Advertisement

Planta

, 251:13 | Cite as

Transgenic expression of Hyp-1 gene from Hypericum perforatum L. alters expression of defense-related genes and modulates recalcitrance to Agrobacterium tumefaciens

  • Weina Hou
  • Rupesh Kumar Singh
  • Pan Zhao
  • Viviana Martins
  • Emmanuel Aguilar
  • Tomás Canto
  • Francisco TenlladoEmail author
  • Alberto Carlos Pires DiasEmail author
Original Article

Abstract

Main conclusion

Phenolic oxidative coupling protein (Hyp-1) isolated from Hypericum perforatum L. was characterized as a defense gene involved in H. perforatum recalcitrance to Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated transformation

Abstract

Hypericum perforatum L. is a reservoir of high-value secondary metabolites of increasing interest to researchers and to the pharmaceutical industry. However, improving their production via genetic manipulation is a challenging task, as H. perforatum is recalcitrant to Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated transformation. Here, phenolic oxidative coupling protein (Hyp-1), a pathogenesis-related (PR) class 10 family gene, was selected from a subtractive cDNA library from A. tumefaciens-treated H. perforatum suspension cells. The role of Hyp-1 in defense against A. tumefaciens was analyzed in transgenic Nicotiana tabacum and Lactuca sativa overexpressing Hyp-1, and in Catharanthus roseus silenced for its homologous Hyp-1 gene, CrIPR. Results showed that Agrobacterium-mediated expression efficiency greatly decreased in Hyp-1 transgenic plants. However, silencing of CrIPR induced CrPR-5 expression and decreased expression efficiency of Agrobacterium. The expression of core genes involved in several defense pathways was also analyzed in Hyp-1 transgenic tobacco plants. Overexpression of Hyp-1 led to an ample down-regulation of key genes involved in auxin signaling, microRNA-based gene silencing, detoxification of reactive oxygen species, phenylpropanoid pathway and PRs. Moreover, Hyp-1 was detected in the nucleus, plasma membrane and the cytoplasm of epidermal cells by confocal microscopy. Overall, our findings suggest Hyp-1 modulates recalcitrance to A. tumefaciens-mediated transformation in H. perforatum.

Keywords

Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated expression Hypericum perforatum secondary metabolites Hyp-1 Plant defense responses PR-10 

Abbreviations

CrIPR

Catharanthus roseus intracellular pathogenesis-related protein

Hyp-1

Phenolic oxidative coupling protein

PR

Pathogenesis-related

VIGS

Virus-induced gene silencing

Notes

Acknowledgements

The author acknowledges the financial support provided by the FCT-Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology, grant UID/BIA/04050/2013 (POCI-01-0145FEDER-007569), PhD grant (SFRH/BD/52561/2014) under the Doctoral Programme “Agricultural Production Chains—from fork to farm” (PD/00122/2012), and the Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness of Spain, grant BIO2016-75619-R (AEI/FEDER, UE) to T.C. and F.T. We gratefully acknowledge the advice of Prof. Vincent L. Chiang and Dr. Rui Shi (North Carolina State University) for microRNA detection. We gratefully thank Prof. Mariana Sottomayor and Dr Joana Guedes (University of Porto) for kindly providing pTRV2: CrChlh and advice.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

All authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Supplementary material

425_2019_3310_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (391 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (PDF 391 kb)
425_2019_3310_MOESM2_ESM.pdf (95 kb)
Supplementary material 2 (PDF 95 kb)
425_2019_3310_MOESM3_ESM.pdf (91 kb)
Supplementary material 3 (PDF 91 kb)

