Advertisement

Associations between overcommitment, effort–reward imbalance and mental health: findings from a longitudinal study

  • Dorothea Margarete Hinsch
  • Katja Spanier
  • Friedrich Michael Radoschewski
  • Matthias Bethge
Original Article
  • 1 Downloads

Abstract

Purpose

The effort–reward imbalance (ERI) model includes extrinsic and intrinsic aspects of work stress. The single components, ERI and overcommitment (OC), are known to be associated with mental health. The aim of this study was to test whether OC is a mediator of the association between ERI and mental health.

Methods

Longitudinal analyses were conducted using data from the Third German Sociomedical Panel of Employees on German employees aged 40–54 years. The short version of the ERI questionnaire was used to measure ERI and OC at baseline (2013). Outcomes were mental health problems and self-rated mental health (5-Item Mental Health Inventory) in 2015. Multivariate regressions were conducted controlling for sociodemographics, health-related behaviour, job-related aspects, and mental health at baseline.

Results

A total of 912 men and 1148 women were included in the final analysis. Baseline OC was positively associated with follow-up mental health problems and negatively with self-rated follow-up mental health. While there was no direct effect of ERI on mental health, ERI affected mental health problems (b = 0.14; 95% CI 0.03 to 0.25) and self-rated mental health (b = − 1.15; 95% CI − 1.79 to − 0.57) indirectly through OC.

Conclusions

OC was associated with reduced mental health. There was no association between ERI and mental health that was independent of OC. OC could therefore be interpreted as a mediator between ERI and mental health. Future studies are needed to test the causality of this association.

Keywords

Psychosocial work stress ERI model Mediation effect Mental health problems 

Abbreviations

BCa CI

Bias-corrected bootstrap confidence interval

BMI

Body mass index

ERI

Effort–reward imbalance

ERR

Effort–reward ratio

GSPE-III

Third German Sociomedical Panel of Employees

OC

Overcommitment

SF-36

36-item Short Form Health Survey

Notes

Funding

This research was funded by the Federal German Pension Insurance Agency. The funders were not involved in the study design, the collection, analysis and interpretation of the data, the writing of the report, nor the decision to submit the paper for publication.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

The study was approved by the ethics committee at Hannover Medical School (1730–2013) and the data protection commissioner of the German Pension Insurance Agency. All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. This article does not contain any studies with animals performed by any of the authors.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all participants included in the study.

