Advertisement

Neuronal networks underlying the conjoint modulation of response selection by subliminal and consciously induced cognitive conflicts

  • Wiebke Bensmann
  • Nicolas Zink
  • Moritz Mückschel
  • Christian Beste
  • Ann-Kathrin StockEmail author
Original Article
  • 60 Downloads

Abstract

Goal-directed behavior has been shown to be affected by consciously and subliminally induced conflicts. Both types of conflict conjointly modulate behavioral performance, but the underlying neuronal mechanisms have remained unclear. While cognitive control is linked to oscillations in the theta frequency band, there are several mechanisms via which theta oscillations may enable cognitive control: via the coordination and synchronization of a large and complex neuronal network and/or via local processes within the medial frontal cortex. We, therefore, investigated this issue with a focus on theta oscillations and the underlying neuronal networks. For this purpose, n = 40 healthy young participants performed a conflict paradigm that combines conscious and subliminal distractors while an EEG was recorded. The data show that separate processes modulate the theta-based activation and organization of cognitive control networks: EEG beamforming analyses showed that variations in theta band power generated in the supplementary motor area reflected the need for control and task-relevant goal shielding, as both conflicts as well as their conjoint effect on behavior increased theta power. Yet, large networks were not modulated by this and graph theoretical analyses of the efficiency (i.e. small worldness) of theta-driven networks did not reflect the need for control. Instead, theta network efficiency was decreased by subliminal conflicts only. This dissociation suggests that while both kinds of conflict require control and goal shielding, which are induced by an increase in theta band power and modulate processes in the medial frontal cortex, only non-conscious conflicts diminish the efficiency of theta-driven large-scale networks.

Keywords

Response conflict Priming Flanker EEG Theta oscillations Small world networks 

Notes

Funding

This study was funded by a grant of the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) SFB940 B8 to A.S. and C.B.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Informed consent

Each participant gave a written informed consent and was reimbursed with either 25€ or course credits for taking part in the study. The study was approved by the ethics committee of the Faculty of Medicine of TU Dresden and conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki.

Supplementary material

429_2019_1866_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (788 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (PDF 789 kb)

