Advertisement

Psychological Research

, Volume 83, Issue 5, pp 989–1006 | Cite as

The exogenous and endogenous control of attentional focusing

  • Lisa N. JefferiesEmail author
  • James T. Enns
  • Vincent Di Lollo
Original Article

Abstract

Selective visual attention involves prioritizing both the location (orienting) and distribution (focusing) of processing. To date, much more research has examined attentional orienting than focusing. One of the most well-established findings is that orienting can be exogenous, as when a unique change in luminance draws attention to a spatial location (e.g., Theeuwes in Atten Percept Psychophys 51:599–606, 1992; Yantis and Jonides in J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 10:601, 1984), and endogenous, as when a red distractor shape diverts attention when one is looking for a red target (e.g., Bacon and Egeth in Percept Psychophys 55:485–496, 1994; Folk et al. in J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 18:1030, 1992). Here we ask whether attentional focusing—the broadening and contracting of prioritized processing—is influenced by the same two factors. Our methodology involved a dual-stream attentional blink task; participants monitored two spatially separated streams of items for two targets that could appear unpredictably either in the same stream or in opposite streams. The spatial distribution of attention was assessed by examining second-target accuracy in relation to inter-target lag and target location (same or opposite streams). In Experiment 1, we found that attentional contracting was more rapid when the targets differed in luminance from the distractor items. In Experiments 2 and 3, we found that the rate of attentional contracting was slower when there were task-relevant distractors in the stream opposite the first target. These results indicate that the rate of attentional focusing, like orienting, can be modulated by both exogenous and endogenous mechanisms.

Notes

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by Discovery Grants from the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada to V. Di Lollo and J. T. Enns.

