Advertisement

Differences of body height, axial length, and refractive error at different ages in Kumejima study

  • Takehiro Yamashita
  • Aiko Iwase
  • Hiroshi Sakai
  • Hiroto Terasaki
  • Taiji SakamotoEmail author
  • Makoto Araie
Miscellaneous

Abstract

Purpose

To determine the relationships between the axial length (AL), refractive error (RE), and body height (BH) at different ages of a genetically-stable population in Kumejima, Japan.

Methods

Cross-sectional, population-based study. Residents of Kumejima who were ≥ 40-years old were studied. The eligible residents had a thorough ocular examinations including measurements of the AL, RE, and BH. The subjects were divided into decade groups. The relationships between the AL, the RE, and the BH of the different decades were determined.

Results

Reliable measurements of the AL of the right eyes were obtained from 2198 (1103 men and 1095 women) normal subjects. There was a significant and negative correlation between the age and the BH (r = −0.44, P < 0.001) and the AL (r = −0.27, P < 0.001). There were significant and positive correlations between the BH and AL in all subjects (r = 0.38, P < 0.001). There was a significant and positive correlation between the BH and the AL in all age brackets (r = 0.26~0.49, P < 0.001). There was a significant and positive correlation between the age and RE (spherical equivalent; r = 0.49, P < 0.001). There were significant and negative correlations between the BH and RE in all subjects (r = −0.29, P < 0.001).

Conclusions

The younger individuals tend to be taller, have longer AL, and are more myopic. Considering the marked improvement of the nutritional status during the growth period of each generation and its close association with BH, nutrition may be one of factors that is related to the increase in the prevalence of myopia in the younger generation.

Keywords

Myopia Axial length Body height Body weight Kumejima study 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Professor Duco Hamasaki of Bascom Palmer Eye Institute, University of Miami, FL, for providing critical discussions and suggestions to our study and editing of the final manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported in part by JSPS KAKENHI grant number JP17591845.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

References

  1. 1.
    Foster PJ, Jiang Y (2014) Epidemiology of myopia. Eye (Lond) 28:202–208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Rahi JS, Cumberland PM, Peckham CS (2011) Myopia over the lifecourse: prevalence and early life influences in the 1958 British birth cohort. Ophthalmology 118:797–804CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Jonas JB, Aung T, Bourne RR, Bron AM, Ritch R, Panda-Jonas S (2017a) Glaucoma. Lancet 390:2183–2193CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Suzuki Y, Iwase A, Araie M, Yamamoto T, Abe H, Shirato S, Kuwayama Y, Mishima HK, Shimizu H, Tomita G, Inoue Y, Kitazawa Y (2006) Risk factors for open-angle glaucoma in a Japanese population: the Tajimi study. Ophthalmology 113:1613–1617CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hoffmann EM, Schmidtmann I, Siouli A, Schuster AK, Beutel ME, Pfeiffer N, Lamparter J (2018) The distribution of retinal nerve fiber layer thickness and associations with age, refraction, and axial length: the Gutenberg health study. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 256:1685–1693CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hayashi K, Ohno-Matsui K, Shimada N, Moriyama M, Kojima A, Hayashi W, Yasuzumi K, Nagaoka N, Saka N, Yoshida T, Tokoro T, Mochizuki M (2010) Long-term pattern of progression of myopic maculopathy: a natural history study. Ophthalmology 117:1595–1611 611 e1–4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Jonas JB, Ohno-Matsui K, Holbach L, Panda-Jonas S (2017b) Association between axial length and horizontal and vertical globe diameters. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 255:237–242CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Iwase A, Araie M, Tomidokoro A, Yamamoto T, Shimizu H, Kitazawa Y, Tajimi Study Group (2006) Prevalence and causes of low vision and blindness in a Japanese adult population: the Tajimi study. Ophthalmology 113:1354–1362CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Xu L, Wang Y, Li Y, Wang Y, Cui T, Li J, Jonas JB (2006) Causes of blindness and visual impairment in urban and rural areas in Beijing: the Beijing Eye Study. Ophthalmology 113(1134):e1–e11Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hsiang HW, Ohno-Matsui K, Shimada N, Hayashi K, Moriyama M, Yoshida T, Tokoro T, Mochizuki M (2008) Clinical characteristics of posterior staphyloma in eyes with pathologic myopia. Am J Ophthalmol 146:102–110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Larsen JS (1971) The sagittal growth of the eye. IV. Ultrasonic measurement of the axial length of the eye from birth to puberty. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh) 873–886Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Morgan IG, Ohno-Matsui K, Saw SM (2012) Myopia. Lancet 379:1739–1748CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Spaide RF, Ohno-Matsui K, Yannuzzi LA (2014) Pathologic myopia. Springer, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Yin G, Wang YX, Zheng ZY, Yang H, Xu L, Jonas JB (2012) Ocular axial length and its associations in Chinese: the Beijing Eye Study. PLoS One 7:e43172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Wang D, Ding X, Liu B, Zhang J, He M (2011) Longitudinal changes of axial length and height are associated and concomitant in children. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 52:7949–7953CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Nangia V, Jonas JB, Matin A, Kulkarni M, Sinha A, Gupta R (2010) Body height and ocular dimensions in the adult population in rural Central India. The Central India Eye and Medical Study. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 248:1657–1666CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Wong TY, Foster PJ, Johnson GJ, Klein BE, Seah SK (2001) The relationship between ocular dimensions and refraction with adult stature: the Tanjong Pagar survey. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 42:1237–1242Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Saw SM, Chua WH, Hong CY, Wu HM, Chia KS, Stone RA, Tan D (2002a) Height and its relationship to refraction and biometry parameters in Singapore Chinese children. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 43:1408–1414Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Eysteinsson T, Jonasson F, Arnarsson A (2005) Relationships between ocular dimensions and adult stature among participants in the Reykjavik Eye Study. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 83:734–738CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Wu HM, Gupta A, Newland HS, Selva D, Aung T, Casson RJ (2007) Association between stature, ocular biometry and refraction in an adult population in rural Myanmar: the Meiktila Eye Study. Clin Exp Ophthalmol 35:834–839CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Xu L, Wang YX, Zhang HT, Jonas JB (2011) Anthropomorphic measurements and general and ocular parameters in adult Chinese. The Beijing Eye Study. Acta Ophthalmol 89:442–447CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    NCD Risk Factor Collaboration (NCD-RisC) (2016) A century of trends in adult human height. Elife 5:e13410CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Sawaguchi S, Sakai H, Iwase A, Yamamoto T, Abe H, Tomita G, Tomidokoro A, Araie M (2012) Prevalence of primary angle closure and primary angleclosure glaucoma in a southwestern rural population of Japan: the Kumejima Study. Ophthalmology 119:1134–1142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Yamamoto S, Sawaguchi S, Iwase A, Yamamoto T, Abe H, Tomita G, Tomidokoro A, Araie M (2014) Primary open-angle glaucoma in a population associated with high prevalence of primary angle-closure glaucoma: the Kumejima