Advertisement

Infrared photographs with a selective wavelength filter to diagnose small-angle esotropia in young children

  • Yung Ju Yoo
  • Hee Kyung Yang
  • Jong-Mo Seo
  • Kwang Gi Kim
  • Jeong-Min HwangEmail author
Pediatrics
  • 20 Downloads

Abstract

Purpose

To validate the effectiveness of the selective wavelength filter analysis with infrared photographs for diagnosing small-angle esotropia in children under age 4.

Methods

This is a retrospective, observational, case-control study. A total of 83 esotropes with an esodeviation of ≤ 16 prism diopters (PD) and 75 orthotropic controls under 4 years of age were included. Full-face infrared photographs were taken with a selective wavelength filter in front of either eye. The angles of esodeviation on photographs were measured with the three-dimensional Strabismus Photo Analyzer. The alternate prism and cover test or the Krimsky test were repeatedly performed to measure ocular alignment.

Results

The testability of infrared photographs using selective wavelength filters in children under 4 years of age was 85.6%. The mean angle of esodeviation was 11.3 ± 4.0 PD by manual measurements and 11.5 ± 4.4 PD by the infrared photograph analysis. Manual measurements and the infrared photograph analysis showed a strong positive correlation (R = 0.815, P < 0.001). The sensitivity and specificity of the infrared photograph analysis for detecting small-angle esotropia were 95.2% and 77.9%, respectively, with a cutoff value of 4.0 PD.

Conclusions

The automated infrared photograph analysis was simple and effective for diagnosing small-angle esotropia in young children.

Keywords

Esotropia Image analysis Selective wavelength filter Alignment 

Notes

Funding

This research was supported by the SNUBH research fund (No. 02-2016-051).

Compliance with ethical standards

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethics approval

Ethics approval was provided by the Institutional Review Board of Seoul National University Bundang Hospital. All aspects of the research protocol were in compliance with the Declarations of Helsinki.

References

  1. 1.
    Anwar DS, Woreta FA, Weng CY, Repka MX (2012) Incidence of esotropia developing in subjects previously diagnosed with pseudoesotropia: a pilot study. Strabismus 20:124–126.  https://doi.org/10.3109/09273972.2012.702368 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Gräf M, Alhammouri Q, Vieregge C, Lorenz B (2011) The Bruckner transillumination test: limited detection of small-angle esotropia. Ophthalmology 118:2504–2509.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2011.05.016
  3. 3.
    Silbert AL, Matta NS, Silbert DI (2012) Incidence of strabismus and amblyopia in preverbal children previously diagnosed with pseudoesotropia. J AAPOS 16:118–119.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaapos.2011.12.146 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Raab EL (2001) Follow-up monitoring of accommodative esotropia. J AAPOS 5:246–249.  https://doi.org/10.1067/mpa.2001.117570 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Pediatric Eye Disease Investigator Group (2009) Interobserver reliability of the prism and alternate cover test in children with esotropia. Arch Ophthalmol 127:59–65.  https://doi.org/10.1001/archophthalmol.2008.548
  6. 6.
    Yang HK, Han SB, Hwang JM, Kim YJ, Jeong CB, Kim KG (2012) Assessment of binocular alignment using the three-dimensional Strabismus Photo Analyzer. Br J Ophthalmol 96:78–82.  https://doi.org/10.1136/bjophthalmol-2011-300305 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Yang HK, Seo JM, Hwang JM, Kim KG (2013) Automated analysis of binocular alignment using an infrared camera and selective wavelength filter. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 54:2733–2737.  https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.12-11400 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bland JM, Altman DG (1999) Measuring agreement in method comparison studies. Stat Methods Med Res 8:135–160.  https://doi.org/10.1177/096228029900800204 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Choi BC (1998) Slopes of a receiver operating characteristic curve and likelihood ratios for a diagnostic test. Am J Epidemiol 148:1127–1132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Han S, Kim US (2014) Symptom based diagnosis of infant under one year in outpatient clinic. Korean J Ophthalmol 28:241–245.  https://doi.org/10.3341/kjo.2014.28.3.241
  11. 11.
    Fu VL, Stager DR, Birch EE (2007) Progression of intermittent, small-angle, and variable esotropia in infancy. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 48:661–664.  https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.06-0717 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hrynchak PK, Herriot C, Irving EL (2010) Comparison of alternate cover test reliability at near in non-strabismus between experienced and novice examiners. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 30:304–309.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-1313.2010.00723.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Von Noorden GK (2002) Binocular vision and ocular motility: theory and management of strabismus. Mosby, St. LouisGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Yang HK, Hwang JM (2011) The effect of target size and accommodation on the distant angle of deviation in intermittent exotropia. Am J Ophthalmol 151:907–913 e901.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2010.11.021 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Multi-ethnic Pediatric Eye Disease Study Group (2008) Prevalence of amblyopia and strabismus in African American and Hispanic children ages 6 to 72 months: the multi-ethnic pediatric eye disease study. Ophthalmology 115:1229–1236.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2007.08.001

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of OphthalmologyKangwon National University Hospital, Kangwon National University Graduate School of MedicineChuncheonSouth Korea
  2. 2.Department of OphthalmologySeoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of MedicineSeongnamSouth Korea
  3. 3.Department of Electrical and Computer EngineeringSeoul National UniversitySeoulSouth Korea
  4. 4.Department of Biomedical Engineering, College of MedicineGachon UniversityInchonSouth Korea

Personalised recommendations