Advertisement

Planta

, Volume 248, Issue 3, pp 591–599 | Cite as

Metabolic and functional distinction of the Smicronyx sp. galls on Cuscuta campestris

  • Lyuben I. Zagorchev
  • Ivanela A. Albanova
  • Anita G. Tosheva
  • Junmin Li
  • Denitsa R. Teofanova
Original Article
  • 195 Downloads

Abstract

Main conclusion

The weevil gall contains two distinct regions, differing in hydrolytic and antioxidant enzymes activity and profiles, which is also functionally distinct from the non-infected Cuscuta stems.

Weevils of the genus Smicronyx are gall-forming insects, widely distributed on parasitic flowering plants of the genus Cuscuta. Thus, they are considered epiparasites and potential method for biological control of their agriculturally harmful hosts. Although several reports on gall formation in Cuscuta spp. exist, the metabolic and functional changes, occurring in the gall, remained largely unknown. Smicronyx sp. galls, collected from a wild Cuscuta campestris population, were dissected into two distinct regions, inner and outer cortex, defined by the higher chlorophyll content of the inner cortex. Based on hydrolytic and antioxidant enzymes activity and isoenzymatic profiles as analyzed after electrophoretic separation, we suggested that the gall differs in its metabolic activity from the non-infected plant tissue. While the outer cortex serves as a region of nutrient storage and mobilization, the inner cortex is directly involved in larvae nutrition. The increase in metabolic activity resulted in significantly increased superoxide dismutase activity in the gall, while several other antioxidant enzymes diminished. The present research offers new insights into the functionally differing regions of Smicronyx galls and the metabolic changes, induced in C. campestris in result of the gall formation.

Keywords

Antioxidant enzymes Insect galls Parasitic plants Hydrolytic enzymes 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The present study was financially supported by the National Science Fund of the Bulgarian Ministry of Education and Science, Grant DNTS China 01/5 and the Inter-governmental S&T Cooperation Proposal between Bulgaria and China (No. 15-2).

References

  1. Anikin V, Nikelshparg M, Nikelshparg E, Konyukhov I (2017) Photosynthetic activity of the dodder Cuscuta campestris (Convolvulaceae) in case of plant inhabitation by the gallformed weevil Smicronyx smreczynskii (Coleoptera, Curculionidae). Izvestiya Saratov Univ New Ser Chem Biol Ecol 17(1):42–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Benvenuti S, Dinelli G, Bonetti A, Catizone P (2005) Germination ecology, emergence and host detection in Cuscuta campestris. Weed Res 45(4):270–278CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Biswas SM, Chakraborty N, Pal B (2014) Foliar gall and antioxidant enzyme responses in Alstonia scholaris, R. Br. after psylloid herbivory—an experimental and statistical analysis. Glob J Bot Sci 2:12–20Google Scholar
  4. Carneiro RG, Isaias RM (2015) Gradients of metabolite accumulation and redifferentiation of nutritive cells associated with vascular tissues in galls induced by sucking insects. Ann Bot Plants.  https://doi.org/10.1093/aobpla/plv086 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. de Oliveira DC, Moreira ASFP, dos Santos Isaias RM (2014) Functional gradients in insect gall tissues: studies on Neotropical host plants. In: Fernandes JW, Santos JK (eds) Neotropical insect galls. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 35–49Google Scholar
  6. Dorchin N, Cramer MD, Hoffmann JH (2006) Photosynthesis and sink activity of wasp-induced galls in Acacia pycnantha. Ecology 87(7):1781–1791CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Dsouza M, Ravishankar B (2014) Nutritional sink formation in galls of Ficus glomerata Roxb. (Moraceae) by the insect Pauropsylla depressa (Psyllidae, Hemiptera). Trop Ecol 55(1):129–136Google Scholar
  8. Fallahpour F, Koocheki A, Mahallati MN, Rastegar MF, Ghorbani R (2016) Biological control of dodder (Cuscuta campestris L.) by fungi pathogens. Būm/shināsī-i kishāvarzī 2(3):408–416Google Scholar
  9. Foyer CH, Shigeoka S (2011) Understanding oxidative stress and antioxidant functions to enhance photosynthesis. Plant Physiol 155(1):93–100CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Giron D, Huguet E, Stone GN, Body M (2016) Insect-induced effects on plants and possible effectors used by galling and leaf-mining insects to manipulate their host-plant. J Insect Physiol 84:70–89CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Haupt S, Oparka KJ, Sauer N, Neumann S (2001) Macromolecular trafficking between Nicotiana tabacum and the holoparasite Cuscuta reflexa. J Exp Bot 52(354):173–177CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Isaias RMS, Carneiro RGS, Oliveira DC, Santos JC (2013) Illustrated and annotated checklist of Brazilian gall morphotypes. Neotrop Entomol 42(3):230–239CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Isaias RMS, Oliveira DC, Moreira ASFP, Soares GLG, Carneiro RGS (2015) The imbalance of redox homeostasis in arthropod-induced plant galls: mechanisms of stress generation and dissipation. Biochim et Biophys Acta (BBA) Gen Subj 1850(8):1509–1517CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Jeschke WD, Räth N, Bäumel P, Czygan F-C, Proksch P (1994) Modelling the flow and partitioning of carbon and nitrogen in the holoparasite Cuscuta reflexa Roxb. and its host Lupinus albus L. I. Methods for estimating net flows. J Exp Bot 45(6):791–800CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Laemmli UK (1970) Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4. Nature 227(5259):680–685CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Manchenko GP (2002) Handbook of detection of enzymes on electrophoretic gels. CRC Press, Boca RatonGoogle Scholar
  17. Parker C (2012) Parasitic weeds: a world challenge. Weed Sci 60(2):269–276CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Pawłowski TA, Staszak AM, Karolewski P, Giertych MJ (2017) Plant development reprogramming by cynipid gall wasp: proteomic analysis. Acta Physiol Plant 39(5):114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Rakleova G, Keightley A, Panchev I, Tsacheva I, Tchorbadjieva M (2010) Cysteine proteinases and somatic embryogenesis in suspension cultures of orchardgrass (Dactylis glomerata L.). Gen Appl Plant Physiol 36(1–2):100–109Google Scholar
  20. Sae-Tang P, Hihara Y, Yumoto I, Orikasa Y, Okuyama H, Nishiyama Y (2016) Overexpressed superoxide dismutase and catalase act synergistically to protect the repair of PSII during photoinhibition in Synechococcus elongatus PCC 7942. Plant Cell Physiol 57(9):1899–1907CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Sandler HA (2010) Managing Cuscuta gronovii (swamp dodder) in cranberry requires an integrated approach. Sustainability 2(2):660–683CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Srivastava S, Tripathi RD, Dwivedi UN (2004) Synthesis of phytochelatins and modulation of antioxidants in response to cadmium stress in Cuscuta reflexa—an angiospermic parasite. J Plant Physiol 161(6):665–674CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Sue M, Ishihara A, Iwamura H (2000) Purification and characterization of a hydroxamic acid glucoside β-glucosidase from wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) seedlings. Planta 210(3):432–438CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Sumanta N, Haque CI, Nishika J, Suprakash R (2014) Spectrophotometric analysis of chlorophylls and carotenoids from commonly grown fern species by using various extracting solvents. Res J Chem Sci 2231:606XGoogle Scholar
  25. Svubova R, Lukacova Z, Kastier P, Blehova A (2017) New aspects of dodder–tobacco interactions during haustorium development. Acta Physiol Plant 39(3):66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Tepe I, Celebi SZ, Kaya I, Ozkan RY (2017) Control of smoothseed alfalfa dodder (Cuscuta approximata) in alfalfa (Medicago sativa). Int J Agric Biol 19(1):199–203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Tjiurutue MC, Sandler HA, Kersch-Becker MF, Theis N, Adler LA (2016) Cranberry resistance to dodder parasitism: induced chemical defenses and behavior of a parasitic plant. J Chem Ecol 42(2):95–106CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Van der Kooij T, Krause K, Dörr I, Krupinska K (2000) Molecular, functional and ultrastructural characterisation of plastids from six species of the parasitic flowering plant genus Cuscuta. Planta 210(5):701–707CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Zhang M, Fang Y, Ji Y, Jiang Z, Wang L (2013) Effects of salt stress on ion content, antioxidant enzymes and protein profile in different tissues of Broussonetia papyrifera. S Afr J Bot 85:1–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Zhekova E, Petkova D, Ivanova I (2014) Smicronyx smreczynskii F. Solari, 1952 (Insecta: Curculionidae): possibilities for biological control of two Cuscuta species (Cuscutaceae) in district of Ruse. Acta Zool Bulg 66(3):431–432Google Scholar
  31. Zimmermann C (1962) Autotrophic development of dodder (Cuscuta pentagona Englm.) in vitro. Crop Sci 2(5):449–450CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Biochemistry, Faculty of BiologySofia University “St. Kliment Ohridski”SofiaBulgaria
  2. 2.Department of Botany, Faculty of BiologySofia University “St. Kliment Ohridski”SofiaBulgaria
  3. 3.Zhejiang Provincial Key Laboratory of Plant Evolutionary Ecology and ConservationTaizhou UniversityTaizhouChina

Personalised recommendations