Advertisement

Measuring attention to reward as an individual trait: the value-driven attention questionnaire (VDAQ)

  • Brian A. AndersonEmail author
  • Haena Kim
  • Mark K. Britton
  • Andy Jeesu Kim
Original Article

Abstract

Reward history is a powerful determinant of what we pay attention to. This influence of reward on attention varies substantially across individuals, being related to a variety of personality variables and clinical conditions. Currently, the ability to measure and quantify attention-to-reward is restricted to the use of psychophysical laboratory tasks, which limits research into the construct in a variety of ways. In the present study, we introduce a questionnaire designed to provide a brief and accessible means of assessing attention-to-reward. Scores on the questionnaire correlate with other measures known to be related to attention-to-reward and predict performance on multiple laboratory tasks measuring the construct. In demonstrating this relationship, we also provide evidence that attention-to-reward as measured in the lab, an automatic and implicit bias in information processing, is related to overt behaviors and motivations in everyday life as assessed via the questionnaire. Variation in scores on the questionnaire is additionally associated with a distinct biomarker in brain connectivity, and the questionnaire exhibits acceptable test–retest reliability. Overall, the Value-Driven Attention Questionnaire (VDAQ) provides a useful proxy-measure of attention-to-reward that is much more accessible than typical laboratory assessments.

Notes

Funding

This study was supported by grants from the Brain and Behavior Research Foundation [NARSAD 26008] and NIH [R01-DA046410] to BAA.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures were conducted in accordance with the ethical standards of the Texas A&M University Institutional Review Board and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

