Musical dynamics in early triadic interactions: a case study
Research of the last 30 years showed the importance of music for psychological development. Communicative musicality studies described musical organisations in dyadic interactions (adult–baby). However, other perspectives proposed that, from the beginning of life, there are early triadic interactions (adult–object–baby) that should also be analysed. Following previous research, we hypothesised that early triadic interactions have a structured musical organisation. We recorded a 2-month-old child interacting with his mother and an object in their home and performed a microgenetic quantitative–qualitative analysis. Given the child’s age, we focused on musical characteristics of the mother’s actions. To our knowledge, this is the first study to combine data processing provided by ELAN, Finale, and Matlab-MIRtoolbox. Our analysis shows that the child participates in triadic interactions in which the mother communicates about and through the maraca using musical resources in increasingly complex ways. Musical structuring happens at the intersegment, intrasequence, and intersequence levels, and involves different musical parameters. We suggest musical organisation in early triadic interactions follows a holographic structure in which each piece carries information about dynamic processes of different timescales. Results highlight the importance of considering objects and their uses to better understand early communicative musicality.
The authors would like to especially thank Dr. Joanna Rączaszek-Leonardi for her valuable comments on this work, and for suggesting the holographic structure idea that we use here.
This study was supported by the Program for the Training of University Teachers [“Formación de Profesorado Universitario”] of the Spanish Ministry of Education, Culture, and Sports, to which the first author of the article belongs [reference FPU16/05358] and project EDU2011-27840 (MINECO, Spain).
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
Authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
- Bates, E., Camaioni, L., & Volterra, V. (1975). The acquisition of performatives prior to speech. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 21(3), 205–226.Google Scholar
- Benward, B., & Saker, M. (2015). Music in theory and practice. Volume 1 (9th edn.). New York: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
- Brinck, I., Reddy, V., & Zahavi, D. (2017). The primacy of the ‘we’? In C. Durt, T. Fuchs & C. Tewes (Eds.), Embodiment, enaction, and culture. Investigating the constitution of the shared world (pp. 131–148). Cambridge/London: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Di Stefano, N. (2016). Musical beings: Playing and dancing bodies. In M. Barone, N. Di Stefano & V. Tambone (Eds.), About the living body: Introduction to philosophical anatomy (pp. 31–47). New York: Nova Science Publisher Inc.Google Scholar
- ELAN (Version 5.2) [Computer software]. (2018). Nijmegen: Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics. Retrieved from https://tla.mpi.nl/tools/tla-tools/elan/. Accessed 17 Aug 2018.
- Fernald, A., Taeschner, T., Dunn, J., Papousek, M., de Boysson-Bardies, B., & Fukui, I. (1989). A cross-language study of prosodic modifications in mothers’ and fathers’ speech to preverbal infants. Journal of Child Language, 16(3), 477–501. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000900010679.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Fogel, A. (1993). Developing through relationships. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
- Gergely, G., & Watson, J. S. (1999). Early socio-emotional development: Contingency perception and the social-biofeedback model. In P. Rochat (Ed.), Early social cognition: Understanding others in the first months of life (pp. 101–136). Mahwah: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
- Holt, S., Fogel, A., & Wood, R. (1998). Innovation in social games. In M. Lyra & J. Valsiner (Eds.), Child development within culturally structured environments. Vol. IV (pp. 35–51). Norwood: Ablex.Google Scholar
- Keller, H., Otto, H., Lamm, B., Yovsi, R. D., & Kärtner, J. (2008). The timing of verbal/vocal communications between mothers and their infants: A longitudinal cross-cultural comparison. Infant Behavior and Development, 31(2), 217–226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infbeh.2007.10.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Lartillot, O., Toiviainen, P., & Eerola, T. (2008). A Matlab toolbox for music information retrieval. In C. Preisach, H. Burkhardt, L. Schmidt-Thieme & R. Decker (Eds.), Data analysis, machine learning and applications. Studies in classification, data analysis, and knowledge organization (pp. 261–268). Berlin/Heilderberg: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-78246-9_31.Google Scholar
- Malloch, S., & Trevarthen, C. (Eds.). (2009). Communicative musicality. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Martínez, I. C., & Español, S. (2009). Image-schemas in parental performance. In J. Louhivuori, T. Eerola, S. Saarikallio, T. Himberg, & P.-S. Eerola (Eds.), Proceedings of the 7th Triennial Conference of European Society for the Cognitive Sciences of Music (ESCOM 2009) (pp. 297–305). Jyväskylä: European Society for the Cognitive Sciences of Music.Google Scholar
- Miller, S. (2017). Developmental research methods (5th edn.). London: SAGE Publications.Google Scholar
- Papoušek, H. (1996). Musicality in infancy research: Biological and cultural origins of early musicality. In I. Deliège & J. Sloboda (Eds.), Musical beginnings. Origins and development of musical competence (pp. 37–55). Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198523321.003.0002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Papoušek, M., & Papoušek, H. (1981). Musical elements in the infant’s vocalizations: Their significance for communication, cognition and creativity. In L. P. Lipsitt (Ed.), Advances in infancy research (pp. 163–224). Norwood: Ablex.Google Scholar
- Rączaszek-Leonardi, J. (2018). Relations out there: Enacted structures of early social interactions. Presented at the 48th Annual Meeting of the Jean Piaget Society. The Dynamics of Development: Process, (Inter-)Action, & Complexity, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
- Rodriguez, C., & Moro, C. (2008). Coming to agreement: Object use by infants and adults. In J. Zlatev, T. P. Racine, C. Sinha & E. Itkonen (Eds.), The shared mind. Perspectives on intersubjectivity (pp. 89–114). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/celcr.12.07rod.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Rodríguez, C. (2006). Del ritmo al símbolo. Los signos en el nacimiento de la inteligencia. Barcelona: I.C.E-Horsori Editorial.Google Scholar
- Rodríguez, C. (2012). The functional permanence of the object: A product of consensus. In E. Martí & C. Rodríguez (Eds.), After Piaget (pp. 123–150). New Brunswick/London: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
- Rodríguez, C., Basilio, M., Cárdenas, K., Cavalcante, S., Moreno-Núñez, A., Palacios, P., & Yuste, N. (2018). Object pragmatics: Culture and communication, the bases for early cognitive development. In A. Rosa & J. Valsiner (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of socio-cultural psychology (2nd edn., pp. 223–244). New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Rodríguez, C., Benassi, J., Estrada, L., & Alessandroni, N. (2017). Early social interactions with people and objects. In A. Slater & G. Bremner (Eds.), An introduction to developmental psychology (3rd edn., pp. 213–258). Hoboken/West Sussex: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Rodríguez, C., & Moro, C. (1991). ¿Por qué tiende el niño el objeto hacia el adulto? La construcción social de la significación de los objetos. Infancia y Aprendizaje, 53, 99–118.Google Scholar
- Rodríguez, C., & Moro, C. (1999). El mágico número tres. Cuando los niños aún no hablan. Barcelona: Paidós Ibérica.Google Scholar
- Rossmanith, N., & Reddy, V. (2016). Structure and openness in the development of self in infancy. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 23(1–2), 237–257.Google Scholar
- Stern, D., Beebe, B., Jaffe, J., & Bennet, S. L. (1977). The infant’s stimulous world during social interaction: A study of caregiver behaviours with particular reference to repetition and timing. In H. R. Schaffer (Ed.), Studies in mother-infant interaction (pp. 15–46). London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
- Trevarthen, C. (1979). Communication and cooperation in early infancy: A description of primary intersubjectivity. In M. Bullowa (Ed.), Before speech: The beginning of human communication (pp. 321–347). London: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Trevarthen, C. (2012). Communicative musicality: The human impulse to create and share music. In D. Hargreaves, D. Miell & R. MacDonald (Eds.), Musical Imaginations. Multidisciplinary perspectives on creativity, performance and perception (pp. 259–284). Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Trevarthen, C., Aitken, K. J., Vandekerckhove, M., Delafield-Butt, J., & Nagy, E. (2006). Collaborative regulations of vitality in early childhood: Stress in intimate relationships and postnatal psychopathology. In D. Cicchetti & D. J. Cohen (Eds.), Developmental psychopathology. Vol. 2 (2nd edn., pp. 65–126). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Trevarthen, C., & Hubley, P. (1978). Secondary intersubjectivity: Confidence, confiding and acts of meaning in the first year. In A. Lock (Ed.), Action, gesture and symbol: The emergence of language (pp. 183–229). London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
- Wallon, H. (1942/1970). De l’acte à la pensée. Paris: Flammarion.Google Scholar