References

  1. Anand A, Uppalapati SR, Ryu C-M et al (2007) Salicylic acid and systemic acquired resistance play a role in attenuating crown gall disease caused by Agrobacterium tumefaciens. Plant Physiol 146:703–715.  https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.107.111302 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Andersson P (2012) Secondary metabolites associated with plant disease, plant defense and biocontrol. Dissertation, Swedish University of Agricultural SciencesGoogle Scholar
  3. Arvidsson S, Kwasniewski M, Riaño-Pachón DM, Mueller-Roeber B (2008) QuantPrime—a flexible tool for reliable high-throughput primer design for quantitative PCR. BMC Bioinform 9:1–15.  https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-9-465 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bagal UR, Leebens-Mack JH, Lorenz WW, Dean JFD (2012) The phenylalanine ammonia lyase (PAL) gene family shows a gymnosperm-specific lineage. BMC Genomics 13:S1.  https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-13-S3-S1 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  5. Bais HP, Vepachedu R, Lawrence CB et al (2003) Molecular and biochemical characterization of an enzyme responsible for the formation of hypericin in St. John’s wort (Hypericum perforatum L.). J Biol Chem 278:32413–32422.  https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M301681200 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Bhardwaj AR, Joshi G, Pandey R et al (2015) A genome-wide perspective of miRNAome in response to high temperature, salinity and drought stresses in Brassica juncea (Czern) L. PLoS One 10(4):e0125644.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0125644 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Boller T, Felix G (2009) A renaissance of elicitors: perception of microbe-associated molecular patterns and danger signals by pattern-recognition receptors. Annu Rev Plant Biol 60:379–406.  https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.arplant.57.032905.105346 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Butterweck V, Christoffel V, Nahrstedt A et al (2003) Step by step removal of hyperforin and hypericin: activity profile of different Hypericum preparations in behavioral models. Life Sci 73:627–639.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0024-3205(03)00314-X CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Chadha P, Das RH (2006) A pathogenesis related protein, AhPR10 from peanut: an insight of its mode of antifungal activity. Planta 225:213–222.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00425-006-0344-7 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Chen ZY, Brown RL, Rajasekaran K et al (2006) Identification of a maize kernel pathogenesis-related protein and evidence for its involvement in resistance to Aspergillus flavus infection and aflatoxin production. Phytopathology 96:87–95.  https://doi.org/10.1094/PHYTO-96-0087 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Colditz F, Braun HP, Jacquet C et al (2005) Proteomic profiling unravels insights into the molecular background underlying increased Aphanomyces euteiches-tolerance of Medicago truncatula. Plant Mol Biol 59:387–406.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11103-005-0184-z CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Colditz F, Niehaus K, Krajinski F (2007) Silencing of PR-10-like proteins in Medicago truncatula results in an antagonistic induction of other PR proteins and in an increased tolerance upon infection with the oomycete Aphanomyces euteiches. Planta 226:57–71.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00425-006-0466-y CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Conley AJ, Joensuu JJ, Jevnikar AM et al (2009) Optimization of elastin-like polypeptide fusions for expression and purification of recombinant proteins in plants. Biotechnol Bioeng 103:562–573.  https://doi.org/10.1002/bit.22278 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Di Fiore S, Hoppmann V, Fischer R, Schillberg S (2004) Transient gene expression of recombinant terpenoid indole alkaloid enzymes in Catharanthus roseus leaves. Plant Mol Biol Report 22:15–22.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02773344 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dunoyer P, Himber C, Voinnet O (2006) Induction, suppression and requirement of RNA silencing pathways in virulent Agrobacterium tumefaciens infections. Nat Genet 38:258–263.  https://doi.org/10.1038/ng1722 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Fang Y, Xie K, Xiong L (2014) Conserved miR164-targeted NAC genes negatively regulate drought resistance in rice. J Exp Bot 65:2119–2135.  https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/eru072 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  17. Fernandes H, Konieczna M, Kolodziejczyk R et al (2008) Crystallization and preliminary crystallographic studies of Hyp-1, a St John’s wort protein implicated in the biosynthesis of hypericin. Acta Crystallogr Sect F Struct Biol Cryst Commun 64:405–408.  https://doi.org/10.1107/S1744309108009111 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  18. Fernandes H, Michalska K, Sikorski M, Jaskolski M (2013) Structural and functional aspects of PR-10 proteins. FEBS J 280:1169–1199.  