References

  1. Bethge M, Spanier K, Neugebauer T, Mohnberg I, Radoschewski FM (2015) Self-reported poor work ability—an indicator of need for rehabilitation? A cross-sectional study of a sample of German employees. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 94:958–966CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bonde JPE (2008) Psychosocial factors at work and risk of depression: a systematic review of the epidemiological evidence. Occup Environ Med 65:438–445CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Buddeberg-Fischer B, Klaghofer R, Stamm M, Siegrist J, Buddeberg C (2008) Work stress and reduced health in young physicians: prospective evidence from Swiss residents. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 82:31–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chandola T, Brunner E, Marmot M (2006) Chronic stress at work and the metabolic syndrome: prospective study. BMJ 332:521–525CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chandola T, Britton A, Brunner E, Hemingway H, Malik M, Kumari M, Badrick E, Kivimaki M, Marmot M (2008) Work stress and coronary heart disease: what are the mechanisms? Eur Heart J 29:640–648CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dragano N, Siegrist J, Nyberg ST, Lunau T, Fransson EI, Alfredsson L, Bjorner JB, Borritz M, Burr H, Erbel R et al (2017) Effort–reward imbalance at work and incident coronary heart disease: a multicohort study of 90,164 individuals. Epidemiology 28:619–626CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Elovainio M, Kivimäki M, Vahtera J (2002) Organizational justice: evidence of a new psychosocial predictor of health. Am J Public Health 92:105–108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Feldt T, Huhtala M, Kinnunen U, Hyvönen K, Mäkikangas A, Sonnentag S (2013) Long-term patterns of effort–reward imbalance and over-commitment: Investigating occupational well-being and recovery experiences as outcomes. Work Stress 27:64–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Feldt T, Hyvönen K, Mäkikangas A, Rantanen J, Huhtala M, Kinnunen U (2016) Overcommitment as a predictor of effort–reward imbalance: evidence from an 8-year follow-up study. Scand J Work Environ Health 42:309–319CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hayes AF (2013a) Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: a regression-based approach. Guilford Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  11. Hayes AF (2013b) Miscellaneous topics in mediation analysis. In: Little TD (ed) Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: a regression-based approach. Guilford Press, New York, pp 165–204Google Scholar
  12. Ilmarinen J (2007) The work ability index (WAI). Occup Med 57:160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Juvani A, Oksanen T, Salo P, Virtanen M, Kivimäki M, Pentti J, Vahtera J (2014) Effort–reward imbalance as a risk factor for disability pension: the Finnish Public Sector Study. Scand J Work Environ Health 40:266–277CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Karasek R, Theorell T (1990) Healthy work. Stress, productivity, and the reconstruction of working life. Basic Books, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  15. Kivimäki M, Siegrist J (2016) Work stress and cardiovascular disease: reviewing research evidence with a focus on effort–reward imbalance at work. In: Siegrist J, Wahrendorf M (eds) Work stress and health in a globalized economy. Springer International Publishing, New York, pp 89–101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kivimäki M, Leino-Arjas P, Luukkonen R, Riihimäki H, Vahtera J, Kirjonen J (2002) Work stress and risk of cardiovascular mortality: prospective cohort study of industrial employees. BMJ 325:857CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kivimäki M, Vahtera J, Elovainio M, Virtanen M, Siegrist J (2007) Effort–reward imbalance, procedural injustice and relational injustice as psychosocial predictors of health: complementary or redundant models? Occup Environ Med 64:659–665CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kroll LE, Lampert T (2011) Unemployment, social support and health problems: results of the GEDA study in Germany, 2009. Dtsch Ärztebl Int 108:47–52Google Scholar
  19. Morfeld M, Kirchberger I, Bullinger M (2011) SF-36 deutsche Version des Short form-36 health survey. Hogrefe, GöttingenGoogle Scholar
  20. Netterstrøm B, Conrad N, Bech P, Fink P, Olsen O, Rugulies R, Stansfeld S (2008) The relation between work-related psychosocial factors and the development of depression. Epidemiol Rev 30:118–132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Nieuwenhuijsen K, Bruinvels D, Frings-Dresen M (2010) Psychosocial work environment and stress-related disorders, a systematic review. Occup Med Oxf Engl 60:277–286CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Ota A, Masue T, Yasuda N, Tsutsumi A, Mino Y, Ohara H, Ono Y (2009) Psychosocial job characteristics and insomnia: a prospective cohort study using the Demand-Control-Support (DCS) and Effort–Reward Imbalance (ERI) job stress models. Sleep Med 10:1112–1117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Preacher KJ, Hayes AF (2008) Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behav Res Methods 40:879–891CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Rothman KJ, Greenland S, Lash TL (2008) Modern epidemiology, 3rd edn. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, PhiladelphiaGoogle Scholar
