Contemporary practice and short-term outcomes after liver resections in a complete national cohort
Improved outcome after liver resections have been reported in several series, but outcomes from national cohorts are scarce. Our aim was to evaluate nationwide practice and short-term outcomes after liver surgery in a universal healthcare system.
A complete 5-year cohort of all liver resections from the Norwegian Patient Registry (NPR). Short-term outcomes were aggregated length of stay (a-LoS), reoperation and 90-day mortality.
Of 2118 liver resections, 605 (28.6%) were major, median age was 65 years and 1184 (55%) were male. Most common indication was metastatic disease (n = 1554; 73.4%) and primary malignancy (n = 328; 15.3%). Laparoscopy was performed in 513 (33.9%) of minor and 37 (6.1%) of major liver resections and increased over time to 39.1% of minor resections in 2016. Median a-LoS was 12 days for major resections, 8 days for open minor and 3 days for laparoscopic minor resections. Reoperation was reported for 159 (7.4%) and 90-day mortality for 44 (2.1%). Primary malignancy, male gender, elderly patients and major resections were associated with poorer outcome.
In a national cohort, laparoscopy is used for a substantial proportion of minor resections and was associated with reduced a-LoS. Risk factors for reoperation and mortality were male gender, increased age and major resection for primary malignancy.
KeywordsLiver resection National cohort Short-term outcomes Laparoscopic
Compliance with ethical standards
Centre of Clinical Documentation and Evaluation (SKDE) holds a concession from the Norwegian Data Protection Authority to access data from the Norwegian Patient Registry (NPR) for patients treated at Norwegian hospitals in the period 1 January 2012 to 31 December 2016. The Norwegian Data Inspectorate licenced the data registry at SKDE (ref. 15/00271–2/CGN and 16/00289–2/CGN). Further ethical approval was not required according to Norwegian law.
Data from the Norwegian Patient Register has been used in this publication. The interpretation and reporting of these data are the sole responsibility of the authors, and no endorsement by the Norwegian Patient Register is intended nor should be inferred.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.
- 3.Ramacciato G, D’Angelo F, Baldini R, Petrucciani N, Antolino L, Aurello P, Nigri G, Bellagamba R, Pezzoli F, Balesh A, Cucchetti A, Cescon M, Del Gaudio M, Ravaioli M, Pinna AD (2012) Hepatocellular carcinomas and primary liver tumors as predictive factors for postoperative mortality after liver resection: a meta-analysis of more than 35,000 hepatic resections. Am Surg 78:456–467PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 7.Abu Hilal M, Aldrighetti L, Dagher I, Edwin B, Troisi RI, Alikhanov R, Aroori S, Belli G, Besselink M, Briceno J, Gayet B, D’Hondt M, Lesurtel M, Menon K, Lodge P, Rotellar F, Santoyo J, Scatton O, Soubrane O, Sutcliffe R, Van Dam R, White S, Halls MC, Cipriani F, Van der Poel M, Ciria R, Barkhatov L, Gomez-Luque Y, Ocana-Garcia S, Cook A, Buell J, Clavien PA, Dervenis C, Fusai G, Geller D, Lang H, Primrose J, Taylor M, Van Gulik T, Wakabayashi G, Asbun H, Cherqui D (2017) The Southampton consensus guidelines for laparoscopic liver surgery: from indication to implementation. Ann SurgGoogle Scholar
- 8.Jin B, Chen MT, Fei YT, Du SD, Mao YL Safety and efficacy for laparoscopic versus open hepatectomy: a meta-analysis. Surg Oncol:2017Google Scholar
- 12.von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, Pocock SJ, Gotzsche PC, Vandenbroucke JP (2007) The strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (strobe) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. Lancet 370:1453–1457. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61602-X CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 13.Mangerud W, Kjelvik M, Krokan T: Activity data for somatic health care in the specialist health service 2016: Norwegian patient registry [in Norwegian]. Oslo, Helsedirektoratet, 2017Google Scholar
- 18.Nomesco classification of surgical procedures; in Care NCfCiH (ed), Nordic Centre for Classifications in Health Care, 2011,Google Scholar
- 19.Belghiti J, Clavien P, Gadzijev E, Garden J, Lau W, Makuuchi M, Strong R: The Brisbane 2000 terminology of liver anatomy and resections: International Hepato Pancreato Biliary World Congress, Isis Medical Media, 2000, 2, pp 333–339Google Scholar
- 21.Quan H, Sundararajan V, Halfon P, Fong A, Burnand B, Luthi JC, Saunders LD, Beck CA, Feasby TE, Ghali WA (2005) Coding algorithms for defining comorbidities in icd-9-cm and icd-10 administrative data. Med Care 43:1130–1139. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.mlr.0000182534.19832.83 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 25.Shutt TA, Philips P, Scoggins CR, McMasters KM, Martin RC 2nd (2016) Permanent loss of preoperative independence in elderly patients undergoing hepatectomy: key factor in the informed consent process. J Gastrointest Surg 20:936–944. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-015-3069-8 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 28.Fretland AA, Dagenborg VJ, Bjornelv GMW, Kazaryan AM, Kristiansen R, Fagerland MW, Hausken J, Tonnessen TI, Abildgaard A, Barkhatov L, Yaqub S, Rosok BI, Bjornbeth BA, Andersen MH, Flatmark K, Aas E, Edwin B (2017) Laparoscopic versus open resection for colorectal liver metastases: the OSLO-COMET randomized controlled trial. Ann SurgGoogle Scholar
- 29.Schneider EB, Ejaz A, Spolverato G, Hirose K, Makary MA, Wolfgang CL, Ahuja N, Weiss M, Pawlik TM (2014) Hospital volume and patient outcomes in hepato-pancreatico-biliary surgery: is assessing differences in mortality enough? J Gastrointest Surg 18:2105–2115. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-014-2619-9 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 32.de Haas RJ, Wicherts DA, Andreani P, Pascal G, Saliba F, Ichai P, Adam R, Castaing D, Azoulay D (2011) Impact of expanding criteria for resectability of colorectal metastases on short- and long-term outcomes after hepatic resection. Ann Surg 253:1069–1079. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0b013e318217e898 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 33.Schroeder RA, Marroquin CE, Bute BP, Khuri S, Henderson WG, Kuo PC (2006) Predictive indices of morbidity and mortality after liver resection. Ann Surg 243:373–379. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.sla.0000201483.95911.08 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 34.Halls MC, Cherqui D, Taylor MA, Primrose JN, Abu Hilal M (2018) Are the current difficulty scores for laparoscopic liver surgery telling the whole story? An international survey and recommendations for the future. HPB (Oxford) 20:231–236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hpb.2017.08.028 CrossRefGoogle Scholar