Health effects among a cohort exposed to low-level arsenic in a geothermal area of Tuscany, Italy
Studies on low-level As exposure have not found an association with cancer, while increased risks were reported for skin lesions, respiratory and cardiovascular diseases and reproductive outcomes. Prospective observational studies with individual exposure measures are needed to study low-level As exposure effects. In a geothermal area in Southern Tuscany (Italy), characterized by a natural presence of As in drinking water (< 50 µg/l), As urinary concentrations were measured in a survey in 1998 and cohort members were followed to evaluate the effects on health.
Around 900 subjects (20–55 years old) randomly sampled in 4 municipalities of the area (Monte Amiata), have been followed from 1999 to 2015, by hospitalisation and mortality registries. Standardized Hospitalisation Ratios (SHRs) were performed, compared to a reference area. Competing-risks regression models were performed to test the association between As urinary concentration and risk of first hospitalisation.
SHRs show various increased risks, more frequently among males. Internal analyses show a positive association between As and skin diseases in the general population, the Hazard Ratio (HR) for 1 µg/l increase of As urinary concentration is 1.06 (90%CI 1.01–1.11) and in males, HR 1.08 (90%CI 1.02–1.14), between As and circulatory system diseases in males, HR 1.03 (90%CI 1.01–1.05).
The results suggest an effect on skin diseases and circulatory system diseases and, considering the relative young age of cohort members, they could be considered also as predictive of future severer diseases.
KeywordsArsenic Low-level exposure Cohort Metal
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
- Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR) (2007) Toxicological profile for Arsenic. US Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, AtlantaGoogle Scholar
- Bavazzano P, Perico A, Rosendahl H, Apostoli P (1996) Determination of urinary arsenic by solvent extraction and electrothermal atomic absorption spectrometry. A comparison with directly coupled high performance liquid chromatography-indiclively coupled plasma mass spectrometry. J Anal At Spectrom 11:521–524. https://doi.org/10.1039/JA9961100521 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Bustaffa E, Minichilli F, Andreassi MG, Carone S, Coi A, Cori L et al (2014) Studies on markers of exposure and early effect in areas with arsenic pollution: methods and results of the project SEpiAs. Epidemiological surveillance in areas with environmental pollution by natural or anthropogenic arsenic. Epidemiol Prev 38(3–4 Suppl 1):27–94Google Scholar
- Chen Y, Parvez F, Gamble M, Islam T, Ahmed A, Argos M et al (2009) Arsenic exposure at low-to-moderate levels and skin lesions, arsenic metabolism, neurological functions, and biomarkers for respiratory and cardiovascular diseases: review of recent findings from the Health Effects of Arsenic Longitudinal Study (HEALS) in Bangladesh. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 239(2):184–192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.taap.2009.01.010 (Epub 2009 Jan 27)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Hartwig A, MAK Commission (2016) Arsenic and its inorganic compounds (with the Exception of Arsine), vol. 1. The Mak-Collection for Occupational Health and Safety: annual thresholds and classifications for the workplace. https://doi.org/10.1002/3527600418.mb744038vere5716
- IARC (2012) Arsenic and arsenic compounds. IARC Monogr Eval Carcinog Risks Hum 100C:41–93Google Scholar
- Leonardi G, Vahter M, Clemens F, Goessler W, Gurzau E, Hemminki K et al (2012) Inorganic arsenic and basal cell carcinoma in areas of Hungary, Romania, and Slovakia: a case-control study. Environ Health Perspect 120(5):721–726. https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.1103534 (Epub 2012 Jan 31)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Maull EA, Ahsan H, Edwards J, Longnecker MP, Navas-Acien A, Pi J et al (2012) Evaluation of the association between arsenic and diabetes: a National Toxicology Program workshop review. Environ Health Perspect 120(12):1658–1670. https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.1104579 (Epub 2012 Aug 10)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Minichilli F, Nuvolone D, Bustaffa E, Cipriani F, Vigotti MA, Bianchi F (2012) State of health of populations residing in geothermal areas of Tuscany. Epidemiol Prev 36(5 Suppl 1):1–104Google Scholar
- Parvez F, Chen Y, Brandt-Rauf PW, Slavkovich V, Islam T, Ahmed A et al (2010) A prospective study of respiratory symptoms associated with chronic arsenic exposure in Bangladesh: findings from the Health Effects of Arsenic Longitudinal Study (HEALS). Thorax 65(6):528–533. https://doi.org/10.1136/thx.2009.119347 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Rahman M, Vahter M, Sohel N, Yunus M, Wahed MA, Streatfield PK et al (2006) Arsenic exposure and age and sex-specific risk for skin lesions: a population-based case-referent study in Bangladesh. Environ Health Perspect 114(12):1847–1852Google Scholar
- WHO (1996) Biological monitoring of chemical exposure in the workplace, vol 1. World Health Organization, GenevaGoogle Scholar