References

  1. Albertella, L., Copeland, D., Pearson, D., Watson, P., Wiers, R. W., & Le Pelley, M. E. (2017). Selective attention moderates the relationship between attentional capture by signals of nondrug reward and illicit drug use. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 175, 99–105.Google Scholar
  2. Anderson, B. A. (2013). A value-driven mechanism of attentional selection. Journal of Vision, 13(3), 1–16.Google Scholar
  3. Anderson, B. A. (2015a). Value-driven attentional capture is modulated by spatial context. Visual Cognition, 23, 67–81.Google Scholar
  4. Anderson, B. A. (2015b). Value-driven attentional priority is context specific. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 22, 750–756.Google Scholar
  5. Anderson, B. A. (2016a). The attention habit: How reward learning shapes attentional selection. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1369, 24–39.Google Scholar
  6. Anderson, B. A. (2016b). What is abnormal about addiction-related attentional biases? Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 167, 8–14.Google Scholar
  7. Anderson, B. A. (2017a). Going for it: The economics of automaticity in perception and action. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 26, 140–145.Google Scholar
  8. Anderson, B. A. (2017b). Reward processing in the value-driven attention network: Reward signals tracking cue identity and location. Social, Cognitive, and Affective Neuroscience, 12, 461–467.Google Scholar
  9. Anderson, B. A. (2019). Neurobiology of value-driven attention. Current Opinion in Psychology, 29, 27–33.Google Scholar
  10. Anderson, B. A., & Britton, M. K. (2019). On the automaticity of attentional orienting to threatening stimuli. Emotion.  https://doi.org/10.1037/emo0000596.Google Scholar
  11. Anderson, B. A., Chiu, M., DiBartolo, M. M., & Leal, S. L. (2017a). On the distinction between value-driven attention and selection history: Evidence from individuals with depressive symptoms. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 24, 1636–1642.Google Scholar
  12. Anderson, B. A., Faulkner, M. L., Rilee, J. J., Yantis, S., & Marvel, C. L. (2013a). Attentional bias for non-drug reward is magnified in addiction. Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology, 21, 499–506.Google Scholar
  13. Anderson, B. A., Folk, C. L., Garrison, R., & Rogers, L. (2016a). Mechanisms of habitual approach: Failure to suppress irrelevant responses evoked by previously reward-associated stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 145, 796–805.Google Scholar
  14. Anderson, B. A., & Kim, H. (2018a). Mechanisms of value-learning in the guidance of spatial attention. Cognition, 178, 26–36.Google Scholar
  15. Anderson, B. A., & Kim, H. (2018b). Relating attentional biases for stimuli associated with social reward and punishment to autistic traits. Collabra Psychology, 4(1), 10.Google Scholar
  16. Anderson, B. A., & Kim, H. (2019a). On the relationship between value-driven and stimulus-driven attentional capture. Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics, 81, 607–613.Google Scholar
  17. Anderson, B. A., & Kim, H. (2019b). Test-retest reliability of value-driven attentional capture. Behavior Research Methods, 51(2), 720–726.Google Scholar
  18. Anderson, B. A., Kronemer, S. I., Rilee, J. J., Sacktor, N., & Marvel, C. L. (2016b). Reward, attention, and HIV-related risk in HIV+ individuals. Neurobiology of Disease, 92, 157–165.Google Scholar
  19. Anderson, B. A., Kuwabara, H., Wong, D. F., Gean, E. G., Rahmim, A., Brasic, J. R., … Yantis, S. (2016c). The role of dopamine in value-based attentional orienting. Current Biology, 26, 550–555.Google Scholar
  20. Anderson, B. A., Kuwabara, H., Wong, D. F., Roberts, J., Rahmim, A., Brasic, J. R., & Courtney, S. M. (2017b). Linking dopaminergic reward signals to the development of attentional bias: A positron emission tomographic study. NeuroImage, 157, 27–33.Google Scholar
  21. Anderson, B. A., Laurent, P. A., & Yantis, S. (2011a). Learned value magnifies salience-based attentional capture. PLoS ONE, 6, e27926.Google Scholar
  22. Anderson, B. A., Laurent, P. A., & Yantis, S. (2011b). Value-driven attentional capture. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 108, 10367–10371.Google Scholar
  23. Anderson, B. A., Laurent, P. A., & Yantis, S. (2013b). Reward predictions bias attentional selection. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7, 262.Google Scholar
  24. Anderson, B. A., Laurent, P. A., & Yantis, S. (2014a). Value-driven attentional priority signals in human basal ganglia and visual cortex. Brain Research, 1587, 88–96.Google Scholar
  25. Anderson, B. A., Leal, S. L., Hall, M. G., Yassa, M. A., & Yantis, S. (2014b). The attribution of value-based attentional priority in individuals with depressive symptoms. Cognitive, Affective, and Behavioral Neuroscience, 14, 1221–1227.Google Scholar
  26. Anderson, B. A., & Yantis, S. (2012). Value-driven attentional and oculomotor capture during goal-directed, unconstrained viewing. Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics, 74, 1644–1653.Google Scholar
  27. Anderson, B. A., & Yantis, S. (2013). Persistence of value-driven attentional capture. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 39, 6–9.Google Scholar
