Cyanobiont diversity in six Azolla spp. and relation to Azolla-nutrient profiling
- 45 Downloads
Illumina-Miseq®-based cyanobiont diversity and biomass were analyzed in six Azolla spp. Results revealed that 93–98% of total operational taxonomic units (OTUs) belong to Nostacaceae followed by Cylindrospermopsis with about 1–6% OTUs.
The taxonomy of Azolla-cyanobiont is a long-term debate within the scientific community. Morphological and biochemical-based reports indicated the presence of Anabaena, Nostoc and/or Trichormus azollae as abundant Azolla-cyanobionts, however, molecular data did not support the abundance of Anabaena and/or Nostoc. To understand furthermore, the cyanobiont diversity in six species of Azolla (A. microphylla, A. mexicana, A. filiculoides, A. caroliniana, A. pinnata and A. rubra) was analyzed based on 16S rRNA Illumina-MiSeq sequencing. Additionally, biomass and nutrient profiling of Azolla spp. were analyzed and correlated with cyanobiont diversity. Illumina-MiSeq data revealed that 99.6–99.9% of total operational taxonomic units (OTUs) belonged to Nostocophycideae (class), Nostocales (order) and Nostacaceae (family). At genus level, the unassigned affiliation (93.4–97.9%) under Nostacaceae family was abundant followed by Cylindrospermopsis OTUs (1.1–6.0%). Interestingly, A. pinnata harboured maximum Cylindrospermopsis OTUs and also recorded higher biomass (40.67 g m−2 day−1), whereas crude protein (25.9%) and antioxidants (76.9%) were recorded to be higher in A. microphylla. Biplot analysis revealed that A. pinnata and its cyanobiont abundance were positively correlated with neutral and acid detergent fibers. Overall, the present findings deepened the understanding about cyanobiont in Azolla and its relations with Azolla nutrient profiling.
KeywordsIllumina-MiSeq® Cyanobiont Azolla Taxonomy Nutrient profiling Biomass
We thank all the erstwhile researchers associated with Azolla and cyanobacteria germplasm maintenance work at the ICAR-National Rice Research Institute (NRRI), Cuttack. We gratefully acknowledge the help extended by Dr. R. K. Mahanta, Scientist, KVK, Santhapur, Odisha, India for nutrient profiling of Azolla. Director, NRRI is highly acknowledged for providing the necessary facilities to carry out this research.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- Adams DG (2000) Cyanobacterial phylogeny and development: questions and challenges. In: Brun LJ, Shimkets (eds) Prokaryotic development. ASM Press, Washington DC, pp 51–81Google Scholar
- AOAC (2012) Official methods of analysis, 19th edn. AOAC International, MarylandGoogle Scholar
- Biudes JFV, Camargo AFM (2008) Studying the limitant factors to primary production of aquatic macrophytes in Brazil. Oecol Brasil 12:7–19Google Scholar
- Carpenter ME (2017) Differences between an acid detergent fiber and a neutral detergent fiber. http://sciencing.com/differences-fiber-neutral-detergent-fiber-8723938.html. Accessed 24 Apr 2017
- Carrapico FJ (2002) Azolla-Anabaena-bacteria system as a natural microcosm. In instruments, methods, and missions for astrobiology. Int Soc Opt Photon 4495:261–266Google Scholar
- Carrapiço F, Tavares R (2012) New data on the Azolla-Anabaena symbiosis. In: Nitrogen fixation with non-legumes: the fourth international symposium on ‘nitrogen fixation with non-legumes’, Rio de Janeiro, 23–28 August 1987, Springer, New York, pp 89–94Google Scholar
- Chatterjee A, Sharma P, Ghosh MK, Mandal M, Roy K (2013) Utilization of Azolla microphylla as feed supplement for crossbred cattle. Int J Agric Food Sci Technol 4:207–214Google Scholar