References

  1. Achard S, Bullmore E (2007) Efficiency and cost of economical brain functional networks. PLoS Comput Biol 3:e17.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.0030017 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bassett DS, Bullmore E (2006) Small-world brain networks. Neuroscientist 12:512–523.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1073858406293182 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Battaglia-Mayer A, Babicola L, Satta E (2016) Parieto-frontal gradients and domains underlying eye and hand operations in the action space. Neuroscience 334:76–92.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroscience.2016.07.009 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bauer M, Oostenveld R, Peeters M, Fries P (2006) Tactile spatial attention enhances gamma-band activity in somatosensory cortex and reduces low-frequency activity in parieto-occipital areas. J Neurosci Off J Soc Neurosci 26:490–501.  https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5228-04.2006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y (1995) Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J R Stat Soc Ser B Methodol 57:289–300Google Scholar
  6. Beste C, Willemssen R, Saft C, Falkenstein M (2010) Response inhibition subprocesses and dopaminergic pathways: basal ganglia disease effects. Neuropsychologia 48:366–373.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2009.09.023 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Beste C, Ness V, Lukas C et al (2012) Mechanisms mediating parallel action monitoring in fronto-striatal circuits. NeuroImage 62:137–146.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.05.019 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Beste C, Mückschel M, Rosales R et al (2017) The basal ganglia striosomes affect the modulation of conflicts by subliminal information-evidence from X-linked dystonia parkinsonism. Cereb Cortex 1991:1–10.  https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhx125 Google Scholar
  9. Bielczyk NZ, Walocha F, Ebel PW et al (2018) Thresholding functional connectomes by means of mixture modeling. NeuroImage 171:402–414.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.01.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Botvinick MM, Braver TS, Barch DM et al (2001) Conflict monitoring and cognitive control. Psychol Rev 108:624–652CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Boy F, Husain M, Sumner P (2010) Unconscious inhibition separates two forms of cognitive control. Proc Natl Acad Sci 107:11134–11139.  https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1001925107 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bullmore E, Sporns O (2009) Complex brain networks: graph theoretical analysis of structural and functional systems. Nat Rev Neurosci 10:186–198.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn2575 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Buzsaki G, Draguhn A (2004) Neuronal oscillations in cortical networks. Science 304:1926–1929.  https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1099745 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cavanagh JF, Frank MJ (2014) Frontal theta as a mechanism for cognitive control. Trends Cogn Sci 18:414–421.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2014.04.012 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Cavanagh JF, Zambrano-Vazquez L, Allen JJB (2012) Theta lingua franca: a common mid-frontal substrate for action monitoring processes. Psychophysiology 49:220–238.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8986.2011.01293.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Chmielewski WX, Mückschel M, Dippel G, Beste C (2016) Concurrent information affects response inhibition processes via the modulation of theta oscillations in cognitive control networks. Brain Struct Funct 221:3949–3961.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00429-015-1137-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Cohen MX (2014) A neural microcircuit for cognitive conflict detection and signaling. Trends Neurosci 37:480–490.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tins.2014.06.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Cohen MX, Donner TH (2013) Midfrontal conflict-related theta-band power reflects neural oscillations that predict behavior. J Neurophysiol 110:2752–2763.  https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00479.2013 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Colebatch JG (2007) Bereitschaftspotential and movement-related potentials: origin, significance, and application in disorders of human movement. Mov Disord 22:601–610.  https://doi.org/10.1002/mds.21323 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. De Blasio FM, Barry RJ (2013) Prestimulus delta and theta determinants of ERP responses in the Go/NoGo task. Int J Psychophysiol Off J Int Organ Psychophysiol 87:279–288.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2012.09.016 Google Scholar
  21. Deecke L, Kornhuber HH (1978) An electrical sign of participation of the mesial ‘supplementary’ motor cortex in human voluntary finger movement. Brain Res 159:473–476.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0006-8993(78)90561-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Diamond A (2013) Executive functions. Annu Rev Psychol 64:135–168.  https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-113011-143750 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Eimer M, Schlaghecken F (2003) Response facilitation and inhibition in subliminal priming. Biol Psychol 64:7–26.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-0511(03)00100-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Evans AC, Collins DL, Milner B, Milner B (1992) An MRI-based stereotactic atlas from 250 young normal subjects. Soc Neurosci Abstr 18:408Google Scholar
  25. Fassbender C, Hester R, Murphy K et al (2009) Prefrontal and midline interactions mediating behavioural control. Eur J Neurosci 29:181–187.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-9568.2008.06557.x Google Scholar
  26. Gohil K, Bluschke A, Roessner V et al (2017) ADHD patients fail to maintain task goals in face of subliminally and consciously induced cognitive conflicts. Psychol Med 47:1771–1783.  https://doi.org/10.1017/s0033291717000216 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Goschke T, Bolte A (2014) Emotional modulation of control dilemmas: the role of positive affect, reward, and dopamine in cognitive stability and flexibility. Neuropsychologia 62:403–423.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2014.07.015 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Goschke T, Dreisbach G (2008) Conflict-triggered goal shielding: response conflicts attenuate background monitoring for prospective memory cues. Psychol Sci 19:25–32.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02042.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Gross J, Kujala J, Hamalainen M et al (2001) Dynamic imaging of coherent sources: studying neural interactions in the human brain. Proc Natl Acad Sci 98:694–699.  https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.98.2.694 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Halsband U, Matsuzaka Y, Tanji J (1994) Neuronal activity in the primate supplementary, pre-supplementary and premotor cortex during externally and internally instructed sequential movements. Neurosci Res 20:149–155.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0168-0102(94)90032-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hampshire A, Sharp DJ (2015) Contrasting network and modular perspectives on inhibitory control. Trends Cogn Sci 19:445–452.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2015.06.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Harper J, Malone SM, Bernat EM (2014) Theta and delta band activity explain N2 and P3 ERP component activity in a go/no-go task. Clin Neurophysiol Off J Int Fed Clin Neurophysiol 125:124–132.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2013.06.025 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Hoogenboom N, Schoffelen J-M, Oostenveld R et al (2006) Localizing human visual gamma-band activity in frequency, time and space. NeuroImage 29:764–773.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.08.043 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Jin S-H, Lin P, Hallett M (2012) Reorganization of brain functional small-world networks during finger movements. Hum Brain Mapp 33:861–872.  https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.21253 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Keller I, Heckhausen H (1990) Readiness potentials preceding spontaneous motor acts: voluntary vs. involuntary control. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 76:351–361CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Keye D, Wilhelm O, Oberauer K, Stürmer B (2013) Individual differences in response conflict adaptations. Front Psychol 4:947.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00947 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Langer N, von Bastian CC, Wirz H et al (2013) The effects of working memory training on functional brain network efficiency. Cortex 49:2424–2438.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2013.01.008 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Li Y, Chen Y, Lv X et al (2015) EEG functional network properties related to visually induced unrecognized spatial disorientation. Biomed Mater Eng 26:S1115–S1124.  https://doi.org/10.3233/BME-151408 Google Scholar
  39. Maris E, Oostenveld R (2007) Nonparametric statistical testing of EEG- and MEG-data. J Neurosci Methods 164:177–190.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneumeth.2007.03.024 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Masson MEJ (2011) A tutorial on a practical Bayesian alternative to null-hypothesis significance testing. Behav Res Methods 43:679–690.  https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-010-0049-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Matsuzaka Y, Aizawa H, Tanji J (1992) A motor area rostral to the supplementary motor area (presupplementary motor area) in the monkey: neuronal activity during a learned motor task. J Neurophysiol 68:653–662CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. McBride J, Boy F, Husain M, Sumner P (2012) Automatic motor activation in the executive control of action. Front Hum Neurosci 6:82.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2012.00082 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Miller EK, Cohen JD (2001) An integrative theory of prefrontal cortex function. Annu Rev Neurosci 24:167–202.  https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.neuro.24.1.167 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Mückschel M, Stock A-K, Dippel G et al (2016) Interacting sources of interference during sensorimotor integration processes. NeuroImage 125:342–349.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.09.075 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Nolte G, Bai O, Wheaton L et al (2004) Identifying true brain interaction from EEG data using the imaginary part of coherency. Clin Neurophysiol 115:2292–2307.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2004.04.029 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Nunez PL, Pilgreen KL (1991) The spline-Laplacian in clinical neurophysiology: a method to improve EEG spatial resolution. J Clin Neurophysiol Off Publ Am Electroencephalogr Soc 8:397–413Google Scholar
  47. O’Connell RG, Dockree PM, Bellgrove MA et al (2007) The role of cingulate cortex in the detection of errors with and without awareness: a high-density electrical mapping study: error awareness. Eur J Neurosci 25:2571–2579.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-9568.2007.05477.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Oostenveld R, Stegeman DF, Praamstra P, van Oosterom A (2003) Brain symmetry and topographic analysis of lateralized event-related potentials. Clin Neurophysiol Off J Int Fed Clin Neurophysiol 114:1194–1202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Oostenveld R, Fries P, Maris E, Schoffelen J-M (2011) FieldTrip: open source software for advanced analysis of MEG, EEG, and invasive electrophysiological data. Comput Intell Neurosci 2011:156869.  https://doi.org/10.1155/2011/156869 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Parkinson J, Haggard P (2014) Subliminal priming of intentional inhibition. Cognition 130:255–265.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2013.11.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Perrin F, Pernier J, Bertrand O, Echallier JF (1989) Spherical splines for scalp potential and current density mapping. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 72:184–187CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Picard N (2003) Activation of the supplementary motor area (SMA) during performance of visually guided movements. Cereb Cortex 13:977–986.  https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/13.9.977 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Roland PE, Larsen B, Lassen NA, Skinhøj E (1980a) Supplementary motor area and other cortical areas in organization of voluntary movements in man. J Neurophysiol 43:118–136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Roland PE, Skinhøj E, Lassen NA, Larsen B (1980b) Different cortical areas in man in organization of voluntary movements in extrapersonal space. J Neurophysiol 43:137–150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Rubinov M, Sporns O (2010) Complex network measures of brain connectivity: uses and interpretations. NeuroImage 52:1059–1069.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.10.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Salvador R, Suckling J, Coleman MR et al (2005) Neurophysiological architecture of functional magnetic resonance images of human brain. Cereb Cortex 15:1332–1342.  https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhi016 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Schiffer A-M, Waszak F, Yeung N (2015) The role of prediction and outcomes in adaptive cognitive control. J Physiol-Paris 109:38–52.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jphysparis.2015.02.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Schlaghecken F, Eimer M (2004) Masked prime stimuli can bias “free” choices between response alternatives. Psychon Bull Rev 11:463–468.  https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196596 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Schneider TR, Debener S, Oostenveld R, Engel AK (2008) Enhanced EEG gamma-band activity reflects multisensory semantic matching in visual-to-auditory object priming. NeuroImage 42:1244–1254.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.05.033 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Sporns O, Chialvo D, Kaiser M, Hilgetag C (2004) Organization, development and function of complex brain networks. Trends Cogn Sci 8:418–425.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2004.07.008 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Sporns O, Tononi G, Kötter R (2005) The human connectome: a structural description of the human brain. PLoS Comput Biol 1:e42.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.0010042 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Stock A-K, Friedrich J, Beste C (2016) Subliminally and consciously induced cognitive conflicts interact at several processing levels. Cortex J Devoted Study Nerv Syst Behav 85:75–89.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2016.09.027 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Tallon-Baudry C, Bertrand O, Delpuech C, Permier J (1997) Oscillatory gamma-band (30–70 Hz) activity induced by a visual search task in humans. J Neurosci Off J Soc Neurosci 17:722–734CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Telesford QK, Joyce KE, Hayasaka S et al (2011) The ubiquity of small-world networks. Brain Connect 1:367–375.  https://doi.org/10.1089/brain.2011.0038 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Ulrich R, Schröter H, Leuthold H, Birngruber T (2015) Automatic and controlled stimulus processing in conflict tasks: superimposed diffusion processes and delta functions. Cogn Psychol 78:148–174.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogpsych.2015.02.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Wagenmakers E (2007) A practical solution to the pervasive problems of p values. Psychon Bull Rev 14:779–804CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Watts DJ, Strogatz SH (1998) Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’ networks. Nature 393:440–442.  https://doi.org/10.1038/30918 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Womelsdorf T, Vinck M, Leung LS, Everling S (2010) Selective theta-synchronization of choice-relevant information subserves goal-directed behavior. Front Hum Neurosci 4:210.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2010.00210 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Yordanova J, Falkenstein M, Hohnsbein J, Kolev V (2004) Parallel systems of error processing in the brain. NeuroImage 22:590–602.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.01.040 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Yu S, Huang D, Singer W, Nikolić D (2008) A small world of neuronal synchrony. Cereb Cortex 18:2891–2901.  https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhn047 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Cognitive Neurophysiology, Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Faculty of MedicineTU DresdenDresdenGermany
  2. 2.Experimental NeurobiologyNational Institute of Mental HealthKlecanyCzech Republic

Personalised recommendations