  28. Baron-Cohen, S., Wheelwright, S., Skinner, R., Martin, J., & Clubly, E. (2001). The autism-spectrum quotient (AQ): Evidence from Asperger syndrome/high-functioning autism, males and females, scientists and mathematicians. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 31, 5–17.Google Scholar
  29. Berridge, K. C. (2012). From prediction error to incentive salience: Mesolimbic computation of reward motivation. European Journal of Neuroscience, 35, 1124–1143.Google Scholar
  30. Berridge, K. C., & Robinson, T. E. (2016). Liking, wanting, and the incentive-sensitization theory of addiction. American Psychologist, 71, 670–679.Google Scholar
  31. Bourgeois, A., Chelazzi, L., & Vuilleumier, P. (2016). How motivation and reward learning modulate selective attention. Progress in Brain Research, 229, 325–342.Google Scholar
  32. Bourgeois, A., Neveu, R., Bayle, D. J., & Vuilleumier, P. (2017). How does reward compete with goal-directed and stimulus-driven shifts of attention? Cognition and Emotion, 31, 109–118.Google Scholar
  33. Brainard, D. H. (1997). The psychophysics toolbox. Spatial Vision, 10, 433–436.Google Scholar
  34. Carver, C. S., & White, T. L. (1994). Behavioral inhibition, behavioral activation, and affective responses to impending reward and punishment: The BIS/BAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 319–333.Google Scholar
  35. Cox, R. W. (1996). AFNI: Software for analysis and visualization of functional magnetic resonance neuroimages. Computers and Biomedical Research, 29, 162–173.Google Scholar
  36. De Tommaso, M., Mastropasqua, T., & Turatto, M. (2017). The salience of a reward cue can outlast reward devaluation. Behavioral Neuroscience, 131, 226–234.Google Scholar
  37. Della Libera, C., & Chelazzi, L. (2009). Learning to attend and to ignore is a matter of gains and losses. Psychological Science, 20, 778–784.Google Scholar
  38. Desimone, R., & Duncan, J. (1995). Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 18, 193–222.Google Scholar
  39. Failing, M., & Theeuwes, J. (2018). Selection history: How reward modulates selectivity of visual attention. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 25, 514–538.Google Scholar
  40. Fan, J., McCandliss, B. D., Fossella, J., Flombaum, J. I., & Posner, M. I. (2005). The activation of attention networks. NeuroImage, 26, 471–479.Google Scholar
  41. Fan, J., McCandliss, B. D., Sommer, T., Raz, A., & Posner, M. I. (2002). Testing the efficacy and independence of attentional networks. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 14, 340–347.Google Scholar
  42. Folk, C. L., Remington, R. W., & Johnston, J. C. (1992). Involuntary covert orienting is contingent on attentional control settings. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18, 1030–1044.Google Scholar
  43. Hickey, C., Chelazzi, L., & Theeuwes, J. (2010a). Reward changes salience in human vision via the anterior cingulate. Journal of Neuroscience, 30, 11096–11103.Google Scholar
  44. Hickey, C., Chelazzi, L., & Theeuwes, J. (2010b). Reward guides vision when it’s your thing: Trait reward-seeking in reward-mediated visual priming. PLoS ONE, 5, e14087.Google Scholar
  45. Hickey, C., & Peelen, M. V. (2015). Neural mechanisms of incentive salience in naturalistic human vision. Neuron, 85, 512–518.Google Scholar
  46. Hickey, C., & Peelen, M. V. (2017). Reward selectively modulates the lingering neural representation of recently attended objects in natural scenes. Journal of Neuroscience, 37, 7297–7304.Google Scholar
  47. Jimura, K., Locke, H. S., & Braver, T. S. (2010). Prefrontal cortex mediation of cognitive enhancement in rewarding motivational contexts. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 107, 8871–8876.Google Scholar
  48. Kim, A. J., & Anderson, B. A. (2019a). Neural correlates of attentional capture by stimuli previously associated with social reward. Cognitive Neuroscience..  https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsw141.Google Scholar
  49. Kim, H., & Anderson, B. A. (2019b). Neural evidence for automatic value-modulated approach behavior. NeuroImage, 189, 150–158.Google Scholar
  50. Kiss, M., Driver, J., & Eimer, M. (2009). Reward priority of visual target singletons modulates event-related potential signatures of attentional selection. Psychological Science, 20, 245–251.Google Scholar
  51. Leganes-Fonteneau, M., Scott, R., & Duka, T. (2018). Attentional responses to stimuli associated with a reward can occur in the absence of knowledge of their predictive values. Behavioural Brain Research, 341, 26–36.Google Scholar
  52. Mack, A., & Rock, I. (1998). Inattentional blindness. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  53. Murty, V. P., Labar, K. S., & Adcock, R. A. (2012). Threat of punishment motivates memory encoding via amygdala, not midbrain, interactions with the medial temporal lobe. Journal of Neuroscience, 32, 8969–8976.Google Scholar
  54. Navalpakkam, V., Koch, C., & Perona, P. (2009). Homo economicus in visual search. Journal of Vision, 9(1), 1–16.Google Scholar
  55. Navalpakkam, V., Koch, C., Rangel, A., & Perona, P. (2010). Optimal reward harvesting in complex perceptual environments. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 107, 5232–5237.Google Scholar
