Advertisement

Springer Nature is making SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

Multiple cognitive control effects of error likelihood and conflict

Abstract

Recent work on cognitive control has suggested a variety of performance monitoring functions of the anterior cingulate cortex such as errors, conflict, error likelihood, and others. Given the variety of monitoring effects, a corresponding variety of control effects on behavior might be expected. This paper explores whether conflict and error likelihood produce distinct cognitive control effects on behavior, as measured by response time. A Change signal task (Brown & Braver, Science 307:1118–1121, 2005) was modified to include conditions of likely errors due to tardy as well as premature responses in conditions with and without conflict. The results discriminate between competing hypotheses of independent versus interacting conflict and error likelihood control effects. Specifically, the results suggest that the likelihood of premature versus tardy response errors can lead to multiple distinct control effects, which are independent of cognitive control effects driven by response conflict. As a whole, the results point to the existence of multiple distinct cognitive control mechanisms and challenge existing models of cognitive control that incorporate only a single control signal.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

References

  1. Behrens, T. E., Woolrich, M. W., Walton, M. E., & Rushworth, M. F. (2007). Learning the value of information in an uncertain world. Nature Neuroscience, 10(9), 1214–1221.

  2. Bogacz, R., Brown, E., Moehlis, J., Holmes, P., & Cohen, J. D. (2006). The physics of optimal decision making: A formal analysis of models of performance in two-alternative forced-choice tasks. Psychological Review, 113(4), 700–765.

  3. Botvinick, M. M., Braver, T. S., Barch, D. M., Carter, C. S., & Cohen, J. C. (2001). Conflict monitoring and cognitive control. Psychological Review, 108, 624–652.

  4. Botvinick, M. M., Nystrom, L., Fissel, K., Carter, C. S., & Cohen, J. D. (1999). Conflict monitoring versus selection-for-action in anterior cingulate cortex. Nature, 402(6758), 179–181.

  5. Brown, J., & Braver, T. S. (2007). Risk prediction and aversion by anterior cingulate cortex. Cognitive, Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience, 7(4), 266–277.

  6. Brown, J., Reynolds, J., & Braver, T. S. (2007). A Computational model of fractionated conflict-control mechanisms in task switching. Cognitive Psychology, 55, 37–85.

  7. Brown, J. W., & Braver, T. S. (2005). Learned predictions of error likelihood in the anterior cingulate cortex. Science, 307(5712), 1118–1121.

  8. Brown, J. W., & Braver, T. S. (2008). A computational model of risk, conflict, and individual difference effects in the anterior cingulate cortex. Brain Research, 1202, 99–108.

  9. Carter, C. S., Braver, T. S., Barch, D. M., Botvinick, M. M., Noll, D. C., & Cohen, J. D. (1998). Anterior cingulate cortex, error detection, and the online monitoring of performance. Science, 280, 747–749.

  10. Dale, A. M. (1999). Optimal experimental design for event-related fMRI. Human Brain Mapping, 8, 109–114.

  11. Dove, A., Pollmann, S., Schubert, T., Wiggins, C. J., & von Cramon, D. Y. (2000). Prefrontal cortex activation in task switching: An event-related fMRI study. Cognitive Brain Research, 9(1), 103–109.

  12. Gehring, W. J., & Knight, R. T. (2000). Prefrontal-cingulate interactions in action monitoring. Nature Neuroscience, 3(5), 516–520.

  13. Gemba, H., Sasaki, K., & Brooks, V. B. (1986). ‘Error’ potentials in limbic cortex (anterior cingulate area 24) of monkeys during motor learning. Neuroscience Letters, 70(2), 223–227.

  14. Goschke, T. (2000). Intentional reconfiguration and involuntary persistence in task set switching. In S. Monsell & J. Driver (Eds.), Control of cognitive processes: Attention and performance XVIII (pp. 331–3555). Cambridge: The MIT Press.

  15. Husain, M., Parton, A., Hodgson, T. L., Mort, D., & Rees, G. (2003). Self-control during response conflict by human supplementary eye field. Nature Neuroscience, 6(2), 117–118.

  16. Ito, S., Stuphorn, V., Brown, J., & Schall, J. D. (2003). Performance monitoring by anterior cingulate cortex during saccade countermanding. Science, 302, 120–122.

  17. Jones, A. D., Cho, R., Nystrom, L. E., Cohen, J. D., & Braver, T. S. (2002). A computational model of anterior cingulate function in speeded response tasks: Effects of frequency, sequence, and conflict. Cognitive, Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience, 2(4), 300–317.

  18. Laming, D. R. J. (1968). Information theory of choice reaction times. London: Academic Press.

  19. Logan, G. D., & Cowan, W. B. (1984). On the ability to inhibit thought and action: A theory of an act of control. Psychological Review, 91(3), 295–327.

  20. MacDonald, A. W., Cohen, J. D., Stenger, V. A., & Carter, C. S. (2000). Dissociating the role of the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex and anterior cingulate cortex in cognitive control. Science, 288, 1835–1838.

  21. Magno, E., Foxe, J. J., Molholm, S., Robertson, I. H., & Garavan, H. (2006). The anterior cingulate and error avoidance. Journal of Neuroscience, 26(18), 4769–4773.

  22. Mayr, U., Awh, E., & Laurey, P. (2003). Conflict adaptation effects in the absence of executive control. Nature Neuroscience, 6(5), 450–452.

  23. Norman, D. A., & Shallice, T. (1986). Attention to action: Willed and automatic control of behavior. In R. J. Davidson, G. E. Schwartz, & D. Shapiro (Eds.), Consciousness and self-regulation (Vol. 4, pp. 1–18). NY: Plenum Press.

  24. Posner, M. I., & DiGirolamo, G. (1998). Conflict, target detection and cognitive control. In R. Parasuraman (Ed.), The attentive brain. Cambridge: MIT Press.

  25. Reynolds, J. R., Braver, T. S., Brown, J., & Stigchel, S. (2006). Computational and neural mechanisms of task switching. Neurocomputing, 69(10), 1332–1336.

  26. Stuphorn, V., Taylor, T. L., & Schall, J. D. (2000). Performance monitoring by the supplementary eye field. Nature, 408, 857–860.

Download references

Acknowledgments

The author thanks E. Dinh for help with data collection. Supported by AFOSR FA9550-07-1-0454, NIDA 1 R03 DA023462-01, a NARSAD Young Investigator Award to JWB, and the Sidney R. Baer, Jr. Foundation.

Author information

Correspondence to Joshua W. Brown.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Brown, J.W. Multiple cognitive control effects of error likelihood and conflict. Psychological Research 73, 744–750 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-008-0198-7

Download citation

Keywords

  • Anterior Cingulate Cortex
  • Cognitive Control
  • Control Effect
  • Subsequent Trial
  • Response Conflict