Advertisement

Damage propagation in 2d beam lattices: 1. Uncertainty and assumptions

  • Andrej Cherkaev
  • Michael Ryvkin
Original
  • 20 Downloads

Abstract

The paper studies damage propagation in brittle elastic beam lattices, using the quasistatic approach. The lattice is subjected to a remote tensile loading; the beams in the lattice are bent and stretched. An introduced initial flaw in a stressed lattice causes an overstress of neighboring beams. When one of the overstressed beams fails, it is eliminated from the lattice; then, the process repeats. When several beams are overstressed, one has to choose which beam to eliminate. The paper studies and compares damage propagation under various criteria of the elimination of the overstressed beams. These criteria account for the stress level, randomness of beams properties, and decay of strength due to micro-damage accumulation during the loading history. A numerical study is performed using discrete Fourier transform approach. We compare damage patterns in triangular stretch-dominated and hexagonal bending-dominated lattices. We discuss quantitative characterization of the damage pattern for different criteria. We find that the randomness in the beam stiffness increases fault tolerance, and we outline conditions restricting the most dangerous straight linear crack-like pattern.

Keywords

Beam lattice Damage propagation Failure criteria Discrete Fourier transform 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors gratefully acknowledge support by DMS, National Science Foundation, Award 1515125 and by Israel Science Foundation, Grant No. 1494/16.

References

  1. 1.
    Aboudi, J., Ryvkin, M.: The effect of localized damage on the behavior of composites with periodic microstructure. Int. J. Eng. Sci. 52, 41–55 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Arabnejad, S., Burnett Johnston, R., Pura, J.A., Singh, B., Tanzer, M., Pasini, D.: High-strength porous biomaterials for bone replacement: a strategy to assess the interplay between cell morphology, mechanical properties, bone ingrowth and manufacturing constraints. Acta Biomater. 30, 345–356 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Astrom, J., Alava, M., Timonen, J.: Crack dynamics and crack surfaces in elastic beam lattices. Phys. Rev. E 57(2), R1259–R1262 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bagheri, Z., Melancon, D., Liu, L., Johnston, R., Pasini, D.: Compensation strategy to reduce geometry and mechanics mismatches in porous biomaterials built with selective laser melting. J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater. 70, 1727 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Cherkaev, A., Leelavanichkul, S.: An impact protective structure with bistable links. Int. J. Damage Mech. 21(5), 697–711 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Cherkaev, A., Ryvkin, M.: Damage propagation in 2d beam lattices: 2. Design of an isotropic fault-tolerant lattice. In: Archive of Applied Mechanics (2017)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Cherkaev, A., Slepyan, L.: Waiting element structures and stability under extension. Int. J. Damage Mech. 4(1), 58–82 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Cherkaev, A., Vinogradov, V., Leelavanishkul, S.: The waves of damage in elastic-plastic lattices with waiting links: design and simulation. Mech. Mater. 38, 748–756 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Cherkaev, A., Zhornitskaya, L.: Protective Structures with waiting links and their damage evolution. In: Multibody System Dynamics Journal, vol 13, no 4 (2005)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Cui, X., Xue, Z., Pei, Y., Fang, D.: Preliminary study on ductile fracture of imperfect lattice materials. Int. J. Solids Struct. 48, 34533461 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Fleck, N.A., Qiu, X.: The damage tolerance of elastic-brittle, two dimensional isotropic lattices. J. Mech. Phys. Solids 55, 562588 (2007)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Fuchs, M.B.: Structures and Their Analysis. Springer, Dordrecht (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Furukawa, H.: Propagation and pattern of crack in two dimensional dynamical lattice. Prog. Theor. Phys. 90(5), 949–959 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Herrmann, H., Hansen, A., Roux, S.: Fracture of disordered, elastic lattices in two dimensions. Phys. Rev. B 39, 1 (1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Karpov, E.G., Stephen, N.G., Dorofeev, D.L.: On static analysis of finite repetitive structures by discrete Fourier transform. Int. J. Solids Struct. 39, 4291–4310 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kucherov, L., Ryvkin, M.: Flaw nucleation in a brittle open-cell Kelvin foam. Int. J. Fract. 175, 79–86 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Li, C., Chou, T.-W.: A structural mechanics approach for the analysis of carbon nanotubes. Int. J. Solids Struct. 40, 24872499 (2003)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Lipperman, P., Ryvkin, M., Fuchs, M.B.: Nucleation of cracks in two-dimensional periodic cellular materials. Comput. Mech. 39(2), 127–139 (2007a)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Lipperman, F., Ryvkin, M., Fuchs, M.B.: Fracture toughness of two-dimensional cellular material with periodic microstructure. Int. J. Fract. 146, 279–290 (2007b)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Lipperman, F., Ryvkin, M., Fuchs, M.B.: Design of crack-resistant two-dimensional periodic cellular materials. J. Mech. Mater. Struct. 4(3), 441–457 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Liu, L., Kamm, P., Garca-Moreno, F., Banhart, J., Pasini, D.: Elastic and failure response of imperfect three-dimensional metallic lattices: the role of geometric defects induced by selective laser melting. J. Mech. Phys. Solids 107, 160184 (2017)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Mohammadipour, A., Willam, K.: On the application of a lattice method to configurational and fracture mechanics. Int. J. Solids Struct. 106107, 152163 (2017)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Monette, L., Anderson, M.: Elastic and fracture properties of the two-dimensional triangular and square lattices. Model. Simul. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2, 53–66 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Nieves, M.J., Mishuris, G.S., Slepyan, L.I.: Analysis of dynamic damage propagation in discrete beam structures. Int. J. Solids Struct. 97–98, 699–713 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Romijn, N., Fleck, N.: The fracture toughness of planar lattices: imperfection sensitivity. J. Mech. Phys. Solids 55, 25382564 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Ryvkin, M., Fuchs, M.B., Nuller, B.: Optimal design of infinite repetitive structures. Struct. Optim. 18(2/3), 202209 (1999)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Ryvkin, M., Hadar, O.: Employing of the discrete Fourier transform for evaluation of crack-tip field in periodic materials. Int. J. Eng. Sci. 86, 10–19 (2015)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Ryvkin, M., Hadar, O., Kucherov, L.: Multiscale analysis of non-periodic stress state in composites with periodic microstructure. Int. J. Eng. Sci. 121, 167181 (2017)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Ryvkin, M., Nuller, B.: Solution of quasi-periodic fracture problems by the representative cell method. Comput. Mech. 20(1), 145–149 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Schmidt, I., Fleck, N.A.: Ductile fracture of two-dimensional cellular structures. Int. J. Fract. 111, 327–342 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Slepyan, L.I.: On discrete models in fracture mechanics. Mech. Solids 45(6), 803–814 (2010)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of MathematicsUniversity of UtahSalt Lake CityUSA
  2. 2.The Iby and Aladar Fleischman Faculty of Engineering, School of Mechanical EngineeringTel Aviv UniversityRamat AvivIsrael

Personalised recommendations