Advertisement

Ocular vascular changes during pregnancy: an optical coherence tomography angiography study

  • Pınar Bingöl KızıltunçEmail author
  • Bulut Varlı
  • Tuna Çelik Büyüktepe
  • Huban Atilla
Miscellaneous
  • 31 Downloads

Abstract

Background

Pregnancy is a period presenting with many physiological adaptation mechanisms. One of the structures in which these mechanisms are observed is ocular tissues. The cornea, lacrimal and meibomian glands, and chorioretinal complex are all among the structures affected by changes during pregnancy. In this study we aimed to evaluate the macular and optic disc vessel density (VD) changes by Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography (OCTA) imaging in pregnancy.

Methods

A total of 248 eyes from 124 pregnant women and 80 eyes from 40 healthy control women were involved. Vessel densities of macula were evaluated for superficial capillary plexus (SCP) and deep capillary plexus (DCP) in whole macula, foveal, parafoveal and perifoveal region. Peripapillary and whole optic disc VDs were also evaluated. Vessel densities of macula and optic disc were compared between control individuals and pregnant women. Vessel densities in different trimesters were also evaluated.

Results

Modest but significant differences in VDs of whole macula of SCP and DCP were observed in pregnancy group. Additionally, perifoveal and parafoveal region of SCP, whole disc and radial peripapillary capillary VD were significantly higher in pregnancy group. There was no correlation between VD ratios of macula and optic disc and pregnancy weeks and trimesters.

Conclusions

This is the first study focusing on the OCTA parameters in pregnant individuals. These findings suggest that physiological changes during pregnancy are not limited to the cornea, eyelids and the choroid but also to the retinal and optic disc vasculature.

Keywords

Estrogen Ocular blood flow Optical coherence tomography angiography Pregnancy Vessel density 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

Author PBK declares that she has no conflict of interest. Author BV declares that he has no conflict of interest. Author TÇB declares that she has no conflict of interest. Author HA declares that she has no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

