Advertisement

European Journal of Pediatrics

, Volume 178, Issue 7, pp 1119–1123 | Cite as

Prescription of vitamin D among Swiss pediatricians

  • Maristella Santi
  • Marco Janner
  • Giacomo D. Simonetti
  • Sebastiano A. G. LavaEmail author
Original Article

Abstract

The traditional recommendation that Swiss children receive vitamin D during the first year of life was recently extended to the second and third year of life and during winter for older children. The aim of the study was to identify how Swiss pediatricians prescribe vitamin D. Between December 2016 and March 2017, 795 (52%) of 1530 invited Swiss board-certified pediatricians answered a closed-ended questionnaire. Respondents routinely prescribe vitamin D supplements in infants ≤ 1 year of age, but infrequently in children ≥ 3 years of age. Only a minority of them prescribe vitamin D in children with conditions that predispose to poor vitamin D status. Oily vitamin D preparations are the most popular and are usually prescribed in a once-a-day regimen. In situations like intake of drugs interfering with vitamin D metabolism, intestinal malabsorption, and diabetes mellitus, Swiss pediatricians often seek the advice of a subspecialist. In cases with clinical suspicion of poor vitamin D status, the diagnosis is confirmed by the determination of 25-hydroxyvitamin D.

Conclusion: Few pediatricians prescribe a vitamin D supplementation in children ≥ 3 years of age. Collaboration between policymakers and health care professionals is required to fill the gap between guidelines and clinical practice.

What is Known:

• In Switzerland, vitamin D supplementation is recommended during the first, second, and third year of life as well as during winter for older children.

• Both alcoholic and oily preparations are currently available.

What is New:

• Swiss pediatricians routinely prescribe vitamin D in infants ≤ 1 year of age, but infrequently in children ≥ 3 years of age.

• Oily vitamin D preparations are the most popular and are usually prescribed in a once-a-day regimen.

Keywords

Vitamin D Supplementation Guidelines Adherence Survey 

Notes

Authors’ contributions

Study concept, study design, inquiry development: MS, SAGL.

Pilot testing of the instrument: MS, GDS.

Programming and management of the survey website: MS, GDS, SAGL.

Email invitations to the participants: MS.

Statistical analysis: MS, SAGL.

Drafting of the manuscript: MS, MJ, SAGL.

Critical revision of the manuscript: MS, MJ, GDS, SAGL.

Final manuscript: MS, MJ, GDS, SAGL.

Funding

This research was supported by the Advisory Board for Research of the Ente Ospedaliero, Canton Ticino (Switzerland), and by the Ettore Balli Foundation.

Compliance with ethical statements

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

This article, being a survey among health professionals, does not contain any clinical or experimental studies with human participants or animals. Participants received information on the study and (anonymous) study participation via an invitation email containing a link to the survey’s website. Participation in the questionnaire following reading of the email implied consent.

References

  1. 1.
    Ariyawatkul K, Lersbuasin P (2018) Prevalence of vitamin D deficiency in cord blood of newborns and the association with maternal vitamin D status. Eur J Pediatr 177:1541–1545CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Basatemur E, Hunter R, Horsfall L, Sutcliffe A, Rait G (2017) Costs of vitamin D testing and prescribing among children in primary care. Eur J Pediatr 176:1405–1409CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Boynton PM (2004) Hands-on guide to questionnaire research - administering, analysing, and reporting your questionnaire. BMJ 328:1372–1375CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Boynton PM, Greenhalgh T (2004) Hands-on guide to questionnaire research - selecting, designing, and developing your questionnaire. BMJ 328:1312–1315CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Boynton PM, Wood GW, Greenhalgh T (2004) Hands-on guide to questionnaire research - reaching beyond the white middle classes. BMJ 328:1433–1436CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Brown GW, Hayden GF (1985) Nonparametric methods. Clinical applications. Clin Pediatr (Phila) 24:490–498CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Cabana MD, Rand CS, Powe NR, Wu AW, Wilson MH, Abboud PA, Rubin HR (1999) Why don’t physicians follow clinical practice guidelines? A framework for improvement. JAMA 282:1458–1465CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Emerson JD, Hosseini H (1984) Analyzing data from ordered categories. N Engl J Med 311:442–448CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Grossman Z, Hadjipanayis A, Stiris T, Del Torso S, Mercier JC, Valiulis A, Shamir R (2017) Vitamin D in European children-statement from the European Academy of Paediatrics (EAP). Eur J Pediatr 176:829–831CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ish-Shalom S, Segal E, Salganik T, Raz B, Bromberg IL, Vieth R (2008) Comparison of daily, weekly, and monthly vitamin D3 in ethanol dosing protocols for two months in elderly hip fracture patients. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 93:3430–3435CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Jackson R, Feder G (1998) Guidelines for clinical guidelines - a simple, pragmatic strategy for guideline development. BMJ 317:427–428CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Jenni OG, Sennhauser FH (2016) Child health care in Switzerland. J Pediatr 177S:S203–S212CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Lava SAG, Simonetti GD, Ramelli GP, Tschumi S, Bianchetti MG (2012) Symptomatic management of fever by Swiss board-certified pediatricians: results from a cross-sectional, web-based survey. Clin Ther 34:250–256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lava SAG, Simonetti GD, Bianchetti AA, Ferrarini A, Bianchetti MG (2013) Prevention of vitamin D insufficiency in Switzerland: a never-ending story. Int J Pharm 457:353–356CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Leaf DA, Neighbor WE, Schaad D, Scott CS (1995) A comparison of self-report and chart audit in studying resident physician assessment of cardiac risk factors. J Gen Intern Med 10:194–198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Messerli FH, Hofstetter L, Agabiti-Rosei E, Burnier M, Elliott WJ, Franklin SS, Grodzicki T, Kario K, Kjeldsen SE, Kostis JB, Laurent S, Leenen FH, Lund-Johansen P, Mancia G, Narkiewicz K, Papademetriou V, Parati G, Poulter N, Redon J, Rimoldi SF, Ruilope LM, Schiffrin EL, Schmieder RE, Schwartz AB, Sever P, Sowers JR, Staessen JA, Wang J, Weber M, Williams B, de Leeuw PW (2017) Expertise: no longer a sine qua non for guideline authors. J Hypertens 35:1564–1566CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Posfay-Barbe KM, Heininger U, Aebi C, Desgrandchamps D, Vaudaux B, Siegrist CA (2005) How do physicians immunize their own children? Differences among pediatricians and nonpediatricians. Pediatrics 116:e623–e633CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Proehl JA, Hoyt KS (2014) Clinical inertia and champions for change. Adv Emerg Nurs J 36:207–208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Rattray J, Jones MC (2007) Essential elements of questionnaire design and development. J Clin Nurs 16:234–243CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Umscheid CA (2009) Should guidelines incorporate evidence on patient preferences? J Gen Intern Med 24:988–990CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Vogiatzi MG, Jacobson-Dickman E, DeBoer MD, Drugs, and Therapeutics Committee of The Pediatric Endocrine Society (2014) Vitamin D supplementation and risk of toxicity in pediatrics: a review of current literature. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 99:1132–1141CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PediatricsUniversity Children’s Hospital of Bern, InselspitalBernSwitzerland
  2. 2.Pediatric Institute of Southern Switzerland, Ospedale San Giovanni, BellinzonaUniversità della Svizzera ItalianaLuganoSwitzerland
  3. 3.Pediatric Cardiology Unit, Department of PediatricsLausanne University Hospital and University of LausanneLausanneSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations