European Journal of Applied Physiology

, Volume 119, Issue 2, pp 333–349 | Cite as

The skeletal muscle fiber: a mechanically sensitive cell

  • Luke A. Olsen
  • Justin X. Nicoll
  • Andrew C. FryEmail author
Invited Review


The plasticity of skeletal muscle, whether an increase in size, change in metabolism, or alteration in structural properties, is in a continuous state of flux largely dependent upon physical activity. Much of the past research has expounded upon these ever-changing aspects of the muscle fiber following exercise. Specifically, endocrine and paracrine signaling have been heavily investigated lending to much of the past literature comprised of such endocrinological dynamics following muscle activity. Mechanotransduction, the ability of a cell to convert a mechanical stimulus into an intracellular biochemical response, has garnered much less attention. Recent work, however, has demonstrated the physical continuity of the muscle fiber, specifically demonstrating a continuous physical link between the extracellular matrix (ECM), cytoskeleton, and nuclear matrix as a means to rapidly regulate gene expression following a mechanical stimulus. Similarly, research has shown mechanical stimuli to directly influence cytoplasmic signaling whether through oxidative adaptations, increased muscle size, or enhanced muscle integrity. Regrettably, minimal research has investigated the role that exercise may play within the mechanotransducing signaling cascades. This proposed line of study may prove paramount as muscle-related diseases greatly impact one’s ability to lead an independent lifestyle along with contributing a substantial burden upon the economy. Thus, this review explores both biophysical and biochemical mechanotransduction, and how these signaling pathways may be influenced following exercise.


Mechanotransduction Muscle Exercise mTOR Hypertrophy Integrin 


Author contributions

All authors listed have made substantial, either direct or intellectual, contribution to the work. All authors approved the manuscript for publication.


  1. Adachi Y, Itoh K, Yamada T, Cerveny KL, Suzuki TL, Macdonald P, Frohman MA, Ramachandran R, Iijima M, … Sesaki H (2016) Coincident phosphatidic acid interaction restrains Drp1 in mitochondrial division. Mol Cell 63(6):1034–1043Google Scholar
  2. Asparuhova MB, Gelman L, Chiquet M (2009) Role of the actin cytoskeleton in tuning cellular responses to external mechanical stress. Scand J Med Sci Sports 19(4):490–499Google Scholar
  3. Bamman MM, Petrella JK, Kim JS, Mayhew DL, Cross JM (2007) Cluster analysis tests the importance of myogenic gene expression during myofiber hypertrophy in humans. J Appl Physiol 102:2232–2239Google Scholar
  4. Barash IA, Peters D, Friden J, Lutz GJ, Lieber RL (2002) Desmin cytoskeletal modifications after a bout of eccentric exercise in the rat. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 283:958–963Google Scholar
  5. Barton ER (2006) Viral expression of insulin-like growth factor-I isoforms promotes different responses in skeletal muscle. J Appl Physiol 100:1778–1784Google Scholar
  6. Booth FW (1977) Time course of muscular atrophy during immobilization of hindlimbs in rats. J Appl Physiol 43:656–661Google Scholar
  7. Boppart MD, Burkin DJ, Kaufman SJ (2006) Alpha7beta1-integrin regulates mechanotransduction and prevents skeletal muscle injury. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 290:C1660–C1665Google Scholar
  8. Burd NA, Holwerda AM, Selby KC, West DWD, Staples AW, Cain NE, Cashaback JGA, Potvin JR, Baker SK, Phillips SM (2010) Resistance exercise volume affects myofibrillar protein synthesis and anabolic signaling molecule phosphorylation in young men. J Physiol 588(16):3119–3130Google Scholar
  9. Chao JA, Yoon YJ, Singer RH (2012) Imaging translation in single cells using fluorescent microscopy. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol 4(11):a012310Google Scholar
  10. Chicurel ME, Singer RH, Meyer CJ, Ingber DE (1998) Integrin binding and mechanical tension induce movement of mRNA and ribosomes to focal adhesions. Nature 392:730–733Google Scholar
  11. D’Angelo MA (2018) Nuclear pore complexes as hubs for gene regulation. Nucleus 9(1):142–148Google Scholar
  12. Doessing S, Heinemeier KM, Holm L, Mackey AL, Schjerling P, Rennie M, Kjaer M (2010) Growth hormone stimulates the collagen synthesis in human tendon and skeletal muscle without affecting myofibrillar protein synthesis. J Physiol 588(Pt 2):341–351Google Scholar
  13. Eftestøl E, Egner IM, Lunde IG, Ellefsen S, Andersen T, Sjåland C et al (2016) Increased hypertrophic response with increased mechanical load in skeletal muscles receiving identical activity patterns. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 311:C616–C629Google Scholar
  14. Eliasson J, Elfegoun T, Nilsson J, Köhnke R, Ekblom B, Blomstrand E (2006) Maximal lengthening contractions increase p70 S6 kinase phosphorylation in human skeletal muscle in the absence of nutritional supply. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 291:E1197–E1205Google Scholar
  15. Engler AJ, Sen S, Sweeney HL, Discher DE (2006) Matrix elasticity directs stem cell lineage specification. Cell 126:677–689Google Scholar
  16. Ervasti JM (2003) Costameres: the Achilles’ heel of Herculean muscle. J Biol Chem 278:13591–13594Google Scholar
  17. Fealy CE, Mulya A, Lai N, Kirwan JP (2014) Exercise training decreases activation of the mitochondrial fission protein dynamin-related protein-1 in insulin-resistant human skeletal muscle. J Appl Physiol 117:239–245Google Scholar
  18. Figueiredo VC, Caldow MK, Massie V, Markworth JF, Cameron-Smith D, Blazevich AJ (2015) Ribosome biogenesis adaptation in resistance training-induced human skeletal muscle hypertrophy. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 309(1):E72–E83Google Scholar
  19. Fonseca PM, Inoue RY, Kobarg CB, Crosara-Alberto DP, Kobarg J, Franchini KG (2005) Targeting to C-terminal myosin heavy chain may explain mechanotransduction involving focal adhesion kinase in cardiac myocytes. Circ Res 96:73–81Google Scholar
  20. Fornaro M, Hinken AC, Needle S, Hu E, Trendelenburg AU, Mayer A, Rosenstiel A, Chang C, Meier V, Billin AN et al (2014) Mechano-growth factor peptide, the COOH terminus of unprocessed insulin-like growth factor 1, has no apparent effect on myoblasts or primary muscle stem cells. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 306:E150–E156Google Scholar
  21. Franchi MV, Reeves ND, Narici MV (2017) Skeletal muscle remodeling in response to eccentric vs. concentric loading: morphological, molecular, and metabolic adaptations. Front Physiol 8:447. Google Scholar
  22. Fruleux A, Hawkins RJ (2016) Physical role for the nucleus in cell migration. J Phys Condens Matter 28:363002Google Scholar
  23. Fyfe JJ, Bishop DJ, Bartlett JD, Hanson ED, Anderson MJ, Garnham AP, Stepto NK (2018) Enhanced skeletal muscle ribosome biogenesis, yet attenuated mTORC1 and ribosome biogenesis-related signalling, following short-term concurrent versus single-mode resistance training. Sci Rep 8(1):560Google Scholar
