, Volume 248, Issue 3, pp 579–589 | Cite as

Heterografting induced DNA methylation polymorphisms in Hevea brasiliensis

  • Thomas K. UthupEmail author
  • Rekha Karumamkandathil
  • Minimol Ravindran
  • Thakurdas Saha
Original Article


Main conclusion

Heterografting induced intraclonal epigenetic variations were detected among rubber plants. Interaction between genetically divergent root stock and scion tissues might have triggered these epigenetic changes which may eventually lead to intraclonal variability in rubber.

DNA methylation in response to stress may be associated with the alteration in gene transcription leading to morphological changes in plants. Rubber tree is commercially propagated by bud grafting where the scion of a high yielding variety is grafted on to a genetically divergent root stock. Still, significant levels of intraclonal variations exist among them. Epigenetic changes associated with heterografting may be partly responsible for this conundrum. In the present study, an attempt was made to identify the impact of divergent root stock on the epigenome of scion in grafted rubber plants. Heterografts were developed by grafting eye buds from a single polyembryony derived seedling on to genetically divergent root stocks of unknown parentage. The plants were uniformly maintained and their DNA was subjected to MSAP analysis. Polymorphic DNA methylation bands corresponding to CG as well as the plant-specific CHG types of methylation were observed. Cloning of selected polymorphic regions and bisulfite sequencing confirmed the presence of methylation in the promoter and coding region of important genes including an LRR receptor kinase gene. Since divergent root stock is the major factor differentiating the grafted plants, the changes in DNA methylation patterns might have been triggered by the interaction between the two genetically different tissues of stock and scion. The study assumes importance in Hevea, because accumulation and maintenance of epigenetic changes in functional genes and promoters during subsequent cycles of vegetative propagation may contribute towards intraclonal variability eventually leading to altered phenotypes.


DNA methylation Hevea brasiliensis Stock–scion interaction Epigenetic changes Intraclonal variability 



We thank Dr. James Jacob, Director of Research, Rubber Research Institute of India for his support. We gratefully aknowledge the bioinformatic support rendered by Mr. Anantharamanan R. We also thank Mr. Madhusoodanan, Scientist, Rubber Technology division, RRII for the art work. This work was supported by the research funds of the Rubber Research Institute of India, Rubber Board (Ministry of Commerce and Industry, Government of India).

Supplementary material

425_2018_2918_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (584 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (PDF 584 kb)