  56. O’Doherty, J. P. (2004). Reward representations and reward-related learning in the human brain: Insights from neuroimaging. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 14, 769–776.Google Scholar
  57. Patton, J. H., Stanford, M. S., & Barratt, E. S. (1995). Factor structure of the Barratt impulsiveness scale. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 51, 768–774.Google Scholar
  58. Pessoa, L., & Engelmann, J. B. (2010). Embedding reward signals into perception and cognition. Frontiers Neuroscience, 4(17), 1–8.Google Scholar
  59. Pool, E., Brosch, T., Delplanque, S., & Sander, D. (2014). Where is the chocolate? Rapid spatial orienting toward stimuli associated with primary rewards. Cognition, 130, 348–359.Google Scholar
  60. Qi, S., Zeng, Q., Ding, C., & Li, H. (2013). Neural correlates of reward-driven attentional capture in visual search. Brain Research, 1532, 32–43.Google Scholar
  61. Raymond, J. E., & O’Brien, J. L. (2009). Selective visual attention and motivation: The consequences of value learning in an attentional blink task. Psychological Science, 20, 981–988.Google Scholar
  62. Rensink, R. A., O’Regan, J. K., & Clark, J. J. (1997). To see or not to see: The need for attention to perceive changes in scenes. Psychological Science, 8, 368–373.Google Scholar
  63. Sali, A. W., Anderson, B. A., & Yantis, S. (2014). The role of reward prediction in the control of attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 40, 1654–1664.Google Scholar
  64. Sali, A. W., Anderson, B. A., Yantis, S., Mostofsky, S. H., & Rosch, K. S. (2018). Reduced value-driven attentional capture among children with ADHD compared to typically developing controls. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 46, 1187–1200.Google Scholar
  65. Schmidt, L. J., Belopolsky, A. V., & Theeuwes, J. (2015). Attentional capture by signals of threat. Cognition and Emotion, 29, 687–694.Google Scholar
  66. Schmidt, L. J., Belopolsky, A. V., & Theeuwes, J. (2017). The time course of attentional bias to cues of threat and safety. Cognition and Emotion, 31, 845–857.Google Scholar
  67. Schultz, W., Dayan, P., & Montague, P. R. (1997). A neural substrate of prediction and reward. Science, 275, 1593–1599.Google Scholar
  68. Seitz, A. R., Kim, D., & Watanabe, T. (2009). Rewards evoke learning of unconsciously processed visual stimuli in adult humans. Neuron, 61, 700–707.Google Scholar
  69. Serences, J. T. (2008). Value-based modulations in human visual cortex. Neuron, 60, 1169–1181.Google Scholar
  70. Serences, J. T., & Saproo, S. (2010). Population response profiles in early visual cortex are biased in favor of more valuable stimuli. Journal of Neurophysiology, 104, 76–87.Google Scholar
  71. Talairach, J., & Tournoux, P. (1988). Co-planar stereotaxic atlas of the human brain. New York: Thieme.Google Scholar
  72. Theeuwes, J. (1992). Perceptual selectivity for color and form. Perception and Psychophysics, 51, 599–606.Google Scholar
  73. Theeuwes, J. (2010). Top-down and bottom-up control of visual selection. Acta Psychologica, 135, 77–99.Google Scholar
  74. Van Dijk, K. R., Sabuncu, M. R., & Buckner, R. L. (2012). The influence of head motion on intrinsic functional connectivity MRI. NeuroImage, 59, 431–438.Google Scholar
  75. van Koningsbruggen, M. G., Ficarella, S. C., Battelli, L., & Hickey, C. (2016). Transcranial random noise stimulation of visual cortex potentiates value-driven attentional capture. Social, Cognitive, and Affective Neuroscience, 11, 1481–1488.Google Scholar
  76. Waelti, P., Dickinson, A., & Schultz, W. (2001). Dopamine responses comply with basic assumptions of formal learning theory. Nature, 412, 43–48.Google Scholar
  77. Wang, L., Yu, H., Hu, J., Theeuwes, J., Gong, X., Xiang, Y., … Zhou, X. (2015). Reward breaks through center-surround inhibition via anterior insula. Human Brain Mapping, 36, 5233–5251.Google Scholar
  78. Wolfe, J. M., Cave, K. R., & Franzel, S. L. (1989). Guided Search: An alternative to the feature integration model for visual search. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 15, 419–433.Google Scholar
  79. Yamamoto, S., Kim, H. F., & Hikosaka, O. (2013). Reward value-contingent changes of visual responses in the primate caudate tail associated with a visuomotor skill. The Journal of Neuroscience, 33, 11227–11238.Google Scholar
  80. Yamamoto, S., Monosov, I. E., Yasuda, M., & Hikosaka, O. (2012). What and where information in the caudate tail guides saccades to visual objects. The Journal of Neuroscience, 32, 11005–11016.Google Scholar
  81. Yantis, S., & Jonides, J. (1984). Abrupt visual onsets and selective attention: Evidence from visual search. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 10, 350–374.Google Scholar
  82. Zhang, J.-T., Ma, S.-S., Yip, S. W., Wang, L.-J., Chen, C., Yan, C.-G., … Fang, X.-Y. (2015). Decreased functional connectivity between ventral tegmental area and nucleus accumbens in internet gaming disorder: Evidence from resting state functional magnetic resonance imaging. Behavioral and Brain Functions, 11(37), 1–7.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PsychologyTexas A&M UniversityCollege StationUSA

Personalised recommendations