Advertisement

European Journal of Applied Physiology

, Volume 119, Issue 7, pp 1633–1648 | Cite as

A novel approach for establishing fitness standards for occupational task performance

  • Jeffrey W. RyderEmail author
  • Paul Fullmer
  • Roxanne E. Buxton
  • J. Brent Crowell
  • Elizabeth Goetchius
  • Omar Bekdash
  • John K. DeWitt
  • Emma Y. Hwang
  • Alan Feiveson
  • Kirk L. English
  • Lori L. Ploutz-Snyder
Original Article
  • 28 Downloads

Abstract

Purpose

To identify strength and performance thresholds below which task performance is impaired.

Methods

A new weighted suit system was used to manipulate strength-to-body-weight ratio during the performance of simulated space explorations tasks. Statistical models were used to evaluate various measures of muscle strength and performance on their ability to predict the probability that subjects could complete the tasks in an acceptable amount of time. Thresholds were defined as the point of greatest change in probability per change in the predictor variable. For each task, median time was used to define the boundary between “acceptable” and “unacceptable” completion times.

Results

Fitness thresholds for four space explorations tasks were identified using 23 physiological input variables. Area under receiver operator characteristic curves varied from a low of 0.68 to a high of 0.92.

Conclusion

An experimental analog for altering strength-to-body weight combined with a probability-based statistical model for success was suitable for identifying thresholds for task performance below which tasks could either not be completed or time to completion was unacceptably high. These results provide data for strength recommendations for exploration mission ambulatory task performance. Furthermore, the approach can be used to identify thresholds for other areas where occupationally relevant tasks vary considerably.

Keywords

Strength Power Work Fitness Threshold Task 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Tinh Trinh for engineering support, and Nichole Gadd and Galen Kreutzberg for test operator support. This work was supported by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration Human Research Program NNJ15HK11B.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors report that they have no conflicts of interest.

Ethical standards

All experiments comply with the current laws of the United States, the country in which the experiments were performed.

References

  1. Alvares JB, Rodrigues R, de Azevedo Franke R, da Silva BG, Pinto RS, Vaz MA, Baroni BM (2015) Inter-machine reliability of the Biodex and Cybex isokinetic dynamometers for knee flexor/extensor isometric, concentric and eccentric tests. Phys Ther Sport 16(1):59–65.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ptsp.2014.04.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barter JT (1957) Estimation of body mass segments. WADC technical report 57-260 (ASTIA 118222) Wright Air Development Center, Wright Patterson Airforce Base, Dayton, OhioGoogle Scholar
  3. Day MK, Allen DL, Mohajerani L, Greenisen MC, Roy RR, Edgerton VR (1995) Adaptations of human skeletal muscle fibers to spaceflight. J Gravit Physiol 2(1):P47–P50Google Scholar
  4. De Witt JK, English KL, Crowell JB, Kalogera KL, Guilliams ME, Nieschwitz BE, Hanson AM, Ploutz-Snyder LL (2018) Isometric midthigh pull reliability and relationship to deadlift one repetition maximum. J Strength Cond Res 32(2):528–533.  https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0000000000001605 Google Scholar
  5. English KL, Lee SMC, Loehr JA, Ploutz-Snyder RJ, Ploutz-Snyder LL (2015) Isokinetic strength changes following long-duration spaceflight on the ISS. Aerosp Med Hum Perform 86(12 Suppl):68–77.  https://doi.org/10.3357/AMHP.EC09.2015 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Feiring DC, Ellenbecker TS, Derscheid GL (1990) Test–retest reliability of the biodex isokinetic dynamometer. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 11(7):298–300CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Gopalakrishnan R, Genc KO, Rice AJ, Lee SM, Evans HJ, Maender CC, Ilaslan H, Cavanagh PR (2010) Muscle volume, strength, endurance, and exercise loads during 6-month missions in space. Aviat Space Environ Med 81(2):91–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Greene WH (2000) Econometric analysis, 4th edn. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle RiverGoogle Scholar
  9. Hackney KJ, Scott JM, Hanson AM, English KL, Downs ME, Ploutz-Snyder LL (2015) The Astronaut-Athlete: optimizing human performance in space. J Strength Cond Res 29(12):3531–3545.  https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0000000000001191 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hanley JA, McNeil BJ (1982) The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Radiology 143(1):29–36.  https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.143.1.7063747 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Laughlin MS, Lee SMC, Loehr JA, Amonette W (2009) Isokinetic strength and endurance tests pre- and post-spaceflight: test–retest reliability, NASA TM-2009-214787. National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Hanover, MD 21076-1320Google Scholar
  12. Levine BD, Lane LD, Watenpaugh DE, Gaffney FA, Buckey JC, Blomqvist CG (1996) Maximal exercise performance after adaptation to microgravity. J Appl Physiol 81(2):686–694.  https://doi.org/10.1152/jappl.1996.81.2.686 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Moore AD Jr, Downs ME, Lee SM, Feiveson AH, Knudsen P, Ploutz-Snyder L (2014) Peak exercise oxygen uptake during and following long-duration spaceflight. J Appl Physiol 117(3):231–238.  https://doi.org/10.1152/japplphysiol.01251.2013 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Mulavara AP, Peters BT, Miller CA, Kofman IS, Reschke MF, Taylor LC, Lawrence EL, Wood SJ, Laurie SS, Lee SMC, Buxton RE, May-Phillips TR, Stenger MB, Ploutz-Snyder LL, Ryder JW, Feiveson AH, Bloomberg JJ (2018) Physiological and functional alterations after spaceflight and bed rest. Med Sci Sports Exerc.  https://doi.org/10.1249/MSS.0000000000001615 Google Scholar
  15. Ozkaya O (2013) Familiarization effects of an elliptical all-out test and the wingate test based on mechanical power indices. J Sports Sci Med 12(3):521–525Google Scholar
  16. Pinheiro JC, Chao EC (2006) Efficient Laplacian and Adaptive Gaussian Quadrature algorithms for multilevel generalized linear mixed models. J Comput Graph Stat 15(1):58–81.  https://doi.org/10.1198/106186006X96962 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Ploutz-Snyder LL, Downs M, Ryder J, Hackney K, Scott J, Buxton R, Goetchius E, Crowell B (2014) Integrated resistance and aerobic exercise protects fitness during bed rest. Med Sci Sports Exerc 46(2):358–368.  https://doi.org/10.1249/MSS.0b013e3182a62f85 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Ploutz-Snyder LL, Downs M, Goetchius E, Crowell B, English KL, Ploutz-Snyder R, Ryder J, Dillon EL, Sheffield-Moore M, Scott JM (2018) Exercise training mitigates multi-system deconditioning during bed rest. Med Sci Sports Exerc.  https://doi.org/10.1249/MSS.0000000000001618 Google Scholar
  19. Rittweger J, Schiessl H, Felsenberg D, Runge M (2004) Reproducibility of the jumping mechanography as a test of mechanical power output in physically competent adult and elderly subjects. J Am Geriatr Soc 52(1):128–131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Rittweger J, Felsenberg D, Maganaris C, Ferretti JL (2007) Vertical jump performance after 90 days bed rest with and without flywheel resistive exercise, including a 180 days follow-up. Eur J Appl Physiol 100(4):427–436.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-007-0443-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Ryder JW, Buxton RE, Goetchius E, Scott-Pandorf M, Hackney KJ, Fiedler J, Ploutz-Snyder RJ, Bloomberg JJ, Ploutz-Snyder LL (2013) Influence of muscle strength to weight ratio on functional task performance. Eur J Appl Physiol 113(4):911–921.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-012-2500-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Spiering BA, Lee SM, Mulavara AP, Bentley JR, Buxton RE, Lawrence EL, Sinka J, Guilliams ME, Ploutz-Snyder LL, Bloomberg JJ (2011) Test battery designed to quickly and safely assess diverse indices of neuromuscular function after unweighting. J Strength Cond Res 25(2):545–555.  https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181f56780 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Tesch PA, Berg HE, Bring D, Evans HJ, LeBlanc AD (2005) Effects of 17-day spaceflight on knee extensor muscle function and size. Eur J Appl Physiol 93(4):463–468.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-004-1236-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Trappe T, Trappe S, Lee G, Widrick J, Fitts R, Costill D (2006) Cardiorespiratory responses to physical work during and following 17 days of bed rest and spaceflight. J Appl Physiol 100(3):951–957.  https://doi.org/10.1152/japplphysiol.01083.2005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Trappe S, Costill D, Gallagher P, Creer A, Peters JR, Evans H, Riley DA, Fitts RH (2009) Exercise in space: human skeletal muscle after 6 months aboard the International Space Station. J Appl Physiol 106(4):1159–1168.  https://doi.org/10.1152/japplphysiol.91578.2008 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© This is a U.S. government work and its text is not subject to copyright protection in the United States; however, its text may be subject to foreign copyright protection 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jeffrey W. Ryder
    • 1
    Email author
  • Paul Fullmer
    • 2
  • Roxanne E. Buxton
    • 3
  • J. Brent Crowell
    • 4
  • Elizabeth Goetchius
    • 3
  • Omar Bekdash
    • 1
  • John K. DeWitt
    • 1
  • Emma Y. Hwang
    • 1
  • Alan Feiveson
    • 5
  • Kirk L. English
    • 2
    • 6
  • Lori L. Ploutz-Snyder
    • 7
  1. 1.KBRwyle Science and SpaceHoustonUSA
  2. 2.Department of Clinical Health and Applied SciencesUniversity of Houston–Clear LakeHoustonUSA
  3. 3.Department of Health and Human PerformanceUniversity of HoustonHoustonUSA
  4. 4.MEI TechnologiesHoustonUSA
  5. 5.Biomedical Research and Environmental Sciences, National Aeronautics and Space AdministrationJohnson Space CenterHoustonUSA
  6. 6.Exercise and Nutritional Health InstituteUniversity of Houston–Clear LakeHoustonUSA
  7. 7.School of KinesiologyUniversity of MichiganAnn ArborUSA

Personalised recommendations