Advertisement

Small-incision cholecystectomy (through a cylinder retractor) under local anaesthesia and sedation: a prospective observational study of five hundred consecutive cases

  • Enrique J. Grau-Talens
  • José Jacob Motos-Micó
  • Rafael Giraldo-Rubio
  • José M. Aparicio-Gallego
  • José F. Salgado
  • Carlos D. Ibáñez
  • Pablo G. Mangione-Castro
  • Martina Arribas-Jurado
  • Carlos Jordán-Chaves
  • Javier Arias-Díaz
ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Abstract

Background

Transcylindrical cholecystectomy (TC) can be performed under local anaesthesia and sedation (LAS) in ambulatory surgery (AS). The aim of this study was to assess the feasibility and results of TC under LAS.

Methods

TC under LAS was proposed to 583 consecutive patients with cholelithiasis in an AS unit. For the TC procedure, a cylindrical retractor with a transparent plunger was inserted into the hepatocystic triangle, and cholecystectomy was performed through the retractor with reusable open instruments. Pre-, intra-, and post-operative variables were prospectively registered, including complications, reasons for conversion to general anaesthesia (GA), non-programmed admissions, readmissions, pain assessments, and satisfaction with the procedure.

Results

Five hundred patients were eligible for LAS, with GA being required in 128 (25.6%) of them. AS was programmed for 447 patients. The rates of non-programmed admissions, readmissions, and conversion to laparotomy were 8.7% (39), 0.8% (4), and 2.6% (13), respectively. There was no main bile duct injury. At 24 h, physical status was good or excellent in 80.4% of the patients. A history of acute cholecystitis, male sex, a body mass index (BMI) ≥ 39.5 kg/m2, and non-suspected acute cholecystitis were found to be independent variables associated with conversion to GA.

Conclusions

TC under LAS is a safe procedure in AS and is feasible in 74% of cholelithiasis patients. Male sex, BMI, gallbladder wall thickness, and a history of acute cholecystitis are factors that increase the probability of conversion to GA.

This prospective study was approved by the ethics committee of Badajoz for patient protection for biomedical research and has been retrospectively registered under the research registry UIN: researchregistry3979.

Keywords

Transcylindrical cholecystectomy Local anaesthesia Ambulatory surgery 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Our sincerest thanks to the Admission Service staff of the Siberia-Serena Hospital, especially to Dr. Felix Miranda, Ms. Guadalupe Díaz and Ines Parralejo, and Francisco Ballesteros Reina. Thanks are also given to Mr. Carlos J. Grau-Polo, Juan Diego Blanco, and Daragh W. Kennedy for their aid in the preparation of this manuscript, and a particular consideration to Dr. Juan Manuel Nogales for his help with the statistics section. The work is supported by the public service “Servicio Extremeño de Salud” (Extremadure Health Service)

Authors’ contributions

Authorship E.J. G-T and J.J. M-M study conception and design and analysis and interpretation of data; R. G-R, J.F. S, C.D. I, P.G. M-C, M. A-J, and C. J-C Study conception and design; J.M. A-G analysis and interpretation of data; and J. A-D critical revision of the manuscript.