  24. Galpin AJ, Fry AC, Nicoll JX, Moore CA, Schilling BK, Thomason DB (2016) Resting extracellular signal-regulated protein kinase 1/2 expression following a continuum of chronic resistance exercise training paradigms. Res Sports Med 24(3):298–303Google Scholar
  25. Garcia D, Shaw RJ (2017) AMPK: mechanisms of cellular energy sensing and restoration of metabolic balance. Mol Cell 66:789–800Google Scholar
  26. Garg K, Boppart MD (2016) Influence of exercise and aging on extracellular matrix composition in the skeletal muscle stem cell niche. J Appl Physiol (1985) 121:1053–1058Google Scholar
  27. Gattazzo F, Urciuolo A, Bonaldo P (2014) Extracellular matrix: a dynamic microenvironment for stem cell niche. Biochim Biophys Acta 1840:2506–2519Google Scholar
  28. Gehlert S, Suhr F, Gutsche K, Willkomm L, Kern J, Jacko D, Knicker A, Schiffer T, Wackerhage H, Bloch W (2015) High force development augments skeletal muscle signalling in resistance exercise modes equalized for time under tension. Pflugers Arch 467(6):1343–1356Google Scholar
  29. Goldberg AL (1968) Protein synthesis during work-induced growth of skeletal muscle. J Cell Biol 36(3):653–658Google Scholar
  30. Goldberg AL, Etlinger JD, Goldspink DF, Jablecki C (1975) Mechanism of work-induced hypertrophy of skeletal muscle. Med Sport Sci 7:185–198Google Scholar
  31. Goldspink G, Yang SY (2001) Method of treating muscular disorders. United States patent. Patent no US 6,221,842 B1Google Scholar
  32. Goodman CA, Dietz JM, Jacobs BL, McNally RM, You JS, Hornberger TA (2015) Yes-associated protein is up-regulated by mechanical overload and is sufficient to induce skeletal muscle hypertrophy. FEBS Lett 589(13):1491–1497Google Scholar
  33. Haddad F, Adams GR (2004) Inhibition of MAPK/ERK kinase prevents IGF-1-induced hypertrophy in rat muscles. J Appl Physiol 96:203–210Google Scholar
  34. Halder G, Dupont S, Piccolo S (2012) Transduction of mechanical and cytoskeletal cues by YAP and TAZ. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 13:591–600Google Scholar
  35. Hawley JA, Hargreaves M, Joyner MJ, Zierath JR (2014) Integrative biology of exercise. Cell 159:738–774Google Scholar
  36. Hill M, Wernig A, Goldspink G (2003) Muscle satellite (stem) cell activation during local tissue injury and repair. J Anat 203(1):89–99Google Scholar
  37. Holm L, van Hall G, Rose JA, Miller BF, Doessing S, Richter EA, Kjaer M (2010) Contraction intensity and feeding affect collagen and myofibrillar protein synthesis rates differently in human skeletal muscle. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 298:E257–E268Google Scholar
  38. Hornberger TA, Armstrong DD, Koh TJ, Burkholder TJ, Esser KA (2005) Intracellular signaling specificity in response to uniaxial vs. multiaxial stretch: implications for mechanotransduction. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 288:C185–C194Google Scholar
  39. Hornberger TA, Chu WK, Mak YW, Hsiung JW, Huang SA, Chien S (2006) The role of phospholipase D and phosphatidic acid in the mechanical activation of mTOR signaling in skeletal muscle. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103:4741–4746Google Scholar
  40. Hughes DC, Wallace MA, Baar K (2015) Effects of aging, exercise, and disease on force transfer in skeletal muscle. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 309(1):E1–E10Google Scholar
  41. Hulmi JJ, Walker S, Ahtiainen JP, Nyman K, Kraemer WJ, Häkkinen K (2012) Molecular signaling in muscle is affected by the specificity of resistance exercise protocol. Scand J Med Sci Sports 22(2):240–248Google Scholar