https://doi.org/10.1111/febs.12114 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Franklin G, Conceição LFR, Kombrink E, Dias ACP (2008) Hypericum perforatum plant cells reduce Agrobacterium viability during co-cultivation. Planta 227:1401–1408.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00425-008-0691-7 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  20. Franklin G, Conceição LFR, Kombrink E, Dias ACP (2009) Xanthone biosynthesis in Hypericum perforatum cells provides antioxidant and antimicrobial protection upon biotic stress. Phytochemistry 70:60–68.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phytochem.2008.10.016 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Fu J, Wang S (2011) Insights into auxin signaling in plant–pathogen interactions. Front Plant Sci 2:74.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2011.00074 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  22. Gasic K, Hernandez A, Korban SS (2004) RNA extraction from different apple tissues rich in polyphenols and polysaccharides for cDNA library construction. Plant Mol Biol Report 22:437–438.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02772687 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Gohlke J, Deeken R (2014) Plant responses to Agrobacterium tumefaciens and crown gall development. Front Plant Sci 5:155.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2014.00155 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  24. Gómez-Gómez L, Rubio-Moraga A, Ahrazem O (2011) Molecular cloning and characterisation of a pathogenesis-related protein CsPR10 from Crocus sativus. Plant Biol 13:297–303.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1438-8677.2010.00359.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Goyal S, Lambert C, Cluzet S, Mérillon JM, Ramawat KG (2012) Secondary metabolites and plant defence. In: Mérillon J, Ramawat K (eds) Plant defence: biological control progress in biological control. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 109–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Guo H, Xie Q, Fei J, Chua N (2005) MicroRNA directs mRNA cleavage of the transcription factor NAC1 to downregulate auxin signals for Arabidopsis lateral root development. Plant Cell 17:1376–1386.  https://doi.org/10.1105/tpc.105.030841.lism CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  27. He M, Xu Y, Cao J et al (2013) Subcellular localization and functional analyses of a PR10 protein gene from Vitis pseudoreticulata in response to Plasmopara viticola infection. Protoplasma 250:129–140.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00709-012-0384-8 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Heldt H-W, Piechulla B (2011) Phenylpropanoids comprise a multitude of plant secondary metabolites and cell wall components. In: Heldt F, Heldt WH, Piechulla B (eds) Plant biochemistry. Academic Press, Cambridge pp, pp 431–449.  https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-384986-1.00018-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Horsch RB, Fry JE, Hoffmann NL et al (1985) A simple and general method for hybridization revealed the expected. Science 227:1229–1231.  https://doi.org/10.1126/science.227.4691.1229 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hou WN, Duan CG, Fang RX et al (2011) Satellite RNA reduces expression of the 2b suppressor protein resulting in the attenuation of symptoms caused by Cucumber mosaic virus infection. Mol Plant Pathol 12:595–605.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1364-3703.2010.00696.x CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  31. Hou WN, Shakya P, Franklin G (2016) A perspective on Hypericum perforatum genetic transformation. Front Plant Sci 7:879.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2016.00879 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  32. Hsu SW, Liu MC, Zen KC, Wang CS (2014) Identification of the tapetum/microspore-specific promoter of the pathogenesis-related 10 gene and its regulation in the anther of Lilium longiflorum. Plant Sci 215–216:124–133.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plantsci.2013.11.006 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Jiang L, Wu J, Fan S et al (2015) Isolation and characterization of a novel pathogenesis-related protein gene (GmPRP) with induced expression in soybean (Glycine max) during infection with Phytophthora sojae. PLoS One 10:e0129932.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0129932 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  34. Karppinen K (2010) Biosynthesis of hypericins and hyperforins in Hypericum perforatum L.(St. John’s wort)—precursors and genes involved. Dissertation, University of OuluGoogle Scholar
  35. Karppinen K, Derzsó E, Jaakola L, Hohtola A (2016) Molecular cloning and expression analysis of hyp-1 type PR-10 family genes in Hypericum perforatum. Front Plant Sci 7:526.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2016.00526 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  36. Kim ST, Yu S, Kang YH et al (2008) The rice pathogen-related protein 10 (JIOsPR10) is induced by abiotic and biotic stresses and exhibits ribonuclease activity. Plant Cell Rep 27:593–603.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00299-007-0485-6 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Kim SG, Kim ST, Wang Y et al (2011) The RNase activity of rice probenazole-induced protein1 (PBZ1) plays a key role in cell death in plants. Mol Cells 31:25–31.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10059-011-0004-z CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  38. Kondou Y, Higuchi M, Matsui M (2010) High-throughput characterization of plant gene functions by using gain-of-function technology. Annu Rev Plant Biol 61:373–393.  https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-arplant-042809-112143 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Košuth J, Katkovčinová Z, Olexová P, Čellárová E (2007) Expression of the hyp-1 gene in early stages of development of Hypericum perforatum L. Plant Cell Rep 26:211–217.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00299-006-0240-4 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Košuth J, Smelcerovic A, Borsch T et al (2011) The hyp-1 gene is not a limiting factor for hypericin biosynthesis in the genus Hypericum. Funct Plant Biol 38:35–43.  https://doi.org/10.1071/FP10144 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Košuth J, Hrehorová D, Jaskolski M, Čellárová E (2013) Stress-induced expression and structure of the putative gene hyp-1 for hypericin biosynthesis. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult 114:207–216.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11240-013-0316-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Krishnaswamy S, Baral PK, James MNG, Kav NNV (2011) Site-directed mutagenesis of histidine 69 and glutamic acid 148 alters the ribonuclease activity of pea ABR17 (PR10.4). Plant Physiol Biochem 49:958–962.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plaphy.2010.10.010 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Lee MH, Jeon HS, Kim HG, Park OK (2017) An Arabidopsis NAC transcription factor NAC4 promotes pathogen-induced cell death under negative regulation by microRNA164. New Phytol 214:343–360.  https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.14371 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Liscombe DK, O’Connor SE (2011) A virus-induced gene silencing approach to understanding alkaloid metabolism in Catharanthus roseus. Phytochemistry 72:1969–1977.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phytochem.2011.07.001 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  45. Mazid M, Khan TA, Mohammad F (2011) Role of secondary metabolites in defense mechanisms of plants. Biol Med 3:232–249 (citeulike-article-id:10435815) Google Scholar
  46. Michalska K, Fernandes H, Sikorski M, Jaskolski M (2010) Crystal structure of Hyp-1, a St. John’s wort protein implicated in the biosynthesis of hypericin. J Struct Biol 169:161–171.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsb.2009.10.008 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Miedes E, Vanholme R, Boerjan W, Molina A (2014) The role of the secondary cell wall in plant resistance to pathogens. Front Plant Sci 5:358.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2014.00358 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  48. Nelson BK, Cai X, Nebenführ A (2007) A multicolored set of in vivo organelle markers for co-localization studies in Arabidopsis and other plants. Plant J 51:1126–1136.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-313X.2007.03212.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Park CJ, Kim KJ, Shin R et al (2004) Pathogenesis-related protein 10 isolated from hot pepper functions as a ribonuclease in an antiviral pathway. Plant J 37:186–198.  https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-313X.2003.01951.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Patočka J (2003) The chemistry, pharmacology, and toxicology of the biologically active constituents of the herb Hypericum perforatum L. J Appl Biomed 1:61–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Pinweha N, Asvarak T, Viboonjun U, Narangajavana J (2015) Involvement of miR160/miR393 and their targets in cassava responses to anthracnose disease. J Plant Physiol 174:26–35.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jplph.2014.09.006 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Pitzschke A (2013) Agrobacterium infection and plant defense—transformation success hangs by a thread. Front Plant Sci 4:519.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2013.00519 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  53. Pruss GJ, Nester EW, Vance V (2008) Infiltration with Agrobacterium tumefaciens induces host defense and development-dependent responses in the infiltrated zone. Mol Plant Microbe Interact 21:1528–1538.  https://doi.org/10.1094/MPMI-21-12-1528 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Pungartnik C, da Silva AC, de Melo SA et al (2009) High-affinity copper transport and Snq2 export permease of Saccharomyces cerevisiae modulate cytotoxicity of PR-10 from Theobroma cacao. Mol Plant-Microbe Interact 22:39–51.  https://doi.org/10.1094/MPMI-22-1-0039 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Saddiqe Z, Naeem I, Maimoona A (2010) A review of the antibacterial activity of Hypericum perforatum L. J Ethnopharmacol 131:511–521.