A novel approach for establishing fitness standards for occupational task performance
- 28 Downloads
To identify strength and performance thresholds below which task performance is impaired.
A new weighted suit system was used to manipulate strength-to-body-weight ratio during the performance of simulated space explorations tasks. Statistical models were used to evaluate various measures of muscle strength and performance on their ability to predict the probability that subjects could complete the tasks in an acceptable amount of time. Thresholds were defined as the point of greatest change in probability per change in the predictor variable. For each task, median time was used to define the boundary between “acceptable” and “unacceptable” completion times.
Fitness thresholds for four space explorations tasks were identified using 23 physiological input variables. Area under receiver operator characteristic curves varied from a low of 0.68 to a high of 0.92.
An experimental analog for altering strength-to-body weight combined with a probability-based statistical model for success was suitable for identifying thresholds for task performance below which tasks could either not be completed or time to completion was unacceptably high. These results provide data for strength recommendations for exploration mission ambulatory task performance. Furthermore, the approach can be used to identify thresholds for other areas where occupationally relevant tasks vary considerably.
KeywordsStrength Power Work Fitness Threshold Task
The authors thank Tinh Trinh for engineering support, and Nichole Gadd and Galen Kreutzberg for test operator support. This work was supported by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration Human Research Program NNJ15HK11B.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors report that they have no conflicts of interest.
All experiments comply with the current laws of the United States, the country in which the experiments were performed.
- Alvares JB, Rodrigues R, de Azevedo Franke R, da Silva BG, Pinto RS, Vaz MA, Baroni BM (2015) Inter-machine reliability of the Biodex and Cybex isokinetic dynamometers for knee flexor/extensor isometric, concentric and eccentric tests. Phys Ther Sport 16(1):59–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ptsp.2014.04.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Barter JT (1957) Estimation of body mass segments. WADC technical report 57-260 (ASTIA 118222) Wright Air Development Center, Wright Patterson Airforce Base, Dayton, OhioGoogle Scholar
- Day MK, Allen DL, Mohajerani L, Greenisen MC, Roy RR, Edgerton VR (1995) Adaptations of human skeletal muscle fibers to spaceflight. J Gravit Physiol 2(1):P47–P50Google Scholar
- Greene WH (2000) Econometric analysis, 4th edn. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle RiverGoogle Scholar
- Laughlin MS, Lee SMC, Loehr JA, Amonette W (2009) Isokinetic strength and endurance tests pre- and post-spaceflight: test–retest reliability, NASA TM-2009-214787. National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Hanover, MD 21076-1320Google Scholar
- Mulavara AP, Peters BT, Miller CA, Kofman IS, Reschke MF, Taylor LC, Lawrence EL, Wood SJ, Laurie SS, Lee SMC, Buxton RE, May-Phillips TR, Stenger MB, Ploutz-Snyder LL, Ryder JW, Feiveson AH, Bloomberg JJ (2018) Physiological and functional alterations after spaceflight and bed rest. Med Sci Sports Exerc. https://doi.org/10.1249/MSS.0000000000001615 Google Scholar
- Ozkaya O (2013) Familiarization effects of an elliptical all-out test and the wingate test based on mechanical power indices. J Sports Sci Med 12(3):521–525Google Scholar
- Ryder JW, Buxton RE, Goetchius E, Scott-Pandorf M, Hackney KJ, Fiedler J, Ploutz-Snyder RJ, Bloomberg JJ, Ploutz-Snyder LL (2013) Influence of muscle strength to weight ratio on functional task performance. Eur J Appl Physiol 113(4):911–921. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-012-2500-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Spiering BA, Lee SM, Mulavara AP, Bentley JR, Buxton RE, Lawrence EL, Sinka J, Guilliams ME, Ploutz-Snyder LL, Bloomberg JJ (2011) Test battery designed to quickly and safely assess diverse indices of neuromuscular function after unweighting. J Strength Cond Res 25(2):545–555. https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181f56780 CrossRefGoogle Scholar