diseases. J Infect Dis 209:s120-s126.  https://doi.org/10.1093/infdis/jiu232 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Mugambi MN, Musekiwa A, Lombard M, Young T, Blaauw R (2013) Association between funding source, methodological quality and research outcomes in randomized controlled trials of synbiotics, probiotics and prebiotics added to infant formula: a systematic review. BMC Med Res Methodol 13:137.  https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-13-137 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Nestle M (2001) Commentary food company sponsorship of nutrition research and professional activities: a conflict of interest? Public Health Nutr 4:1015-1022.  https://doi.org/10.1079/PHN2001253 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Neuzil KM, Hohlbein C, Zhu Y (2002) Illness among schoolchildren during influenza season: effect on school absenteeism, parental absenteeism from work, and secondary illness in families. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 156:986-991CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    O’Grady NP, Alexander M, Burns LA, Dellinger EP, Garland J, Heard SO, Lipsett PA, Masur H, Mermel LA, Pearson ML, Raad II, Randolph AG, Rupp ME, Saint S, Healthcare Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee (HICPAC) (2011) Guidelines for the prevention of intravascular catheter-related infections. Clin Infect Dis 52:e162-e193.  https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/cir257 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Quigley M, Kelly Y, Sacker A (2009) Infant feeding, solid foods and hospitalisation in the first 8 months after birth. Arch Dis Child 94:148-150.  https://doi.org/10.1136/adc.2008.146126 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Robinson S, Fall C (2012) Infant nutrition and later health: a review of current evidence. Nutrients 4:859-874.  https://doi.org/10.3390/nu4080859 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Rosenthal A, Oliveira SB, Madubuko U, Tanuos H, Schwab J, Monteiro IM (2019) Effects of immigration on infant feeding practices in an inner city, low socioeconomic community. J Natl Med Assoc 111:153-157.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnma.2018.07.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Schrier L, Hadjipanayis A, Del Torso S, Stiris T, Emonts M, Dornbusch HJ (2018) European Antibiotic Awareness Day 2017: training the next generation of health care professionals in antibiotic stewardship. Eur J Pediatr 177:279-283.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00431-017-3055-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Størdal K, Lundeby KM, Brantsæter AL, Haugen M, Nakstad B, Lund-Blix NA, Stene LC (2017) Breastfeeding and infant hospitalisation for infections: large cohort- and sibling analysis. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 65:225-231.  https://doi.org/10.1097/MPG.0000000000001539 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Tromp I, Kiefte-de Jong J, Raat H, Jaddoe V, Franco O, Hofman A, de Jongste J, Moll H (2017) Breastfeeding and the risk of respiratory tract infections after infancy: the Generation R Study. PLoS One 12:e0172763.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0172763 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    van Tulleken C (2018) Overdiagnosis and industry influence: how cow’s milk protein allergy is extending the reach of infant formula manufacturers. BMJ 363:k5056.  https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.k5056 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Videholm S, Silfverdal SA, Reniers G (2019) Maternal weight and infections in early childhood: a cohort study. Arch Dis Child 104:58-63.  https://doi.org/10.1136/archdischild-2017-314628 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    WHO Collaborating Centre for Drug Statistics Methodology (2012) Guidelines for ATC classification and DDD assignment 2013. Oslo. https://www.whocc.no/filearchive/publications/1_2013guidelines.pdf. Accessed 13 March 2019
  41. 41.
    World Health Organization/UNICEF (2008) Indicators for assessing infant and young child feeding practices. Geneva. https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/43895/9789241596664_eng.pdf;jsessionid=2BCEEB67C03460CC225761AAC98EFB78?sequence=1. Accessed 13 March 2019
  42. 42.
    Yonts AB, Kronman MP, Hamdy RF (2018) The burden and impact of antibiotic prescribing in ambulatory pediatrics. Curr Probl Pediatr Adolesc Health Care 48:272-288.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cppeds.2018.09.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Zhang Z, Zhu Y, Zhang L, Wan H (2018) What factors influence exclusive breastfeeding based on the theory of planned behaviour. Midwifery 62:177-182.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2018.04.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Simona Di Mario
    • 1
    Email author
  • Carlo Gagliotti
    • 2
  • Andrea Donatini
    • 3
  • Sergio Battaglia
    • 4
  • Rossella Buttazzi
    • 2
  • Sara Balduzzi
    • 5
  • Silvana Borsari
    • 3
  • Vittorio Basevi
    • 1
  • Luca Barbieri
    • 3
  • and the Regional breastfeeding monitoring group
  1. 1.SaPeRiDoc-Documentation Centre on Perinatal and Reproductive Health, Primary Care Service, Regional Health Authority of Emilia-RomagnaBolognaItaly
  2. 2.Regional Health and Social Agency of Emilia-RomagnaBolognaItaly
  3. 3.Primary Care ServiceRegional Health Authority of Emilia-RomagnaBolognaItaly
  4. 4.Information Technology Service, Regional Health Authority of Emilia-RomagnaBolognaItaly
  5. 5.Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Statistics UnitUniversity Hospital of Modena and Reggio EmiliaModenaItaly

Personalised recommendations