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jep.2010.07.034 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. Schindelin J, Arganda-Carreras I, Frise E et al (2012) Fiji: an open-source platform for biological-image analysis. Nat Methods 9:676–682.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.2019 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. Schmidt GW, Delaney SK (2010) Stable internal reference genes for normalization of real-time RT-PCR in tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum) during development and abiotic stress. Mol Genet Genomics 283:233–241.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00438-010-0511-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Sheshadri SA, Nishanth MJ, Yamine V, Simon B (2018) Effect of melatonin on the stability and expression of reference genes in Catharanthus roseus. Sci Rep 8:2222.  https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-20474-2 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  59. Shi R, Yang C, Lu S et al (2010) Specific down-regulation of PAL genes by artificial microRNAs in Populus trichocarpa. Planta 232:1281–1288.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00425-010-1253-3 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. Shi R, Sun YH, Zhang XH, Chiang VL (2012) Poly(T) adaptor RT-PCR. In: Fan JB (ed) Next-generation microRNA expression profiling technology. Methods Mol Biol (Methods and Protocols). Humana Press, New York, pp 53–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Singh RK, Hou WN, Franklin G (2016) Construction of hypericin gland-specific cDNA library via suppression subtractive hybridization. In: Jain S, Saxena P (eds) Protocols for in vitro cultures and secondary metabolite analysis of aromatic and medicinal plants. Methods Mol Biology, 2nd edn. Humana Press, New York, pp 317–334Google Scholar
  62. Sliwiak J, Dauter Z, Jaskolski M (2016) Crystal structure of Hyp-1, a Hypericum perforatum PR-10 protein, in complex with melatonin. Front Plant Sci 7:668.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2016.00668 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  63. Tamura K, Stecher G, Peterson D et al (2013) MEGA6: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 6.0. Mol Biol Evol 30:2725–2729.  https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/mst197 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  64. Tatsis EC, Boeren S, Exarchou V et al (2007) Identification of the major constituents of Hypericum perforatum by LC/SPE/NMR and/or LC/MS. Phytochemistry 68:383–393.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phytochem.2006.11.026 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. Wójcik AM, Nodine MD, Gaj MD (2017) miR160 and miR166/165 contribute to the LEC2-mediated auxin response involved in the somatic embryogenesis induction in Arabidopsis. Front Plant Sci 8:2024.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2017.02024 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  66. Xie YR, Chen ZY, Brown RL, Bhatnagar D (2010) Expression and functional characterization of two pathogenesis-related protein 10 genes from Zea mays. J Plant Physiol 167:121–130.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jplph.2009.07.004 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  67. Xu P, Jiang L, Wu J et al (2014) Isolation and characterization of a pathogenesis-related protein 10 gene (GmPR10) with induced expression in soybean (Glycine max) during infection with Phytophthora sojae. Mol Biol Rep 41:4899–4909.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11033-014-3356-6 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  68. Zhang R, Wang Y, Liu G, Li H (2010) Cloning and characterization of a pathogenesis-related gene (ThPR10) from Tamarix hispida. Acta Biol Crac Ser Bot 52:17–25.  https://doi.org/10.2478/v10182-010-0019-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Zhang L, Yao L, Zhang N et al (2018) Lateral root development in potato is mediated by Stu-mi164 regulation of NAC transcription factor. Front Plant Sci 9:383.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2018.00383 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Weina Hou
    • 1
  • Rupesh Kumar Singh
    • 2
  • Pan Zhao
    • 3
  • Viviana Martins
    • 4
  • Emmanuel Aguilar
    • 5
  • Tomás Canto
    • 5
  • Francisco Tenllado
    • 5
    Email author
  • Alberto Carlos Pires Dias
    • 1
    • 4
    • 6
    Email author
  1. 1.Centre for the Research and Technology of Agro-Environmental and Biological Sciences (CITAB), Department of BiologyUniversity of MinhoBragaPortugal
  2. 2.Centro de Química de Vila Real (CQ-VR), UTADVila RealPortugal
  3. 3.National Key Laboratory of Plant GenomicsInstitute of Microbiology, Chinese Academy of SciencesBeijingChina
  4. 4.Centre of Molecular and Environmental Biology (CBMA), Department of BiologyUniversity of MinhoBragaPortugal
  5. 5.Departamento de Biotecnología Microbiana y de PlantasCentro de Investigaciones Biológicas, CSICMadridSpain
  6. 6.Center of Biological Engineering (CEB)University of MinhoBragaPortugal

Personalised recommendations