study. Ophthalmology 121:1558–1565CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Saito H, Tsutsumi T, Iwase A, Tomidokoro A, Araie M (2010) Correlation of disc morphology quantified on stereophotographs to results by Heidelberg retina Tomograph II, GDx variable corneal compensation, and visual field tests. Ophthalmology 117:282–289CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Iwase A, Sawaguchi S, Sakai H, Tanaka K, Tsutsumi T, Araie M (2017) Optic disc, rim and peripapillary chorioretinal atrophy in normal Japanese eyes: the Kumejima Study. Jpn J Ophthalmol 61:223–229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Paciorek CJ, Stevens GA, Finucane MM, Ezzati M, Nutrition Impact Model Study Group (Child Growth) (2013) Children’s height and weight in rural and urban populations in low-income and middle-income countries: a systematic analysis of population-representative data. Lancet Glob Health 1:e300–e309CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Roberts JL, Stein AD (2017) The impact of nutritional interventions beyond the first 2 years of life on linear growth: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Adv Nutr 8:323–336CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Hermanussen M, Scheffler C, Groth D, Aßmann C (2015) Height and skeletal morphology in relation to modern life style. J Physiol Anthropol 34:41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Terasaki H, Yamashita T, Yoshihara N, Kii Y, Sakamoto T (2017) Association of lifestyle and body structure to ocular axial length in Japanese elementary school children. BMC Ophthalmol 17:123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    National Health and Nutrition Survey. Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare. http://www.mhlw.go.jp/bunya/kenkou/kenkou_eiyou_chousa.html. Accessed 15 Apr 2018
  32. 32.
    Deurenberg P, Deurenberg-Yap M (2003) Validity of body composition methods across ethnic population groups. Forum Nutr 56:299–301Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Saw SM, Gazzard G, Au Eong KG, Tan DT (2002b) Myopia: attempts to arrest progression. Br J Ophthalmol 86:1306–1311CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Sherwin JC, Reacher MH, Keogh RH, Khawaja AP, Mackey DA, Foster PJ (2012) The association between time spent outdoors and myopia in children and adolescents: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ophthalmology 119:2141–2151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Guo X, Fu M, Ding X, Morgan IG, Zeng Y, He M (2017) Significant axial elongation with minimal change in refraction in 3- to 6-year-old Chinese preschoolers: the Shenzhen kindergarten eye study. Ophthalmology 124:1826–1838CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Fotedar R, Mitchell P, Burlutsky G, Wang JJ (2008) Relationship of 10-year change in refraction to nuclear cataract and axial length findings from an older population. Ophthalmology 115:1273–1278CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Katz J, Tielsch JM, Sommer A (1997) Prevalence and risk factors for refractive errors in an adult inner city population. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 38:334–340Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Wang Q, Klein BE, Klein R, Moss SE (1994) Refractive status in the beaver dam eye study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 35:W4344–W4347Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Wensor M, McCarty CA, Taylor HR (1999) Prevalence and risk factors of myopia in Victoria, Australia. Arch Ophthalmol 117:658–663CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Attebo K, Ivers RQ, Mitchell P (1999) Refractive errors in an older population: the Blue Mountains Eye Study. Ophthalmology 106:1066–1072CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Saw SM, Gazzard G, Koh D, Farook M, Widjaja D, Lee J, Tan DT (2002c) Prevalence rates of refractive errors in Sumatra. Indonesia Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 43:3174–3180Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Dandona R, Dandona L, Naduvilath TJ, Srinivas M, McCarty CA, Rao GN (1999) Refractive errors in an urban population in southern India: the Andhra Pradesh Eye Disease Study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 40:2810–2818Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Wickremasinghe S, Foster PJ, Uranchimeg D, Lee PS, Devereux JG, Alsbirk PH, Machin D, Johnson GJ, Baasanhu J (2004) Ocular biometry and refraction in Mongolian adults. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 45:776–783CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Bourne RR, Dineen BP, Ali SM, Noorul Huq DM, Johnson GJ (2004) Prevalence of refractive error in Bangladeshi adults. Results of the National Blindness and Low Vision Survey of Bangladesh. Ophthalmology 111:1150–1160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Wong TY, Foster PJ, Hee J, Ng TP, Tielsch JM, Chew SJ, Johnson GJ, Seah SK (2000) Prevalence and risk factors for refractive errors in adult Chinese in Singapore. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 41:2486–2494Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Sawada A, Tomidokoro A, Araie M, Iwase A, Yamamoto T, Tajimi Study Group (2008) Refractive errors in an elderly Japanese population: the Tajimi study. Ophthalmology 115(2):363–370CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of OphthalmologyKagoshima University Graduate School of Medical and Dental SciencesKagoshimaJapan
  2. 2.Tajimi Iwase Eye ClinicGifuJapan
  3. 3.Department of OphthalmologyUniversity of the Ryukyus Faculty of MedicineOkinawaJapan
  4. 4.Department of OphthalmologyKanto Central HospitalTokyoJapan

Personalised recommendations