Advertisement

Planta

pp 1–16 | Cite as

Characterization of Maf1 in Arabidopsis: function under stress conditions and regulation by the TOR signaling pathway

  • Chang Sook Ahn
  • Du-Hwa Lee
  • Hyun-Sook Pai
Original Article

Abstract

Main conclusion

Maf1 repressor activity is critical for plant survival during environmental stresses, and is regulated by its phosphorylation/dephosphorylation through the activity of TOR and PP4/PP2A phosphatases.

Maf1 is a global repressor of RNA polymerase III (Pol III), and is conserved in eukaryotes. Pol III synthesizes small RNAs, 5S rRNA, and tRNAs that are essential for protein translation and cell growth. Maf1 is a phosphoprotein and dephosphorylation of Maf1 promotes its repressor activity in yeast and mammals. Plant Maf1 was identified in citrus plants as a canker elicitor-binding protein, and citrus Maf1 represses cell growth associated with canker development. However, functions of plant Maf1 under diverse stress conditions and its regulation by the target of rapamycin (TOR) signaling components are poorly understood. In this study, the Arabidopsis maf1 mutants were more susceptible to diverse stresses and treatment with the TOR inhibitor Torin-1 than wild-type plants. The maf1 mutants expressed higher levels of Maf1 target RNAs, including 5S rRNA and pre-tRNAs in leaf cells, supporting Pol III repressor activity of Arabidopsis Maf1. Cellular stresses and Torin-1 treatment induced dephosphorylation of Maf1, suggesting Maf1 activation under diverse stress conditions. TOR silencing also stimulated Maf1 dephosphorylation, while silencing of catalytic subunit genes of PP4 and PP2A repressed it. Thus, TOR kinase and PP4/PP2A phosphatases appeared to oppositely modulate the Maf1 phosphorylation status. TOR silencing decreased the abundance of the target RNAs, while silencing of the PP4 and PP2A subunit genes increased it, supporting the positive correlation between Maf1 dephosphorylation and its repressor activity. Taken together, these results suggest that repressor activity of Maf1, regulated by the TOR signaling pathway, is critical for plant cell survival during environmental stresses.

Keywords

Phosphorylation/dephosphorylation Phos-tag gels Protein phosphatases Target gene expression TOR Virus-induced gene silencing 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by the Cooperative Research Program for Agriculture Science and Technology Development [Project numbers PJ013212 (PMBC) and PJ013227 (SSAC)] from the Rural Development Administration, and Mid-Career Researcher Program (NRF-2016R1A2B4013180) from the National Research Foundation (NRF) of the Republic of Korea.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Supplementary material

425_2018_3024_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (272 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (PDF 272 kb)

