Advertisement

Are occupational physical activities tailored to the age of cleaners and manufacturing workers?

  • Jodi OakmanEmail author
  • Els Clays
  • Marie Birk Jørgensen
  • Andreas Holtermann
Original Article

Abstract

Purpose

An ageing population will necessitate people to work for longer. High occupational physical activities (OPA) are a well-documented barrier to sustainable employment. Blue-collar workers are at high risk for early exit from the labour market, which may be prevented by improved tailoring of OPA to the capacities of ageing workers. However, little is known about the current approaches used in blue collar workplaces. This study investigated age and OPA using objective field measurements in the cleaning and manufacturing sector.

Methods

Associations were examined between age and percentage of working time of three OPA: total time on feet, standing still and walking, among 615 cleaners and manufacturing workers from the Danish Physical Activity cohort with Objective measurements (DPhacto). OPA were measured over 3–4 days with accelerometers. Regression modeling was used to investigate the relationship between age and the respective OPA stratified by the two sectors after adjustment for potential confounders.

Results

No tendency for negative associations between age and OPA were found for either sector. To the contrary, a positive association between age and high levels of time on feet was found for male manufacturing workers (OR 1.05; 95% CI 1.02–1.08 per year).

Conclusion

Using objective measurements of OPA, this study found that OPA are not tailored to the age of workers. To the contrary, some older workers are more likely to have higher OPA. A need exists for further investigation and development of guidelines to support job design that will enable older workers to remain employed.

Keywords

Accelerometer Ageing Physical demands Occupational physical activity Objective measures 

Notes

Funding

The study was funded by the Danish Working Environment Research Fund.

Compliance with ethical standards

Ethical considerations

The present study was conducted according to the Helsinki Declaration and approved by the Danish data protection agency and local ethics committee (H-2-2012-011).

