Advertisement

Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery

, Volume 403, Issue 8, pp 967–975 | Cite as

Thoracoscopic esophagectomy with total meso-esophageal excision reduces regional lymph node recurrence

  • Yuji AkiyamaEmail author
  • Takeshi Iwaya
  • Fumitaka Endo
  • Haruka Nikai
  • Kei Sato
  • Shigeaki Baba
  • Takehiro Chiba
  • Toshimoto Kimura
  • Takeshi Takahara
  • Koki Otsuka
  • Hiroyuki Nitta
  • Masaru Mizuno
  • Yusuke Kimura
  • Keisuke Koeda
  • Akira Sasaki
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • 90 Downloads

Abstract

Purpose

We investigated the operative outcomes of thoracoscopic esophagectomy (TE) in the prone position, using the concept of total meso-esophageal excision for esophageal cancer.

Methods

The medical records of 140 consecutive patients with esophageal cancer who underwent radical esophagectomy by TE were reviewed retrospectively, and operative outcomes were compared between patients treated before (non-meso-esophagus; non-ME group) and after (ME group) the introduction of total meso-esophageal excision (ME).

Results

There were no significant differences between the groups in postoperative morbidity (non-ME group vs. ME group, 28.3% vs. 41.4%, p = 0.119), 30-day mortality (non-ME group vs. ME group, 0% vs. 1.1%; p = 0.433), and in-hospital mortality (non-ME group vs. ME group, 1.9% vs. 0%, p = 0.199). Although overall survival and relapse-free survival did not differ significantly between the groups, the overall recurrence rate was significantly lower in the ME group than the non-ME group (non-ME group vs. ME group, 43.4% vs. 23%, p = 0.011). In particular, the rate of regional lymph node recurrence in the mediastinum was lower in the ME group (non-ME group vs. ME group, 11.3% vs. 2.3%; p = 0.026).

Conclusions

Our results suggest that the ME procedure might be one of the procedures that reduce regional lymph node recurrence in the mediastinum without any deterioration in short-term outcomes.

Keywords

Thoracoscopic esophagectomy Minimally invasive esophagectomy Esophageal cancer Meso-esophagus Preceding anterior approach 

Notes

Author’s contributions

Study conception and design: Yuji Akiyama and Takeshi Iwaya. Acquisition of data: Fumitaka Endo, Haruka Nikai, Kei Sato, Shigeaki Baba, and Takehiro Chiba. Analysis and interpretation of data: Toshimoto Kimura, Takeshi Takahara, Koki Otsuka, and Hiroyuki Nitta. Drafting of manuscript: Yuji Akiyama and Takeshi Iwaya. Critical revision of manuscript: Masaru Mizuno, Yusuke Kimura, Keisuke Koeda, and Akira Sasaki.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