References

  1. 1.
    Lillemoe KD, Lin JW, Talamini MA, Yeo CJ, Snyder DS, Parker SD (1999) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy as a “true” outpatient procedure: initial experience in 130 consecutive patients. J Gastrointest Surg 3:44–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Vaughan J, Gurusamy KS, Davidson BR (2013) Day-surgery versus overnight stay surgery for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev.  https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD006798
  3. 3.
    Harris M, Chung F (2013) Complications of general anesthesia. Clin Plast Surg 40:503–513CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Yuksek YN, Akat AZ, Gozalan U, Daglar G, Pala Y, Canturk M, Tutuncu T, Kama NA (2008) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy under spinal anesthesia. Am J Surg 195:533–536CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Donmez T, Erdem VM, Uzman S, Yildirim D, Avaroglu H, Ferahman S, Sunamak O (2017) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy under spinal-epidural anesthesia vs. general anesthesia: a prospective randomized study. Ann Surg Treat Res 92:136–142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Keus F, de Jong JA, Gooszen HG, van Laarhoven CJ (2006) Laparoscopic versus small-incision cholecystectomy for patients with symptomatic cholecystolithiasis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev.  https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD006229
  7. 7.
    Ledet WP Jr (1990) Ambulatory cholecystectomy without disability. Arch Surg 125:1434–1435CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Seale AK, Ledet WP Jr (1999) Minicholecystectomy: a safe, cost-effective day surgery procedure. Arch Surg 134:308–310CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Grau-Talens EJ, García-Olives F, Rupérez-Arribas MP (1988) Transcylindrical cholecystectomy: new technique for minimally invasive cholecystectomy. World J Surg 22:453–458CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Grau-Talens EJ, Giner M (2010) Transcylindrical gas-free cholecystectomy for the treatment of cholelithiasis, cholecystitis, and choledocholithiasis. Surg Endosc 24:2099–2104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Grau-Talens EJ, Cattáneo JH, Giraldo R, Mangione-Castro PG, Giner M (2010) Transcylindrical cholecystectomy under local anesthesia plus sedation. A pilot study. Endoscopy 42:395–399CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    American Society of Anesthesiologists (2009) Continuum of depth of sedation: definition of general anesthesia and levels of sedation/analgesia. Available at: <http://www.asahq.org/formembers/&sim;/media/formembers/standardsandguidelines/2012/continuumofdepthofsedation442012.ashx. October 2009. (Accessed 23.5.14)
  13. 13.
    Chung F (1995) Recovery pattern and home-readiness after ambulatory surgery. Anesth Analg 80:896–902PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Chung F (1995) Discharge criteria—a new trend. Can J Anaesth 42:1056–1058CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ware JE (2000) SF-36 health survey update. Spine 25:3130–3139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Martin RF, Rossi RL (1994) Bile duct injuries. Spectrum, mechanisms of injury, and their prevention. Surg Clin North Am 74:781–803PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Way LW, Stewart L, Gantert W, Liu K, Lee CM, Whang K, Hunter JG (2003) Causes and prevention of laparoscopic bile duct injuries: analysis of 252 cases from a human factors and cognitive psychology perspective. Ann Surg 237:460–469PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Savader SJ, Lillemoe KD, Prescott CA, Winick AB, Venbrux AC, Lund GB, Mitchell SE, Cameron JL, Osterman FA Jr (1997) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy-related bile duct injuries: a health and financial disaster. Ann Surg 225:268–273CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Keus F, Gooszen HG, van Laarhoven CJ (2010) Open, small-incision, or laparoscopic cholecystectomy for patients with symptomatic cholecystolithiasis. An overview of Cochrane Hepato-Biliary Group reviews. Cochrane Database Syst Rev.  https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD008318
  20. 20.
    Keus F, de Jonge T, Gooszen HG, Buskens E, van Laarhoven CJ (2009) Cost-minimization analysis in a blind randomized trial on small-incision versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy from a societal perspective: sick leave outweighs efforts in hospital savings. Trials 10:80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Keus F, Wetterslev J, Gluud C, Gooszen HG, van Laarhoven CJ (2010) Trial sequential analyses of meta-analyses of complications in laparoscopic vs. small-incision cholecystectomy: more randomized patients are needed. J Clin Epidemiol 63:246–256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Nordin P, Zetterstrom H, Gunnarsson U, Nilsson E (2003) Local, regional, or general anaesthesia in groin hernia repair: multicentre randomised trial. Lancet 362:853–857CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Tiwari S, Chauhan A, Chaterjee P, Alam MT (2013) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy under spinal anaesthesia: a prospective, randomised study. J Minim Access Surg 9:65–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Bessa SS, Katri KM, Abdel-Salam WN, El-Kayal e-SA, Tawfik TA (2012) Spinal versus general anesthesia for day-case laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective randomized study. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 22:550–555CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Séfiani T, Uscain M, Sany JL, Grousseau D, Marchand P, Villate D, Vincent JL (2004) Laparoscopy under local anaesthesia and hypnoanaesthesia about 35 cholecystectomies and 15 inguinal hernia repair. Ann Fr Anesth Reanim 23:1093–1101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Tangjaroen S, Watanapa P (2007) Mini-cholecystectomy under local anaesthesia. Asian J Surg 30:235–238CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Yu G, Wen Q, Qiu L, Bo L, Yu J (2015) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy under spinal anaesthesia vs. general anaesthesia: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. BMC Anesthesiol 15:176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Wang XX, Zhou Q, Pan DB, Deng HW, Zhou AG, Guo HJ, Huang FR (2016) Comparison of postoperative events between spinal anesthesia and general anesthesia in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a systemic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Biomed Res Int.  https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/9480539 Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Asai T, Koga K, Vaughan RS (1998) Respiratory complications associated with tracheal intubation and extubation. Br J Anaesth 80:767–775CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Weber S (2002) Traumatic complications of airway management. Anesthesiol Clin North Am 20:503–512CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Koscielny S, Gottschall R (2006) Perforation of the hypopharynx as a rare life-threatening complication of endotracheal intubation. Anaesthesist 55:45–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Yu SH, Beirne OR (2010) Laryngeal mask airways have a lower risk of airway complications compared with endotracheal intubation: a systematic review. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 68:2359–2376CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Neudecker J, Sauerland S, Neugebauer E, Bergamaschi R, Bonjer HJ, Cuschieri A, Fuchs KH, Jacobi C, Jansen FW, Koivusalo AM, Lacy A, McMahon MJ, Millat B, Schwenk W (2002) The European Association for Endoscopic Surgery clinical practice guideline on the pneumoperitoneum for laparoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc 16:1121–1143CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Enrique J. Grau-Talens
    • 1
    • 2
  • José Jacob Motos-Micó
    • 1
    • 3
  • Rafael Giraldo-Rubio
    • 1
    • 3
  • José M. Aparicio-Gallego
    • 1
    • 3
  • José F. Salgado
    • 1
    • 3
  • Carlos D. Ibáñez
    • 1
    • 3
  • Pablo G. Mangione-Castro
    • 1
    • 4
  • Martina Arribas-Jurado
    • 1
    • 5
  • Carlos Jordán-Chaves
    • 1
    • 6
  • Javier Arias-Díaz
    • 7
  1. 1.School of Medicine of Extremadura University, Section of Ambulatory Surgery UnitHospital Siberia-SerenaTalarrubiasSpain
  2. 2.BadajozSpain
  3. 3.Don BenitoSpain
  4. 4.BarcelonaSpain
  5. 5.Villaviciosa de CórdobaSpain
  6. 6.LlerenaSpain
  7. 7.Department of SurgeryComplutense University of MadridMadridSpain

Personalised recommendations