Advertisement

Affective perception of Euro banknotes: cognitive factors and interindividual differences

  • Valerio ManippaEmail author
  • Felice Giuliani
  • Alfredo Brancucci
  • Luca Tommasi
  • Riccardo Palumbo
  • Davide Pietroni
Original Article

Abstract

Money can be a tool to achieve a wide range of goals in everyday life. Different studies have reported that both the mere exposure to money and its use as a reward can determine cognitive and social effects. Nevertheless, little is known about the basic affective perception of Euro banknotes. Thus, in the present study we aim to assess differences in valence, arousal and familiarity evaluations of banknote pictures (from 5 to 500€) by taking into account gender, socioeconomic status and Love of Money (LoM) score, which measures the subjective attitude toward money, in a sample of participants. We found that valence and arousal increase with the nominal value of the banknotes, and that the relationship between these affective scores and the nominal value appears to be logarithmic (Weber’s law) rather than linear. High value banknotes were evaluated as pleasant, highly arousing, and less familiar. Low value banknotes instead were evaluated as more familiar, less arousing and neutrally valenced. Finally, we found that valence and arousal evaluations are mainly influenced by the LoM score of our participants. Instead, gender and economic condition influenced only arousal scores. These findings suggest the importance of deepening the study of these variables to shed light on money-related biases and abnormal economic behaviors.

Notes

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Stefano Anzani for his useful suggestions in the final phase of the manuscript preparation.

Author contributions

VM and FG conceived and designed the experiment, collected, analyzed and interpreted the data and wrote the manuscript. AB, LC, RP and DP provided critical revisions and contributed to the final version of the manuscript. All authors approved the final version for submission and agreed to be accountable for all aspects of the work.

Funding

This study did not receive any funding.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

