Sex differences in ACL loading and strain during typical athletic movements: a musculoskeletal simulation analysis
- 50 Downloads
Female athletes experience anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries at a much greater rate than males, yet the mechanisms responsible for this are not well-understood. The current investigation aimed using a musculoskeletal simulation-based approach, to examine sex differences in ACL loading parameters during cut and hop movements.
Fifteen male and fifteen female participants completed 45° cut and maximal one legged hop movements. Three-dimensional motion capture and ground reaction force data during the stance phase of the cut movement and landing phase of the one legged hop were obtained. Lower extremity muscle forces, ACL forces and ACL strains were extracted via a simulation-based approach using a musculoskeletal model, with an ACL insertion into the femur and tibia.
During the hop movement, females were associated with significantly greater peak ACL forces (male = 15.01 N/kg and female = 15.70 N/kg) and strains (male = 6.87% and female = 10.74%). In addition, for both the cut (male = 4.45 and female = 1.45) and hop (male = 2.04 and female = 1.46) movements, the soleus/gastrocnemius ratio was significantly larger in males.
The current investigation provides new information regarding sex differences during athletic movements that provide further insight regarding the increased incidence of ACL injuries in females.
KeywordsBiomechanics Kinematics Anterior cruciate ligament Sport
JS conceived and designed the study, collected the data, analysed the data, wrote and drafted the paper. DB conceived and designed the study, drafted the paper. PS collected the data, wrote and drafted the paper.
- Arendt EA, Agel J, Dick R (1999) Anterior cruciate ligament injury patterns among collegiate men and women. J Athl Train 34:86–92Google Scholar
- Ellison AE, Berg EE (1985) Embryology, anatomy, and function of the anterior cruciate ligament. Orthop Clin N Am 16:3–14Google Scholar
- Evans S, Shaginaw J, Bartolozzi A (2014) ACL reconstruction it’s all about timing. Int J Sports Phys Ther 9:268–273Google Scholar
- Hewett TE, Myer GD, Ford KR, Heidt RS Jr, Colosimo AJ, McLean SG, Van den Bogert AJ, Paterno MV, Succop P (2005) Biomechanical measures of neuromuscular control and valgus loading of the knee predict anterior cruciate ligament injury risk in female athletes: a prospective study. Am J Sports Med 33:492–501CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Kernozek TW, Torry MR, Van Hoof H, Cowley H, Tanner S (2005) Gender differences in frontal and sagittal plane biomechanics during drop landings. Med Sci Sports Exerc 37:1003–1012Google Scholar
- Lund K, Hicks J (2013) Getting started with RRA. https://simtk-confluence.stanford.edu:8443/display/OpenSim/Getting+Started+with+RRA. Accessed 10 Oct 2018
- Russell KA, Palmieri RM, Zinder SM, Ingersoll CD (2006) Sex differences in valgus knee angle during a single-leg drop jump. J Athl Train 41:166–171Google Scholar
- Schilaty ND, Bates NA, Nagelli CV, Krych AJ, Hewett TE (2018) Sex-based differences of medial collateral ligament and anterior cruciate ligament strains with cadaveric impact simulations. Orthop J Sports Med 6:2325967118765215Google Scholar
- Sinclair J, Greenhalgh A, Edmundson CJ, Brooks D, Hobbs SJ (2012) Gender differences in the kinetics and kinematics of distance running: implications for footwear design. Int J Sport Sci Eng 6:118–128Google Scholar