  1. Brosnan CA, Mitter N, Christie M, Smith NA, Waterhouse PM, Carroll BJ (2007) Nuclear gene silencing directs reception of long-distance mRNA silencing in Arabidopsis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104:14741–14746. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Cao X, Jacobsen SE (2002) Locus-specific control of asymmetric and CpNpG methylation by the DRM and CMT3 methyltransferase genes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99:16491–16498CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Cardinal ABB, Gonçalves PS, Mello MAL (2007) Stock–scion interactions on growth and rubber yield of Hevea brasiliensis. Sci Agric (Piracicaba, Braz) 64:235–240CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chan SW, Henderson IR, Jacobsen SE (2005) Gardening the genome: DNA methylation in Arabidopsis thaliana. Nat Rev Genet 6:351–360CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Combe JC (1975) Demonstration of intraclonal variability in young graft trees. Revue Generaledes Caouth Plast 52:91–94Google Scholar
  6. Combe JC, Gerner P (1977) Effect of the stock family on the growth and production of grafted Heveas. J Rubber Res Inst Sri Lanka 54:83–92Google Scholar
  7. Cohen S, Naor A, Bennink J, Grava A, Tyree M (2007) Hydraulic resistance components of mature apple trees on rootstocks of different vigours. J Exp Bot 58(15–16):4213–4224CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cookson SJ, Clemente Moreno MJ, Hevin C, Nyamba Mendome LZ, Delrot S, Magnin N, Trossat-Magnin C, Ollat N (2014) Heterografting with nonself rootstocks induces genes involved in stress responses at the graft interface when compared with autografted controls. J Exp Bot 65:2473–2481. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  9. Dyachenko OV, Zakharchenko NS, Shevchuk TV, Bohnert HJ, Cushman JC, Buryanov YaI (2006) Effect of hypermethylation of CCWGG sequences in DNA of Mesembryanthemum crystallinum plants on their adaptation to salt stress. Biochemistry (Mosc) 71(4):461–465CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dorsett D, Ström L (2012) The ancient and evolving roles of cohesin in gene expression and DNA repair. Curr Biol 22:R240–R250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Doyle JJ, Doyle JL (1990) Isolation of plant DNA from fresh tissue. Focus 12:13–15Google Scholar
  12. Feng S, Cokus SJ, Zhang X, Chen PY, Bostick M, Goll MG, Hetzel J, Jain J, Strauss SH, Halpern ME, Ukomadu C, Sadler KC, Pradhan S, Pellegrini M, Jacobsen SE (2010) Conservation and divergence of methylation patterning in plants and animals. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 107:8689–8694CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Fulneček J, Kovařík A (2014) How to interpret methylation sensitive amplified polymorphism (MSAP) profiles? BMC Genet 15:2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gainza F, Opazo I, Muñoz C (2015) Graft incompatibility in plants: metabolic changes during formation and establishment of the rootstock/scion union with emphasis on Prunus species. Chilean J Agric Res. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Galaud J-P, Gaspar T, Boyer N (1993) Inhibition of internode growth due to mechanical stress in Bryonia dioica: relationship between changes in DNA methylation and ethylene metabolism. Physiol Plant 87(1):25–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Goll MG, Bestor TH (2005) Eukaryotic cytosine methyltransferases. Annu Rev Biochem 74:481–514CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gonçalves PS, Martins ALM (2002) Combining ability effects of clonal rootstocks and scions in rubber trees (Hevea). Crop Breed Appl Biotechnol 2:445–452CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Haffani YZ, Silva NF, Goring DR (2004) Receptor kinase signalling in plants. Can J Bot 82:1–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hetzl J, Foerster AM, Raidl G, Mittelsten Scheid O (2007) CyMATE: a new tool for methylation analysis of plant genomic DNA after bisulfite sequencing. Plant J 51(3):526–536CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kanehira A, Yamada K, Iwaya T, Tsuwamoto R, Kasai A, Nakazono M, Harada T (2010) Apple phloem cells contain some mRNAs transported over long distances. Tree Genet Genomes 6:635–642CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Koepke T, Dhingra A (2013) Rootstock scion somatogenetic interactions in perennial composite plants. Plant Cell Rep 32:1321–1337CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kovařik A, Koukalová B, Bezděk M, Opatrný Z (1997) Hypermethylation of tobacco heterochromatic loci in response to osmotic stress. TAG Theor Appl Genet 95(1–2):301–306Google Scholar
  23. Lämke J, Bäurle I (2017) Epigenetic and chromatin-based mechanisms in environmental stress adaptation and stress memory in plants. Genome Biol 18:124. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  24. Labra M, Ghiani A, Citterio S, Sgorbati S, Sala F, Vannini C, Ruffini-Castiglione M, Bracale M (2002) Analysis of cytosine methylation pattern in response to water deficit in pea root tips. Plant Biol 4(6):694–699CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Liang D, Zhang Z, Wu H, Huang C, Shuai P, Ye C-Y et al (2014) Single-base-resolution methylomes of Populus trichocarpa reveal the association between DNA methylation and drought stress. BMC Genet 15(Suppl 1):S9. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  26. Maor GL, Yearim A, Ast G (2015) The alternative role of DNA methylation in splicing regulation. Trends Genet 5:274–280. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Molnar A, Melnyk CW, Bassett A, Hardcastle TJ, Dunn R, Baulcombe DC (2010) Small silencing RNAs in plants are mobile and direct epigenetic modification in recipient cells. Science 328:872–875. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Mun M, Yi H, Nou I, Hur Y (2015) Grafting-Induced gene expression change in Brassica rapa leaves is different from fruit trees. Plant Breed Biotechnol 3:67–76. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Nasmyth K, Haering CH (2009) Cohesin: its roles and mechanisms. Annu Rev Genet 43:525–558CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Nayanakantha NMC, Seneviratne P (2007) Tissue culture of rubber: past, present and future prospects. Cey J Sci (Bio Sci) 36:116–125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Ng AP, Ho CY, Sultan MO, Ooi CB, Lew HL, Yoon PK (1981) Influence of six rootstocks on growth and yield of six scion clones of Hevea brasiliensis. In: RRIM planters’s conference, London, Proceedings, pp 134–151Google Scholar
  32. Omokhafe KO (2004) Clonal stability of tree dryness in Hevea brasiliensis Muell. Argic Genet Mol Biol 27:242–244CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Pradillo M, Knoll A, Oliver Varas J, Corredor E, Puchta H, Santos JL (2015) Involvement of the cohesin cofactor PDS5 (SPO76) during meiosis and DNA repair in Arabidopsis thaliana. Front Plant Sci. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  34. Premakumari D, Nair RB, Soman TA, John A, Nazeer MA (2002) Genetic influence for intraclonal variations and associations of juvenile yield and girth in thirteen Hevea clones grown in Kanyakumari region of south India. Indian J Nat Rubber Res 15:28–32Google Scholar
  35. Priyadarshan PM (2016) Genetic diversity and erosion in hevea rubber. In: Ahuja MR, Jain SM (eds) Genetic diversity and erosion in plants: case histories. Springer, Switzerland, pp 233–267CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Rekha K, Jayashree R, Sushamakumari S, Sobha S, Gireesh T, Supriya R, Anita A, Saha T, Thulaseedharan A (2010) Induction of zygotic polyembryony and production of true-to-type seedlings of Hevea brasiliensis. In: Proceedings of the international conference on biotechnology: a global scenario. Kakatiya University, Warangal, pp 121–122Google Scholar
  37. Rekha K, Thomas KU, Sobha S, Divya UK, Saha T, Sushamakumari S (2015) Genetic and epigenetic uniformity of polyembryony derived multiple seedlings of Hevea brasiliensis. Protoplasma. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Sanabria N, Goring D, Nurnberger T, Dubery I (2008) Self/nonself perception and recognition mechanisms in plants: a comparison of self incompatibility and innate immunity. New Phytol 178:503–513CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Saze H (2008) Epigenetic memory transmission through mitosis and meiosis in plants. Semin Cell Dev Biol 19:527–536CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Schönberger B, Chen X, Mager S, Ludewig U (2016) Site-dependent differences in DNA methylation and their impact on plant establishment and phosphorus nutrition in Populus trichocarpa. PLoS One. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  41. Shang X, Cao Y, Ma L (2017) Alternative splicing in plant genes: a means of regulating the environmental fitness of plants. Int J Mol Sci. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  42. Sobhana P, Jayasree G, Jacob J, Sethuraj MR (2001) Physiological and biochemical aspects of stock–scion interaction in Hevea brasiliensis. Indian J Nat Rubber Res 14:131–136Google Scholar
  43. Souza LM et al (2015) Genetic diversity strategy for the management and use of rubber genetic resources: more than 1,000 wild and cultivated accessions in a 100-genotype core collection. PLoS One. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  44. Steward N, Kusano T, Sano H (2000) Expression of ZmMET1, a gene encoding a DNA methyltransferase from maize, is associated not only with DNA replication in actively proliferating cells, but also with altered DNA methylation status in cold-stressed quiescent cells. Nucleic Acids Res 28:3250–3259CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Tang C et al (2016) The rubber tree genome reveals new insights into rubber production and species adaptation. Nat Plants. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  46. Tsaftaris AS, Polidoros AN (2000) DNA methylation and plant breeding. Plant Breed Rev 18:87–176Google Scholar
  47. Uthup TK, Ravindran M, Bini K, Saha T (2011) Divergent DNA methylation patterns associated with abiotic stress in Hevea brasiliensis. Mol Plant 4:996–1013CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Wada Y, Miyamoto K, Kusano T et al (2004) Association between up-regulation of stress-responsive genes and hypomethylation of genomic DNA in tobacco plants. Mol Genet Genom 271:658–666CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Waidmann S, Kusenda B, Mayerhofer J, Mechtler K, Jonak C (2014) A DEK domain-containing protein modulates chromatin structure and function in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 26:4328–4344CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Wendt KS, Peters JM (2009) How cohesin and CTCF cooperate in regulating gene expression. Chromosome Res 17:201–214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Wu R, Wang X, Lin Y, Ma Y, Liu G, Yu X et al (2013) Inter-species grafting caused extensive and heritable alterations of DNA methylation in Solanaceae plants. PLoS One 8:e61995. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  52. Yin H, Yan B, Sun J et al (2012) Graft-union development: a delicate process that involves cell-cell communication between scion and stock for local auxin accumulation. J Exp Bot 63:4219–4232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Zhang WN, Gong L, Ma C, Xu HY, Hu JF, Harada T, Li TZ (2012) Gibberellin acid-insensitive mRNA transport in Pyrus. Plant Mol Biol Rep 30:614–623CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Zhang W, Spector TD, Deloukas P, Bell JT, Engelhardt BE (2015) Predicting genome-wide DNA methylation using methylation marks, genomic position, and DNA regulatory elements. Genome Biol 16:14. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  55. Zheng BS, Chu HL, Jin SH, Huang YJ, Wang ZJ, Chen M, Huang JQ (2010) cDNA-AFLP analysis of gene expression in hickory (Carya cathayensis) during graft process. Tree Physiol 30:297–303CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Thomas K. Uthup
    • 1
    Email author
  • Rekha Karumamkandathil
    • 1
  • Minimol Ravindran
    • 1
  • Thakurdas Saha
    • 1
  1. 1.Advanced Centre for Molecular Biology and BiotechnologyRubber Research Institute of IndiaKottayamIndia

Personalised recommendations