Effort-reward imbalance among students at German universities: associations with self-rated health and mental health
Although psychosocial stress has been associated with adverse health parameters, little is known about this topic among the variety of university students. We thus examined associations of psychosocial stress due to academic education with self-rated health, and symptoms of depression and anxiety among students from various study disciplines.
We used data from the Nutrition and Physical Activity (NuPhA) Study, a cross-sectional online survey among students enrolled across German universities (n = 698). Academic stress was assessed by a newly developed and validated student version of the Effort–Reward Imbalance (ERI-Student) Questionnaire. Depressive and anxiety symptoms were measured by applying the Patient Health Questionnaire-4 (PHQ-4) and using validated cut-offs.
Separate multivariate logistic regression analyses run for the different ERI components, the ERI-ratio revealed that high effort, low reward, high over-commitment, and a high ERI-ratio were associated with poor self-rated health, and depressive and anxiety symptoms (odds ratios ≥ 2.43). Separate analyses for medical students and non-medical students largely confirmed these findings for both groups. Associations between all ERI components, the ERI ratio, and both mental health measures were, however, more pronounced among medical students.
We were able to show consistent associations between the ERI-Student Questionnaire and self-rated health and mental health across students from different study disciplines. Further research on associations between academic stress and health parameters is necessary to develop effective strategies that prevent students from adverse health outcomes during their academic education.
KeywordsEffort-reward imbalance Mental health Psychosocial stress Self-rated health University students
The authors thank all students that participated in the quantitative part of the NuPhA Study. Further, we are indebted to Prof. Johannes Siegrist and Dr. Natalia Wege, both from the University of Düsseldorf, for granting us permission to use the ERI-Student Questionnaire.
JH-K and AL designed the scope of the manuscript and have final responsibility for the content of the manuscript. KD and JH-K designed the NuPhA Study and collected all data. RH conducted the statistical analysis. RH and KD carefully reviewed the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final version of the manuscript.
The quantitative part of the NuPhA Study was partially funded by the non-profit organisation “Institute Danone Ernährung für Gesundheit e.V., Haar, Germany” (project number: 2014/01). The funding organisation had no influence on designing, analysing, or interpreting the data. In addition, they had no role in writing or in publishing of this manuscript.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors have no competing interest to report.
The NuPhA Study received ethical approval by the Ethics Committee of the Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University (2013-634-N-MA).
- Kroenke K, Spitzer RL, Williams JBW, Lowe B (2009) An Ultra-Brief Screening Scale for anxiety and depression: the PHQ-4. Psychosomatics 50(6):613–621Google Scholar
- Racic M, Todorovic R, Ivkovic N, Masic S, Joksimovic B, Kulic M (2017) Self- perceived stress in relation to anxiety, depression and health-related quality of life among health professions students: a cross-sectional study from Bosnia and Herzegovina. Zdr Varst 56(4):251–259Google Scholar
- Statistisches Bundesamt (2018) [Students at German universities] Fachserie 11 Reihe 4,1 Sommersemester 2017Google Scholar