- Dijkhuizen LW, Brouwer P, Bolhuis H, Reichart GJ, Koppers N, Huettel B, Bolger AM, Li FW, Cheng S, Liu X, Wong GKS (2018) Is there foul play in the leaf pocket? The metagenome of floating fern Azolla reveals endophytes that do not fix N2 but may denitrify. New Phytol 217(1):453–466CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Fjerdingstad E (1976) Anabaena variabilis status azollae. Arch Hydrobiol 49:377–381Google Scholar
- Gebhardt JS, Nierzwicki-Bauer SA (1991) Identification of a common cyanobacterial symbiont associated with Azolla spp. through molecular and morphological characterization of free-living and symbiotic cyanobacteria. Appl Environ Microbiol 57:2141–2146Google Scholar
- Gopalaswamy C, Kannaiyan S (1998) Biomass production, nitrogen fixation and biochemical characterization of Azolla hybrids. Indian J Microbiol 38:81–84Google Scholar
- Indira D, Rao KS, Suresh J, Naidu KV, Ravi A (2009) Azolla (Azolla pinnata) as feed supplement in buffalo calves on growth performance. Indian J Anim Nutr 26:345–348Google Scholar
- Jones DB (1941) Factors for converting percentages of nitrogen in foods and feeds into percentages of proteins. US Department of Agriculture, Washington, pp 1–22Google Scholar
- Kumar U, Kumar A, Umakanta N, Bagchi TB, Mohanty S, Kumar A, Shahid M, Nayak AK (2015) Nutrient profiling and identification of genetic marker for Azolla sp. In: XXIII International Grassland Congress—IGC 2015 at Delhi NCRGoogle Scholar
- Kumar U, Shahid M, Tripathi R, Mohanty S, Kumar A, Bhattacharyya P, Lal B, Gautam P, Raja R, Panda BB, Jambhulakar NN, Shukla AK, Nayak AK (2017) Variation of functional diversity of soil microbial community in sub-humid tropical rice-rice cropping system under long-term organic and inorganic fertilization. Ecol Indic 73:536–543CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Kumar U, Nayak AK, Shahid M, Gupta VV, Panneerselvam P, Mohanty S, Kaviraj M, Kumar A, Chatterjee D, Lal B, Gautam P, Tripathi R, Panda BB (2018) Continuous application of inorganic and organic fertilizers over 47 years in paddy soil alters the bacterial community structure and its influence on rice production. Agric Ecosyst Environ 262:65–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Margalef R (1958) Temporal succession and spatial heterogeneity in phytoplankton. In: Buzzati T (ed) Perspective in marine biology. University California Press, Berkeley, pp 323–347Google Scholar
- Papaefthimiou D, van Hove C, Lejeune A, Rasmussen U, Wilmotte A (2008) Diversity and host specificity of Azolla-cyanobionts. J Psychol 44:60–70Google Scholar
- Peters GA, Toia RE, Evans WR, Crist DK, Mayne BC, Poole RE (1980) Characterization and comparisons of five N2-fixing Azolla-Anabaena associations, I. Optimization of growth conditions for biomass increase and N content in a controlled environment. Plant Cell Environ 3:261–269Google Scholar
- Petro MJ, Gates JE (1987) Distribution of Anhrobacter sp. in the leaf cavities of four species of the N-fixing Azolla fern. Symbiosis 3:41–48Google Scholar
- Serrano R, Carrapiço F, Vidal R (1999) The presence of lectins in bacteria associated with the Azolla-Anabaena symbiosis. Symbiosis 27:169–178Google Scholar
- Talapatra SK, Ray SC, Sen KC (1940) The analysis of mineral characteristics in biological materials. 1. Estimation of phosphorus, chlorine, calcium, magnesium, sodium and potassium in foodstuffs. Indian J Vet Sci Anim Husb 10:240–258Google Scholar
- Van Saun RJ (2013) Determining forage quality: understanding feed analysis. http://extension.psu.edu/animals/camelids/nutrition/determining-forage-quality-understanding-feed-analysis. Accessed 18 Sept 2013
- Zapomělová E, Jezberová J, Hrouzek P, Hisem D, Řeháková K, Komárková J (2010) Polyphasic characterization of three strains of Anabaena reniformis and Aphanizomenon aphanizomenoides (cyanobacteria) and their reclassification to Sphaerospermum gen. nov (incl. Anabaena kisseleviana). J Phycol 46:415CrossRefGoogle Scholar