References

  1. Baird, J. C., & Noma, E. J. (1978). Fundamentals of scaling and psychophysics. Hoboken: Wiley.Google Scholar
  2. Bernoulli, D. (1954). Exposition of a new theory on the measurement of risk. Econometrica, 22, 23–36. (Original work published 1738).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bolls, P. D., Lang, A., & Potter, R. F. (2001). The effects of message valence and listener arousal on attention, memory, and facial muscular responses to radio advertisements. Communication Research, 28(5), 627–651.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brandstätter, E., & Brandstätter, H. (1996). What’s money worth? Determinants of the subjective value of money. Journal of Economic Psychology, 17(4), 443–464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brodeur, M. B., Dionne-Dostie, E., Montreuil, T., & Lepage, M. (2010). The Bank of Standardized Stimuli (BOSS), a new set of 480 normative photos of objects to be used as visual stimuli in cognitive research. PLoS One, 5(5), e10773.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  6. Bruner, J. S., & Goodman, C. C. (1947). Value and need as organizing factors in perception. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 42(1), 33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bruner, J. S., & Minturn, A. L. (1955). Perceptual identification and perceptual organization. The Journal of General Psychology, 53(1), 21–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Buss, D. M. (1998). Sexual strategies theory: Historical origins and current status. Journal of Sex Research, 35(1), 19–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Buss, D. M., & Schmitt, D. P. (1993). Sexual strategies theory: an evolutionary perspective on human mating. Psychological Review, 100(2), 204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Charbonnier, L., Van Der Laan, L. N., Viergever, M. A., & Smeets, P. A. (2015). Functional MRI of challenging food choices: forced choice between equally liked high-and low-calorie foods in the absence of hunger. PLoS One, 10(7), e0131727.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  11. Dehaene, S. (2003). The neural basis of the Weber-Fechner law: a logarithmic mental number line. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7(4), 145–147.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Delgado, M. R., Nystrom, L. E., Fissell, C., Noll, D. C., & Fiez, J. A. (2000). Tracking the hemodynamic responses to reward and punishment in the striatum. Journal of Neurophysiology, 84(6), 3072–3077.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Deng, Y., Chang, L., Yang, M., Huo, M., & Zhou, R. (2016). Gender differences in emotional response: Inconsistency between experience and expressivity. PLoS One, 11(6), e0158666.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  14. Dittmar, H. (2004). Understanding and diagnosing compulsive buying. Handbook of Addictive Disorders, 42, 411–450.Google Scholar
  15. Dittmar, H. (2005). Compulsive buying—a growing concern? An examination of gender, age, and endorsement of materialistic values as predictors. British Journal of Psychology, 96(4), 467–491.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Elliott, R., Newman, J. L., Longe, O. A., & Deakin, J. W. (2003). Differential response patterns in the striatum and orbitofrontal cortex to financial reward in humans: a parametric functional magnetic resonance imaging study. Journal of Neuroscience, 23(1), 303–307.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Feldman, L. A. (1995). Valence focus and arousal focus: Individual differences in the structure of affective experience. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69(1), 153–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Foroni, F., Pergola, G., Argiris, G., & Rumiati, R. I. (2013). The FoodCast research image database (FRIDa). Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7, 51.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  19. Freud, E., Culham, J. C., Namdar, G., & Behrmann, M. (2019). Object complexity modulates the association between action and perception in childhood. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 179, 56–72.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Giuliani, F., D’Anselmo, A., Tommasi, L., Brancucci, A., & Pietroni, D. (2017). Hemispheric asymmetries in price estimation: do brain hemispheres attribute different monetary values? Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 2042.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  21. Giuliani, F., Manippa, V., Brancucci, A., Tommasi, L., & Pietroni, D. (2018). Side biases in Euro banknotes recognition: The horizontal mapping of monetary value. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 2293.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  22. Hamilton, R. W., Mittal, C., Shah, A., Thompson, D. V., & Griskevicius, V. (2019). How financial constraints influence consumer behavior: An integrative framework. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 29(2), 285–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kacelnik, A., & Abreu, F. B. (1998). Risky choice and Weber’s law. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 194(2), 289–298.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Kahneman, D., & Deaton, A. (2010). High income improves evaluation of life but not emotional well-being. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 107(38), 16489–16493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (2013). Choices, values, and frames. In L. C. MacLean, & W. T. Ziemba (Eds.), Handbook of the fundamentals of financial decision making (Vol. 4, Part 1, pp. 269–278). Singapore: World Scientific.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Krug, M. K., & Braver, T. S. (2014). Motivation and cognitive control: Going beyond monetary incentives. In H. Aarts, & E. Bijleveld (Eds.), The psychological science of money (pp. 137–162). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  27. Kuppens, P., Tuerlinckx, F., Russell, J. A., & Barrett, L. F. (2013). The relation between valence and arousal in subjective experience. Psychological Bulletin, 139(4), 917.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Lang, P. J., Bradley, M. M., & Cuthbert, B. N. (1997). International affective picture system (IAPS): Technical manual and affective ratings. NIMH Center for the Study of Emotion and Attention, 1, 39–58.Google Scholar
  29. Lang, A., Dhillon, K., & Dong, Q. (1995). The effects of emotional arousal and valence on television viewers’ cognitive capacity and memory. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 39(3), 313–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Lea, S. E., & Webley, P. (2006). Money as tool, money as drug: The biological psychology of a strong incentive. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 29(2), 161–209.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Lithari, C., Frantzidis, C. A., Papadelis, C., Vivas, A. B., Klados, M. A., Kourtidou-Papadeli, C., & Bamidis, P. D. (2010). Are females more responsive to emotional stimuli? A neurophysiological study across arousal and valence dimensions. Brain Topography, 23(1), 27–40.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Lodder, P., Ong, H. H., Grasman, R. P., & Wicherts, J. (2019). A comprehensive meta-analysis of money priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 148, 688–712.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Lundqvist, D., Flykt, A., & Öhman, A. (1998). KDEF: The Karolinska directed emotional faces. Stockholm: Karolinska Institutet. ISBN 91-630-7164-9.Google Scholar
