Advertisement

Behavioral realism and lifelike psychophysiological responses in virtual reality by the example of a height exposure

  • Joanna KiskerEmail author
  • Thomas Gruber
  • Benjamin Schöne
Original Article

Abstract

Virtual reality (VR) is increasingly gaining importance as a valuable methodical tool for psychological research. The greatest benefit of using VR is generating rich, complex and vivid, but still highly controllable settings. As VR has been found to elicit lifelike psychophysiological and emotional responses, we examined by means of a height exposure whether VR resembles physical reality to the necessary degree to constitute a suitable framework for investigating real-life behavior in a controlled experimental context. As hypothesized, participants behaved in VR exactly as would be appropriate in a real environment: Being exposed to great height, participants walked significantly slower across a virtual steel girder construction protruding from a high-rise building as compared to participants who traversed the very same construction on the ground level. In the height condition, this realistic behavior could be predicted on basis of the participants’ trait anxiety. Aligned with the behavioral responses, they showed realistic psychophysiological responses, i.e., an elevated heart rate when exposed to height. Interestingly, participants of the height condition reported a greater sense of presence, which indicates that emotions have an elevating effect on presence. As a conclusion, our findings provide further evidence that VR evokes lifelike responses at both behavioral and psychophysiological level and therefore increases ecological validity of psychological experiments.

Notes

Acknowledgements

We thank Rosa M. Puca for her most valuable comments on an early version of the manuscript and for her advice on statistical analysis.

Author contributions

All authors contributed to the study design. Testing, data collection and data analysis were performed by JK. JK and BS performed the data interpretation under the supervision of TG. JK drafted the manuscript, and BS and TG provided critical revisions. All authors approved the final version of the manuscript for submission.

Funding

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

All authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Statement of ethical approval

All procedures performed in this study involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the local ethic committee of Osnabrueck University and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration.

Supplementary material

Supplementary material 1 (MP4 72346 kb)

Supplementary material 2 (MP4 88775 kb)

Supplementary material 3 (MP4 103801 kb)

Supplementary material 4 (MP4 96169 kb)

426_2019_1244_MOESM5_ESM.pdf (367 kb)
Supplementary material 5 (PDF 367 kb)