Compliance with ethical standards

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

References

  1. Akyürek, E. G., Eshuis, S. A., Nieuwenstein, M. R., Saija, J. D., Başkent, D., & Hommel, B. (2012). Temporal target integration underlies performance at lag 1 in the attentional blink. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 38, 1448.Google Scholar
  2. Awh, E., & Pashler, H. (2000). Evidence for split attentional foci. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 26(2), 834–846.Google Scholar
  3. Bacon, W. F., & Egeth, H. E. (1994). Overriding stimulus-driven attentional capture. Perception & Psychophysics, 55, 485–496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barriopedro, M. I., & Botella, J. (1998). New evidence for the zoom lens model using the RSVP technique. Perception & Psychophysics, 60, 1406–1414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bay, M., & Wyble, B. (2014). The benefit of attention is not diminished when distributed over two simultaneous cues. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 76, 1287–1297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Benso, F., Turatto, M., Mascetti, G. G., & Umiltà, C. (1998). The time course of attentional focusing. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 10, 378–388.Google Scholar
  7. Breitmeyer, B. G., Ehrenstein, A., Pritchard, K., Hiscock, M., & Crisan, J. (1999). The roles of location specificity and masking mechanisms in the attentional blink. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 61, 798–809.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Breitmeyer, B. G., Hoar, W. S., Randall, D. J., & Conte, F. P. (1984). Visual masking: An integrative approach. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  9. Castiello, U., & Umiltà, C. (1990). Size of the attentional focus and efficiency of processing. Acta Psychologica, 73, 195–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chun, M. M., & Potter, M. C. (1995). A two-stage model for multiple target detection in rapid serial visual presentation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21, 109–127.Google Scholar
  11. Di Lollo, V., Enns, J. T., Yantis, S., & Dechief, L. G. (2000). Response latencies to the onset and offset of visual stimuli. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 62, 218–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Egeth, H. (1977). Attention and preattention. Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 11, 277–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Egeth, H. E., & Yantis, S. (1997). Visual attention: Control, representation, and time course. Annual Review of Psychology, 48, 269–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Eimer, M., & Grubert, A. (2014). Spatial attention can be allocated rapidly and in parallel to new visual objects. Current Biology, 24, 193–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Eimer, M., & Kiss, M. (2008). Involuntary attentional capture is determined by task set: Evidence from event-related brain potentials. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 20, 1423–1433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Eriksen, C. W., & St. James, J. D. (1986). Visual attention within and around the field of focal attention: A zoom lens model. Perception & Psychophysics, 42, 225–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Eriksen, C. W., & Yeh, Y-y. (1985). Allocation of attention in the visual field. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 11, 583–597.Google Scholar
  18. Facoetti, A., Lorusso, M. L., Paganoni, P., Cattaneo, C., Galli, R., & Mascetti, G. G. (2003). The time course of attentional focusing in dyslexic and normally reading children. Brain and Cognition, 53, 181–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Folk, C. L., Remington, R. W., & Johnston, J. C. (1992). Involuntary covert orienting is contingent on attentional control settings. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18, 1030.Google Scholar
  20. Folk, C. L., Remington, R. W., & Wright, J. H. (1994). The structure of attentional control: contingent attentional capture by apparent motion, abrupt onset, and color. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 317.Google Scholar
  21. Ghorashi, S., Enns, J. T., Klein, R. M., & Di Lollo, V. (2010). Spatial selection and target identification are separable processes in visual search. Journal of Vision, 10(3), 7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Ghorashi, S. M. S., Jefferies, L. N., Kawahara, J.-I., & Watanabe, K. (2008). Does attention accompany the conscious awareness of both location and identity of an object. Psyche, 14, 1–13.Google Scholar
  23. Ghorashi, S. M., Zuvic, S. M., Visser, T. A., & Di Lollo, V. (2003). Focal distraction: spatial shifts of attentional focus are not required for contingent capture. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 29, 78.Google Scholar
  24. Greenwood, P. M., Parasuraman, P., & Haxby, J. V. (1993). Changes in visuospatial attention over the adult lifespan. Neuropsychologia, 31, 471–485.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hawkins, H. L., Shafto, M. G., & Richardson, K. (1988). Effects of target luminance and cue validity on the latency of visual detection. Perception & Psychophysics, 44(5), 484–492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hommel, B., & Akyürek, E. G. (2005). Lag-1 sparing in the attentional blink: Benefits and costs of integrating two events into a single episode. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A, 58, 1415–1433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Jans, B., Peters, J. C., & De Weerd, P. (2010). Visual spatial attention to multiple locations at once: The jury is still out. Psychological Review, 117, 637–684.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Jefferies, L. N., & Di Lollo, V. (2009). Linear changes in the spatial extent of the focus of attention across time. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 35, 1020–1031.Google Scholar
  29. Jefferies, L. N., & Di Lollo, V. (2015). When can spatial attention be deployed in the form of an annulus? Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 77, 413–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Jefferies, L. N., Enns, J. T., & Di Lollo, V. (2014a). The flexible focus: Whether spatial attention is unitary or divided depends on observer goals. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 40, 465.Google Scholar
  31. Jefferies, L. N., Ghorashi, S., Kawahara, J-i, & Di Lollo, V. (2007). Ignorance is bliss: The role of observer expectation in dynamic spatial tuning of the attentional focus. Perception & Psychophysics, 69, 1162–1174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Jefferies, L. N., Gmeindl, L., & Yantis, S. (2014b). Attending to illusory differences in object size. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 76, 1393–1402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Jefferies, L.N., & Witt, J.B. First unitary, then divided: The temporal dynamics of dividing attention (under review). Google Scholar