  25. Rugulies R, Krause N (2008) Effort–reward imbalance and incidence of low back and neck injuries in San Francisco transit operators. Occup Environ Med 65:525–533CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Rugulies R, Aust B, Madsen IEH, Burr H, Siegrist J, Bültmann U (2013) Adverse psychosocial working conditions and risk of severe depressive symptoms. Do effects differ by occupational grade? Eur J Public Health 23:415–420CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Rugulies R, Aust B, Madsen IE (2017) Effort–reward imbalance at work and risk of depressive disorders. A systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies. Scand J Work Environ Health 43:294–306CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Schirmer SM (2015) Validierung der “Overcommitmentskala” des Modells beruflicher Gratifikationskrisen. Dissertation, Philipps-Universität MarburgGoogle Scholar
  29. Sembajwe G, Wahrendorf M, Siegrist J, Sitta R, Zins M, Goldberg M, Berkman L (2012) Effects of job strain on fatigue: cross-sectional and prospective views of the job content questionnaire and effort–reward imbalance in the GAZEL cohort. Occup Environ Med 69:377–384CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Shimazu A, de Jonge J (2009) Reciprocal relations between effort–reward imbalance at work and adverse health: a three-wave panel survey. Soc Sci Med 1982 68:60–68Google Scholar
  31. Siegrist J (1996) Adverse health effects of high-effort/low–reward conditions. J Occup Health Psychol 1:27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Siegrist J (2005) Social reciprocity and health: new scientific evidence and policy implications. Psychoneuroendocrinology 30:1033–1038CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Siegrist J (2008) Chronic psychosocial stress at work and risk of depression: evidence from prospective studies. Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci 258(Suppl 5):115–119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Siegrist J, Li J (2016) Associations of extrinsic and intrinsic components of work stress with health: a systematic review of evidence on the effort–reward imbalance model. Int J Environ Res Public Health 13:432CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Siegrist J, Marmot M (2004) Health inequalities and the psychosocial environment-two scientific challenges. Soc Sci Med 1982 58:1463–1473Google Scholar
  36. Siegrist J, Starke D, Chandola T, Godin I, Marmot M, Niedhammer I, Peter R (2004) The measurement of effort–reward imbalance at work: European comparisons. Soc Sci Med 1982 58:1483–1499Google Scholar
  37. Siegrist J, Wege N, Pühlhofer F, Wahrendorf M (2009) A short generic measure of work stress in the era of globalization: effort–reward imbalance. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 82:1005–1013CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Siegrist J, Lunau T, Wahrendorf M, Dragano N (2012) Depressive symptoms and psychosocial stress at work among older employees in three continents. Glob Health 8:27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Slesina W (1987) Arbeitsbedingte Erkrankungen und Arbeitsanalyse: Arbeitsanalyse unter dem Gesichtspunkt der Gesundheitsvorsorge. Enke, StuttgartGoogle Scholar
  40. Sonnentag S, Fritz C (2015) Recovery from job stress: the stressor-detachment model as an integrative framework. J Organ Behav 36:72–103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Sonnentag S, Binnewies C, Mojza EJ (2010) Staying well and engaged when demands are high: the role of psychological detachment. J Appl Psychol 95:965–976CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Sverke M, Hellgren J, Näswall K (2002) No security: a meta-analysis and review of job insecurity and its consequences. J Occup Health Psychol 7:242–264CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. The Commission of the European Communities (2003) Commission Recommendation of 6 May 2003 concerning the definition of micro, small and medium-sized enterprises. http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/ALL/?uri=CELEX:32003H0361. Accessed 23 May 2018
  44. Theorell T (2017) On effort–reward imbalance and depression. Scand J Work Environ Health 43:291–293CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Theorell T, Hasselhorn HM (2005) On cross-sectional questionnaire studies of relationships between psychosocial conditions at work and health—are they reliable? Int Arch Occup Environ Health 78:517–522CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Theorell T, Hammarström A, Aronsson G, Träskman Bendz L, Grape T, Hogstedt C, Marteinsdottir I, Skoog I, Hall C (2015) A systematic review including meta-analysis of work environment and depressive symptoms. BMC Public Health 15:738CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. van Vegchel N, de Jonge J, Bosma H, Schaufeli W (2005) Reviewing the effort–reward imbalance model: drawing up the balance of 45 empirical studies. Soc Sci Med 1982 60:1117–1131Google Scholar
  48. Wahrendorf M, Sembajwe G, Zins M, Berkman L, Goldberg M, Siegrist J (2012) Long-term effects of psychosocial work stress in midlife on health functioning after labor market exit—results from the GAZEL study. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci 67:471–480CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Wang J, Patten SB, Currie S, Sareen J, Schmitz N (2012) A population-based longitudinal study on work environmental factors and the risk of major depressive disorder. Am J Epidemiol 176:52–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Wege N, Dragano N, Erbel R, Jockel K-H, Moebus S, Stang A, Siegrist J (2008) When does work stress hurt? Testing the interaction with socioeconomic position in the Heinz Nixdorf Recall Study. J Epidemiol Community Health 62:338–341CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Social Medicine and EpidemiologyUniversity of LübeckLübeckGermany
  2. 2.Institute of Medical Sociology and Rehabilitation ScienceCharite Universitätsmedizin BerlinBerlinGermany

Personalised recommendations