References

  1. Alshaer, A., Regenbrecht, H., & O’Hare, D. (2017). Immersion factors affecting perception and behavior in a virtual reality power wheelchair simulator. Applied Ergonomics, 58, 1–12.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2016.05.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Asjad, N. S., Adams, H., Paris, R., & Bodenheimer, B. (2018). Perception of height in virtual reality: a study of climbing stairs. In Proceedings of the 15th ACM Symposium on Applied Perception, p. 4. ACM.Google Scholar
  3. Biedermann, S. V., Biedermann, D. G., Wenzlaff, F., Kurjak, T., Nouri, S., Auer, M. K., & Fuss, J. (2017). An elevated plus-maze in mixed reality for studying human anxiety-related behavior. BMC Biology, 15(1), 125.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s12915-017-0463-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Blascovich, J., Loomis, J., Beall, A. C., Swinth, K. R., Hoyt, C. L., & Bailenson, J. N. (2002). Immersive virtual environment technology as a methodological tool for social psychology. Psychological Inquiry, 13(2), 103–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bohil, C. J., Alicea, B., & Biocca, F. A. (2011). Virtual reality in neuroscience research and therapy. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 12(12), 752–762.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn3122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brandt, T., & Huppert, D. (2014). Fear of heights and visual height intolerance. Current Opinion in Neurology, 27, 111–117.  https://doi.org/10.1097/WCO.0000000000000057.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chittaro, L., Sioni, R., Crescentini, C., & Fabbro, F. (2017). Mortality salience in virtual reality experiences and its effects on users’ attitudes towards risk. Journal of Human Computer Studies, 101, 10–22.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2017.01.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cohen, D. C. (1977). Comparison of self-report and overt-behavioral procedures for assessing acrophobia. Behavior Therapy, 8, 17–23.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0005-7894(77)80116-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Côté, S., & Bouchard, S. (2009). Cognitive mechanisms underlying virtual reality exposure. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 12(2), 121–129.  https://doi.org/10.1089/cpb.2008.0008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dibbets, P., & Schulte-Ostermann, M. A. (2015). Virtual reality, real emotions: A novel analogue for the assessment of risk factors of post-traumatic stress disorder. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 681.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00681.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Diemer, J., Alpers, G. W., Peperkorn, H., Shiban, Y., & Mühlberger, A. (2015). The impact of perception and presence on emotional reactions: A review of research in virtual reality. Frontiers in Psychology.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00026.Google Scholar
  12. Diwas Singh, K. C., Staats, B. R., Kouchaki, M., & Gino, F. (2017). Task selection and workload: A focus on completing easy tasks hurts long-term performance. Harvard Business School NOM Unit Working Paper, 17, 18–26.Google Scholar
  13. Eichenberg, C., & Wolters, C. (2012). Virtual realities in the treatment of mental disorders: A review of the current state of research. Virtual Reality in Psychological, Medical and Pedagogical Applications, 2, 35–64.  https://doi.org/10.5772/50094.Google Scholar
  14. Emmelkamp, P. M., Krijn, M., Hulsbosch, A. M., De Vries, S., Schuemie, M. J., & van der Mast, C. A. (2002). Virtual reality treatment versus exposure in vivo: A comparative evaluation in acrophobia. Behavior Research and Therapy, 40(5), 509–516.  https://doi.org/10.1089/109493101300210222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Felnhofer, A., Kothgassner, O. D., Schmidt, M., Heinzle, A. K., Beutl, L., Hlavacs, H., & Kryspin-Exner, I. (2015). Is virtual reality emotionally arousing? Investigating five emotion inducing virtual park scenarios. International Journal of Human Computer Studies, 82, 48–56.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2015.05.004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Freeman, J., Avons, S. E., Meddis, R., & Pearson, D. E. (2000). Using behavioral realism to estimate presence: A study of the utility of postural responses to motion stimuli. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 9(2), 149–164.  https://doi.org/10.1162/105474600566691.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gorini, A., Griez, E., Petrova, A., & Riva, G. (2010). Assessment of the emotional responses produced by exposure to real food, virtual food and photographs of food in patients affected by eating disorders. Annals of General Psychiatry, 9, 30–39.  https://doi.org/10.1186/1744-859X-9-30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gromer, D., Madeira, O., Gast, P., Nehfischer, M., Jost, M., Müller, M., & Pauli, P. (2018). Height simulation in a virtual reality CAVE system: Validity of fear responses and effects of an immersion manipulation. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 12, 372.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2018.00372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gromer, D., Reinke, M., Christner, I., & Pauli, P. (2019). Causal interactive links between presence and fear in virtual reality height exposure. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 141.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Higuera-Trujillo, J. L., López-Tarruella Maldonado, J., & Llinares Millán, C. (2017). Psychological and physiological human responses to simulated and real environments: A comparison between photographs, 360° panoramas, and virtual reality. Applied Ergonomics, 65, 398–409.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2017.05.006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hodges, L. F., Rothbaum, B. O., Kooper, R., Opdyke, D., Meyer, T., de Graaff, J. J, North, M. M. (1994). Presence as the defining factor in a VR application: Virtual reality graded exposure in the treatment of acrophobia.Google Scholar
  22. Ibrahim, N., Balbed, M. A. M., Yusof, A. M., Salleh, F. H. M., Singh, J., & Shahidan, M. S. (2008). Virtual reality approach in treating acrophobia: Simulating height in virtual environment. WSEAS Transactions on Computers, 5(7), 511–518.Google Scholar
  23. IJsselsteijn, W. A., De Ridder, H., Freeman, J., & Avons, S. E. (2000). Presence: Concept, determinants, and measurement. Human vision and electronic imaging V. International Society for Optics and Photonics, 3959, 520–530.Google Scholar
  24. Kisker, J., Gruber, T., & Schöne, B. (2019). Experiences in virtual reality entail different processes of retrieval as opposed to conventional laboratory settings: A study on human memory. Current Psychology, 106, 1–8.Google Scholar