  42. Ingber DE (2006) Cellular mechanotransduction: putting all the pieces together again. Faseb J 20:811–827Google Scholar
  43. Jastrzebski K, Hannan KM, Tchoubrieva EB, Hannan RD, Pearson RB (2007) Coordinate regulation of ribosome biogenesis and function by the ribosomal protein S6 kinase, a key mediator of mTOR function. Growth Factors (Chur, Switz). 25(4):209–226Google Scholar
  44. Joy JM, Gundermann DM, Lowery RP, Jäger R, McCleary SA, Purpura M, Wilson JM (2014) Phosphatidic acid enhances mTOR signaling and resistance exercise induced hypertrophy. Nutr Metab 11:29Google Scholar
  45. Kazior Z, Willis SJ, Moberg M, Apró W, Calbet JAL, Holmberg H-C, Blomstrand E (2016) Endurance exercise enhances the effect of strength training on muscle fiber size and protein expression of Akt and mTOR. PLoS One 11:1–18Google Scholar
  46. Khurana A, Dey CS (2002) Subtype specific roles of mitogen activated protein kinases in L6E9 skeletal muscle cell differentiation. Mol Cell Biochem 238(1–2):27–39Google Scholar
  47. Kjaer M (2004) Role of extracellular matrix in adaptation of tendon and skeletal muscle to mechanical loading. Physiol Rev 84:649–698Google Scholar
  48. Klossner S, Durieux A-C, Freyssenet D, Flueck M (2009) Mechano-transduction to muscle protein synthesis is modulated by FAK. Eur J Appl Physiol 106:389–398Google Scholar
  49. Koskinen SOA et al (2002) Short-term effects of forced eccentric contractions on collagen synthesis and degradation in rat skeletal muscle. Pflugers Arch 444:59–72Google Scholar
  50. Laplante M, Sabatini DM (2009) mTOR signaling at a glance. J Cell Sci 122:3589–3594Google Scholar
  51. Legate KR, Wickstrom SA, Fassler R (2009) Genetic and cell biological analysis of integrin outside-in signaling. Genes Dev 23:397–418Google Scholar
  52. Lessard SJ, MacDonald TL, Pathak P, Han MS, Coffey VG, Edge J, Rivas JDA, Hirshamn MF, Davis RJ, Goodyear LJ (2018) JNK regulates muscle remodeling via myostatin/SMAD inhibition. Nat Commun 9(1):3030Google Scholar
  53. Lillemeier BF, Pfeiffer JR, Surviladze Z, Wilson BS, Davis MM (2006) Plasma membrane-associated proteins are clustered into islands attached to the cytoskeleton. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103:18992–18997Google Scholar
  54. Locke L (2008) Heat shock protein accumulation and heat shock transcription factor activation in rat skeletal muscle during compensatory hypertrophy. Acta Physiol (Oxf) 192:403–411Google Scholar
  55. Loenneke JP, Fahs CA, Rossow LM, Abe T, Bemben MG (2012a) The anabolic benefits of venous blood flow restriction training may be induced by muscle cell swelling. Med Hypotheses 78(1):151–154Google Scholar
  56. Loenneke JP, Abe T, Wilson JM, Ugrinowitsch C, Bemben MG (2012b) Blood flow restriction: how does it work? Front Physiol 3:392Google Scholar
  57. Long YC, Widegren U, Zierath JR (2004) Exercise-induced mitogen-activated protein kinase signaling in skeletal muscle. Proc Nutr Soc 63(2):227–232Google Scholar
  58. Low SY, Taylor PM (1998) Integrin and cytoskeletal involvement in signaling cell volume changes to glutamine transport in rat skeletal muscle. J Physiol 512(Pt 2):481–485Google Scholar
  59. Lueders TN, Zou K, Huntsman HD, Meador B, Mahmassani Z, Abel M et al (2011) The alpha7beta1-integrin accelerates fiber hypertrophy and myogenesis following a single bout of eccentric exercise. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 301:C938–C946Google Scholar
