Advertisement

European Journal of Pediatrics

, Volume 178, Issue 10, pp 1501–1505 | Cite as

Performance of axillary and rectal temperature measurement in private pediatric practice

  • Jan Teller
  • Reto Bernasconi
  • Giacomo D. Simonetti
  • Sebastiano A. G. LavaEmail author
Original Article

Abstract

To better understand the role and reliability of axillary temperature measurements in clinical real life, axillary and rectal measurements in infants presenting in a private pediatric practice because of fever were compared. Prospectively, 169 infants (81 girls), median 9 (interquartile range 6–13) months of age, were examined at room temperature (20–24 °C). Two left and two right axillary, as well as two rectal measurements were taken with a digital thermometer and subsequently averaged. The median and interquartile range for axillary and rectal measurements were 36.9 (36.3–37.6) °C and 38.2 (37.4–38.9) °C, respectively (p < 0.0001). The limits of agreement in the Bland-Altman plots were 0.32 to 1.98 °C, with a mean bias of 1.15 °C. Axillary thermometers showed a good sensitivity for detecting rectal temperature > 38 °C (95%) but limited specificity (75%), with an area-under-the-curve of 0.95.

Conclusions: Axillary readings are always lower than rectal ones, the limits of agreement are quite wide. Axillary readings can be used for screening but critical measurements should be confirmed by more reliable methods.

What is Known

• In infants and toddlers, temperature has been traditionally taken rectally.

• Axillary measurements are better accepted and are recommended in current guidelines.

What is New

• Axillary temperature was always lower than rectal temperature.

• The limits of agreement of axillary thermometers are wide.

• Axillary thermometers have a good sensitivity but limited specificity and are therefore adequate for fever screening.

Keywords

Children Measurement Fever Infants Thermometer 

Abbreviations

CI

Confidence interval

IQR

Interquartile range

JT

Jan Teller

ROC

Receiver operating characteristics

SD

Standard deviation

Notes

Authors’ contributions

- Study concept and design: JT, SAGL

- Consent, Recruitment, Study execution: JT

- Statistical analysis: RB, SAGL

- Review of the literature, Preparation of the figures, Drafting of the manuscript: RB, SAGL

- Critical revision of the manuscript: GDS, SAGL

- Approval of the final manuscript: JT, RB, GDS, SAGL

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Research involving human participants and/or animals

This project was performed in the context of a routine quality assessment. All procedures performed were in accordance with ethical standards as laid down in the 1964 Helsinki declaration.

Informed consent

Caregivers received information on the study and (anonymous) study participation and had to give oral consent in order for their children to be enrolled in the study. Since only infants < 24 months of age were included, children assent was not required.