  25. Kober, S. E., Kurzmann, J., & Neuper, C. (2012). Cortical correlate of spatial presence in 2D and 3D interactive virtual reality: An EEG study. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 83(3), 365–374.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2011.12.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Krijn, M., Emmelkamp, P. M., Biemond, R., de Ligny, C. D. W., Schuemie, M. J., & van der Mast, C. A. (2004). Treatment of acrophobia in virtual reality: The role of immersion and presence. Behavior Research and Therapy, 42(2), 229–239.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0005-7967(03)00139-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Krohne, H. W., Egloff, B., Kohlmann, C. W., & Tausch, A. (1996). Untersuchungen mit einer deutschen version der “Positive and Negative Affect Schedule” (PANAS). Diagnostica-Gottingen, 42, 139–156.Google Scholar
  28. Laux, L., Glanzmann, P., & Schaffner, P. (1981). State-Trait-Angstinventar [German version of Spielberger, et al.’s State-Trait-Anxiety Inventory]. Göttingen: Hogrefe.Google Scholar
  29. Mania, K., & Chalmers, A. (2001). The effects of levels of immersion on memory and presence in virtual environments: A reality centered approach. CyberPsychology and Behavior, 4(2), 247–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Nilsson, N. C., Nordahl, R., & Serafin, S. (2016). Immersion revisited: A review of existing definitions of immersion and their relation to different theories of presence. Human Technology, 12(2), 108–134.  https://doi.org/10.17011/ht/urn.201611174652.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Pan, X., & de Hamilton, A. F. C. (2018). Why and how to use virtual reality to study human social interaction: The challenges of exploring a new research landscape. British Journal of Psychology.  https://doi.org/10.1111/bjop.12290.Google Scholar
  32. Parsons, T. D., Courtney, C. G., & Dawson, M. E. (2013). Virtual reality Stroop task for assessment of supervisory attentional processing. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 35(8), 812–826.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13803395.2013.824556.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Peterson, S. M., Furuichi, E., & Ferris, D. P. (2018). Effects of virtual reality high heights exposure during beam-walking on physiological stress and cognitive loading. PLoS One, 13(7), e0200306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Rebelo, F., Noriega, P., Duarte, E., & Soares, M. (2012). Using virtual reality to assess user experience. Human Factors, 54(6), 964–982.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720812465006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Riva, G., Davide, F., & IJsselsteijn, W. A. (2003). 7 Measuring presence: Subjective, behavioral and physiological methods. Concepts, effects and measurement of user presence in synthetic environments (pp. 110–118). Amsterdam: IOS Press.Google Scholar
  36. Riva, G., Mantovani, F., Capideville, C. S., Preziosa, A., Morganti, F., Villani, D., & Alcañiz, M. (2007). Affective interactions using virtual reality: The link between presence and emotions. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 10(1), 45–56.  https://doi.org/10.1089/cpb.2006.9993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Schniepp, R., Kugler, G., Wuehr, M., Eckl, M., Huppert, D., Huth, S., & Brandt, T. (2014). Quantification of gait changes in subjects with visual height intolerance when exposed to heights. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8, 963.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Schniepp, R., Wuehr, M., Neuhaeusser, M., Kamenova, M., Dimitriadis, K., Klopstock, T., et al. (2012). Locomotion speed determines gait variability in cerebellar ataxia and vestibular failure. Movement Disorders, 27, 125–131.  https://doi.org/10.1002/mds.23978.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Schöne, B., Wessels, M., & Gruber, T. (2017). Experiences in virtual reality: A window to autobiographical memory. Current Psychology.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-017-9648-y.Google Scholar
  40. Schubert, T., Friedmann, F., & Regenbrecht, H. (2001). The experience of presence: Factor analytic insights. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 10(3), 266–281.  https://doi.org/10.1162/105474601300343603.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Serino, S., & Repetto, C. (2018). New trends in episodic memory assessment: Immersive 360 ecological videos. Frontiers in psychology, 9, 1878.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Shiban, Y., Diemer, J., Brandl, S., Zack, R., Mühlberger, A., & Wüst, S. (2016). Trier Social Stress Test in vivo and in virtual reality: Dissociation of response domains. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 110, 47–55.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2016.10.008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Slater, M. (2004). How colorful was your day? Why questionnaires cannot assess presence in virtual environments. Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments, 13(4), 484–493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Slater, M., & Sanchez-Vives, M. V. (2016). Enhancing our lives with immersive virtual reality. Frontiers in Robotics and AI, 3, 1–47.  https://doi.org/10.3389/frobt.2016.00074.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Slater, M., & Usoh, M. (1994). Body centred interaction in immersive virtual environments. Artificial life and virtual reality, 1(1994), 125–148.Google Scholar
  46. Slater, M., Usoh, M., & Steed, A. (1994). Depth of presence in virtual environments. Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments, 3(2), 130–144.  https://doi.org/10.1162/pres.1994.3.2.130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Slater, M., & Wilbur, S. (1997). A framework for immersive virtual environments (FIVE): Speculations on the role of presence in virtual environments. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments.  https://doi.org/10.1162/pres.1997.6.6.603.Google Scholar
  48. Spielberger, C. D. (2010). State-trait anxiety inventory. The Corsini Encyclopedia of Psychology, 30, 1.Google Scholar
  49. Tarr, M. J., & Warren, W. H. (2002). Virtual reality in behavioral neuroscience and beyond. Nature Neuroscience, 5(11s), 1089.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Tersteeg, M., Marple-Horvat, D. E., & Loram, I. D. (2012). Cautious gait in relation to knowledge and vision of height: Is altered visual information the dominant influence? Journal of Neurophysiology, 107, 2686–2691.  https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00875.2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Usoh, M., Catena, E., Arman, S., & Slater, M. (2000). Using presence questionnaires in reality. Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments, 9(5), 497–503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Zuckerman, M. (1994). Behavioral expressions and biosocial bases of sensation seeking. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  53. Zuckerman, M., Kolin, E. A., Price, L., & Zoob, I. (1964). Development of a sensation-seeking scale. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 28(6), 477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Joanna Kisker
    • 1
    Email author
  • Thomas Gruber
    • 1
  • Benjamin Schöne
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of PsychologyOsnabrück UniversityOsnabrückGermany

Personalised recommendations