  60. Lundberg TR, Fernandez-Gonzalo R, Tesch PA (2014) Exercise-induced AMPK activation does not interfere with muscle hypertrophy in response to resistance training in men. J Appl Physiol Bethesda Md 1985 116:611–620Google Scholar
  61. Mackey AL, Donnelly AE, Turpeenniemi-Hujanen T, Roper HP (2004) Skeletal muscle collagen content in humans after high-force eccentric contractions. J Appl Physiol 97:197–203Google Scholar
  62. Maniotis AJ, Chen CS, Ingber DE (1997) Demonstration of mechanical connections between integrins, cytoskeletal filaments, and nucleoplasm that stabilize nuclear structure. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 94(3):849–854Google Scholar
  63. Martin TD, Dennis MD, Gordon BS, Kimball SR, Jefferson LS (2014) mTORC1 and JNK coordinate phosphorylation of the p70S6K1 autoinhibitory domain in skeletal muscle following functional overloading. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 306:E1397–E1405Google Scholar
  64. Martineau LC, Gardiner PF (2001) Insight into skeletal muscle mechanotransduction: MAPK activation is quantitatively related to tension. J Appl Physiol 91(2):693–702Google Scholar
  65. Matheny RW et al (2010) Minireview: mechano-growth factor: a putative product of IGF-I gene expression involved in tissue repair and regeneration. Endocrinology 151(3): 865–875Google Scholar
  66. Mayer C, Grummt I (2006) Ribosome biogenesis and cell growth: mTOR coordinates transcription by all three classes of nuclear RNA polymerases. Oncogene 25(48):6384–6391Google Scholar
  67. McBride TA, Stockert BW, Gorin FA, Carlsen Richard CRC (2000) Stretch-activated ion channels contribute to membrane depolarization after eccentric contractions. J Appl Physiol 88:91–101Google Scholar
  68. McCarthy JJ et al (2011) Effective fiber hypertrophy in satellite cell-depleted skeletal muscle. Development (Camb, Engl) 138(17):3657–3666Google Scholar
  69. Mei L, Xiong WC (2010) FAK interaction with MBD2: a link from cell adhesion to nuclear chromatin remodeling? Cell Adhes Migr 4:77–80Google Scholar
  70. Milner DJ, Mavroidis M, Weisleder N, Capetanaki Y (2000) Desmin cytoskeleton linked to muscle mitochondrial distribution and respiratory function. J Cell Biol 150(6):1283–1298Google Scholar
  71. Murach KA, Fry CS, Kirby TJ, Jackson JR, Lee JD, White SH et al (2018) Starring or supporting role? Satellite cells and skeletal muscle fiber size regulation. Physiology 33:26–38Google Scholar
  72. Murgia M, Serrano AL, Calabria E, Pallafacchina G, Lomo T, Schiaffino S (2000) Ras is involved in nerve-activity-dependent regulation of muscle genes. Nat Cell Biol 2(3):142–147Google Scholar
  73. Na S, Collin O, Chowdhury F, Tay B, Ouyang M, Wang Y, Wang N (2008) Rapid signal transduction in living cells is a unique feature of mechanotransduction. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105(18):6626–6631Google Scholar
  74. Nakada S, Ogasawara R, Kawada S, Maekawa T, Ishii N (2016) Correlation between ribosome biogenesis and the magnitude of hypertrophy in overloaded skeletal muscle. PLoS One 11(1):e0147284Google Scholar
  75. Nicoll JX, Fry AC, Galpin AJ, Sterczala AJ, Thomason DB, Moore CA, Weiss LW, Chiu LZF (2016) Changes in resting mitogen-activated protein kinases following resistance exercise overreaching and overtraining. Eur J Appl Physiol 116(11–12):2401–2413Google Scholar
  76. Nicoll JX, Fry AC, Galpin AJ, Thomason DB, Moore CA (2017) Resting MAPK expression in chronically trained endurance runners. Eur J Sports Sci 17(9):1194–1202Google Scholar