References

  1. 1.
    Mamidanna R, Bottle A, Aylin P, Faiz O, Hanna GB (2012) Short-term outcomes following open versus minimally invasive esophagectomy for cancer in England: a population-based national study. Ann Surg 255:197–203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Takeuchi H, Miyata H, Ozawa S, Udagawa H, Osugi H, Matsubara H, Konno H, Seto Y, Kitagawa Y (2017) Comparison of short-term outcomes between open and minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer using a nationwide database in Japan. Ann Surg Oncol 24:1821–1827CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Biere SS, van Berge Henegouwen MI, Maas KW, Bonavina L, Rosman C, Garcia JR, Gisbertz SS, Klinkenbijl JH, Hollmann MW, de Lange ES, Bonjer HJ, van der Peet DL, Cuesta MA (2012) Minimally invasive versus open oesophagectomy for patients with oesophageal cancer: a multicentre, open-label, randomized controlled trial. Lancet 379:1887–1892CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Nagpal K, Ahmed K, Vats A, Yakoub D, James D, Ashrafian H, Darzi A, Moorthy K, Athanasiou T (2010) Is minimally invasive surgery beneficial in the management of esophageal cancer? A meta-analysis. Surg Endosc 24:1621–1629CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Straatman J, van der Wielen N, Cuesta MA, Daams F, Roig Garcia J, Bonavina L, Rosman C, van Berge Henegouwen MI, Gisbertz SS, van der Peet DL (2017) Minimally invasive versus open esophageal resection: three-year follow-up of the previously reported randomized controlled trial: the TIME trial. Ann Surg 266:232–236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Guo W, Ma X, Yang S, Zhu X, Qin W, Xiang J, Lerut T, Li H (2016) Combined thoracoscopic-laparoscopic esophagectomy versus open esophagectomy: a meta-analysis of outcomes. Surg Endosc 30:3873–3881CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Cuschieri A, Shimi S, Banting S (1992) Endoscopic oesophagectomy through a right thoracoscopic approach. J R Coll Surg Edinb 37:7–11Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Palanivelu C, Prakash A, Senthilkumar R, Senthilnathan P, Parthasarathi R, Rajan PS, Venkatachlam S (2006) Minimally invasive esophagectomy: thoracoscopic mobilization of the esophagus and mediastinal lymphadenectomy in prone position--experience of 130 patients. J Am Coll Surg 203:7–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Osugi H, Takemura M, Higashino M, Takada N, Lee S, Ueno M, Tanaka Y, Fukuhara K, Hashimoto Y, Fujiwara Y, Kinoshita H (2002) Video-assisted thoracoscopic esophagectomy and radical lymph node dissection for esophageal cancer. A series of 75 cases Surg Endosc 16:1588–1593Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Noshiro H, Iwasaki H, Kobayashi K, Uchiyama A, Miyasaka Y, Masatsugu T, Koike K, Miyazaki K (2010) Lymphadenectomy along the left recurrent laryngeal nerve by a minimally invasive esophagectomy in the prone position for thoracic esophageal cancer. Surg Endosc 24:2965–2973CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Fabian T, Martin J, Katigbak M, McKelvey AA, Federico JA (2008) Thoracoscopic esophageal mobilization during minimally invasive esophagectomy: a head-to-head comparison of prone versus decubitus positions. Surg Endosc 22:2485–2491CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Teshima J, Miyata G, Kamei T, Nakano T, Abe S, Katsura K, Taniyama Y, Sakurai T, Hikage M, Nakamura T, Takaya K, Zuguchi M, Okamoto H, Youhei O, Ohuchi N (2015) Comparison of short-term outcomes between prone and lateral decubitus positions for thoracoscopic esophagectomy. Surg Endosc 29:2756–2762CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Otsubo D, Nakamura T, Yamamoto M, Kanaji S, Kanemitsu K, Yamashita K, Imanishi T, Oshikiri T, Sumi Y, Suzuki S, Kuroda D, Kakeji Y (2017) Prone position in thoracoscopic esophagectomy improves postoperative oxygenation and reduces pulmonary complications. Surg Endosc 31:1136–1141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Cuesta MA, Weijs TJ, Bleys RL, van Hillegersberg R, van Berge Henegouwen MI, Gisbertz SS, Ruurda JP, Straatman J, Osugi H, van der Peet DL (2015) A new concept of the anatomy of the thoracic oesophagus: the meso-oesophagus. Observational study during thoracoscopic esophagectomy. Surg Endosc 29:2576–2582CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Heald RJ (1988) The 'Holy Plane' of rectal surgery. J R Soc Med 81:503–508CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Hohenberger W, Weber K, Matzel K, Papadopoulos T, Merkel S (2009) Standardized surgery for colonic cancer: complete mesocolic excision and