References

  1. Ahn CS, Han JA, Lee HS, Lee S, Pai HS (2011) The PP2A regulatory subunit Tap46, a component of the TOR signaling pathway, modulates growth and metabolism in plants. Plant Cell 23:185–209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ahn CS, Ahn HK, Pai HS (2015a) Overexpression of the PP2A regulatory subunit Tap46 leads to enhanced plant growth through stimulation of the TOR signalling pathway. J Exp Bot 66:827–840CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ahn HK, Kang YW, Lim HM, Hwang I, Pai H-S (2015b) Physiological functions of the COPI complex in higher plants. Mol Cells 38:866–875CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Apel K, Hirt H (2004) Reactive oxygen species: metabolism, oxidative stress, and signal transduction. Annu Rev Plant Biol 55:373–399CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ballesteros I, Domínguez T, Sauer M, Paredes P, Duprat A, Rojo E, Sanmartín M, Sánchez-Serrano JJ (2013) Specialized functions of the PP2A subfamily II catalytic subunits PP2A-C3 and PP2A-C4 in the distribution of auxin fluxes and development in Arabidopsis. Plant J 73:862–872CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bögre L, Henriques R, Magyar Z (2013) TOR tour to auxin. EMBO J 32:1069–1071CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Boguta M (2012) Maf1, a general negative regulator of RNA polymerase III in yeast. Biochim Biophys Acta 1829:376–384CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Boguta M, Graczyk D (2011) RNA polymerase III under control: repression and de-repression. Trends Biochem Sci 36:451–456CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Boguta M, Czerska K, Zoladek T (1997) Mutation in a new gene MAF1 affects tRNA suppressor efficiency in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Gene 185:291–296CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Boisnard S, Lagniel G, Garmendia-Torres C, Molin M, Boy-Marcotte E, Jacquet M, Toledano MB, Labarre J, Chedin S (2009) H2O2 activates the nuclear localization of Msn2 and Maf1 through thioredoxins in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Eukaryot Cell 8:1429–1438CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Burch-Smith TM, Schiff M, Liu Y, Dinesh-Kumar SP (2006) Efficient virus-induced gene silencing in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol 142:21–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Clough SJ, Bent AF (1998) Floral dip: a simplified method for Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J 16:735–743CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Desai N, Lee J, Upadhya R, Chu Y, Moir RD, Willis IM (2005) Two steps in Maf1-dependent repression of transcription by RNA polymerase III. J Biol Chem 280:6455–6462CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Di Como CJ, Jiang Y (2006) The association of Tap42 phosphatase complexes with TORC1: another level of regulation in Tor signaling. Cell Cycle 5:2729–2732CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dieci G, Fiorino G, Castelnuovo M, Teichmann M, Pagano A (2007) The expanding RNA polymerase III transcriptome. Trends Genet 23:614–622CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Dobrenel T, Caldana C, Hanson J, Robaglia C, Vincentz M, Veit B, Meyer C (2016) TOR signaling and nutrient sensing. Annu Rev Plant Biol 67:261–285CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Duvel K, Broach J (2004) The role of phosphatases in TOR signaling in yeast. Curr Top Microbiol Immunol 279:19–38PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Farkas I, Dombradi V, Miskei M, Szabados L, Koncz C (2007) Arabidopsis PPP family of serine/threonine phosphatases. Trends Plant Sci 12:169–176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gately DP, Howell SB (1993) Cellular accumulation of the anticancer agent cisplatin: a review. Brit J Cancer 67:1171–1176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Goodfellow SJ, Graham EL, Kantidakis T, Marshall L, Coppins BA, Oficjalska-Pham D, Gérard M, Lefebvre O, White RJ (2008) Regulation of RNA polymerase III transcription by Maf1 in mammalian cells. J Mol Biol 378:481–491CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Graczyk D, Debski J, Muszynska G, Bretner M, Lefebvre O, Boguta M (2011) Casein kinase II-mediated phosphorylation of general repressor Maf1 triggers RNA polymerase III activation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 108:4926–4931CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hannan KM, Brandenburger Y, Jenkins A et al (2003) mTOR-dependent regulation of ribosomal gene transcription requires S6K1 and is mediated by phosphorylation of the carboxy-terminal activation domain of the nucleolar transcription factor UBF. Mol Cell Biol 23:8862–8877CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. He X, Anderson JC, del Pozo O, Gu YQ, Tang X, Martin GB (2004) Silencing of subfamily I of protein phosphatase 2A catalytic subunits results in activation of plant defense responses and localized cell death. Plant J 38:563–577CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Janssens V, Goris J (2001) Protein phosphatase 2A: a highly regulated family of serine/threonine phosphatases implicated in cell growth and signalling. Biochem J 353:417–439CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kantidakis T, Ramsbottom BA, Birch JL, Dowding SN, White RJ (2010) mTOR associates with TFIIIC, is found at tRNA and 5S rRNA genes, and targets their repressor Maf1. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 107:11823–11828CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Karkusiewicz I, Turowski TW, Graczyk D, Towpik J, Dhungel N, Hopper AK, Boguta M (2011) Maf1 protein, repressor of RNA polymerase III, indirectly affects tRNA processing. J Biol Chem 286:39478–39488CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kataya ARA, Creighton MT, Napitupulu TP, Saetre C, Heidari B, Ruoff P, Lillo C (2017) PLATINUM SENSITIVE 2 LIKE impacts growth, root morphology, seed set, and stress responses. PLoS One 12:e0180478CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kinoshita E, Kinoshita-Kikuta E, Takiyama K, Koike T (2006) Phosphate-binding tag, a new tool to visualize phosphorylated proteins. Mol Cell Proteomics 5:749–757CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kinoshita E, Kinoshita-Kikuta E, Koike T (2012) Phos-tag SDS–PAGE systems for phosphorylation profiling of proteins with a wide range of molecular masses under neutral pH conditions. Proteomics 12:192–202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kirik A, Ehrhardt DW, Kirik V (2012) TONNEAU2/FASS regulates the geometry of microtubule nucleation and cortical array organization in interphase Arabidopsis cells. Plant Cell 24:1158–1170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Lee J, Moir RD, Willis IM (2009) Regulation of RNA polymerase III transcription involves SCH9-dependent and SCH9-independent branches of the target of rapamycin (TOR) pathway. J Biol Chem 284:12604–12608CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Lee DH, Park SJ, Ahn CS, Pai HS (2017) MRF family genes are involved in translation control, especially under energy-deficient conditions, and their expression and functions are modulated by the TOR signaling pathway. Plant Cell 29:2895–2920CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Lundin C, North M, Erixon K, Walters K, Jenssen D, Goldman AS, Helleday T (2005) Methyl methanesulfonate (MMS) produces heat-labile DNA damage but no detectable in vivo DNA double-strand breaks. Nucleic Acids Res 33:3799–3811CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Ma XM, Blenis J (2009) Molecular mechanisms of mTOR-mediated translational control. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 10:307–318CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Mayer C, Grummt I (2006) Ribosome biogenesis and cell growth: mTOR coordinates transcription by all three classes of nuclear RNA polymerases. Oncogene 25:6384–6391CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Michels AA, Robitaille AM, Buczynski-Ruchonnet D, Hodroj W, Reina JH, Hall MN, Hernandez N (2010) mTORC1 directly phosphorylates and regulates human MAF1. Mol Cell Biol 30:3749–3757CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Michniewicz M, Zago MK, Abas L et al (2007) Antagonistic regulation of PIN phosphorylation by PP2A and PINOID directs auxin flux. Cell 130:1044–1056CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Moir RD, Lee J, Haeusler RA, Desai N, Engelke DR, Willis IM (2006) Protein kinase A regulates RNA polymerase III transcription through the nuclear localization of Maf1. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103:15044–15049CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Oficjalska-Pham D, Harismendy O, Smagowicz W et al (2006) General repression of RNA polymerase III transcription is triggered by protein phosphatase type 2A-mediated dephosphorylation of Maf1. Mol Cell 22:623–632CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Oler AJ, Cairns BR (2012) PP4 dephosphorylates Maf1 to couple multiple stress conditions to RNA polymerase III repression. EMBO J 31:1440–1452CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Pluta K, Lefebvre O, Martin NC, Smagowicz WJ, Stanford DR, Ellis SR, Hopper AK, Sentenac A, Boguta M (2001) Maf1p, a negative effector of RNA polymerase III in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Biol 21:5031–5040CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Porra RJ, Scheer H (2000) 18O and mass spectrometry in chlorophyll research: Derivation and loss of oxygen atoms at the periphery of the chlorophyll macrocycle during biosynthesis, degradation and adaptation. Photosynth Res 66:159–175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Pujol G, Baskin TI, Casamayor A, Cortadellas N, Ferrer A, Ariño J (2000) The Arabidopsis thaliana PPX/PP4 phosphatases: molecular cloning and structural organization of the genes and immunolocalization of the proteins to plastids. Plant Mol Biol 44:499–511CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Reina JH, Azzouz TN, Hernandez N (2006) Maf1, a new player in the regulation of human RNA polymerase III transcription. PLoS One 1:e134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Revenkova E, Masson J, Koncz C, Afsar K, Jakovleva L, Paszkowski J (1999) Involvement of Arabidopsis thaliana ribosomal protein S27 in mRNA degradation triggered by genotoxic stress. EMBO J 18:490–499CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Roberts D, Wilson B, Huff J, Stewart A, Cairns B (2006) Dephosphorylation and genome-wide association of Maf1 with Pol III-transcribed genes during repression. Mol Cell 22:633–644CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Rollins J, Veras I, Cabarcas S, Willis I, Schramm L (2007) Human Maf1 negatively regulates RNA polymerase III transcription via the TFIIB family members Brf1 and Brf2. Int J Biol Sci 3:292–302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Schepetilnikov M, Dimitrova M, Mancera-Martinez E, Geldreich A, Keller M, Ryabova LA (2013) TOR and S6K1 promote translation reinitiation of uORF-containing mRNAs via phosphorylation of eIF3h. EMBO J 32:1087–1102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Soprano AS, Abe VY, Smetana JH, Benedetti CE (2013) Citrus MAF1, a repressor of RNA polymerase III, binds the Xanthomonas citri canker elicitor PthA4 and suppresses citrus canker development. Plant Physiol 163:232–242CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Soprano AS, Giuseppe PO, Shimo HM et al (2017) Crystal structure and regulation of the citrus Pol III repressor MAF1 by auxin and phosphorylation. Structure 25:1360–1370CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Spinner L, Gadeyne A, Belcram K et al (2013) A protein phosphatase 2A complex spatially controls plant cell division. Nat Commun 4:1863CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Su C, Li Z, Cheng J, Li L, Zhong S, Liu L, Zheng Y, Zheng B (2017) The protein phosphatase 4 and SMEK1 complex dephosphorylates HYL1 to promote miRNA biogenesis by antagonizing the MAPK cascade in Arabidopsis. Dev Cell 41:527.e5–539.e5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Tang W et al (2011) PP2A activates brassinosteroid-responsive gene expression and plant growth by dephosphorylating BZR1. Nat Cell Biol 13:124–131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Thoreen CC, Chantranupong L, Keys HR, Wang T, Gray NS, Sabatini DM (2012) A unifying model for mTORC1-mediated regulation of mRNA translation. Nature 485:109–113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Towpik J, Graczyk D, Gajda A, Lefebvre O, Boguta M (2008) Derepression of RNA polymerase III transcription by phosphorylation and nuclear export of its negative regulator, Maf1. J Biol Chem 283:17168–17174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Tseng TS, Briggs WR (2010) The Arabidopsis rcn1-1 mutation impairs dephosphorylation of Phot2, resulting in enhanced blue light responses. Plant Cell 22:392–402CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Turowski TW, Karkusiewicz I, Kowal J, Boguta M (2012) Maf1-mediated repression of RNA polymerase III transcription inhibits tRNA degradation via RTD pathway. RNA 18:1823–1832CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Upadhya R, Lee J, Willis IM (2002) Maf1 is an essential mediator of diverse signals that repress RNA polymerase III transcription. Mol Cell 10:1489–1494CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Vannini A, Ringel R, Kusser AG, Berninghausen O, Kassavetis GA, Cramer P (2010) Molecular basis of RNA polymerase III transcription repression by Maf1. Cell 143:59–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Waadt R, Manalansan B, Rauniyar N et al (2015) Identification of open stomata1-interacting proteins reveals interactions with sucrose non-fermenting1-related protein kinases2 and with type 2A protein phosphatases that function in abscisic acid responses. Plant Physiol 169:760–779CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Wei Y, Zheng XFS (2010) Maf1 regulation: a model of signal transduction inside the nucleus. Nucleus 1:162–165PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  62. Wei Y, Tsang CK, Zheng XF (2009) Mechanisms of regulation of RNA polymerase III-dependent transcription by TORC1. EMBO J 28:2220–2230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. White RJ (2008) RNA polymerases I and III, non-coding RNAs and cancer. Trends Genet 24:622–629CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Wullschleger S, Loewith R, Hall MN (2006) TOR signaling in growth and metabolism. Cell 124:471–484CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Xiong Y, Sheen J (2013) Moving beyond translation: glucose-TOR signaling in the transcriptional control of cell cycle. Cell Cycle 12:1989–1990CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Zaragoza D, Ghavidel A, Heitman J, Schultz MC (1998) Rapamycin induces the G0 program of transcriptional repression in yeast by interfering with the TOR signaling pathway. Mol Cell Biol 18:4463–4470CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Systems BiologyYonsei UniversitySeoulKorea
  2. 2.Future Technology Research CenterCorporate R&D, LG Chem/LG Science ParkSeoulKorea

Personalised recommendations