  77. Ohlendieck K (2011) Skeletal muscle proteomics: current approaches, technical challenges and emerging techniques. Skelet Muscle 1(1):6Google Scholar
  78. Pasqualini FS, Nesmith AP, Horton RE, Sheehy SP, Parker KK (2016) Mechanotransduction and metabolism in cardiomyocyte microdomains. BioMed Res Int 2016:4081638Google Scholar
  79. Plopper GE, McNamee HP, Dike LE, Bojanowski K, Ingber DE (1995) Convergence of integrin and growth factor receptor signaling pathways within the focal adhesion complex. Mol Biol Cell 6(10):1349–1365Google Scholar
  80. Qin J, Vinogradova O, Plow EF (2004) Integrin bidirectional signaling: a molecular view. PLoS Biol 2(6):e169Google Scholar
  81. Ramaswamy KS, Palmer ML, van der Meulen JH, Renoux A, Kostrominova TY, Michele DE, Faulkner JA (2011) Lateral transmission of force is impaired in skeletal muscles of dystrophic mice and very old rats. J Physiol 589:1195–1208Google Scholar
  82. Rindom E, Vissing K (2016) Mechanosensitive Molecular networks involved in transducing resistance exercise-signals into muscle protein accretion. Front Physiol 7:547Google Scholar
  83. Roman W, Gomes ER (2018) Nuclear positioning in skeletal muscle. Semin Cell Dev Biol 82:51–56Google Scholar
  84. Romero MA, Mobley CB, Linden MA, Meers GM, Martin JS, Young KC, Rector RS, … Roberts MD (2017) Endurance training lowers ribosome density despite increasing ribosome biogenesis markers in rodent skeletal muscle. BMC Res Notes 10(1):399Google Scholar
  85. Sabatini DM (2017) Twenty-five years of mTOR: uncovering the link from nutrients to growth. Proc Natl Acad Sci 114(45):11818–11825Google Scholar
  86. Saxton RA, Sabatini DM (2017) mTOR signaling in growth, metabolism, and disease. Cell 168(6):960–976Google Scholar
  87. Schiaffino S, Sandri M, Murgia (2007) Activity-dependent signaling pathways controlling muscle diversity and plasticity. Physiology (Bethesda) 22:269–278Google Scholar
  88. Schwartz MA (2010) Integrins and extracellular matrix in mechanotransduction. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol 2:a005066Google Scholar
  89. Senf SM (2013) Skeletal muscle heat shock protein 70: diverse functions and therapeutic potential for wasting disorders. Front Physiol 4:330Google Scholar
  90. Shah SB, Davis J, Weisleder N, Kostavassili I, McCulloch AD, Ralston E, Lieber RL et al (2004) Structural and functional roles of desmin in mouse skeletal muscle during passive deformation. Biophys J 86(5):2993–3008Google Scholar
  91. Shi H, Scheffler JM, Pleitner JM, Zeng C, Park S, Hannon KM, Grant AL, Gerrard DE (2008) Modulation of skeletal muscle fiber type by mitogen activated protein kinase signaling. FASEB J 22:2990–3000Google Scholar
  92. Spangenburg EE, McBride TA (2006) Inhibition of stretch-activated channels during eccentric muscle contraction attenuates p70S6K activation. J Appl Physiol 100:129–135Google Scholar
  93. Spiering BA, Kraemer WJ, Anderson JM, Armstrong LE, Nindl BC, Volek JS, Maresh CM (2008) Resistance exercise biology: manipulation of resistance exercise programme variables determines the responses of cellular and molecular signalling pathways. Sports Med 38:527–540Google Scholar
  94. Stary CM, Hogan MC (2016) Cytosolic calcium transients are a determinant of contraction-induced HSP72 transcription in single skeletal muscle fibers. J Appl Physiol 120:1260–1266Google Scholar
  95. Stary CM, Walsh BJ, Knapp AE, Brafman D, Hogan MC (2008) Elevation in heat shock protein 72 mRNA following contractions in isolated single skeletal muscle fibers. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 295(2):R642–R648Google Scholar