References

  1. 1.
    Sarrell EM, Wielunsky E, Cohen HA (2006) Antipyretic treatment in young children with fever: acetaminophen, ibuprofen, or both alternating in a randomized, double-blind study. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 160:197–202.  https://doi.org/10.1001/archpedi.160.2.197 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Lava SA, Simonetti GD, Ferrarini A, Ramelli GP, Bianchetti MG (2013) Regional differences in symptomatic fever management among paediatricians in Switzerland: the results of a cross-sectional web-based survey. Br J Clin Pharmacol 75:236–243.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2125.2012.04311.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    de Vos-Kerkhof E, Geurts DHF, Steyerberg EW, Lakhanpaul M, Moll HA, Oostenbrink R (2018) Characteristics of revisits of children at risk for serious infections in pediatric emergency care. Eur J Pediatr 177:617–624.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00431-018-3095-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Chiappini E, Venturini E, Remaschi G, Principi N, Longhi R, Tovo PA, Becherucci P, Bonsignori F, Esposito S, Festini F, Galli L, Lucchesi B, Mugelli A, Marseglia GL, de Martino M, Italian Pediatric Society Panel for the Management of Fever in Children (2017) 2016 Update of the Italian Pediatric Society guidelines for management of fever in children. J Pediatr 180:177–183.e1.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpeds.2016.09.043 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Teller J, Ragazzi M, Simonetti GD, Lava SA (2014) Accuracy of tympanic and forehead thermometers in private paediatric practice. Acta Paediatr 103:e80–e83.  https://doi.org/10.1111/apa.12464 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Mogensen CB, Wittenhoff L, Fruerhøj G, Hansen S (2018) Forehead or ear temperature measurement cannot replace rectal measurements, except for screening purposes. BMC Pediatr 18:15.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s12887-018-0994-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Fields E, Chard J, Murphy MS, Richardson M, Guideline Development Group and Technical Team (2013) Assessment and initial management of feverish illness in children younger than 5 years: summary of updated NICE guidance. BMJ 346:f2866.  https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.f2866 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bland JM, Altman DG (2011) Agreed statistics - measurement method comparison. Anesthesiology 116:182–185.  https://doi.org/10.1097/ALN.0b013e31823d7784 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Paes BF, Vermeulen K, Brohet RM, van der Ploeg T, de Winter JP (2010) Accuracy of tympanic and infrared skin thermometers in children. Arch Dis Child 95:974–978.  https://doi.org/10.1136/adc.2010.185801 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Avner JR, Baker MD (2002) Management of fever in infants and children. Emerg Med Clin North Am 20:49–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Schmitt BD (1980) Fever phobia: misconceptions of parents about fevers. Am J Dis Child 134:176–181CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Brick T, Agbeko RS, Davies P, Davis PJ, Deep A, Fortune PM, Inwald DP, Jones A, Levin R, Morris KP, Pappachan J, Ray S, Tibby SM, Tume LN, Peters MJ, UK Paediatric Intensive Care Society Study Group (PICS-SG) (2017) Attitudes towards fever amongst UK paediatric intensive care staff. Eur J Pediatr 176:423–427.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00431-016-2844-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Goldberg S, Heitner S, Mimouni F, Joseph L, Bromiker R, Picard E (2018) The influence of reducing fever on blood oxygen saturation in children. Eur J Pediatr 177:195–199.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00431-018-3188-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Morley CJ, Hewson PH, Thornton AJ, Cole TJ (1992) Axillary and rectal temperature measurements in infants. Arch Dis Child 67:122–125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Craig JV, Lancaster GA, Williamson PR, Smyth RL (2000) Temperature measured at the axilla compared with rectum in children and young people: systematic review. BMJ 320:1174–1178.  https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.320.7243.1174 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Niven DJ, Gaudet JE, Laupland KB, Mrklas KJ, Roberts DJ, Stelfox HT (2015) Accuracy of peripheral thermometers for estimating temperature: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Intern Med 163:768–777.  https://doi.org/10.7326/M15-1150 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Chiappini E, Principi N, Longhi R, Tovo PA, Becherucci P, Bonsignori F, Esposito S, Festini F, Galli L, Lucchesi B, Mugelli A, de Martino M, Writing Committee of the Italian Pediatric Society Panel for the Management of Fever in Children (2009) Management of fever in children: summary of the Italian Pediatric Society guidelines. Clin Ther 31:1826–1843.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinthera.2009.08.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Forrest AJ, Juliano ML, Conley SP, Cronyn PD, McGlynn A, Auten JD (2017) Temporal artery and axillary thermometry comparison with rectal thermometry in children presenting to the ED. Am J Emerg Med 35:1855–1858.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajem.2017.06.017 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Kettunen S, Lantto U, Koivunen P, Tapiainen T, Uhari M, Renko M (2018) Risk factors for periodic fever, aphthous stomatitis, pharyngitis, and adenitis (PFAPA) syndrome: a case-control study. Eur J Pediatr 177:1201–1206.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00431-018-3175-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Private Pediatric PracticeLangnau I.E.Switzerland
  2. 2.Department of AnesthesiaBasel University HospitalBaselSwitzerland
  3. 3.Department of Pediatrics, Pediatric Nephrology UnitInselspital, and University of BernBernSwitzerland
  4. 4.Pediatric Institute of Southern SwitzerlandOspedale San Giovanni Bellinzona, and Università della Svizzera ItalianaLuganoSwitzerland
  5. 5.Pediatric Cardiology Unit, Department of Pediatrics, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois (CHUV)Lausanne University Hospital and University of LausanneLausanneSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations