Advertisement

Green as a cbemcuru: modal as well as amodal color cues can help to solve anagrams

Original Article
  • 14 Downloads

Abstract

Embodied cognition theories have been getting much support in recent years from studies showing that multimodal experiential traces are activated during language comprehension. However, there are almost no studies examining this influence in the opposite direction. Here, we investigated the influence of modal (physical color patch) and amodal (color word) cues on anagram solving times. We manipulated the association between the color cue and the solution word’s referent color (e.g., finding the solution word “cucumber” for the anagram “cmrbucue” should be facilitated by the word “green” or a green color patch). In a third experiment, both cues were combined: a color word was presented inside a color patch before the anagram appeared. We indeed observed priming effects: anagrams were solved faster when the preceding color patch or color word matched the solution word’s referent compared to a mismatching color patch or color word. When combining these cues, a priming effect only was found when both color word and color patch matched the solution word’s referent. These results further strengthen the notion that multimodal experiential traces play an important role in language comprehension and expand upon the results of earlier studies on anagram solution tasks.

Notes

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by the German Research Foundation (DFG) as part of the Collaborative Research Center “SFB 833”; Project B4 of Barbara Kaup and Hartmut Leuthold. We want to thank the two reviewers of an earlier version of this paper for their helpful remarks and great suggestions.

References

  1. Antonietti, A., & Girotti, G. (1991). Anagram solving is facilitated by intra-but not cross-modal priming. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 72(2), 403–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barsalou, L. W. (1999). Perceptions of perceptual symbols. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22(4), 637–660.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barsalou, L. W. (2008). Grounded cognition. Annual Review of Psychology, 59, 617–645.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Bates, D., Maechler, M., Bolker, B., Walker, S., Christensen, R. H. B., & Singmann, H. (2015). lme4: Linear mixed-effects models using Eigen and S4, 2014. R package version, 1(4), 1–23.Google Scholar
  5. Berndt, E., Dudschig, C., & Kaup, B. (2016). Activating concepts by activating experiential traces: Investigations with a series of anagram solution tasks. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 71(2), 483–498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Binder, J. R., & Desai, R. H. (2011). The neurobiology of semantic memory. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 15(11), 527–536.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  7. Bramão, I., Reis, A., Petersson, K. M., & Faísca, L. (2011). The role of color information on object recognition: A review and meta-analysis. Acta Psychologica, 138(1), 244–253.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Connell, L. (2007). Representing object colour in language comprehension. Cognition, 102(3), 476–485.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. de Leeuw, J. R., & Motz, B. A. (2016). Psychophysics in a Web browser? Comparing response times collected with JavaScript and Psychophysics Toolbox in a visual search task. Behavior Research Methods, 48(1), 1–12.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Dominowski, R. L., & Ekstrand, B. R. (1967). Direct and associative priming in anagram solving. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 74(1), 84–86.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Dove, G. (2009). Beyond perceptual symbols: A call for representational pluralism. Cognition, 110(3), 412–431.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Dove, G. (2011). On the need for embodied and dis-embodied cognition. Frontiers in Psychology, 1, 242.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  13. Dudschig, C., de la Vega, I., De Filippis, M., & Kaup, B. (2014). Language and vertical space: On the automaticity of language action interconnections. Cortex, 58, 151–160.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Dudschig, C., & Kaup, B. (2017). Is it all task-specific? The role of binary responses, verbal mediation, and saliency for eliciting language-space associations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 43(2), 259–270.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Dudschig, C., Souman, J., Lachmair, M., de la Vega, I., & Kaup, B. (2013). Reading “sun” and looking up: The influence of language on saccadic eye movements in the vertical dimension. PloS One, 8(2), e56872.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  16. Dudschig, C., de la Vega, I., & Kaup, B. (2015). To fly or not to fly? The automatic influence of negation on language–space associations. Cognitive Processing, 16(1), 203–207.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Fodor, J. A. (1975). The language of thought, vol. 5. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Gallese, V., & Lakoff, G. (2005). The brain’s concepts: The role of the sensory-motor system in conceptual knowledge. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 22(3–4), 455–479.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Jones, D. (2010). A WEIRD view of human nature skews psychologists’ studies. Science, 328(5986), 1627–1627.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Kintsch, W. (1988). The role of knowledge in discourse comprehension: A construction- integration model. Psychological Review, 95(2), 163–182.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Kaup, B., de la Vega, I., Strozyk, J., & Dudschig, C. (2015). The role of sensorimotor processes in meaning composition. In M. H. Fischer & Y. Coello (Eds.), Conceptual and Interactive Embodiment (pp. 58–82). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  22. Kintsch, W. (2001). Predication. Cognitive Science, 25(2), 173–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kirsh, D. (2009). Problem solving and situated cognition. In P. Robbins, M. Aydede (eds.) The Cambridge Handbook of Situated Cognition (pp. 264–306). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Lachmair, M., Dudschig, C., De Filippis, M., de la Vega, I., & Kaup, B. (2011). Root versus roof: automatic activation of location information during word processing. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 18(6), 1180–1188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Mahon, B. Z., & Caramazza, A. (2008). A critical look at the embodied cognition hypothesis and a new proposal for grounding conceptual content. Journal of Physiology-Paris, 102(1–3), 59–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Mannaert, L. N. H., Dijkstra, K., & Zwaan, R. A. (2017). Is color an integral part of a rich mental simulation? Memory & Cognition, 45, 974–982.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Mehta, R., & Zhu, R. J. (2009). Blue or red? Exploring the effect of color on cognitive task performances. Science, 323(5918), 1226–1229.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Mills, M., Boychuk, P., Chasteen, A. L., & Pratt, J. (2018). Attention goes both ways: Shifting attention influences lexical decisions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 147(2), 282–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Newell, A., & Simon, H. A. (1972). Human problem solving. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  30. Novick, L. R., & Sherman, S. J. (2003). On the nature of insight solutions: Evidence from skill differences in anagram solution. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Section A, 56(2), 351–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Novick, L. R., & Sherman, S. J. (2008). The effects of superficial and structural information on online problem solving for good versus poor anagram solver. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 61(7), 1098–1120.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Rajaram, S., & Roediger, H. L. (1993). Direct comparison of four implicit memory tests. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 19(4), 765–776.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Richter, T., & Zwaan, R. A. (2010). Integration of perceptual information in word access. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 63(1), 81–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Scribner, S. (1985). Knowledge at work. Anthropology & Education Quarterly, 16(3), 199–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Sperber, R. D., McCauley, C., Ragain, R. D., & Weil, C. M. (1979). Semantic priming effects on picture and word processing. Memory & Cognition, 7(5), 339–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Srinivas, K., & Roediger, I. I. I., H. L (1990). Classifying implicit memory tests: Category association and anagram solution. Journal of Memory and Language, 29(4), 389–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Stanfield, R. A., & Zwaan, R. A. (2001). The effect of implied orientation derived from verbal context on picture recognition. Psychological Science, 12(2), 153–156.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Steele, K. M. (2014). Failure to replicate the Mehta and Zhu (2009) color-priming effect on anagram solution times. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 21(3), 771–776.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Zwaan, R. A., & Pecher, D. (2012). Revisiting mental simulation in language comprehension: Six replication attempts. PloS One, 7(12), e51382.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  40. Zwaan, R. A., Stanfield, R. A., & Yaxley, R. H. (2002). Language comprehenders mentally represent the shapes of objects. Psychological Science, 13(2), 168–171.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of TübingenTübingenGermany

Personalised recommendations