  96. Stiber JA, Seth M, Rosenberg PB (2009) Mechanosensitive channels in striated muscle and the cardiovascular system: not quite a stretch anymore. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol 54(2):116–122Google Scholar
  97. Tajik A, Zhang Y, Wei F, Sun J, Jia Q, Zhou W, Wang N (2016) Transcription upregulation via force-induced direct stretching of chromatin. Nat Mater 15(12):1287–1296Google Scholar
  98. Takada Y, Takada YK, Fujita M (2017) Crosstalk between insulin-like growth factor (IGF) receptor and integrins through direct integrin binding to IGF1. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev 34:67–72Google Scholar
  99. Tan J, Kuang W, Jin Z, Jin F, Xu L, Yu Q, Kong L, Zeng G, Yuan X, Duan Y (2009) Inhibition of NFkappaB by activated c-Jun NH2 terminal kinase 1 acts as a switch for C2C12 cell death under excessive stretch. Apoptosis 14(6):764–770Google Scholar
  100. Thalacker-Mercer A, Stec M, Cui X, Cross J, Windham S, Bamman M (2013) Cluster analysis reveals differential transcript profiles associated with resistance training-induced human skeletal muscle hypertrophy. Physiol Genom 45(12):499–507Google Scholar
  101. Vera M, Singer RH (2014) Gene regulation: the HSP70 gene jumps when shocked. Curr Biol 24(10):R396–R398Google Scholar
  102. Wang N, Tolic-Norrelykke IM, Chen J, Mijailovich SM, Butler JP, Fredberg JJ, Stamenovic D (2002) Cell prestress. I. Stiffness and prestress are closely associated in adherent contractile cells. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 282:C606–C616Google Scholar
  103. West DWD, Burd NA, Staples AW, Phillips SM (2010) Human exercise-mediated skeletal muscle hypertrophy is an intrinsic process. Int J Biochem Cell Biol 42:1371–1375Google Scholar
  104. West DW, Baehr LM, Marcotte GR, Chason CM, Tolento L, Gomes AV, Bodine SC, Baar K (2016) Acute resistance exercise activates rapamycin-sensitive and -insensitive mechanisms that control translational activity and capacity in skeletal muscle. J Physiol 594:453–468Google Scholar
  105. Wu Z, Woodring PJ, Bhakta KS, Tamura K, Wen F, Feramisco JR, Karin M, Wang YG, Puri PL (2000) p38 and extracellular signal-regulated kinases regulate the myogenic program at multiple steps. Mol Cell Biol 20(11):3951–3964Google Scholar
  106. Yamada M, Tatsumi R, Kikuiri T, Okamoto S, Nonoshita S, Mizunoya W et al (2006) Matrix metalloproteinases are involved in mechanical stretch-induced activation of skeletal muscle satellite cells. Muscle Nerve 34:313–319Google Scholar
  107. Ye GJ, Nesmith AP, Parker KK (2014) The role of mechanotransduction on vascular smooth muscle myocytes’ [corrected] cytoskeleton and contractile function. Anat Rec (Hoboken) 297:1758–1769Google Scholar
  108. You J-S, Lincoln HC, Kim C-R, Frey JW, Goodman CA, Zhong X-P et al (2014) The role of diacylglycerol kinase ζ and phosphatidic acid in the mechanical activation of mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) signaling and skeletal muscle hypertrophy. J Biol Chem 289:1551–1563Google Scholar
  109. Zou K, Meador BM, Johnson B, Huntsman HD, Mahmassani Z, Valero MC, Huey KA, Boppart MD (2011) The α7β1-integrin increases muscle hypertrophy following multiple bouts of eccentric exercise. J Appl Physiol 111:1134–1141Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Biomedical SciencesUniversity of Kansas Medical CenterKansas CityUSA
  2. 2.Department of KinesiologyCalifornia State UniversityNorthridgeUSA
  3. 3.Department of Health, Sport, and Exercise SciencesUniversity of KansasLawrenceUSA

Personalised recommendations