References

  1. 1.
    Carlin A, Alfirevic Z (2008) Physiological changes of pregnancy and monitoring. Best practice & research Clinical obstetrics & gynaecology 22:801–823.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2008.06.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kalogeropoulos D, Sung VC, Paschopoulos M, Moschos MM, Panidis P, Kalogeropoulos C (2019) The physiologic and pathologic effects of pregnancy on the human visual system. Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology : the journal of the Institute of Obstetrics and Gynaecology:1–12.  https://doi.org/10.1080/01443615.2019.1584891 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Mehdizadehkashi K, Chaichian S, Mehdizadehkashi A, Jafarzadepour E, Tamannaie Z, Moazzami B, Pishgahroudsari M (2014) Visual acuity changes during pregnancy and postpartum: a cross-sectional study in Iran. J Pregnancy 2014:675792.  https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/675792 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Shin YU, Hong EH, Kang MH, Cho H, Seong M (2018) The association between female reproductive factors and open-angle Glaucoma in Korean women: the Korean National Health and nutrition examination survey V. J Ophthalmol 2018:2750786.  https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/2750786 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Naderan M (2018) Ocular changes during pregnancy. Journal of current ophthalmology 30:202–210.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joco.2017.11.012 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Centofanti M, Migliardi R, Bonini S, Manni G, Bucci MG, Pesavento CB, Amin CS, Harris A (2002) Pulsatile ocular blood flow during pregnancy. Eur J Ophthalmol 12:276–280CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Sato T, Sugawara J, Aizawa N, Iwama N, Takahashi F, Nakamura-Kurakata M, Saito M, Sugiyama T, Kunikata H, Nakazawa T, Yaegashi N (2017) Longitudinal changes of ocular blood flow using laser speckle flowgraphy during normal pregnancy. PLoS One 12:e0173127.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0173127 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Jia Y, Tan O, Tokayer J, Potsaid B, Wang Y, Liu JJ, Kraus MF, Subhash H, Fujimoto JG, Hornegger J, Huang D (2012) Split-spectrum amplitude-decorrelation angiography with optical coherence tomography. Opt Express 20:4710–4725.  https://doi.org/10.1364/oe.20.004710 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Eisner A (2015) Sex, eyes, and vision: male/female distinctions in ophthalmic disorders. Curr Eye Res 40:96–101.  https://doi.org/10.3109/02713683.2014.975368 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Nuzzi R, Scalabrin S, Becco A, Panzica G (2019) Sex hormones and optic nerve disorders: a review. Front Neurosci 13:57.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2019.00057 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Gupta PD, Johar K Sr, Nagpal K, Vasavada AR (2005) Sex hormone receptors in the human eye. Surv Ophthalmol 50:274–284.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.survophthal.2005.02.005 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Soldin OP, Guo T, Weiderpass E, Tractenberg RE, Hilakivi-Clarke L, Soldin SJ (2005) Steroid hormone levels in pregnancy and 1 year postpartum using isotope dilution tandem mass spectrometry. Fertil Steril 84:701–710.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2005.02.045 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Wickham LA, Gao J, Toda I, Rocha EM, Ono M, Sullivan DA (2000) Identification of androgen, estrogen and progesterone receptor mRNAs in the eye. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 78:146–153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Keaney JF Jr, Shwaery GT, Xu A, Nicolosi RJ, Loscalzo J, Foxall TL, Vita JA (1994) 17 beta-estradiol preserves endothelial vasodilator function and limits low-density lipoprotein oxidation in hypercholesterolemic swine. Circulation 89:2251–2259CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Toker E, Yenice O, Akpinar I, Aribal E, Kazokoglu H (2003) The influence of sex hormones on ocular blood flow in women. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 81:617–624CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Mikkola T, Viinikka L, Ylikorkala O (1998) Estrogen and postmenopausal estrogen/progestin therapy: effect on endothelium-dependent prostacyclin, nitric oxide and endothelin-1 production. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 79:75–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Mather KJ, Norman EG, Prior JC, Elliott TG (2000) Preserved forearm endothelial responses with acute exposure to progesterone: a randomized cross-over trial of 17-beta estradiol, progesterone, and 17-beta estradiol with progesterone in healthy menopausal women. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 85:4644–4649.  https://doi.org/10.1210/jcem.85.12.7011 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Meah VL, Cockcroft JR, Backx K, Shave R, Stohr EJ (2016) Cardiac output and related haemodynamics during pregnancy: a series of meta-analyses. Heart 102:518–526.  https://doi.org/10.1136/heartjnl-2015-308476 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    de Haas S, Ghossein-Doha C, van Kuijk SM, van Drongelen J, Spaanderman ME (2017) Physiological adaptation of maternal plasma volume during pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 49:177–187.  https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.17360 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Lang RM, Pridjian G, Feldman T, Neumann A, Lindheimer M, Borow KM (1991) Left ventricular mechanics in preeclampsia. Am Heart J 121:1768–1775.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-8703(91)90024-c CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Belfort MA, Tooke-Miller C, Allen JC Jr, Saade GR, Dildy GA, Grunewald C, Nisell H, Herd JA (2001) Changes in flow velocity, resistance indices, and cerebral perfusion pressure in the maternal middle cerebral artery distribution during normal pregnancy. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 80:104–112PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Conrad KP, Davison JM (2014) The renal circulation in normal pregnancy and preeclampsia: is there a place for relaxin? American journal of physiology Renal physiology 306:F1121–F1135.  https://doi.org/10.1152/ajprenal.00042.2014 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Flo K, Wilsgaard T, Vartun A, Acharya G (2010) A longitudinal study of the relationship between maternal cardiac output measured by impedance cardiography and uterine artery blood flow in the second half of pregnancy. BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology 117:837–844.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.2010.02548.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of OphthalmologyAnkara University School of Medicine, Vehbi Koç Eye BankAnkaraTurkey
  2. 2.Department of Obstetrics and GynecologyAnkara University School of MedicineAnkaraTurkey

Personalised recommendations