central ligation-technical notes and outcome. Color Dis 11:354–365CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Merkel S, Weber K, Matzel KE, Agaimy A, Göhl J, Hohenberger W (2016) Prognosis of patients with colonic carcinoma before, during and after implementation of complete mesocolic excision. Br J Surg 103:1220–1229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Ando N, Kato H, Igaki H, Shinoda M, Ozawa S, Shimizu H, Nakamura T, Yabusaki H, Aoyama N, Kurita A, Ikeda K, Kanda T, Tsujinaka T, Nakamura K, Fukuda H (2012) A randomized trial comparing postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy with cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil versus preoperative chemotherapy for localized advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the thoracic esophagus (JCOG9907). Ann Surg Oncol 19:68–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Akiyama Y, Iwaya T, Endo F, Chiba T, Takahara T, Otsuka K, Nitta H, Koeda K, Mizuno M, Kimura Y, Sasaki A (2018) Investigation of operative outcomes of thoracoscopic esophagectomy after triplet chemotherapy with docetaxel, cisplatin, and 5-fluorouracil for advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Surg Endosc 32:391–399CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Japan Esophageal Society (2015) Japanese classification of esophageal cancer, 11th edn. Kanehara, TokyoGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Japan Esophageal Society (2009) Japanese classification of esophageal cancer, tenth edition: part I. Esophagus 6:1–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Japan Esophageal Society (2009) Japanese classification of esophageal cancer, tenth edition: part II and III. Esophagus 6:71–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Ozawa S, Ito E, Kazuno A, Chino O, Nakui M, Yamamoto S, Shimada H, Makuuchi H (2013) Thoracoscopic esophagectomy while in a prone position for esophageal cancer: a preceding anterior approach method. Surg Endosc 27:40–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Akiyama Y, Iwaya T, Endo F, Shioi Y, Chiba T, Takahara T, Otsuka K, Nitta H, Koeda K, Mizuno M, Kimura Y, Sasaki A (2017) Stability of cervical esophagogastrostomy via hand-sewn anastomosis after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer. Dis Esophagus 30:1–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Low DE, Alderson D, Cecconello I, Chang AC, Darling GE, DʼJourno XB, Griffin SM, Hölscher AH, Hofstetter WL, Jobe BA, Kitagawa Y, Kucharczuk JC, Law SY, Lerut TE, Maynard N, Pera M, Peters JH, Pramesh CS, Reynolds JV, Smithers BM, van Lanschot JJ (2015) International consensus on standardization of data collection for complications associated with esophagectomy: Esophagectomy Complications Consensus Group (ECCG). Ann Surg 262:286–294CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240:205–213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Tokairin Y, Nakajima Y, Kawada K, Hoshino A, Okada T, Ryotokuji T, Okuda M, Kume Y, Kawamura Y, Yamaguchi K, Nagai K, Akita K, Kinugasa Y (2018) Histological study of the thin membranous structure made of dense connective tissue around the esophagus in the upper mediastinum. Esophagus 15(Jun 13):272–280.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10388-018-0625-9. [Epub ahead of print] CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Poon JT, Law WL, Fan JK, Lo OS (2009) Impact of the standardized medial-to-lateral approach on outcome of laparoscopic colorectal resection. World J Surg 33:2177–2182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Oshikiri T, Nakamura T, Hasegawa H, Yamamoto M, Kanaji S, Yamashita K, Matsuda T, Sumi Y, Fujino Y, Tominaga M, Suzuki S, Kakeji Y (2018) Standardizing procedures improves and homogenizes short-term outcomes after minimally invasive esophagectomy. Langenbeck's Arch Surg 403:221–234Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yuji Akiyama
    • 1
  • Takeshi Iwaya
    • 1
  • Fumitaka Endo
    • 1
  • Haruka Nikai
    • 1
  • Kei Sato
    • 1
  • Shigeaki Baba
    • 1
  • Takehiro Chiba
    • 1
  • Toshimoto Kimura
    • 1
  • Takeshi Takahara
    • 1
  • Koki Otsuka
    • 1
  • Hiroyuki Nitta
    • 1
  • Masaru Mizuno
    • 1
  • Yusuke Kimura
    • 2
  • Keisuke Koeda
    • 3
  • Akira Sasaki
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of SurgeryIwate Medical University School of MedicineIwateJapan
  2. 2.Department of Palliative MedicineIwate Medical University School of MedicineIwateJapan
  3. 3.Department of Medical Safety ScienceIwate Medical University School of MedicineIwateJapan

Personalised recommendations