Advertisement

Accreditation of endocrine surgery units

  • Thomas J. MusholtEmail author
  • Robert Bränström
  • Reto Martin Kaderli
  • Nuria Muñoz Pérez
  • Marco Raffaelli
  • Michael J. Stechman
  • on behalf of ESES
Review Article

Abstract

Background/purpose

A key measure to maintain and improve the quality of healthcare is the formal accreditation of provider units. The European Society of Endocrine Surgeons (ESES) therefore proposes a system of accreditation for endocrine surgical centers in Europe to supplement existing measures that promote high standards in the practice in endocrine surgery.

Methods

A working group analyzed the current healthcare situation in the field of endocrine surgery in Europe. Two surveys were distributed to ESES members to acquire information about the structure, staffing, caseload, specifications, and technology available to endocrine surgery units. Further data were sought on tracer diagnoses for quality standards, training provision, and research activity. Existing accreditation models related to endocrine surgery were included in the analysis.

Results

The analysis of existing accreditation models, available evidence, and survey results suggests that a majority of ESES members aspire to a two-level model (termed competence and reference centers), sub-divided into those providing neck endocrine surgery and those providing endocrine surgery. Criteria for minimum caseload, number and certification of staff, unit structure, on-site collaborating disciplines, research activities, and training capacity for competence center accreditation are proposed. Lastly, quality indicators for distinct tracer diagnoses are defined.

Conclusions

Differing healthcare structures, existing accreditation models, training models, and varied case volumes across Europe are barriers to the conception and implementation of a pan-European accreditation model. However, there is consensus on accepted standards required for accrediting an ESES competence center. These will serve as a basis for first-stage accreditation of endocrine surgery units.

Keywords

Accreditation Endocrine surgery Quality control 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We thank ESES for the opportunity to develop the proposal.

Authors’ contributions

Study conception and design: Thomas J. Musholt. Acquisition of data: Robert Bränström. Analysis and interpretation of data: Thomas J. Musholt, Robert Bränström, Reto Martin Kaderli, Nuria Muñoz Pérez, Marco Raffaelli, Michael Stechman. Drafting of manuscript: Thomas J. Musholt, Robert Bränström, Reto Martin Kaderli, Nuria Muñoz Pérez, Marco Raffaelli, Michael Stechman. Critical revision of manuscript: Thomas J. Musholt, Robert Bränström, Reto Martin Kaderli, Nuria Muñoz Pérez, Marco Raffaelli, Michael Stechman.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants performed by any of the authors.

References

  1. 1.
    Sosa JA, Bowman HM, Tielsch JM, Powe NR, Gordon TA, Udelsman R (1998) The importance of surgeon experience for clinical and economic outcomes from thyroidectomy. Ann Surg 228(3):320–330CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Gourin CG, Tufano RP, Forastiere AA, Koch WM, Pawlik TM, Bristow RE (2010) Volume-based trends in thyroid surgery. Archives of otolaryngology--head & neck surgery 136(12):1191–1198.  https://doi.org/10.1001/archoto.2010.212 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Loyo M, Tufano RP, Gourin CG (2013) National trends in thyroid surgery and the effect of volume on short-term outcomes. Laryngoscope 123(8):2056–2063.  https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.23923 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Gonzalez-Sanchez C, Franch-Arcas G, Gomez-Alonso A (2013) Morbidity following thyroid surgery: does surgeon volume matter? Langenbeck's Arch Surg 398(3):419–422.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-012-1027-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kandil E, Noureldine SI, Abbas A, Tufano RP (2013) The impact of surgical volume on patient outcomes following thyroid surgery. Surgery 154 (6):1346–1352; discussion 1352-1343. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2013.04.068
  6. 6.
    Al-Qurayshi Z, Robins R, Hauch A, Randolph GW, Kandil E (2016) Association of surgeon volume with outcomes and cost savings following thyroidectomy: a national forecast. JAMA otolaryngology-- head & neck surgery 142(1):32–39.  https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaoto.2015.2503 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Adam MA, Thomas S, Youngwirth L, Hyslop T, Reed SD, Scheri RP, Roman SA, Sosa JA (2017) Is there a minimum number of thyroidectomies a surgeon should perform to optimize patient outcomes? Ann Surg 265(2):402–407.  https://doi.org/10.1097/sla.0000000000001688 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Nouraei SA, Virk JS, Middleton SE, Aylin P, Mace A, Vaz F, Kaddour H, Darzi A, Tolley NS (2017) A national analysis of trends, outcomes and volume-outcome relationships in thyroid surgery. Clinical otolaryngology : official journal of ENT-UK ; official journal of Netherlands Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology & Cervico-Facial Surgery 42(2):354–365.  https://doi.org/10.1111/coa.12730 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Thomusch O, Sekulla C, Billmann F, Seifert G, Dralle H, Lorenz K (2018) Risk profile analysis and complications after surgery for autoimmune thyroid disease. Br J Surg 105(6):677–685.  https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.10770 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Meltzer C, Klau M, Gurushanthaiah D, Tsai J, Meng D, Radler L, Sundang A (2016) Surgeon volume in thyroid surgery: surgical efficiency, outcomes, and utilization. Laryngoscope 126(11):2630–2639.  https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.26119 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Adkisson CD, Howell GM, McCoy KL, Armstrong MJ, Kelley ML, Stang MT, Joyce JM, Hodak SP, Carty SE, Yip L (2014) Surgeon volume and adequacy of thyroidectomy for differentiated thyroid cancer. Surgery 156 (6):1453–1459; discussion 1460. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2014.08.024
  12. 12.
    Promberger R, Ott J, Kober F, Koppitsch C, Seemann R, Freissmuth M, Hermann M (2012) Risk factors for postoperative bleeding after thyroid surgery. Br J Surg 99(3):373–379.  https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.7824 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Maneck M, Dotzenrath C, Dralle H, Fahlenbrach C, Paschke R, Steinmuller T, Tusch E, Jeschke E, Gunster C (2017) Complications after thyroid gland operations in Germany : a routine data analysis of 66,902 AOK patients. Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen 88(1):50–57.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00104-016-0267-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Weiss A, Lee KC, Brumund KT, Chang DC, Bouvet M (2014) Risk factors for hematoma after thyroidectomy: results from the nationwide inpatient sample. Surgery 156(2):399–404.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2014.03.015 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Dehal A, Abbas A, Al-Tememi M, Hussain F, Johna S (2014) Impact of surgeon volume on incidence of neck hematoma after thyroid and parathyroid surgery: ten years’ analysis of nationwide in-patient sample database. Am Surg 80(10):948–952Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Hauch A, Al-Qurayshi Z, Randolph G, Kandil E (2014) Total thyroidectomy is associated with increased risk of complications for low- and high-volume surgeons. Ann Surg Oncol 21(12):3844–3852.  https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-014-3846-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Dralle H, Sekulla C, Haerting J, Timmermann W, Neumann HJ, Kruse E, Grond S, Muhlig HP, Richter C, Voss J, Thomusch O, Lippert H, Gastinger I, Brauckhoff M, Gimm O (2004) Risk factors of paralysis and functional outcome after recurrent laryngeal nerve monitoring in thyroid surgery. Surgery 136(6):1310–1322.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2004.07.018 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Malmaeus J, Granberg PO, Halvorsen J, Akerstrom G, Johansson H (1988) Parathyroid surgery in Scandinavia. Acta Chir Scand 154(7–8):409–413Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Stavrakis AI, Ituarte PH, Ko CY, Yeh MW (2007) Surgeon volume as a predictor of outcomes in inpatient and outpatient endocrine surgery. Surgery 142 (6):887–899; discussion 887–899. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2007.09.003
  20. 20.
    Mitchell J, Milas M, Barbosa G, Sutton J, Berber E, Siperstein A (2008) Avoidable reoperations for thyroid and parathyroid surgery: effect of hospital volume. Surgery 144 (6):899–906; discussion 906–897. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2008.07.022
  21. 21.
    Noureldine SI, Abbas A, Tufano RP, Srivastav S, Slakey DP, Friedlander P, Kandil E (2014) The impact of surgical volume on racial disparity in thyroid and parathyroid surgery. Ann Surg Oncol 21(8):2733–2739.  https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-014-3610-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Meltzer C, Klau M, Gurushanthaiah D, Tsai J, Meng D, Radler L, Sundang A (2017) Surgeon volume in parathyroid surgery-surgical efficiency, outcomes, and utilization. JAMA otolaryngology-- head & neck surgery 143(8):843–847.  https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaoto.2017.0124 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Sosa JA, Tuggle CT, Wang TS, Thomas DC, Boudourakis L, Rivkees S, Roman SA (2008) Clinical and economic outcomes of thyroid and parathyroid surgery in children. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 93(8):3058–3065.  https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2008-0660 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Neychev VK, Ghanem M, Blackwood SL, Aragon Han P, Fazeli R, Schneider E, Najafian A, Bloch DC, Bard MC, Klarsfeld JH, Zeiger MA, Lipton RJ (2016) Parathyroid surgery can be safely performed in a community hospital by experienced parathyroid surgeons: a retrospective cohort study. International journal of surgery (London, England) 27:72–76.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2015.11.026 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Abdulla AG, Ituarte PH, Harari A, Wu JX, Yeh MW (2015) Trends in the frequency and quality of parathyroid surgery: analysis of 17,082 cases over 10 years. Ann Surg 261(4):746–750.  https://doi.org/10.1097/sla.0000000000000812 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Chen H, Wang TS, Yen TW, Doffek K, Krzywda E, Schaefer S, Sippel RS, Wilson SD (2010) Operative failures after parathyroidectomy for hyperparathyroidism: the influence of surgical volume. Ann Surg 252(4):691–695.  https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181f698df Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Park HS, Roman SA, Sosa JA (2009) Outcomes from 3144 adrenalectomies in the United States: which matters more, surgeon volume or specialty? Archives of surgery (Chicago, Ill : 1960) 144(11):1060–1067.  https://doi.org/10.1001/archsurg.2009.191 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Lindeman B, Hashimoto DA, Bababekov YJ, Stapleton SM, Chang DC, Hodin RA, Phitayakorn R (2018) Fifteen years of adrenalectomies: impact of specialty training and operative volume. Surgery 163(1):150–156.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2017.05.024 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Anderson KL Jr, Thomas SM, Adam MA, Pontius LN, Stang MT, Scheri RP, Roman SA, Sosa JA (2018) Each procedure matters: threshold for surgeon volume to minimize complications and decrease cost associated with adrenalectomy. Surgery 163(1):157–164.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2017.04.028 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Palazzo F, Dickinson A, Phillips B, Sahdev A, Bliss R, Rasheed A, Krukowski Z, Newell-Price J (2016) Adrenal surgery in England: better outcomes in high-volume practices. Clin Endocrinol 85(1):17–20.  https://doi.org/10.1111/cen.13021 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Al-Qurayshi Z, Robins R, Buell J, Kandil E (2016) Surgeon volume impact on outcomes and cost of adrenal surgeries. European journal of surgical oncology : the journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and the British Association of Surgical Oncology 42(10):1483–1490.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejso.2016.06.392 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Kazaure HS, Roman SA, Sosa JA (2011) Adrenalectomy in older Americans has increased morbidity and mortality: an analysis of 6,416 patients. Ann Surg Oncol 18(10):2714–2721.  https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-011-1757-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Schneider R, Randolph GW, Dionigi G, Wu CW, Barczynski M, Chiang FY, Al-Quaryshi Z, Angelos P, Brauckhoff K, Cernea CR, Chaplin J, Cheetham J, Davies L, Goretzki PE, Hartl D, Kamani D, Kandil E, Kyriazidis N, Liddy W, Orloff L, Scharpf J, Serpell J, Shin JJ, Sinclair CF, Singer MC, Snyder SK, Tolley NS, Van Slycke S, Volpi E, Witterick I, Wong RJ, Woodson G, Zafereo M, Dralle H (2018) International neural monitoring study group guideline 2018 part I: staging bilateral thyroid surgery with monitoring loss of signal. Laryngoscope 128(Suppl 3):S1–s17.  https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.27359 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Wu CW, Dionigi G, Barczynski M, Chiang FY, Dralle H, Schneider R, Al-Quaryshi Z, Angelos P, Brauckhoff K, Brooks JA, Cernea CR, Chaplin J, Chen AY, Davies L, Diercks GR, Duh QY, Fundakowski C, Goretzki PE, Hales NW, Hartl D, Kamani D, Kandil E, Kyriazidis N, Liddy W, Miyauchi A, Orloff L, Rastatter JC, Scharpf J, Serpell J, Shin JJ, Sinclair CF, Stack BC Jr, Tolley NS, Slycke SV, Snyder SK, Urken ML, Volpi E, Witterick I, Wong RJ, Woodson G, Zafereo M, Randolph GW (2018) International neuromonitoring study group guidelines 2018: part II: optimal recurrent laryngeal nerve management for invasive thyroid cancer-incorporation of surgical, laryngeal, and neural electrophysiologic data. Laryngoscope 128(Suppl 3):S18–s27.  https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.27360 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Yang S, Zhou L, Lu Z, Ma B, Ji Q, Wang Y (2017) Systematic review with meta-analysis of intraoperative neuromonitoring during thyroidectomy. International journal of surgery (London, England) 39:104–113.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2017.01.086 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Wong KP, Mak KL, Wong CK, Lang BH (2017) Systematic review and meta-analysis on intra-operative neuro-monitoring in high-risk thyroidectomy. International journal of surgery (London, England) 38:21–30.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2016.12.039 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Liu J, Sun W, Dong W, Wang Z, Zhang P, Zhang T, Zhang H (2017) Risk factors for post-thyroidectomy haemorrhage: a meta-analysis. Eur J Endocrinol 176(5):591–602.  https://doi.org/10.1530/eje-16-0757 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Kaderli RM, Riss P, Geroldinger A, Selberherr A, Scheuba C, Niederle B (2018) Primary hyperparathyroidism: dynamic postoperative metabolic changes. Clin Endocrinol 88(1):129–138.  https://doi.org/10.1111/cen.13476 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Guerin C, Paladino NC, Lowery A, Castinetti F, Taieb D, Sebag F (2017) Persistent and recurrent hyperparathyroidism. Updat Surg 69(2):161–169.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s13304-017-0447-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Suffat LP, Mondini G, Demaria F, Perino P, Bertotti L, Rosato L (2017) A proposal for thyroid surgery: criteria to identify the references of endocrine surgery. Updat Surg 69(4):431–434.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s13304-017-0487-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    NHS England (2013) 2013/14 NHS standard contract for specialised endocrinology services (adult). https://www.england.nhs.uk/wp-content/uploads/2013/06/a03-spec-endo-adult.pdf.
  42. 42.
    Deutsche Gesellschaft für Allgemein- und Viszeralchirurgie (2016) Das Zertifizierungssystem der DGAV (zertO 5.1). www.dgav.de/fileadmin/media/texte_pdf/zertifizierung/zerto/Zertifizierungsordnung_Kurzform_CAEK.pdf. Accessed April 2019
  43. 43.
    Società Italiana Unitaria di Endocrinochirurgia Programma Valutativo di Accreditamento delle UO di Endocrinochirurgia per la patologia della tiroide. siuec.it/download/file/Regolamento%20per%20Accreditamento%20UO%20SIUEC.pdf. Accessed April 2019Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    The british association of endocrine surgeons (2003) Guidelines for the surgical management of endocrine disease and the training requirements for endocrine surgery. https://www.baets.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/BAETS-Guidelines-2003.pdf. Accessed April 2019
  45. 45.
    De Siqueira JR, Gough MJ (2016) Correlation between experience targets and competence for general surgery certification. Br J Surg 103(7):921–927.  https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.10145 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Brown C, Abdelrahman T, Patel N, Thomas C, Pollitt MJ, Lewis WG (2017) Operative learning curve trajectory in a cohort of surgical trainees. Br J Surg 104(10):1405–1411.  https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.10584 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Rosato L, De Crea C, Bellantone R, Brandi ML, De Toma G, Filetti S, Miccoli P, Pacini F, Pelizzo MR, Pontecorvi A, Avenia N, De Pasquale L, Chiofalo MG, Gurrado A, Innaro N, La Valle G, Lombardi CP, Marini PL, Mondini G, Mullineris B, Pezzullo L, Raffaelli M, Testini M, De Palma M (2016) Diagnostic, therapeutic and health-care management protocol in thyroid surgery: a position statement of the Italian Association of Endocrine Surgery Units (U.E.C. CLUB). J Endocrinol Investig 39(8):939–953.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s40618-016-0455-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Section of Endocrine Surgery, Department of General, Visceral and Transplant SurgeryUniversity Medicine of the Johannes Gutenberg-University MainzMainzGermany
  2. 2.Endocrine and Sarcoma Surgery Unit, Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska InstitutetKarolinska University HospitalStockholmSweden
  3. 3.Department of Visceral Surgery and Medicine, Bern University HospitalUniversity of BernBernGermany
  4. 4.Cirugía General, Sección de Cirugía EndocrinaHospital Universitario Virgen de las NievesGranadaSpain
  5. 5.Istituto di Semeiotica ChirurgicaUniversità Cattolica del Sacro CuoreRomeItaly
  6. 6.Department of Endocrine SurgeryUniversity Hospital of WalesCardiffUK

Personalised recommendations