  34. Jefferies, L. N., Roggeveen, A. B., Enns, J. T., Bennett, P. J., Sekuler, A. B., & Di Lollo, V. (2015). On the time course of attentional focusing in older adults. Psychological Research, 79, 28–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Jonides, J. (1983). Further toward a model of the mind’s eye’s movement. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 21(4), 247–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Jonides, J., & Yantis, S. (1988). Uniqueness of abrupt visual onset in capturing attention. Perception & Psychophysics, 43, 346–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Kawahara, J. I., & Yamada, Y. (2006). Two noncontiguous locations can be attended concurrently: Evidence from the attentional blink. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 13, 594–599.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. LaBerge, D. (1983). Spatial extent of attention to letters and words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 9, 371.Google Scholar
  39. Lit, A., Young, R. H., & Shaffer, M. (1971). Simple time reaction as a function of luminance for various wavelengths. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 10(6), 397–399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Lunau, R., & Olivers, C. N. (2010). The attentional blink and lag 1 sparing are nonspatial. Attention, Perception & Psychophysics, 72, 317–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Maringelli, F., & Umiltà, C. (1998). The control of the attentional focus. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 10, 225–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. McMains, S. A., & Somers, D. C. (2004). Multiple spotlights of attentional selection in human visual cortex. Neuron, 42, 677–686.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Müller, M. M., Malinowski, P., Gruber, T., & Hillyard, S. A. (2003). Sustained division of the attentional spotlight. Nature, 424, 309–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Posner, M. I. (1980). Orienting of attention. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 32, 3–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Posner, M. I., & Cohen, Y. (1984). Components of visual orienting. Attention and Performance X: Control of Language Processes, 32, 531–556.Google Scholar
  46. Posner, M. I., & Petersen, S. E. (1990). The attention system of the human brain. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 13(1), 25–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Posner, M. I., Petersen, S. E., Fox, P. T., & Raichle, M. E. (1988). Localization of cognitive operations in the human brain. Science, 240(4859), 1627.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Posner, M. I., Sheese, B. E., Odludaş, Y., & Tang, Y. (2006). Analyzing and shaping human attentional networks. Neural Networks, 19, 1422–1429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Posner, M. I., Snyder, C. R., & Davidson, B. J. (1980). Attention and the detection of signals. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 109, 160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Potter, M. C., Chun, M. M., Banks, B. S., & Muckenhoupt, M. (1998). Two attentional deficits in serial target search: The visual attentional blink and an amodal task-switch deficit. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 24, 979–992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Raymond, J. E., Shapiro, K. L., & Arnell, K. M. (1992). Temporary suppression of visual processing in an RSVP task: An attentional blink? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18, 849–860.Google Scholar
  52. Remington, R. W., Johnston, J. C., & Yantis, S. (1992). Involuntary attentional capture by abrupt onsets. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 51, 279–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Ronconi, L., Gori, S., Ruffino, M., Molteni, M., & Facoetti, A. (2012). Zoom-out attentional impairment in children with autism spectrum disorder. Cortex, 49, 1–9.Google Scholar
  54. Shih, S. I. (2000). Recall of two visual targets embedded in RSVP streams of distractors depends on their temporal and spatial relationship. Perception & Psychophysics, 62, 1348–1355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Spalek, T. M., Lagroix, H. E., Yanko, M. R., & Di Lollo, V. (2012). Perception of temporal order is impaired during the time course of the attentional blink. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 38, 402.Google Scholar
  56. Theeuwes, J. (1992). Perceptual selectivity for color and form. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 51, 599–606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Visser, T. A. W., Bischof, W. F., & Di Lollo, V. (1999a). Attentional switching in spatial and non-spatial domains: evidence from the attentional blink. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 458–469.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Visser, T. A., Zuvic, S. M., Bischof, W. F., & Di Lollo, V. (1999b). The attentional blink with targets in different spatial locations. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 6, 432–436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Weichselgartner, E., & Sperling, G. (1987). Dynamics of automatic and controlled visual attention. Science, 238, 778–781.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Woodman, G. F., & Luck, S. J. (2003). Serial deployment of attention during visual search. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 29(1), 121.Google Scholar
  61. Woodworth, R. S., & Schlosberg, H. (1954). Experimental Psychology. New Delhi: Oxford & IBH.Google Scholar
  62. Yamada, Y., & Kawahara, J. I. (2007). Dividing attention between two different categories and locations in rapid serial visual presentations. Perception & Psychophysics, 69, 1218–1229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Yantis, S. (1993). Stimulus-driven attentional capture and attentional control settings. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 19, 676–681.Google Scholar
  64. Yantis, S., & Jonides, J. (1984). Abrupt visual onsets and selective attention: evidence from visual search. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 10, 601.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lisa N. Jefferies
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • James T. Enns
    • 3
    • 4
  • Vincent Di Lollo
    • 5
  1. 1.School of Applied PsychologyGriffith UniversitySouthportAustralia
  2. 2.Menzies Health Institute QueenslandBrisbaneAustralia
  3. 3.University of British ColumbiaVancouverCanada
  4. 4.University of Western AustraliaPerthAustralia
  5. 5.Simon Fraser UniversityBurnabyCanada

Personalised recommendations