Differences of body height, axial length, and refractive error at different ages in Kumejima study
To determine the relationships between the axial length (AL), refractive error (RE), and body height (BH) at different ages of a genetically-stable population in Kumejima, Japan.
Cross-sectional, population-based study. Residents of Kumejima who were ≥ 40-years old were studied. The eligible residents had a thorough ocular examinations including measurements of the AL, RE, and BH. The subjects were divided into decade groups. The relationships between the AL, the RE, and the BH of the different decades were determined.
Reliable measurements of the AL of the right eyes were obtained from 2198 (1103 men and 1095 women) normal subjects. There was a significant and negative correlation between the age and the BH (r = −0.44, P < 0.001) and the AL (r = −0.27, P < 0.001). There were significant and positive correlations between the BH and AL in all subjects (r = 0.38, P < 0.001). There was a significant and positive correlation between the BH and the AL in all age brackets (r = 0.26~0.49, P < 0.001). There was a significant and positive correlation between the age and RE (spherical equivalent; r = 0.49, P < 0.001). There were significant and negative correlations between the BH and RE in all subjects (r = −0.29, P < 0.001).
The younger individuals tend to be taller, have longer AL, and are more myopic. Considering the marked improvement of the nutritional status during the growth period of each generation and its close association with BH, nutrition may be one of factors that is related to the increase in the prevalence of myopia in the younger generation.
KeywordsMyopia Axial length Body height Body weight Kumejima study
The authors thank Professor Duco Hamasaki of Bascom Palmer Eye Institute, University of Miami, FL, for providing critical discussions and suggestions to our study and editing of the final manuscript.
This work was supported in part by JSPS KAKENHI grant number JP17591845.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
- 5.Hoffmann EM, Schmidtmann I, Siouli A, Schuster AK, Beutel ME, Pfeiffer N, Lamparter J (2018) The distribution of retinal nerve fiber layer thickness and associations with age, refraction, and axial length: the Gutenberg health study. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 256:1685–1693CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 9.Xu L, Wang Y, Li Y, Wang Y, Cui T, Li J, Jonas JB (2006) Causes of blindness and visual impairment in urban and rural areas in Beijing: the Beijing Eye Study. Ophthalmology 113(1134):e1–e11Google Scholar
- 11.Larsen JS (1971) The sagittal growth of the eye. IV. Ultrasonic measurement of the axial length of the eye from birth to puberty. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh) 873–886Google Scholar
- 17.Wong TY, Foster PJ, Johnson GJ, Klein BE, Seah SK (2001) The relationship between ocular dimensions and refraction with adult stature: the Tanjong Pagar survey. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 42:1237–1242Google Scholar
- 18.Saw SM, Chua WH, Hong CY, Wu HM, Chia KS, Stone RA, Tan D (2002a) Height and its relationship to refraction and biometry parameters in Singapore Chinese children. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 43:1408–1414Google Scholar
- 27.Paciorek CJ, Stevens GA, Finucane MM, Ezzati M, Nutrition Impact Model Study Group (Child Growth) (2013) Children’s height and weight in rural and urban populations in low-income and middle-income countries: a systematic analysis of population-representative data. Lancet Glob Health 1:e300–e309CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 31.National Health and Nutrition Survey. Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare. http://www.mhlw.go.jp/bunya/kenkou/kenkou_eiyou_chousa.html. Accessed 15 Apr 2018
- 32.Deurenberg P, Deurenberg-Yap M (2003) Validity of body composition methods across ethnic population groups. Forum Nutr 56:299–301Google Scholar
- 37.Katz J, Tielsch JM, Sommer A (1997) Prevalence and risk factors for refractive errors in an adult inner city population. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 38:334–340Google Scholar
- 38.Wang Q, Klein BE, Klein R, Moss SE (1994) Refractive status in the beaver dam eye study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 35:W4344–W4347Google Scholar
- 41.Saw SM, Gazzard G, Koh D, Farook M, Widjaja D, Lee J, Tan DT (2002c) Prevalence rates of refractive errors in Sumatra. Indonesia Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 43:3174–3180Google Scholar
- 42.Dandona R, Dandona L, Naduvilath TJ, Srinivas M, McCarty CA, Rao GN (1999) Refractive errors in an urban population in southern India: the Andhra Pradesh Eye Disease Study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 40:2810–2818Google Scholar
- 45.Wong TY, Foster PJ, Hee J, Ng TP, Tielsch JM, Chew SJ, Johnson GJ, Seah SK (2000) Prevalence and risk factors for refractive errors in adult Chinese in Singapore. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 41:2486–2494Google Scholar