  34. Lynn, R. (1993). Sex differences in competitiveness and the valuation of money in twenty countries. The Journal of Social Psychology, 133(4), 507–511.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Maison, D. (2019). Spending money: Pleasure or pain? Why some people spend money easily while others have a problem with it? In D. Maison (Ed.), The psychology of financial consumer behavior (pp. 73–103). Cham: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Mandel, N., & Johnson, E. J. (2002). When web pages influence choice: Effects of visual primes on experts and novices. Journal of Consumer Research, 29(2), 235–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Manippa, V., Padulo, C., van der Laan, L. N., & Brancucci, A. (2017). Gender differences in food choice: Effects of superior temporal sulcus stimulation. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 11, 597.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  38. Mitchell, T. R., & Mickel, A. E. (1999). The meaning of money: An individual-difference perspective. Academy of Management Review, 24(3), 568–578.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Namboodiri, V. M. K., Mihalas, S., & Shuler, M. G. H. (2014). A temporal basis for Weber’s law in value perception. Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience, 8, 79.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  40. O’Neill, J. (2003). The gender gap in wages, circa 2000. American Economic Review, 93(2), 309–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Padulo, C., Carlucci, L., Manippa, V., Marzoli, D., Saggino, A., Tommasi, L., & Brancucci, A. (2017). Valence, familiarity and arousal of different foods in relation to age, sex and weight. Food Quality and Preference, 57, 104–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Padulo, C., Carlucci, L., Marzoli, D., Manippa, V., Tommasi, L., Saggino, A., & Brancucci, A. (2018). Affective evaluation of food images according to stimulus and subject characteristics. Journal of Human Nutrition and Dietetics, 31, 715–724.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Papini, M. R., & Pellegrini, S. (2006). Scaling relative incentive value in consummatory behavior. Learning and Motivation, 37(4), 357–378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Pessiglione, M., Schmidt, L., Draganski, B., Kalisch, R., Lau, H., Dolan, R. J., & Frith, C. D. (2007). How the brain translates money into force: a neuroimaging study of subliminal motivation. Science, 316(5826), 904–906.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  45. Plantenga, J., & Remery, C. (2006). The gender pay gap. Origins and policy responses. A comparative review of thirty European countries. Brussels: Equality Unit.Google Scholar
  46. Pliner, P. (1982). The effects of mere exposure on liking for edible substances. Appetite, 3(3), 283–290.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Raposo, A., Frade, S., Alves, M., & Marques, J. F. (2018). The neural bases of price estimation: Effects of size and precision of the estimate. Brain and Cognition, 125, 157–164.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Russell, J. A. (1980). A circumplex model of affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39(6), 1161–1178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Schmidt, L., Cléry-Melin, M. L., Lafargue, G., Valabrègue, R., Fossati, P., Dubois, B., & Pessiglione, M. (2009). Get aroused and be stronger: emotional facilitation of physical effort in the human brain. Journal of Neuroscience, 29(30), 9450–9457.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Tang, T. L. P. (1993). The meaning of money: Extension and exploration of the money ethic scale in a sample of university students in Taiwan. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 14(1), 93–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Tang, T. L. P. (1995). The development of a short money ethic scale: Attitudes toward money and pay satisfaction revisited. Personality and Individual Differences, 19(6), 809–816.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Tang, T. L. P., & Chiu, R. K. (2003). Income, money ethic, pay satisfaction, commitment, and unethical behavior: Is the love of money the root of evil for Hong Kong employees? Journal of Business Ethics, 46(1), 13–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Tang, T. L. P., Sutarso, T., Akande, A., Allen, M. W., Alzubaidi, A. S., Ansari, M. A., & Cheng, B. S. (2006). The love of money and pay level satisfaction: Measurement and functional equivalence in 29 geopolitical entities around the world. Management and Organization Review, 2(3), 423–452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1981). The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science, 211(4481), 453–458.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Veling, H., & Aarts, H. (2010). Cueing task goals and earning money: Relatively high monetary rewards reduce failures to act on goals in a Stroop task. Motivation and Emotion, 34(2), 184–190.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  56. Vohs, K. D. (2015). Money priming can change people’s thoughts, feelings, motivations, and behaviors: An update on 10 years of experiments. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 144(4), e86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Watson, D., & Tellegen, A. (1985). Toward a consensual structure of mood. Psychological Bulletin, 98(2), 219–235.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. Worchel, S., Lee, J., & Adewole, A. (1975). Effects of supply and demand on ratings of object value. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32(5), 906–914.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Zajonc, R. B. (1968). Attitudinal effects of mere exposure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 9(2p2), 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Zink, C. F., Pagnoni, G., Martin-Skurski, M. E., Chappelow, J. C., & Berns, G. S. (2004). Human striatal responses to monetary reward depend on saliency. Neuron, 42(3), 509–517.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Psychological, Health and Territorial SciencesUniversity “G. d’ Annunzio” of Chieti-PescaraChietiItaly
  2. 2.Laboratory of Behavioral Economics, Human Centered Design and HealthcareUniversity “G. d’ Annunzio” of Chieti-PescaraChietiItaly
  3. 3.Department of Neuroscience, Imaging and Clinical SciencesUniversity “G. d’ Annunzio” of Chieti-PescaraChietiItaly

Personalised recommendations