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Adams SA et al (2005) The effect of social desirability and social approval on self-reports of physical activity. Am J Epidemiol 161(4):389–398.  https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwi054 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Blekesaune M, Solem PE (2005) Working conditions and early retirement. Res Aging 27(1):3–30 doi.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0164027504271438 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bloom DE, Canning D, Fink G (2010) Implications of population ageing for economic growth. Oxford Rev Eco Policy 26(4):583–612CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Buckley JP et al (2015) The sedentary office: an expert statement on the growing case for change towards better health and productivity. Br J Sports Med 49(21):1357–1362.  https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2015-094618 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Caplan RD (1987) Person-environment fit theory and organizations: commensurate dimensions, time perspectives, and mechanisms. J Voc Behav 31(3):248–267CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Clays E et al (2013) The association between leisure time physical activity and coronary heart disease among men with different physical work demands: a prospective cohort study. Eur J Epidemiol 28(3):241–247.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10654-013-9764-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cooke M (2006) Policy changes and the labour force participation of older workers: evidence from six countries. Can J Aging/La revue canadienne du vieillissement 25(4):387–400CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Edwards JR (1996) An examination of competing versions of the person-environment fit approach to stress. Acad Manag J 39(2):292–339Google Scholar
  9. Elovainio M, Forma P, Kivimäki M, Sinervo T, Sutinen R, Laine M (2005) Job demands and job control as correlates of early retirement thoughts in Finnish social and health care employees. Work Stress 19(1):84–92.  https://doi.org/10.1080/02678370500084623 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Eurofound (2015) Sustainable work over the life course: Concept paper Publications Office of the European Union. Retrieved http://www.eurofound.europa.eu/sites/default/files/ef_publication/field_ef_document/ef1519en.pdf, Luxembourg. Accessed 29 Oct 2018
  11. Freund AM (2008) Successful aging as management of resources: the role of selection, optimization, and compensation. Res Hum Devel 5(2):94–106.  https://doi.org/10.1080/15427600802034827 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gupta N, Christiansen CS, Hallman DM, Korshøj M, Carneiro IG, Holtermann A (2015) Is objectively measured sitting time associated with low back pain? A cross-sectional investigation in the NOMAD study. PLoS One 10(3):e0121159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hallman DM, Gupta N, Mathiassen SE, Holtermann A (2015) Association between objectively measured sitting time and neck–shoulder pain among blue-collar workers. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 88(8):1031–1042CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Ingebrigtsen J, Stemland I, Christiansen C, Jorgen S, Hanisch C et al (2013) Validation of a commercial and custom made accelerometer-based software for step count and frequency during walking and running. J Ergonomics 3:119.  https://doi.org/10.4172/2165-7556.1000119 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Jørgensen MB et al (2013) Physical activities at work and risk of musculoskeletal pain and its consequences: protocol for a study with objective field measures among blue-collar workers. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 14(1):1–9.  https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-14-213 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kenny GP, Yardley JE, Martineau L, Jay O (2008) Physical work capacity in older adults: Implications for the aging worker. Am J Ind Med 51(8):610–625.  https://doi.org/10.1002/ajim.20600 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kleiner BM (2006) Macroergonomics: analysis and design of work systems. Appl Ergon 37(1):81–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Korshøj M et al (2014) Validity of the Acti4 software using ActiGraph GT3X + accelerometer for recording of arm and upper body inclination in simulated work tasks. Ergonomics 57(2):247–253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Krause N et al (2007) Occupational physical activity, energy expenditure and 11-year progression of carotid atherosclerosis. Scand J Work Environ Health 33(6):405–424CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kuorinka I et al (1987) Standardised Nordic questionnaires for the analysis of musculoskeletal symptoms. Appl Ergon 18(3):233–237.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-6870(87)90010-X CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Oakman J, Wells Y (2013) Retirement Intentions: What is the role of push factors in predicting retirement intentions? Ageing Soc 33(6):988–1008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Oakman J, Wells YD (2016) Working longer: What is the relationship between person–environment fit and retirement intentions? Asia Pac J Hum Resour 54(2):207–229.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1744-7941.12075 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Oude Hengel KM, Blatter BM, Geuskens GA, Koppes LLJ, Bongers PM (2012) Factors associated with the ability and willingness to continue working until the age of 65 in construction workers. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 85(7):783–790.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00420-011-0719-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Pejtersen JH, Kristensen TS, Borg V, Bjorner JB (2010) The second version of the Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire. Scand J Public Health 38(3 suppl):8–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Prakash K et al (2016) Midlife job profiles and disabilities in later life: a 28-year follow-up of municipal employees in Finland. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 89(6):997–1007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Prentice RL, Gloeckler LA (1978) Regression analysis of grouped survival data with application to breast cancer data. Biometrics.  https://doi.org/10.2307/2529588 Google Scholar
  27. Robroek SJW, Schuring M, Croezen S, Stattin M, Burdorf A (2013) Poor health, unhealthy behaviors, and unfavorable work characteristics influence pathways of exit from paid employment among older workers in Europe: a four year follow-up study. Scand J Work Environ Health 39(2):125–133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Skotte J, Korshøj M, Kristiansen J, Hanisch C, Holtermann A (2014) Detection of physical activity types using triaxial accelerometers. J Phys Act Health 11(1):76–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Smith PM, Berecki-Gisolf J (2014) Age, occupational demands and the risk of serious work injury. Occup Med 64(8):571–576.  https://doi.org/10.1093/occmed/kqu125 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Sterud T (2013) Work-related mechanical risk factors for long-term sick leave: a prospective study of the general working population in Norway. Eur J Public Health 24(1):111–116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Tüchsen F, Hannerz H, Burr H (2006) A 12 year prospective study of circulatory disease among Danish shift workers. Occup Environ Med 63(7):451–455CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Tuomi K, Ilmarinen J, Jahkola A, Katajarinne L, Tulkki A (1998) Work ability index. 2nd revised edn. Finnish Institute of Occupational Health, Helsinki, FinlandGoogle Scholar
  33. van den Berg TI, Elders LA, Burdorf A (2010) Influence of health and work on early retirement. J Occup Environ Med 52(6):576–583CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Public HealthLa Trobe UniversityBundooraAustralia
  2. 2.Department of Public HealthGhent University, University Hospital, 4K3GhentBelgium
  3. 3.National Research Centre for the Working EnvironmentCopenhagenDenmark

Personalised recommendations