Advertisement

Risk assessment of vascular disorders by a supplementary hand–arm vascular weighting of hand-transmitted vibration

  • Massimo BovenziEmail author
  • Iole Pinto
  • Francesco Picciolo
Original Article
  • 91 Downloads

Abstract

Purpose

To provide an updated epidemiological validation for a supplementary method for assessing the risk of vascular disorders from hand-transmitted vibration.

Methods

The occurrence of vibration-induced white finger (VWF) in the vibration-exposed workers of the Italian cohort of the EU VIBRISKS study was related to measures of daily vibration exposure expressed in terms of r.m.s. acceleration magnitude normalised to an 8-h day, frequency weighted according to either the frequency weighting Wh defined in international standard ISO 5349-1:2001 [Ah(8) in ms− 2] or the hand–arm vascular frequency weighting Wp proposed in the ISO technical report (TR) 18570:2017 [Ap(8) in ms− 2]. To estimate a threshold value for vascular hand–arm vibration risk, the Wp-weighted vibration exposure value Ep,d (in ms− 1.5) was calculated according to the ISO/TR document. The difference in the predictions of VWF between the exposure measures calculated with the frequency weightings Wh or Wp was investigated by means of logistic modelling.

Results

Measures of daily vibration exposure constructed with the frequency weighting Wp [Ap(8) and Ep,d], which gives more importance to intermediate- and high-frequency vibration, were better predictors of the occurrence of VWF in the vibration-exposed workers than the metric derived from the conventional ISO frequency weighting Wh [Ah(8)]. There was some epidemiological evidence for a threshold value of Ep,d for the onset of VWF in the vibration-exposed workers.

Conclusions

Measures of daily vibration exposure evaluated with the vascular weighting Wp performed better for the predictions of VWF than those obtained with the frequency weighting Wh recommended in ISO 5349-1.

Keywords

Frequency weightings Epidemiology Hand-transmitted vibration Vascular disorders 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by the European Commission under the Quality of Life and Management of Living Resources programme - Project No. QLK4-2002-02650 (VIBRISKS).

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

References

  1. Bovenzi M (2002) Finger systolic blood pressure indices for the diagnosis of vibration-induced white finger. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 75:20–28Google Scholar
  2. Bovenzi M (2010) A prospective cohort study of exposure-response relationship for vibration-induced white finger. Occup Environ Med 67:38–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bovenzi M (2012) Epidemiological evidence for new frequency weightings of hand-transmitted vibration. Ind Health 50:377–387CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bovenzi M, The Italian Study Group on Physical Hazards in the Stone Industry (1994) Hand-arm vibration and dose-response relation for vibration induced white finger among quarry drillers and stone carvers. Occup Environ Med 51:603–611CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bovenzi M, Petronio L, Di Marino F (1980) Epidemiological survey of shipyard workers exposed to hand-arm vibration. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 46:251–266CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bovenzi M, Franzinelli A, Strambi F (1988) Prevalence of vibration induced white finger and assessment of vibration exposure among travertine workers in Italy. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 61:25–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bovenzi M, Lindsell CJ, Griffin MJ (2000) Acute vascular response to the frequency of vibration transmitted to the hand. Occup Environ Med 57:422–430CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bovenzi M, Della Vedova A, Nataletti P, Alessandrini B, Poian T (2005) Work-related disorders of the upper limb in female workers using orbital sanders. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 78:303–310CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bovenzi M, Pinto I, Picciolo F, Mauro M, Ronchese F (2011) Frequency weightings of hand-transmitted vibration for predicting vibration-induced white finger. Scand J Work Environ Health 37:244–252CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bovenzi M, Prodi A, Mauro M (2015) Relationships of neurosensory disorders and reduced work ability to alternative frequency weightings of hand-transmitted vibration. Scand J Work Environ Health 41:247–258CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bovenzi M, Prodi A, Mauro M (2016) A longitudinal study of neck and upper limb musculoskeletal disorders and alternative measures of vibration exposure. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 89:923–933CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Brammer AJ, Pitts PM (2012a) Hand-arm vibration risk—editorial. Ind Health 50:341CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Brammer AJ, Pitts PM (2012b) Frequency weighting for vibration-induced white finger compatible with exposure-response models. Ind Health 50:397–411CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Brammer AJ, Yu G (2017) Health effects from exposure of the hand to mechanical shocks. Institut für Arbeitsschutz der Deutschen Gesetzlichen Unfallversicherung (IFA) Report, 5. DGUV, Berlin, pp 31–38Google Scholar
  15. Burnham KP, Anderson DR (2004) Multimodel inference: understanding AIC and BIC in model selection. Sociol Methods Res 33:261–304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Bylund SL, Burgstrom L, Knutsson A (2002) A descriptive study of women injured by hand-arm vibration. Ann Occup Hyg 46:299–307Google Scholar
  17. Comité Européen de Normalisation (CEN) (1996) Mechanical vibration—guide to the health effects of vibration on the human body. CR Report 12349. CEN, BrusselsGoogle Scholar
  18. Cui J (2007) QIC program and model selection in GEE analyses. Stata J 7:209–220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. The European Parliament and the Council of the European Union (2002) The European Parliament and the Council of the European Union (2002) On the minimum health and safety requirements regarding the exposure of workers to the risks arising from physical agents (vibration), (16th individual Directive within the meaning of Article 16(1) of Directive 89/391/EEC). Directive 2002/44/EC. Official Journal of the European Communities, 6 July 2002, L 117/13–19Google Scholar
  20. Dong RG, Welcome DE, Wu JZ (2005) Frequency weightings based on biodynamics of fingers-hand-arm system. Ind Health 43:516–526CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gamer R, Kumari R, Lanyon P, Doherty M, Zhang W (2015) Prevalence, risk factors and associations of primary Raynaud’s phenomenon: systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. BMJ Open 5:e006389.  https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006389 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Griffin MJ (1997) Measurement, evaluation, and assessment of occupational exposures to hand-transmitted vibration. Occup Environ Med 54:73–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Griffin MJ (2012) Frequency-dependence of psychophysical and physiological responses to hand-transmitted vibration. Ind Health 50:354–369CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. International Organization for Standardization (ISO) (2001) Mechanical vibration—measurement and evaluation of human exposure to handtransmitted vibration—part 1: general requirements. ISO 5349-1. ISO, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  25. International Organization for Standardization (ISO) (2005) Mechanical vibration and shock—cold provocation tests for the assessment of peripheral vascular function—part 2: measurement and evaluation of finger systolic blood pressure. In: ISO 14835-2. ISO, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  26. International Organization for Standardization (ISO) (2017) Mechanical vibration—measurement and evaluation of human exposure to hand-transmitted vibration—supplementary method for assessing risk of vascular disorders. ISO/TR 18570. ISO, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  27. Krajnak K, Riley DA, Wu J, McDowell T, Welcome DE, Xu XS, Dong RG (2012) Frequency-dependent effects of vibration on physiological systems: experiments with animals and other human surrogates. Ind Health 50:343–353CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lesage M (1998) Work-related diseases and occupational diseases: the ILO international list. In: Stellman JM (ed) Encyclopaedia of occupational health and safety, vol I, 4th edn. International Labour Office, Geneva, pp 26.2–26.6Google Scholar
  29. Lindsell CJ (2005) Test battery for assessing vascular disturbances of fingers. Environ Health Prev Med 10:341–350CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Mahbub MH, Harada N (2011) Review of different quantification methods for the diagnosis of digital vascular abnormalities in hand-arm vibration syndrome. J Occup Health 53:241–249CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Miwa T (1967) Evaluation methods for vibration effect. Part 3: measurement of thresholds and equal sensation contours on hand for vertical and horizontal vibrations. Ind Health 5:213–220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Negro C, Rui F, D’Agostin F, Bovenzi M (2008) Use of color charts for the diagnosis of finger whiteness in vibration-exposed workers. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 81:633–638CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Olsen N, Hagberg M, Ekenvall L, Futatsuka M, Harrison J, Nasu Y, Welsh C, Yamada S, Yoshida M (1995) Clinical and laboratory diagnostics of vascular symptoms induced by hand-arm vibration. Report from discussions in a working group. In: Gemne G, Brammer AJ, Hagberg M, Lundström R, Nilsson T (eds). Proceedings of the Stockholm workshop 94. Hand-arm vibration syndrome: diagnostics and quantitative relationships to exposure. Arb Hälsa 5:181–186Google Scholar
  34. Palmer KT, Griffin MJ, Syddall H, Pannett B, Cooper C, Coggon D (2000) Prevalence of Raynaud’s phenomenon in Great Britain and its relation to hand transmitted vibration: a national postal survey. Occup Environ Med 57:448–452CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Thompson AJL, Griffin MJ (2009) Effect of the magnitude and frequency of hand-transmitted vibration on finger blood flow during and after exposure to vibration. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 82:1151–1162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Tominaga Y (2005) New frequency weighting of hand-arm vibration. Ind Health 43:509–515CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. VIBRISKS (2007) Risks of Occupational Vibration Exposures. FP5 Project No. QLK4-2002-02650. European Commission Quality of Life and Management of Living Resources Programme. Southampton, UK: Human Factors Research Unit, Institute of Sound and Vibration Research, University of Southampton (updated 28 February 2007). http://www.vibrisks.soton.ac.uk. Accessed 30 Jan 2018
  38. Ye Y, Griffin MJ (2016) Assessment of two alternative standardised tests for the vascular component of the hand-arm vibration syndrome. Occup Environ Med 73:701–708CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Clinical Unit of Occupational Medicine, Department of Medical SciencesUniversity of TriesteTriesteItaly
  2. 2.Physical Agents, Public Health Lab, Local Health Authority Toscana Sud EstNHSSienaItaly
  3. 3.Department of Physical Sciences, Earth and EnvironmentUniversity of SienaSienaItaly

Personalised recommendations